Body counts of heterosexual non-transgender White women age 18-34: very liberal vs. very conservative
Libtards have higher body counts on average, but there isn't a huge difference between the two populations.
The Very Liberal sample size is ~10 times larger, so it gives a smoother curve and more accurate measurements. Note the larger confidence intervals for older women in the Very Conservative sample. However, the smaller sample size of n=3,311 is still good.
Libtards have higher body counts on average, but there isn't a huge difference between the two populations.
The Very Liberal sample size is ~10 times larger, so it gives a smoother curve and more accurate measurements. Note the larger confidence intervals for older women in the Very Conservative sample. However, the smaller sample size of n=3,311 is still good.
This data is sourced from the "big kink survey" (more results here). You may think: "how on earth is this pervert survey representative?"
Obviously no online sex survey is truly nationally representative of any country, but the overwhelming majority of respondents were White Westerners.
Respondents came from a variety of sources (twitter, tiktok, reddit, etc.) and the sample is weighted to make it more representative of the US population.
It also has a colossal sample size of n=980,000, which you can heavily filter to explore results from specific subpopulations, excluding certain sample sources, races, and so on.
Respondents were mostly left-wing, hence the "very liberal white women" sample size being ten times larger than the "very conservative" sample size, but this doesn't really matter when there are still thousands and thousands of non-leftist samples.
Obviously no online sex survey is truly nationally representative of any country, but the overwhelming majority of respondents were White Westerners.
Respondents came from a variety of sources (twitter, tiktok, reddit, etc.) and the sample is weighted to make it more representative of the US population.
It also has a colossal sample size of n=980,000, which you can heavily filter to explore results from specific subpopulations, excluding certain sample sources, races, and so on.
Respondents were mostly left-wing, hence the "very liberal white women" sample size being ten times larger than the "very conservative" sample size, but this doesn't really matter when there are still thousands and thousands of non-leftist samples.
Telegram
Thuletide
Body counts of heterosexual non-transgender White women age 18-34: very liberal vs. very conservative
Libtards have higher body counts on average, but there isn't a huge difference between the two populations.
The Very Liberal sample size is ~10 times larger…
Libtards have higher body counts on average, but there isn't a huge difference between the two populations.
The Very Liberal sample size is ~10 times larger…
Imperial Italian samples from Rome can be modeled as descending overwhelmingly from the mixed Greek-Anatolian population of Hellenistic Anatolia. I've only included non-outlier samples, representative of the average population.
The results were pretty much identical whichever post-Bronze Age Anatolian source I used, but the Hellenistic era source gave the best fit and is the most historically plausible, since the Romans conquered Hellenistic Anatolia.
I have no idea what the authors of the old Roman & Etruscan genetic studies were thinking when they modeled Imperial Italians as half Roman Republic + half Levantine.
It looks like they have no Republic-era central Italian ancestry at all - although G25 often confuses Roman Republic ancestry with Balkan or Continental Celtic ancestry, due to their genetic similarity. Any "Levantine" ancestry could also be Eastern Anatolian. It's possible that my model is terribly wrong somehow, but I doubt it.
The results were pretty much identical whichever post-Bronze Age Anatolian source I used, but the Hellenistic era source gave the best fit and is the most historically plausible, since the Romans conquered Hellenistic Anatolia.
I have no idea what the authors of the old Roman & Etruscan genetic studies were thinking when they modeled Imperial Italians as half Roman Republic + half Levantine.
It looks like they have no Republic-era central Italian ancestry at all - although G25 often confuses Roman Republic ancestry with Balkan or Continental Celtic ancestry, due to their genetic similarity. Any "Levantine" ancestry could also be Eastern Anatolian. It's possible that my model is terribly wrong somehow, but I doubt it.
To support my argument that the average Imperial Roman was basically a fresh-off-the-boat Hellenized Anatolian, here is a deep ancestry model comparing Imperial Romans to Greeks, Aegean Anatolians, and Central Anatolians from the Early Bronze Age to Roman periods.
I used two sets of Imperial Roman samples and both were most genetically similar to Anatolianized Greeks from the Roman period, Hellenized Anatolians, and Byzantine Anatolians (specifically from the Aegean coast).
btw India_RoopkundB = Greeks in India, not actual Indians.
I used two sets of Imperial Roman samples and both were most genetically similar to Anatolianized Greeks from the Roman period, Hellenized Anatolians, and Byzantine Anatolians (specifically from the Aegean coast).
btw India_RoopkundB = Greeks in India, not actual Indians.
The lottery study preprint has been published:
https://jhr.uwpress.org/content/early/2026/05/01/jhr.0824-13793R2.abstract
#fertility
https://jhr.uwpress.org/content/early/2026/05/01/jhr.0824-13793R2.abstract
#fertility
Telegram
Thuletide
Study: Men win the lottery then marry and reproduce; women win the lottery and immediately get divorced.
Winning the lottery also decreased men's divorce rates but had practically zero effect on women's fertility and marriage rates.
Another paper found…
Winning the lottery also decreased men's divorce rates but had practically zero effect on women's fertility and marriage rates.
Another paper found…
If you give women testosterone, they become less aggressive and behave more fairly.
If you give women a placebo but they them it's testosterone, they become more aggressive and behave unfairly.
Here are some related posts with studies on testosterone:
https://t.iss.one/thuletide/4772
https://t.iss.one/thuletide/6039
https://t.iss.one/thuletide/8054
https://t.iss.one/thuletide/3444
https://t.iss.one/thuletide/6303
If you give women a placebo but they them it's testosterone, they become more aggressive and behave unfairly.
Here are some related posts with studies on testosterone:
https://t.iss.one/thuletide/4772
https://t.iss.one/thuletide/6039
https://t.iss.one/thuletide/8054
https://t.iss.one/thuletide/3444
https://t.iss.one/thuletide/6303
Genetic studies on the Goths' expansion from South Scandinavia across Eastern Europe:
Wielbark Culture, the initial Gothic expansion into what is now Poland:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13059-023-03013-9
The Maslomecz Group, a Wielbark population from southeast Poland:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12924530/
Chernyakhov Culture of modern-day Ukraine; multiethnic society dominated by a Gothic elite, home to Scythians, Sarmatians, Thracians, Dacians, early Slavs, etc.:
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr0695
Chernyakhov/Gothic expansion into the Balkans:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.03.709317v2
Wielbark Culture, the initial Gothic expansion into what is now Poland:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13059-023-03013-9
The Maslomecz Group, a Wielbark population from southeast Poland:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12924530/
Chernyakhov Culture of modern-day Ukraine; multiethnic society dominated by a Gothic elite, home to Scythians, Sarmatians, Thracians, Dacians, early Slavs, etc.:
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr0695
Chernyakhov/Gothic expansion into the Balkans:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.03.709317v2
Tom Homan: "Even though [deportation] numbers are historic, I want more."
https://x.com/derzum_/status/2057198897492082702
https://x.com/derzum_/status/2057198897492082702
Forwarded from Race Realism Channel
After the collapse of the Roman Empire, 92% of Roman cities with ≥5,000 inhabitants were either depopulated (devolving into small towns or settlements) or destroyed.
For cities with ≥10,000 inhabitants, urbanization rates in formerly-Roman territories had still not recovered by the 18th century.
For cities with ≥10,000 inhabitants, urbanization rates in formerly-Roman territories had still not recovered by the 18th century.