We present the articles of the third issue of scientific journal "Mining Science and Technologyβ (Russia) for 2024:
The resulting model can be used for general analysis of operability and stability, as well as for verifying the correct selection of key elements in the design of sucker-rod pump unit systems with variable frequency drives.
For more information, see the article:
π Ershov M.S., Efimov E.S. Stability of a controlled sucker-rod pump unit drive under operating conditions and during voltage dips in the electrical network. Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2024;9(3):292-303. https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2024-01-213
Subscribe to the journal's Telegram channel:
πt.iss.one/MinSciTechπ
#inenglish #MST #pump #drive #control #voltage #frequency #brake #mode #energy #network #generator #current #torque #power #speed #rectifier #inverter #battery #signal #model #Matlab #Simulink #algorithm #emergency #protection #recovery #compensation #load #fluctuations #stability
The resulting model can be used for general analysis of operability and stability, as well as for verifying the correct selection of key elements in the design of sucker-rod pump unit systems with variable frequency drives.
For more information, see the article:
π Ershov M.S., Efimov E.S. Stability of a controlled sucker-rod pump unit drive under operating conditions and during voltage dips in the electrical network. Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2024;9(3):292-303. https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2024-01-213
Subscribe to the journal's Telegram channel:
πt.iss.one/MinSciTechπ
#inenglish #MST #pump #drive #control #voltage #frequency #brake #mode #energy #network #generator #current #torque #power #speed #rectifier #inverter #battery #signal #model #Matlab #Simulink #algorithm #emergency #protection #recovery #compensation #load #fluctuations #stability
mst.misis.ru
Stability of a controlled sucker-rod pump unit drive under operating conditions and during voltage dips in the electrical networkβ¦
β€2π2β‘1π₯1π1
π Dry vs wet: unexpected results for Arkachan gold ore
Comparison Methods:
βοΈ Dry Processing: Crushing (DKD-300) + Grinding (TsMVU-800) + Pneumatic Separation (POS-2000)
βοΈ Wet Processing: Gravity Separation with GRG Test (ITOMAK-0.1)
π Key Data:
Gold Distribution:
βοΈ 27.35% in -0.2+0.1 mm class;
βοΈ 11.75% in -0.1+0.071 mm class;
βοΈ 23.46% in -0.071 mm class;
β Total 62.56% in particles <0.2 mm
Method Efficiency:
βοΈ pneumatic Separation: 35.25% recovery at 1.8 t/h;
βοΈ GRG Test: 73.91% recovery with grinding to 80% passing 0.071 mm.
GRG Test Results by Stage:
βοΈ Stage 1 (-1 mm): 40.20% recovery;
βοΈ Stage 2 (-0.315 mm): +14.46%;
βοΈ Stage 3 (-0.071 mm): +20.88%.
Conclusions:
1. Dry methods are ineffective for fine-grained gold (<100 Β΅m).
2. Gravity separation requires fine grinding but achieves high recovery.
3. Major losses are due to incomplete liberation of gold in pyrite.
π Full Article:
Matveev Π.I., Lebedev I.F., Vinokurov V.R., Lvov E.S. Comparative processing studies of the Arkachan deposit gold-bearing ores using dry separation and classical wet gravity separation methods. Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2024;9(2):158-169. https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2023-10-168
π Subscribe: @MinSciTech
π¬ What modern methods could improve dry processing for such ores?
#InEnglish #MST #Mining #Gold #Beneficiation #Crusher #Mill #Separator #DryProcessing #ParticleSize #Pyrite #Sample #Ore #Test #Method #Analysis #Stage #Class #Gravity #FineGrained #Particles #Concentrate #Grinding #Efficiency #Crushing #Recovery #Flowchart #Cycle #Fraction #Balance #Parameter #Mode #Degree #Impact #Abrasion #Subsample #Sludge #Pulp #SizeFraction #Feed #Tailings #Losses #Product #Intergrowths
P.S. For ores with fine-grained gold, classical gravity remains optimal. Are there alternatives?
Comparison Methods:
βοΈ Dry Processing: Crushing (DKD-300) + Grinding (TsMVU-800) + Pneumatic Separation (POS-2000)
βοΈ Wet Processing: Gravity Separation with GRG Test (ITOMAK-0.1)
π Key Data:
Gold Distribution:
βοΈ 27.35% in -0.2+0.1 mm class;
βοΈ 11.75% in -0.1+0.071 mm class;
βοΈ 23.46% in -0.071 mm class;
β Total 62.56% in particles <0.2 mm
Method Efficiency:
βοΈ pneumatic Separation: 35.25% recovery at 1.8 t/h;
βοΈ GRG Test: 73.91% recovery with grinding to 80% passing 0.071 mm.
GRG Test Results by Stage:
βοΈ Stage 1 (-1 mm): 40.20% recovery;
βοΈ Stage 2 (-0.315 mm): +14.46%;
βοΈ Stage 3 (-0.071 mm): +20.88%.
Conclusions:
1. Dry methods are ineffective for fine-grained gold (<100 Β΅m).
2. Gravity separation requires fine grinding but achieves high recovery.
3. Major losses are due to incomplete liberation of gold in pyrite.
π Full Article:
Matveev Π.I., Lebedev I.F., Vinokurov V.R., Lvov E.S. Comparative processing studies of the Arkachan deposit gold-bearing ores using dry separation and classical wet gravity separation methods. Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2024;9(2):158-169. https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2023-10-168
π Subscribe: @MinSciTech
π¬ What modern methods could improve dry processing for such ores?
#InEnglish #MST #Mining #Gold #Beneficiation #Crusher #Mill #Separator #DryProcessing #ParticleSize #Pyrite #Sample #Ore #Test #Method #Analysis #Stage #Class #Gravity #FineGrained #Particles #Concentrate #Grinding #Efficiency #Crushing #Recovery #Flowchart #Cycle #Fraction #Balance #Parameter #Mode #Degree #Impact #Abrasion #Subsample #Sludge #Pulp #SizeFraction #Feed #Tailings #Losses #Product #Intergrowths
P.S. For ores with fine-grained gold, classical gravity remains optimal. Are there alternatives?
π4β€2π₯1π1π―1