The extralegal "ethical red lines" built into Anthropic's AI, Claude, are based on Effective Altruism, which is just utilitarian third-worldist-communism-but-sneakier. The company is riddled at the highest levels with "effective altruists"; they apparently deny this fact but the evidence is overwhelming.

By the principles of "effective altruism," if you can "save more lives" by stealing all wealth from Whites and redistributing it to non-Whites, then you should do it. Of course, they don't frame it in this way; they would say something about "addressing global wealth inequalities" because they seek to avoid "harmful backlash" (right-wing resistance).

Anthropic spent months claiming to have created a superweapon more powerful than a nuclear bomb and that China stole this weapon, but they refuse to give the US government full control over its use. Imagine if Lockheed Martin were run by anti-White communists who demanded that they had full control over the end use of the technology they manufactured for the US military, or if Oppenheimer demanded full control over the Manhattan Project.

These AI companies are trying to create woke cyber gods to spread gay race communism and then worm them into positions where they can overrule entire governments. These people are neo-Bolsheviks with cutting-edge technology. They are incredibly dangerous and they know exactly what they are doing. Anthropic shouldn't have been fired, its leadership should've been executed by firing squad for treason and the company should've been nationalized.

Iran bombed by America and Israel, supreme leader killed, and their response was to randomly bomb 7 neighboring Middle Eastern countries that had no involvement, killing and wounding civilians (no exact casualty toll, as of yet).

Definitely a country I'd trust with nuclear weapons!

"Trump bombed Iran because of Epstein" (20,000 likes)

I don't even know what to say at this point.

People seem to have forgotten about this.

Hegseth: "America, regardless of what so-called 'international institutions' say, is unleashing the most lethal and precise airpower campaign in history... All on our terms, with maximum authorities. No stupid rules of engagement, no nation-building quagmire, no democracy building exercise, no politically correct wars. We fight to win and we don't waste time or lives."

Rubio: Strike on Iran was preemptive; Israel was planning to attack Iran, which would result in Iranian attacks on American forces and much higher casualties.

"Why now? Two reasons. First, it was abundantly clear that if Iran came under attack by anyone — the United States, or Israel, or anyone — they were going to respond against the United States. The orders had been delegated down to the field commanders and [Iran's response] was automatic."

"Second, if we stood and waited for that attack to come first, we would suffer much higher casualties. The president made a very wise decision. We knew there would be an Israeli action, we knew that would precipitate an attack against American forces, and we knew that if we didn't preemptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties and we would all be here answering questions about why we knew that and didn't act."

Rubio: Israel forced America's hand by attacking Iran first.

"We knew that if Iran was attacked, and we believed they would be attacked, that they would immediately come after us... The Department of War assessed that if we waited for them to hit us first after they were attacked — by someone else! Israel attacked them — we would suffer more casualties and more deaths. We went proactively in a defensive way to prevent them from inflicting higher damage. Had we not done so, there would be hearings on Capitol Hill about how we knew this was going to happen and we didn't act preemptively to prevent more casualties."

Vigilantism is making a comeback in Europe: Hooded men attack young migrants in Spain over rape of 14-year-old Spanish girl

"In the wake of the arrest, the conservative regional government led by Isabel Ayuso announced plans to request that the accused be included in a group of 37 migrant minors deemed 'maladapted' and considered for repatriation."

Journalist: "Are you saying the US was forced to strike [Iran] because of an impending Israeli action?"

Rubio: "That's the answer to the question 'why now?' but this operation needed to happen because Iran in about a year would cross the line of immunity, meaning they would have so many short-range missiles, so many drones, that they could hold the whole world hostage. Look at the damage they're doing now and this is a weakened Iran; imagine a year from now? We were aware of Israeli intentions and understood what that would mean for us and we had to be prepared to act as a result of it, but this had to happen no matter what."

"The Trump administration’s policies will reduce legal immigration to the United States by an estimated 33% to 50%"

Source: National Foundation for American Policy