Forwarded from Frankie Lutt
Thank you for your contribution Steve for sending me this as it's how everything around autographs will be dealt with. In the first book being released before the end of February. There are templates of headers/address pages and autograph pages provided. If people become members of Sovereign Solutions and they have the unique email for members they can have personalised Header/address pages and autograph pages provided for them.
Forwarded from Peter Piper
COUNCIL TAX INFORMATION -EPISODE 4 Introduction
If you know the law and your rights the corporations that form the legal and financial system cannot intimidate or coerce you into doing something that isn't lawful. If you do your research and stand in your power you can refuse to be coerced and there is nothing they can do about it.
Financial institutions, the legal system, and the government have used personage and legal entrapment to enslave men and women by tricking us into registering our names as a corporate entity through the Certified Copy of an Entry (Birth Certificate), Drivers Licence, and Passport. We then believe that this ALL-CAPS legal fiction with the title Mr/Mrs/Miss/Ms is actually us, so we unwittingly represent this implied corporation and therefore bear the burden of fines, taxes, tickets, and policies.
Their use constitutes an unlawful attempt to lower the status of a man or a woman, which is above a public servant, to that of a PERSON, which is under a public servant. A PERSON is considered an unpaid employee of the United Kingdom PLC, in other words a slave. It also constitutes an unlawful attempt to gain jurisdiction, when no such jurisdiction exists, nor can it ever exist unless there is a provable cause where a man or woman has filed a verified claim (affidavit).
Together with the crime of personage or legal entrapment is another criminal activity known by the term ‘barratry’, which is a legal term in British case law that describes a criminal offence committed by people who are overly officious in instigating or encouraging prosecution of groundless litigation, or who bring repeated or persistent acts of litigation for the purposes of profit or harassment. Knowingly bringing false claims into court is something that the police, politicians, judges, and local councils are doing daily.
There is no obligation to acknowledge, believe, or adhere to written instruments such as Statutes, Acts, or Legislation authored by other men and women acting as public servants unless you are property of the public servants who authored the foregoing written instruments. Since living men and women are not owned by the author of these documents or anyone accepting liability for these false statements, we have no obligation to contract with the author or anyone accepting liability for the false statement.
An obligation is a moral or legal requirement or duty; the act of obligating; or the state of being obligated. It is a legally enforceable agreement to perform some act, especially to pay money, for the benefit of another party. It is a legal bond by which one or more parties (the obligated) are bound to act, or indeed to refrain from acting, which is in essence a contract.
A contract is an agreement made by the mutual consent of two or more persons by their own free will. In order to be legally binding a contract MUST have: Offer, Acceptance, Consideration, Full disclosure and be signed by two sentient living beings. Only a man or a woman and another man and woman can sign a contract. A corporation cannot sign a contract with a man or woman. Our duties, rights and obligations are created by such contracts and creating them without our agreement would be an act of force that is unlawful.
Nobody has entered in any contract with their local council, nor has anyone ever agreed to pay them. Nobody can create an obligation for another man or woman without their permission. But that is exactly what your local council is doing when they send you a council tax bill.
When a corporation writes to you saying that you owe them money, always write back asking for verification of a contract with wet ink signatures, a true bill, and all of the material evidence to support their claim in the form of an Affidavit which means that a living man or woman must accept liability. Since there is no such contract, no bill that conforms to the Bill of Exchanges Act 1882, and no Affidavit (corporations can't write them) the chances are that this won’t happen.
If you know the law and your rights the corporations that form the legal and financial system cannot intimidate or coerce you into doing something that isn't lawful. If you do your research and stand in your power you can refuse to be coerced and there is nothing they can do about it.
Financial institutions, the legal system, and the government have used personage and legal entrapment to enslave men and women by tricking us into registering our names as a corporate entity through the Certified Copy of an Entry (Birth Certificate), Drivers Licence, and Passport. We then believe that this ALL-CAPS legal fiction with the title Mr/Mrs/Miss/Ms is actually us, so we unwittingly represent this implied corporation and therefore bear the burden of fines, taxes, tickets, and policies.
Their use constitutes an unlawful attempt to lower the status of a man or a woman, which is above a public servant, to that of a PERSON, which is under a public servant. A PERSON is considered an unpaid employee of the United Kingdom PLC, in other words a slave. It also constitutes an unlawful attempt to gain jurisdiction, when no such jurisdiction exists, nor can it ever exist unless there is a provable cause where a man or woman has filed a verified claim (affidavit).
Together with the crime of personage or legal entrapment is another criminal activity known by the term ‘barratry’, which is a legal term in British case law that describes a criminal offence committed by people who are overly officious in instigating or encouraging prosecution of groundless litigation, or who bring repeated or persistent acts of litigation for the purposes of profit or harassment. Knowingly bringing false claims into court is something that the police, politicians, judges, and local councils are doing daily.
There is no obligation to acknowledge, believe, or adhere to written instruments such as Statutes, Acts, or Legislation authored by other men and women acting as public servants unless you are property of the public servants who authored the foregoing written instruments. Since living men and women are not owned by the author of these documents or anyone accepting liability for these false statements, we have no obligation to contract with the author or anyone accepting liability for the false statement.
An obligation is a moral or legal requirement or duty; the act of obligating; or the state of being obligated. It is a legally enforceable agreement to perform some act, especially to pay money, for the benefit of another party. It is a legal bond by which one or more parties (the obligated) are bound to act, or indeed to refrain from acting, which is in essence a contract.
A contract is an agreement made by the mutual consent of two or more persons by their own free will. In order to be legally binding a contract MUST have: Offer, Acceptance, Consideration, Full disclosure and be signed by two sentient living beings. Only a man or a woman and another man and woman can sign a contract. A corporation cannot sign a contract with a man or woman. Our duties, rights and obligations are created by such contracts and creating them without our agreement would be an act of force that is unlawful.
Nobody has entered in any contract with their local council, nor has anyone ever agreed to pay them. Nobody can create an obligation for another man or woman without their permission. But that is exactly what your local council is doing when they send you a council tax bill.
When a corporation writes to you saying that you owe them money, always write back asking for verification of a contract with wet ink signatures, a true bill, and all of the material evidence to support their claim in the form of an Affidavit which means that a living man or woman must accept liability. Since there is no such contract, no bill that conforms to the Bill of Exchanges Act 1882, and no Affidavit (corporations can't write them) the chances are that this won’t happen.
Forwarded from Peter Piper
COUNCIL TAX INFORMATION -EPISODE 5 COUNCILS ARE CORPORATIONS
Since 1972, all councils have been corporations or body corporates. The Chief Legal Officer and Section 151 Officers are statutory officers inserted by political parties carrying out criminal acts of treason therefore they are complicit. They can be arrested for concealing Misprision of Treason as carried out by every unlawful government since 1972.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972
2 Constitution of principal councils in England. (3) Each council mentioned in subsection (1) or (2) above shall be a body corporate by the name “The County Council” or “The District Council”, as the case may be, with the addition of the name of the particular county or district.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1972/70/section/2
The Companies Act considers a body corporate to be the same thing as a corporation.
The Companies Act 2006
1173 Minor definitions: general
(1) In the Companies Acts— • “body corporate” and “corporation” include a body incorporated outside the United Kingdom, but do not include —
(a) a corporation sole, or
(b) a partnership that, whether or not a legal person, is not regarded as a body corporate under the law by which it is governed;
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/1173
Any party implementing any directions from an unlawful assembly since 1973 is complicit in high treason against the people. We, the people are now free to hold lawful court where at least TWO statements shall be taken as evidence in accordance with the EXPRESS TERMS of The Treason Act 1795 of the allegation of HIGH TREASON and if found guilty shall "suffer pains of death”.
Action to Take
The first thing you can do is send an FOI request to the council asking for their DUNS Number, Company Number with Companies House, their ICO number, and their VAT registration number.
When you write to the council always quote their Dun & Bradstreet number - DUNS Number. Put it on the letter or notice you are sending under the name of the Chief Executive and the address on the left-hand side. Look up the number here:
https://www.dnb.co.uk/duns-number/lookup.html
They will also be registered with Companies House in England & Wales. You can do a search here: https://www.gov.uk/get-information-about-a-company
If the result doesn’t come up try this search:
https://companycheck.co.uk or https://www.endole.co.uk/
Also look up their ICO registration number:
https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/what-we-do/register-of-feepayers/
As evidenced by the DUNS Number the council is a private, Foreign State Registered for-profit company charging for so-called ‘services’ (which have not been evidenced as consideration in any contract with us) and is therefore no different to McDonalds.
Under the Clearfield Doctrine, a Supreme Court Case, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, (1943) 318 US 363-371, when the State or government enters into commercial business it abandons its sovereign capacity and is to be treated like any other corporation. The Clearfield Doctrine strips the council of its "government" cloak and any protection that it offers. Therefore, legislation that applies to all companies also applies to the council.
Since 1972, all councils have been corporations or body corporates. The Chief Legal Officer and Section 151 Officers are statutory officers inserted by political parties carrying out criminal acts of treason therefore they are complicit. They can be arrested for concealing Misprision of Treason as carried out by every unlawful government since 1972.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972
2 Constitution of principal councils in England. (3) Each council mentioned in subsection (1) or (2) above shall be a body corporate by the name “The County Council” or “The District Council”, as the case may be, with the addition of the name of the particular county or district.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1972/70/section/2
The Companies Act considers a body corporate to be the same thing as a corporation.
The Companies Act 2006
1173 Minor definitions: general
(1) In the Companies Acts— • “body corporate” and “corporation” include a body incorporated outside the United Kingdom, but do not include —
(a) a corporation sole, or
(b) a partnership that, whether or not a legal person, is not regarded as a body corporate under the law by which it is governed;
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/1173
Any party implementing any directions from an unlawful assembly since 1973 is complicit in high treason against the people. We, the people are now free to hold lawful court where at least TWO statements shall be taken as evidence in accordance with the EXPRESS TERMS of The Treason Act 1795 of the allegation of HIGH TREASON and if found guilty shall "suffer pains of death”.
Action to Take
The first thing you can do is send an FOI request to the council asking for their DUNS Number, Company Number with Companies House, their ICO number, and their VAT registration number.
When you write to the council always quote their Dun & Bradstreet number - DUNS Number. Put it on the letter or notice you are sending under the name of the Chief Executive and the address on the left-hand side. Look up the number here:
https://www.dnb.co.uk/duns-number/lookup.html
They will also be registered with Companies House in England & Wales. You can do a search here: https://www.gov.uk/get-information-about-a-company
If the result doesn’t come up try this search:
https://companycheck.co.uk or https://www.endole.co.uk/
Also look up their ICO registration number:
https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/what-we-do/register-of-feepayers/
As evidenced by the DUNS Number the council is a private, Foreign State Registered for-profit company charging for so-called ‘services’ (which have not been evidenced as consideration in any contract with us) and is therefore no different to McDonalds.
Under the Clearfield Doctrine, a Supreme Court Case, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, (1943) 318 US 363-371, when the State or government enters into commercial business it abandons its sovereign capacity and is to be treated like any other corporation. The Clearfield Doctrine strips the council of its "government" cloak and any protection that it offers. Therefore, legislation that applies to all companies also applies to the council.
www.legislation.gov.uk
Local Government Act 1972
An Act to make provision with respect to local government and the functions of local authorities in England and Wales; to amend Part II of the Transport Act 1968; to confer rights of appeal in respect of decisions relating to licences under the Home Counties…
Forwarded from ChooseThisDay
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Final warning of Dr. Andrew Moulden before he was suicided by big pharma at the age of 49. His life’s work scrubbed from google and YouTube. You can still find some of his work on other search engines such as Yandex.
Yours, Steve Johnson
Join: @Secrets_of_civilizations
I found a hidden channel: "Banned Truth" check it out before it disappears!
Yours, Steve Johnson
Join: @Secrets_of_civilizations
I found a hidden channel: "Banned Truth" check it out before it disappears!
Forwarded from Elaine
How to REALLY Resist Digital ID - #SolutionsWatch | The Corbett Report
https://corbettreport.com/how-to-really-resist-digital-id/
https://corbettreport.com/how-to-really-resist-digital-id/
The Corbett Report
How to REALLY Resist Digital ID - #SolutionsWatch | The Corbett Report
Today James talks to Gabriel of the Libre Solutions Network about how to really resist the encroaching digital ID grid.
Forwarded from SHADOW PATRIOT
Makes you wonder why they started popping them up in 2019 with such a hurry... MILITARY DOCUMENT SHOWS THE TRUE EFFECTS OF 5G....
@Shadow_Patriot💀
@Shadow_Patriot
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from SHADOW PATRIOT
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Why is this not taught?
Forwarded from COVID19 VACCINE VICTIMS AND FAMILIES
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Meet Bill Gates’ new microneedle patch implant that installs both modified mRNA and permanent quantum-dot “QR codes” into your body.
Planned for mass rollout during the next plandemic — a biological “vaccine” passport controlling who can shop, dine, or travel.
Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES
Planned for mass rollout during the next plandemic — a biological “vaccine” passport controlling who can shop, dine, or travel.
Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES
Forwarded from Dr David Martin
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Flashback to 2020 .. It was all so obviously BS 🐂 💩
“Clinicians, if the test is negative, ask for another test, or if you believe the patient has Covid-19, just tell the patient they have it.” -
Dr. Mandy Cohen, sec of NC HHS.
“Clinicians, if the test is negative, ask for another test, or if you believe the patient has Covid-19, just tell the patient they have it.” -
Dr. Mandy Cohen, sec of NC HHS.
Forwarded from Stop World Control
GREAT NEWS ABOUT THE BATTLE AGAINST CHEMTRAILS
Dear Friends,
For years, millions of people have looked up at the skies and asked the same questions:
What are those trails spreading across the atmosphere? Why do some disappear quickly while others expand into massive white haze that blankets the sky? Why has the public never received clear answers? And why have governments and regulatory agencies consistently avoided addressing this directly?
For the past two years, researchers, legal experts, public health advocates, and environmental investigators have conducted one of the most extensive independent investigations ever undertaken into these questions.
What we uncovered is far bigger than most people realize.
After hundreds of hours of scientific analysis, federal regulatory review, atmospheric data investigation, and legal research, we are now prepared to publicly reveal what we found.
This is not speculation. This is not internet rumor.
This is a formal federal legal action backed by peer-reviewed science, government data, documented atmospheric evidence, and the government’s own records.
A landmark Petition for Rulemaking has now been formally filed with the EPA. For the first time, a comprehensive legal and scientific case regarding atmospheric aerosol operations and emissions has been placed directly into the federal record.
The EPA is now legally required to respond.
The clock has started.
The agency has 180 days to answer. If it refuses to act, the next step is federal court.
This changes everything.
For over twenty years, citizens, researchers, legislators, and environmental activists have asked the right questions while lacking a complete legal and scientific framework to force accountability.
Now that framework exists.
For the first time, the science, legal mechanisms, regulatory pathways, documented evidence, and accountability structure have all been unified into one coordinated federal action.
We are no longer merely asking questions.
We are demanding answers.
And this time, those answers cannot simply be ignored.
What we uncovered challenges many assumptions people have held for years. Some findings may surprise even longtime researchers. But the evidence speaks for itself.
This is not a replay of old debates.
This is entirely new ground.
And it is historic.
Joining this effort are leading researchers and advocates including James Franklin Lee Jr. of ClimateViewer News LLC, Reinette Senum of GenSeven and SaveOurSkies.org, Leslie Manookian of the Health Freedom Defense Fund, Michael Hogan of Missouri Clean Skies, and Valerie Ferrell of Stand for Health Freedom.
During the public webinar, the coalition will present:
• Scientific evidence and atmospheric data
• Federal documents exposing regulatory failures
• The legal strategy now in motion
• What this means for state-level efforts nationwide
• The path forward toward genuine atmospheric accountability and clean skies
Monday, May 4, 2026
5:00 PM Pacific
Streaming live on YouTube, Rumble, and X.
A live Q&A will follow.
Bring your questions. Bring your skepticism. Bring your evidence.
We will bring ours.
Two years ago, this investigation began with questions. What was uncovered revealed a much larger picture involving atmospheric operations, regulatory failures, environmental consequences, and institutional silence that can no longer be ignored.
The era of vague speculation is ending.
The era of evidence, legal accountability, and direct federal challenge has begun.
Monday night, the public will finally see the full picture.
https://www.youtube.com/live/jGlVChXfNk0?si=BlqoiA7mCtIsmqYU
Dear Friends,
For years, millions of people have looked up at the skies and asked the same questions:
What are those trails spreading across the atmosphere? Why do some disappear quickly while others expand into massive white haze that blankets the sky? Why has the public never received clear answers? And why have governments and regulatory agencies consistently avoided addressing this directly?
For the past two years, researchers, legal experts, public health advocates, and environmental investigators have conducted one of the most extensive independent investigations ever undertaken into these questions.
What we uncovered is far bigger than most people realize.
After hundreds of hours of scientific analysis, federal regulatory review, atmospheric data investigation, and legal research, we are now prepared to publicly reveal what we found.
This is not speculation. This is not internet rumor.
This is a formal federal legal action backed by peer-reviewed science, government data, documented atmospheric evidence, and the government’s own records.
A landmark Petition for Rulemaking has now been formally filed with the EPA. For the first time, a comprehensive legal and scientific case regarding atmospheric aerosol operations and emissions has been placed directly into the federal record.
The EPA is now legally required to respond.
The clock has started.
The agency has 180 days to answer. If it refuses to act, the next step is federal court.
This changes everything.
For over twenty years, citizens, researchers, legislators, and environmental activists have asked the right questions while lacking a complete legal and scientific framework to force accountability.
Now that framework exists.
For the first time, the science, legal mechanisms, regulatory pathways, documented evidence, and accountability structure have all been unified into one coordinated federal action.
We are no longer merely asking questions.
We are demanding answers.
And this time, those answers cannot simply be ignored.
What we uncovered challenges many assumptions people have held for years. Some findings may surprise even longtime researchers. But the evidence speaks for itself.
This is not a replay of old debates.
This is entirely new ground.
And it is historic.
Joining this effort are leading researchers and advocates including James Franklin Lee Jr. of ClimateViewer News LLC, Reinette Senum of GenSeven and SaveOurSkies.org, Leslie Manookian of the Health Freedom Defense Fund, Michael Hogan of Missouri Clean Skies, and Valerie Ferrell of Stand for Health Freedom.
During the public webinar, the coalition will present:
• Scientific evidence and atmospheric data
• Federal documents exposing regulatory failures
• The legal strategy now in motion
• What this means for state-level efforts nationwide
• The path forward toward genuine atmospheric accountability and clean skies
Monday, May 4, 2026
5:00 PM Pacific
Streaming live on YouTube, Rumble, and X.
A live Q&A will follow.
Bring your questions. Bring your skepticism. Bring your evidence.
We will bring ours.
Two years ago, this investigation began with questions. What was uncovered revealed a much larger picture involving atmospheric operations, regulatory failures, environmental consequences, and institutional silence that can no longer be ignored.
The era of vague speculation is ending.
The era of evidence, legal accountability, and direct federal challenge has begun.
Monday night, the public will finally see the full picture.
https://www.youtube.com/live/jGlVChXfNk0?si=BlqoiA7mCtIsmqYU
YouTube
Taking Chemtrails to Court: Landmark Legal Action
The Geoengineering Elephant in the Room
https://www.climateviewer.news/p/taking-chemtrails-to-court-landmark
A Coalition of Researchers and Legal Advocates Announces a
Major Public Webinar on What Is Happening in America’s Skies
Special Public Webinar…
https://www.climateviewer.news/p/taking-chemtrails-to-court-landmark
A Coalition of Researchers and Legal Advocates Announces a
Major Public Webinar on What Is Happening in America’s Skies
Special Public Webinar…