If a judge releases a violent criminal who goes on to murder somebody, the judge should be immediately capitally punished, no trial. This shit will end fast once their lives are on the line.
"He was released from custody and never prosecuted because he wasn’t found competent to stand trial — despite the district attorney’s office warning he was a danger."
"The perp, who doctors said has an intellectual disability and language impairment, also didn’t meet the burden to be involuntarily committed to a mental health facility."
https://nypost.com/2026/05/05/us-news/family-of-murdered-nashville-college-student-from-nj-outraged-over-killers-sentencing
"He was released from custody and never prosecuted because he wasn’t found competent to stand trial — despite the district attorney’s office warning he was a danger."
"The perp, who doctors said has an intellectual disability and language impairment, also didn’t meet the burden to be involuntarily committed to a mental health facility."
https://nypost.com/2026/05/05/us-news/family-of-murdered-nashville-college-student-from-nj-outraged-over-killers-sentencing
Forwarded from Race Realism Channel
Study: Brain differences between Paleolithic Humans and Neanderthals (separate species) are found to be smaller than those between contemporary Americans and Chinese (same species).
For seemingly ideological reasons, the authors declare that these differences are "not evolutionarily significant."
Obviously, there are evolutionarily significant cognitive differences between modern human populations, such as those that enabled Europeans to conquer ~85% of the Earth's surface from ~1490 to ~1920 AD, and those that prevented Sub-Saharan Africans from inventing the wheel.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2426638123
For seemingly ideological reasons, the authors declare that these differences are "not evolutionarily significant."
Obviously, there are evolutionarily significant cognitive differences between modern human populations, such as those that enabled Europeans to conquer ~85% of the Earth's surface from ~1490 to ~1920 AD, and those that prevented Sub-Saharan Africans from inventing the wheel.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2426638123
Study: Men win the lottery then marry and reproduce; women win the lottery and immediately get divorced.
Winning the lottery also decreased men's divorce rates but had practically zero effect on women's fertility and marriage rates.
Another paper found that "marriage rates decline when the predicted probability that a woman earns more than a man increases."
Make Women Poor Again.
#fertility
Winning the lottery also decreased men's divorce rates but had practically zero effect on women's fertility and marriage rates.
Another paper found that "marriage rates decline when the predicted probability that a woman earns more than a man increases."
Make Women Poor Again.
#fertility
This is my most important message... the fate of our civilization hangs in the balance...
I don't think declining fertility is a huge problem in and of itself, since most Western countries were overpopulated even before the era of mass migration.
Our fertility-related problems are:
1) Mass migration forcing Whites into a breeding contest with the entire third world.
2) Dysgenic fertility among Whites causing us to become shorter, fatter, more mentally ill, and less intelligent.
Take Imperial Britain as a case study in the importance of quality over quantity:
At the peak of Britain's world domination, their empire of ~450 million subjects was ruled by ~150,000 ethnic Britons, including all civil and military personnel — one for every 3000 subjects, on average. In regions such as Africa, the ratio was as high as 1:5000.
For comparison, the Mongols ruled ~100 million with a ruler-to-subject ratio of 1:800 (ethnic Mongols only), the Romans ruled ~65 million with a ratio of 1:185, and the Ottomans ruled ~65 million with a ratio of 1:722.
The imperial Britons were men of incredible intelligence, courage, and discipline, operating a well-oiled machine that relied upon efficient systems and cutting-edge technology, both products of British excellence. This breed of man is practically extinct today.
The foundations of the British Empire were laid by centuries of mostly-incidental eugenics (see: A Farewell to Alms by Gregory Clark), whereby wealthier Britons had twice as many children as the poor, resulting in elite downward mobility, the diffusion of their genes/values across British society, and a significantly more intelligent and effective population overall.
Britain's long history of internal migration helped to spread these genes/values, but also reduced clannishness, producing a people who were predisposed to limited government, economic freedom, and innovative individualism; "nullius in verba" (take nobody's word for it) is the motto of the Royal Society.
These factors, combined with some luck (timing, geography, natural resources, political stability relative to continental Europe, etc.), culminated in Britain's scientific and industrial revolutions, and, ultimately, their world domination.
I'm oversimplifying, of course, but my point is that since the Proto-Indo-Europeans first expanded from the Pontic-Caspian steppe, the White man has always been outnumbered, but never outgunned.
Our fertility-related problems are:
1) Mass migration forcing Whites into a breeding contest with the entire third world.
2) Dysgenic fertility among Whites causing us to become shorter, fatter, more mentally ill, and less intelligent.
Take Imperial Britain as a case study in the importance of quality over quantity:
At the peak of Britain's world domination, their empire of ~450 million subjects was ruled by ~150,000 ethnic Britons, including all civil and military personnel — one for every 3000 subjects, on average. In regions such as Africa, the ratio was as high as 1:5000.
For comparison, the Mongols ruled ~100 million with a ruler-to-subject ratio of 1:800 (ethnic Mongols only), the Romans ruled ~65 million with a ratio of 1:185, and the Ottomans ruled ~65 million with a ratio of 1:722.
The imperial Britons were men of incredible intelligence, courage, and discipline, operating a well-oiled machine that relied upon efficient systems and cutting-edge technology, both products of British excellence. This breed of man is practically extinct today.
The foundations of the British Empire were laid by centuries of mostly-incidental eugenics (see: A Farewell to Alms by Gregory Clark), whereby wealthier Britons had twice as many children as the poor, resulting in elite downward mobility, the diffusion of their genes/values across British society, and a significantly more intelligent and effective population overall.
Britain's long history of internal migration helped to spread these genes/values, but also reduced clannishness, producing a people who were predisposed to limited government, economic freedom, and innovative individualism; "nullius in verba" (take nobody's word for it) is the motto of the Royal Society.
These factors, combined with some luck (timing, geography, natural resources, political stability relative to continental Europe, etc.), culminated in Britain's scientific and industrial revolutions, and, ultimately, their world domination.
I'm oversimplifying, of course, but my point is that since the Proto-Indo-Europeans first expanded from the Pontic-Caspian steppe, the White man has always been outnumbered, but never outgunned.
Telegram
Thuletide
Dysgenics among Whites, two recent genetic studies:
Whites are becoming shorter, fatter, more mentally ill, and less intelligent on average. Even without mass migration, the West is destined to decline unless these breeding patterns are reversed.
Human…
Whites are becoming shorter, fatter, more mentally ill, and less intelligent on average. Even without mass migration, the West is destined to decline unless these breeding patterns are reversed.
Human…
Anyway, despite writing all of that, I'm going to post more fertility studies, specifically ones that provide evidence we must impoverish women to save the white race.
Telegram
Thuletide
I don't think declining fertility is a huge problem in and of itself, since most Western countries were overpopulated even before the era of mass migration.
Our fertility-related problems are:
1) Mass migration forcing Whites into a breeding contest with…
Our fertility-related problems are:
1) Mass migration forcing Whites into a breeding contest with…
Increasing men's wages increases their fertility. Increasing women's wages decreases their fertility.
"We use longitudinal register data on Danish couples and labor income tax reforms, especially in 2009/2010, to pin down how fertility decisions are affected by changes in the marginal net wage rates of men and women, analogous to the elasticity of taxable income literature... We find strong asymmetric effects: Increased marginal net wages of women reduce fertility of couples, while increased marginal net wages of men increase fertility. Our results imply that the substitution effect between children and labor supply is dominating for women while the income effect is dominating for men."
Source: Fertility and Family Labor Supply (2022) https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4118084
#fertility
"We use longitudinal register data on Danish couples and labor income tax reforms, especially in 2009/2010, to pin down how fertility decisions are affected by changes in the marginal net wage rates of men and women, analogous to the elasticity of taxable income literature... We find strong asymmetric effects: Increased marginal net wages of women reduce fertility of couples, while increased marginal net wages of men increase fertility. Our results imply that the substitution effect between children and labor supply is dominating for women while the income effect is dominating for men."
Source: Fertility and Family Labor Supply (2022) https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4118084
#fertility
Western women are twice as likely as men to say that "good financial prospects" are important in a marriage partner.
Western men are more likely to say that looks are important, but the difference was less significant.
Western women prefer men 2.9 years older than themselves, while men prefer women 1.9 years younger.
As previously mentioned, older-male age gap relationships are more fertile, while older-female age gap relationships are less fertile.
"In the vast majority of the thirty-seven cultures considered in the international study on choosing a mate, women valued social status in a prospective mate more than men."
Sources:
- Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures (n=10,047; mean age of Western participants ~23, SD ~3)
- International Preferences in Selecting Mates: A Study of 37 Cultures
- Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating
- Figures from Evolutionary Psychology by David Buss
#fertility
Western men are more likely to say that looks are important, but the difference was less significant.
Western women prefer men 2.9 years older than themselves, while men prefer women 1.9 years younger.
As previously mentioned, older-male age gap relationships are more fertile, while older-female age gap relationships are less fertile.
"In the vast majority of the thirty-seven cultures considered in the international study on choosing a mate, women valued social status in a prospective mate more than men."
Sources:
- Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures (n=10,047; mean age of Western participants ~23, SD ~3)
- International Preferences in Selecting Mates: A Study of 37 Cultures
- Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating
- Figures from Evolutionary Psychology by David Buss
#fertility
Being stuck in an evolutionary mismatch decreases fertility rates. This phenomenon is well documented in zoology:
"Captive-born animals have a 42% decreased odds of reproductive success in captivity compared to their wild-born counterparts" (1)
"Zoo population managers can improve the reproduction and health of captive species by addressing the evolutionary mismatch between the environment that their species are adapted for, and the captive zoo environment in which they currently exist" (2)
1. A meta-analysis of birth-origin effects on reproduction in diverse captive environments
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5849764/
2. Integrating evolution in the management of captive zoo populations
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4430766/
#fertility
"Captive-born animals have a 42% decreased odds of reproductive success in captivity compared to their wild-born counterparts" (1)
"Zoo population managers can improve the reproduction and health of captive species by addressing the evolutionary mismatch between the environment that their species are adapted for, and the captive zoo environment in which they currently exist" (2)
1. A meta-analysis of birth-origin effects on reproduction in diverse captive environments
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5849764/
2. Integrating evolution in the management of captive zoo populations
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4430766/
#fertility
Forwarded from Race Realism Channel
Catalog of genetic studies on ancient Europeans
Updated periodically. Older studies are often amended/refuted by newer studies, but still contain useful information.
EARLY ANATOMICALLY MODERN HUMAN EXPANSIONS
Genetics and Material Culture Support Repeated Expansions into Paleolithic Eurasia from a Population Hub Out of Africa (2022)
The role of genetic selection and climatic factors in the dispersal of anatomically modern humans out of Africa (2023)
The Persian plateau served as hub for Homo sapiens after the main out of Africa dispersal (2024)
PALEOLITHIC, MESOLITHIC
Population Genomics of Stone Age Eurasia (2022)
The genetic history of Ice Age Europe (2016)
Palaeogenomics of Upper Palaeolithic to Neolithic European hunter-gatherers (2023)
Late Pleistocene human genome suggests a local origin for the first farmers of central Anatolia (2019)
The genomic origins of the world’s first farmers (2022)
Early Neolithic genomes from the eastern Fertile Crescent (2017)
NEOLITHIC, BRONZE AGE
The Genetic Origin of the Indo-Europeans (2025)
A genomic history of the North Pontic Region from the Neolithic to the Bronze Age (2025, supplement to above paper)
Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe (2015)
Ancient genomics support deep divergence between Eastern and Western Mediterranean Indo-European languages (2024)
The formation of human populations in South and Central Asia (2019)
100 ancient genomes show repeated population turnovers in Neolithic Denmark (2024)
The genomic origins of the Bronze Age Tarim Basin mummies (2021)
Bronze and Iron Age population movements underlie Xinjiang population history (2022)
IRON AGE, ANTIQUITY, MEDIEVAL
Stable population structure in Europe since the Iron Age, despite high mobility (2024)
High-resolution genomic history of early medieval Europe (2025)
Steppe Ancestry in Western Eurasia and the Spread of the Germanic Languages (2025)
The Anglo-Saxon migration and the formation of the early English gene pool (2022)
Population genomics of the Viking world (2019)
Evidence for dynastic succession among early Celtic elites in Central Europe (2024)
Demography and life histories across the Roman frontier in Germany 400–700 ce (2026)
The genomic history of the Iberian Peninsula over the past 8000 years (2019)
Ancient Rome: A genetic crossroads of Europe and the Mediterranean (2019)
The origin and legacy of the Etruscans through a 2000-year archeogenomic time transect (2021)
Ancient DNA connects large-scale migration with the spread of Slavs (2025)
Genetic history of Rus’ (2025)
A genetic history of the Balkans from Roman frontier to Slavic migrations (2023, see supplements for detailed admixture analyses)
Ancient DNA reveals admixture history and endogamy in the prehistoric Aegean (2023)
Ancient DNA reveals the origins of the Albanians (2025)
Genetic history of Scythia (2025)
Ancient DNA reveals the prehistory of the Uralic and Yeniseian peoples (2025)
The genetic origin of Huns, Avars, and conquering Hungarians (2022)
Ancient DNA reveals reproductive barrier despite shared Avar-period culture (2025)
Genome-wide data from medieval German Jews show that the Ashkenazi founder event pre-dated the 14th century (2022)
Updated periodically. Older studies are often amended/refuted by newer studies, but still contain useful information.
EARLY ANATOMICALLY MODERN HUMAN EXPANSIONS
Genetics and Material Culture Support Repeated Expansions into Paleolithic Eurasia from a Population Hub Out of Africa (2022)
The role of genetic selection and climatic factors in the dispersal of anatomically modern humans out of Africa (2023)
The Persian plateau served as hub for Homo sapiens after the main out of Africa dispersal (2024)
PALEOLITHIC, MESOLITHIC
Population Genomics of Stone Age Eurasia (2022)
The genetic history of Ice Age Europe (2016)
Palaeogenomics of Upper Palaeolithic to Neolithic European hunter-gatherers (2023)
Late Pleistocene human genome suggests a local origin for the first farmers of central Anatolia (2019)
The genomic origins of the world’s first farmers (2022)
Early Neolithic genomes from the eastern Fertile Crescent (2017)
NEOLITHIC, BRONZE AGE
The Genetic Origin of the Indo-Europeans (2025)
A genomic history of the North Pontic Region from the Neolithic to the Bronze Age (2025, supplement to above paper)
Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe (2015)
Ancient genomics support deep divergence between Eastern and Western Mediterranean Indo-European languages (2024)
The formation of human populations in South and Central Asia (2019)
100 ancient genomes show repeated population turnovers in Neolithic Denmark (2024)
The genomic origins of the Bronze Age Tarim Basin mummies (2021)
Bronze and Iron Age population movements underlie Xinjiang population history (2022)
IRON AGE, ANTIQUITY, MEDIEVAL
Stable population structure in Europe since the Iron Age, despite high mobility (2024)
High-resolution genomic history of early medieval Europe (2025)
Steppe Ancestry in Western Eurasia and the Spread of the Germanic Languages (2025)
The Anglo-Saxon migration and the formation of the early English gene pool (2022)
Population genomics of the Viking world (2019)
Evidence for dynastic succession among early Celtic elites in Central Europe (2024)
Demography and life histories across the Roman frontier in Germany 400–700 ce (2026)
The genomic history of the Iberian Peninsula over the past 8000 years (2019)
Ancient Rome: A genetic crossroads of Europe and the Mediterranean (2019)
The origin and legacy of the Etruscans through a 2000-year archeogenomic time transect (2021)
Ancient DNA connects large-scale migration with the spread of Slavs (2025)
Genetic history of Rus’ (2025)
A genetic history of the Balkans from Roman frontier to Slavic migrations (2023, see supplements for detailed admixture analyses)
Ancient DNA reveals admixture history and endogamy in the prehistoric Aegean (2023)
Ancient DNA reveals the origins of the Albanians (2025)
Genetic history of Scythia (2025)
Ancient DNA reveals the prehistory of the Uralic and Yeniseian peoples (2025)
The genetic origin of Huns, Avars, and conquering Hungarians (2022)
Ancient DNA reveals reproductive barrier despite shared Avar-period culture (2025)
Genome-wide data from medieval German Jews show that the Ashkenazi founder event pre-dated the 14th century (2022)
Forwarded from Race Realism Channel
Modern Balkan populations descend from:
- Iron Age Balkaners
- Roman-era Western Anatolians
- Early Medieval Slavs
- Ottoman-era Western Anatolians
Their Slavic and Anatolian ancestry is inversely correlated.
Early Slavs had ~70% Baltic-related ancestry and ~30% Balkan-related ancestry (possibly Dacian, source population currently unknown).
Roman-era Anatolians were genetically ~40% Mycenaean Greek and ~60% Indo-European Anatolian (Hittie, Luwian, etc.).
Ottoman-era Anatolians descended directly from the Roman-era population, but had variable levels of Turkic ancestry.
The Oghuz Turks who conquered the Byzantine Empire were approximately half Scythian, half Mongolian/Siberian.
Admixture analysis source:
A genetic history of the Balkans from Roman frontier to Slavic migrations (2023)
- Iron Age Balkaners
- Roman-era Western Anatolians
- Early Medieval Slavs
- Ottoman-era Western Anatolians
Their Slavic and Anatolian ancestry is inversely correlated.
Early Slavs had ~70% Baltic-related ancestry and ~30% Balkan-related ancestry (possibly Dacian, source population currently unknown).
Roman-era Anatolians were genetically ~40% Mycenaean Greek and ~60% Indo-European Anatolian (Hittie, Luwian, etc.).
Ottoman-era Anatolians descended directly from the Roman-era population, but had variable levels of Turkic ancestry.
The Oghuz Turks who conquered the Byzantine Empire were approximately half Scythian, half Mongolian/Siberian.
Admixture analysis source:
A genetic history of the Balkans from Roman frontier to Slavic migrations (2023)