Digital Panopticon update: New federal bill introduced that would require ALL operating systems to implement mandatory age verification.
House Resolution 8250 : "To require operating system providers to verify the age of any user of an operating system, and for other purposes."
Introduced by Josh Gottheimer, Democrat from New Jersey, co-sponsored by Elise M. Stefanik, Republican from New York.
Press release summary:
- OS developers like Apple and Google required to verify users ages on device setup.
- Age settings flow to apps and platforms, so all content is tailored.
- Prevent "children" (unverified users?) from accessing "harmful or explicit content" by creating consistent cross-platform standards.
The bill's full text is currently publicly unavailable; here is the link for future use:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/8250/all-info
House Resolution 8250 : "To require operating system providers to verify the age of any user of an operating system, and for other purposes."
Introduced by Josh Gottheimer, Democrat from New Jersey, co-sponsored by Elise M. Stefanik, Republican from New York.
Press release summary:
- OS developers like Apple and Google required to verify users ages on device setup.
- Age settings flow to apps and platforms, so all content is tailored.
- Prevent "children" (unverified users?) from accessing "harmful or explicit content" by creating consistent cross-platform standards.
The bill's full text is currently publicly unavailable; here is the link for future use:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/8250/all-info
UPDATE: Censorship bill that would require all operating systems to implement mandatory age verification is now available to read.
The bill is ironically titled the "Parents Decide Act" rather than the "Government Decides Act."
It applies to all operating systems; Windows, Linux, embedded systems, even smart refrigerators.
Developers will have full access to all relevant personal data.
The bill doesn't even specify how age verification will work and instead delegates this task to the FTC, which will also specify data storage/protection requirements.
Law considered in effect one year from date it is enacted and violations will be handled under the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Once again, "child protection" laws like this are the thin end of the wedge for digital ID and, ultimately, a social credit system.
The bill is ironically titled the "Parents Decide Act" rather than the "Government Decides Act."
It applies to all operating systems; Windows, Linux, embedded systems, even smart refrigerators.
Developers will have full access to all relevant personal data.
The bill doesn't even specify how age verification will work and instead delegates this task to the FTC, which will also specify data storage/protection requirements.
Law considered in effect one year from date it is enacted and violations will be handled under the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Once again, "child protection" laws like this are the thin end of the wedge for digital ID and, ultimately, a social credit system.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Trump: "We stopped third world migration, we suspended all refugee resettlement, except for persecuted South Africans."
"There's a genocide going on in South Africa... they kill people if they're White... So we said [to White South Africans]: 'You can come in, you get a greencard and a passport, you can stay in our country.'"
"People don't like talking about [the genocide]... The New York Times wrote a story about it years ago, the only story they ever wrote about it. I'm sure the reporter got fired immediately!"
"There's a genocide going on in South Africa... they kill people if they're White... So we said [to White South Africans]: 'You can come in, you get a greencard and a passport, you can stay in our country.'"
"People don't like talking about [the genocide]... The New York Times wrote a story about it years ago, the only story they ever wrote about it. I'm sure the reporter got fired immediately!"
This Pew survey saying 56% of adult zoomer women are tattooed is going viral on twitter and everybody is rightfully repulsed by its findings.
56% is a horrifying statistic but it's worth noting that zoomers are ~50% brown and having zero tattoos (for all age ranges) correlates with:
- being White (68% clean skin)
- heterosexuality (69% clean skin)
- higher income (79% clean skin)
- having a degree (76-79% clean skin)
Conversely, having a tattoo correlates with being brown, gay, poor, and uneducated.
So, it would be logical to assume that dirty-skin percentages among zoomers are being driven up by undesirables, but the situation is still diabolically bad.
Related: I discuss environmental vs. genetic influence on tattooing in these posts.
56% is a horrifying statistic but it's worth noting that zoomers are ~50% brown and having zero tattoos (for all age ranges) correlates with:
- being White (68% clean skin)
- heterosexuality (69% clean skin)
- higher income (79% clean skin)
- having a degree (76-79% clean skin)
Conversely, having a tattoo correlates with being brown, gay, poor, and uneducated.
So, it would be logical to assume that dirty-skin percentages among zoomers are being driven up by undesirables, but the situation is still diabolically bad.
Related: I discuss environmental vs. genetic influence on tattooing in these posts.
Women are dumb:
Many people are aware of sex differences in intelligence, but mistakenly believe this is limited to greater male variability (more male retards and geniuses, more average women), and that men and women have the same average IQ. This pattern is represented by the first graph, variations of which are often posted online.
However, this is not entirely accurate. It is true that men have greater IQ variability, but women also have lower average IQ than men. The male IQ advantage manifests from an early age and continues to increase until IQ plateaus. See images 2 to 5.
"The higher male g average and wider distribution transform into an exponentially increased male–female ratio at the high end of the g distribution, and this largely explains male dominance in society."
Sources:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.12.011
(Backup link).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.04.005
(Backup link).
Many people are aware of sex differences in intelligence, but mistakenly believe this is limited to greater male variability (more male retards and geniuses, more average women), and that men and women have the same average IQ. This pattern is represented by the first graph, variations of which are often posted online.
However, this is not entirely accurate. It is true that men have greater IQ variability, but women also have lower average IQ than men. The male IQ advantage manifests from an early age and continues to increase until IQ plateaus. See images 2 to 5.
"The higher male g average and wider distribution transform into an exponentially increased male–female ratio at the high end of the g distribution, and this largely explains male dominance in society."
Sources:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.12.011
(Backup link).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.04.005
(Backup link).
Addendum: IQ differences among children/adolescents are typically lower in more recent studies because tests have been modified in favor of females.
Telegram
Thuletide
Women are dumb:
Many people are aware of sex differences in intelligence, but mistakenly believe this is limited to greater male variability (more male retards and geniuses, more average women), and that men and women have the same average IQ. This pattern…
Many people are aware of sex differences in intelligence, but mistakenly believe this is limited to greater male variability (more male retards and geniuses, more average women), and that men and women have the same average IQ. This pattern…
Adolescent girls are more violent and controlling in relationships than adolescent boys.
"Contrary to common perceptions, boys report experiencing higher rates of violent and controlling behaviours from their partners compared to girls."
"Gender differences are most pronounced among younger teenagers. For 13-15-year-olds, 35% of boys in relationships report being hit, kicked or shoved by a partner, compared to 17% of girls. In the same age group, 34% of boys report experiencing sexual coercion, compared to 20% of girls."
Source:
Children, violence, and vulnerability (2024)
Nationally representative UK study
n=10,387 adolescents age 13-17
"Contrary to common perceptions, boys report experiencing higher rates of violent and controlling behaviours from their partners compared to girls."
"Gender differences are most pronounced among younger teenagers. For 13-15-year-olds, 35% of boys in relationships report being hit, kicked or shoved by a partner, compared to 17% of girls. In the same age group, 34% of boys report experiencing sexual coercion, compared to 20% of girls."
Source:
Children, violence, and vulnerability (2024)
Nationally representative UK study
n=10,387 adolescents age 13-17
Young women are significantly more anti-male than vice versa.
Typically, this is framed as a rational response to young men becoming right-wing misogynists, having been "radicalized" by nefarious manosphere influencers, like Andrew Tate.
In reality, young men's shift to the "right" (center) was a response to women's radical leftward shift beginning circa 2010 with the rise of "#KillAllMen" feminism.
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/polling/2026/04/revealed-the-new-radicalism-among-young-women
(https://archive.today/T49e5)
https://www.ft.com/content/29fd9b5c-2f35-41bf-9d4c-994db4e12998%20
(https://archive.today/zwXKU)
Typically, this is framed as a rational response to young men becoming right-wing misogynists, having been "radicalized" by nefarious manosphere influencers, like Andrew Tate.
In reality, young men's shift to the "right" (center) was a response to women's radical leftward shift beginning circa 2010 with the rise of "#KillAllMen" feminism.
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/polling/2026/04/revealed-the-new-radicalism-among-young-women
(https://archive.today/T49e5)
https://www.ft.com/content/29fd9b5c-2f35-41bf-9d4c-994db4e12998%20
(https://archive.today/zwXKU)
Tumblr was the midwife of radical "Kill All Men" feminism that rose to prominence circa 2010, in the same way that 4chan was instrumental to the spread of right-wing ideologies.
Approximately 25% of female teenage internet users were on Tumblr in 2016. Young adolescent girls would log on to look at pictures of flowers and participate in One Direction fandoms or whatever, only to be met by college-aged Marxist rainbow groomers posting extracts from the SCUM Manifesto ("Society for Cutting Up Men").
Tumblr intentionally cultivated this radical userbase with far-left moderation and overt appeals to the woke. In 2016, they launched Action on Tumblr, "a hub to elevate marginalized voices, educate users on timely political and social issues, and provide resources that can lead to real impact — online and off."
Tumblr declined in 2018 after being forced by Apple to ban porn because child sexual abuse material kept slipping past its filters. The company did little to prevent underage users from viewing porn and many users described Tumblr as a "hellsite of grooming and abuse."
Unfortunately, all of this vital internet history seems to be arcane wisdom on the Right today, but feminist academics and authors often praise the influence of Tumblr:
"the purpose of this paper is to illustrate that Tumblr is ultimately a hopeful space for discussion that has the potential for real social change... although negativity towards feminism is propagated through the anonymity of the internet, Tumblr has become both a location for feminist “world building” as a feminist community of practice. Through this platform comes the reshaping of feminism for the internet generation" (Welcome to the FEMINIST CULT, 2015)
"By the end of the 2010s, reports indicated that the majority of young women identified as feminists – a far cry from the preceding decade marked by ambivalence and unease, if not outright hostility, toward feminism.... Feminism, it seemed, had lost its former reputation as an outdated and dirty word. By 2017, feminism was so central to the zeitgeist that it was declared the Merriam-Webster word of the year." (How Tumblr raised a generation of feminists, 2024)
Approximately 25% of female teenage internet users were on Tumblr in 2016. Young adolescent girls would log on to look at pictures of flowers and participate in One Direction fandoms or whatever, only to be met by college-aged Marxist rainbow groomers posting extracts from the SCUM Manifesto ("Society for Cutting Up Men").
Tumblr intentionally cultivated this radical userbase with far-left moderation and overt appeals to the woke. In 2016, they launched Action on Tumblr, "a hub to elevate marginalized voices, educate users on timely political and social issues, and provide resources that can lead to real impact — online and off."
Tumblr declined in 2018 after being forced by Apple to ban porn because child sexual abuse material kept slipping past its filters. The company did little to prevent underage users from viewing porn and many users described Tumblr as a "hellsite of grooming and abuse."
Unfortunately, all of this vital internet history seems to be arcane wisdom on the Right today, but feminist academics and authors often praise the influence of Tumblr:
"the purpose of this paper is to illustrate that Tumblr is ultimately a hopeful space for discussion that has the potential for real social change... although negativity towards feminism is propagated through the anonymity of the internet, Tumblr has become both a location for feminist “world building” as a feminist community of practice. Through this platform comes the reshaping of feminism for the internet generation" (Welcome to the FEMINIST CULT, 2015)
"By the end of the 2010s, reports indicated that the majority of young women identified as feminists – a far cry from the preceding decade marked by ambivalence and unease, if not outright hostility, toward feminism.... Feminism, it seemed, had lost its former reputation as an outdated and dirty word. By 2017, feminism was so central to the zeitgeist that it was declared the Merriam-Webster word of the year." (How Tumblr raised a generation of feminists, 2024)
Telegram
Thuletide
Young women are significantly more anti-male than vice versa.
Typically, this is framed as a rational response to young men becoming right-wing misogynists, having been "radicalized" by nefarious manosphere influencers, like Andrew Tate.
In reality, young…
Typically, this is framed as a rational response to young men becoming right-wing misogynists, having been "radicalized" by nefarious manosphere influencers, like Andrew Tate.
In reality, young…
"Tumblr was such an insane era. Just a bunch of 14-year-olds learning graduate level gender and sexuality discourse from people with usernames like tac-hoe-belle"
275k likes.
As I said, Tumblr was full of college age rainbow Marxist feminists grooming young teenage girls.
https://x.com/GovernorAnne/status/1434208609106231298
275k likes.
As I said, Tumblr was full of college age rainbow Marxist feminists grooming young teenage girls.
https://x.com/GovernorAnne/status/1434208609106231298
Forwarded from Survive the Jive: All-feed
Where did GOOD BOY come from? New study by Marsh et al reveals the origin of dogs.
In Palaeolithic Europe, dogs were spread 16,000 years ago by the ancestors of Mesolithic WHG (Cheddar man), the Epigravettians. They spread dogs not only to other Europeans (Magdalenians), but also to Anatolian HG's and other Near Easterners, where dogs later picked up local Syrian-like wolf admixture in the Neolithic, while those back in Europe did not mix with local wolves. So most dogs used to be of European origin.
Over 9000 years ago the westward movement of EHG people from Siberia and Eastern Europe, brought with them a divergent dog lineage. This Eastern dog admixture accounted for on avg 43.8% of dog ancestry in the Mesolithic Balkans. The Eastern doggo admixture was distributed more widely with the Indo-Europeans (largely of EHG descent) of the late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age so that it accounts for 33% of Bronze age European dog ancestry, and about 20% in modern breeds.
In Palaeolithic Europe, dogs were spread 16,000 years ago by the ancestors of Mesolithic WHG (Cheddar man), the Epigravettians. They spread dogs not only to other Europeans (Magdalenians), but also to Anatolian HG's and other Near Easterners, where dogs later picked up local Syrian-like wolf admixture in the Neolithic, while those back in Europe did not mix with local wolves. So most dogs used to be of European origin.
Over 9000 years ago the westward movement of EHG people from Siberia and Eastern Europe, brought with them a divergent dog lineage. This Eastern dog admixture accounted for on avg 43.8% of dog ancestry in the Mesolithic Balkans. The Eastern doggo admixture was distributed more widely with the Indo-Europeans (largely of EHG descent) of the late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age so that it accounts for 33% of Bronze age European dog ancestry, and about 20% in modern breeds.