Valdai Discussion Club
988 subscribers
902 photos
87 videos
2.63K links
πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§
πŸ‘‰ Telegram β€” @valdai_club
πŸ‘‰ VK β€” https://vk.com/valdaidiscussionclub
πŸ‘‰ X β€” https://twitter.com/Valdai_Club

πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί
πŸ‘‰ Telegram β€” @valdaiclub
πŸ‘‰ VK β€” https://vk.com/valdaiclubcom
πŸ‘‰ Dzen β€” https://dzen.ru/valdaiclub
Download Telegram
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡«πŸŒ NATO’s defeat in Afghanistan represents a wider defeat of the unipolar moment.

The US invaded Afghanistan as a response to terrorist attacks on September 11 2001, although Washington was somewhat open about the geopolitical objectives.

Since the beginning of the war, there was no shortage of analyses about how Afghanistan could be a bridgehead to assert US influence in the energy-rich Central Asian region and oust Russian and Chinese influence.

The offshore security strategy of both the UK and the US as de-facto island-states has throughout history been to prevent the emergence of a hegemon or collective hegemon in either Europe or Eurasia. In Europe, this entailed preventing a Russian-German alignment, and in the wider Eurasia it entailed obstructing a Russian-Chinese alignment. 

The fall of Kabul will have profound implications for Central Asia and wider Eurasia β€” presenting both risks and opportunities. The risks associated with the Taliban in control of Afghanistan can be construed as an opportunity to test and advance the Greater Eurasian Partnership, writes Valdai Club expert Glenn Diesen.

https://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/central-asia-and-eurasia-after-the-fall-of-kabul/

#Global_Governance #Afghanistan #TalibanTakeover #USwithdrawal

@valdai_club