🎥 Day 4 of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club started with the session, titled “Russia as a Solution. What Did the Shocks Teach Russia and How Is This Useful to the World?” It was followed by an open discussion. The culmination of the Annual meeting was a traditional plenary session in which the President of Russia participated.

#VALDAI2021

@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club

🤖 It is important who in the world will be the monastery defining technological heresy and dogma.

In any event, the competition between companies and mega-corporations, the rivalry among states, around intelligence and technology have different facets. At the national level, the club of the smartest brains is still very small, but more democratic, than the military technology club.

If a country rushes to be more significant, there is no alternative than to develop technologies and patents, with an emphasis on a certain specialisation, or all at once - if it claims to be a superpower. This resembles  technological napalm.

Therefore, in terms of the logic of power, political relations between states and within states, much less has changed than in instruments. Intelligence, not artificial, but quite natural and trained, will be in maximum demand by states in matters of balancing technology and ethics, and in rule-making.

Whoever is the first to push ethical boundaries with the help of intellect and technology, and then fence them, as was the case with nuclear weapons, has a chance to succeed in fundamentally new technologies that change our way of life and political alignments, writes Anastasia Likhacheva, speaker of Session 5 of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Valdai Club, Director of the Centre for Comprehensive European and International Studies (CCEIS).

🔗 Ethics as Applied Intelligence

#VALDAI2021 #intelligence #technologies

@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club

🎥 On October 21 the open discussion among the participants of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club took place. If you missed the live broadcast yesterday, watch the video on our website.

🔗 Open Discussion at the 18th Annual Meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club

#VALDAI2021

@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club

🎥 Tension between the US and China has been rising over past two years. What is expecting in this relation in future. What are the countries interests in this situation? What consequences of the direct conflict could be?

👉 Thomas Graham, Distinguished Fellow, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) (USA), shared his thoughts with valdaiclub.com.

#VALDAI2021

@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club

🎥 According to Thomas Graham, Distinguished Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations (USA), and speaker at the first session of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club, it is possible to solve some problems by military force, as did Azerbaijan in Nagorno-Karabakh. Small powers can do this, but if big powers engage in conflicts today, the consequences can be devastating. The USA, China, Russia, India, Pakistan – all have nuclear weapons. We need to work out a code of conduct, all major powers must understand the limits of using the military force in a much more competitive world.

#VALDAI2021

@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club

🪆🌎 A conservative foreign policy presupposes reliance on manipulation rather than forceful pressure.

Since this approach is inevitably associated with limited resources, first we must ask the question of their distribution in specific situations.

However, under the pressure of those powers that behave in a revolutionary way, the conductor of a conservative strategy will increasingly face situations that will require him to use force to prevent revolutionary change, writes Valdai Club Programme Director Timofei Bordachev, who took part in the 18th Annual meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club.

🔗 Origins and Challenges of Putin’s Conservative Strategy

#VALDAI2021

@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club

🪆🌎 A conservative foreign policy presupposes reliance on manipulation rather than forceful pressure.

Since this approach is inevitably associated with limited resources, first we must ask the question of their distribution in specific situations.

However, under the pressure of those powers that behave in a revolutionary way, the conductor of a conservative strategy will increasingly face situations that will require him to use force to prevent revolutionary change, writes Valdai Club Programme Director Timofei Bordachev, who took part in the 18th Annual meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club.

🔗 Origins and Challenges of Putin’s Conservative Strategy

#VALDAI2021

@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club

🎥 How have attitudes in the US and the EU changed towards Euro-Atlantic security issues in the 21st century compared to the Cold War period? How are responsibilities now shared among the allies? 

👉 Anatol Lieven, Senior Fellow, Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft (USA), gave his analyses. He took part in the 18th Annual Meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club.

#VALDAI2021 #Europe #EU #ColdWar

@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club

🌳🌐 While environmental social and governance criteria remain context dependent and cannot be universally applied, it is key to balance these factors with real world market realities through a technology agnostic approach, writes Valdai Club expert Christof Van Agt.

🔗 Real World Change on Climate Will Rely on Free Markets, Dialogue, and Solidarity

#climatechange #greeneconomy #VALDAI2021

📷 ©Reuters

@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club

🎥 Is the creation of an EU armed force possible and, if so, when might it happen? 

👉 Anatol Lieven, Senior Fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft (USA), a participant of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club, answered these and other questions.

#VALDAI2021 #Europe #EU #armedforce

@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club