This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Democrat Rep. Yassamin Ansari, an Iranian immigrant, praises Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Nick Fuentes, and Alex Jones for spreading anti-Trump demoralization propaganda and helping her campaign to have Trump removed from power via the 25th amendment.
Female Latinx immigrant wielding a huge knife kidnapped and attempted to murder a White child. The child survived the attack.
The would-be murderer, Noemi Guzman, was killed by police. Hopefully they release the bodycam footage soon.
Guzman also attempted to murder her own father in 2024. She attacked him with a knife, doused him with flammable liquid, attempted to set him and his house on fire. She later broke into a church and attacked a priest, who barricaded himself on the second floor.
A judge found her "not guilty by reason of insanity" and RELEASED her back into the public, as long as she followed a mental health treatment plan.
These corrupt judges need to be held accountable. If they release some violent lunatic who goes on to attack more innocent people, the judge should face the death penalty. No questions asked, immediate execution.
The would-be murderer, Noemi Guzman, was killed by police. Hopefully they release the bodycam footage soon.
Guzman also attempted to murder her own father in 2024. She attacked him with a knife, doused him with flammable liquid, attempted to set him and his house on fire. She later broke into a church and attacked a priest, who barricaded himself on the second floor.
A judge found her "not guilty by reason of insanity" and RELEASED her back into the public, as long as she followed a mental health treatment plan.
These corrupt judges need to be held accountable. If they release some violent lunatic who goes on to attack more innocent people, the judge should face the death penalty. No questions asked, immediate execution.
Digital Panopticon update: New federal bill introduced that would require ALL operating systems to implement mandatory age verification.
House Resolution 8250 : "To require operating system providers to verify the age of any user of an operating system, and for other purposes."
Introduced by Josh Gottheimer, Democrat from New Jersey, co-sponsored by Elise M. Stefanik, Republican from New York.
Press release summary:
- OS developers like Apple and Google required to verify users ages on device setup.
- Age settings flow to apps and platforms, so all content is tailored.
- Prevent "children" (unverified users?) from accessing "harmful or explicit content" by creating consistent cross-platform standards.
The bill's full text is currently publicly unavailable; here is the link for future use:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/8250/all-info
House Resolution 8250 : "To require operating system providers to verify the age of any user of an operating system, and for other purposes."
Introduced by Josh Gottheimer, Democrat from New Jersey, co-sponsored by Elise M. Stefanik, Republican from New York.
Press release summary:
- OS developers like Apple and Google required to verify users ages on device setup.
- Age settings flow to apps and platforms, so all content is tailored.
- Prevent "children" (unverified users?) from accessing "harmful or explicit content" by creating consistent cross-platform standards.
The bill's full text is currently publicly unavailable; here is the link for future use:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/8250/all-info
UPDATE: Censorship bill that would require all operating systems to implement mandatory age verification is now available to read.
The bill is ironically titled the "Parents Decide Act" rather than the "Government Decides Act."
It applies to all operating systems; Windows, Linux, embedded systems, even smart refrigerators.
Developers will have full access to all relevant personal data.
The bill doesn't even specify how age verification will work and instead delegates this task to the FTC, which will also specify data storage/protection requirements.
Law considered in effect one year from date it is enacted and violations will be handled under the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Once again, "child protection" laws like this are the thin end of the wedge for digital ID and, ultimately, a social credit system.
The bill is ironically titled the "Parents Decide Act" rather than the "Government Decides Act."
It applies to all operating systems; Windows, Linux, embedded systems, even smart refrigerators.
Developers will have full access to all relevant personal data.
The bill doesn't even specify how age verification will work and instead delegates this task to the FTC, which will also specify data storage/protection requirements.
Law considered in effect one year from date it is enacted and violations will be handled under the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Once again, "child protection" laws like this are the thin end of the wedge for digital ID and, ultimately, a social credit system.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Trump: "We stopped third world migration, we suspended all refugee resettlement, except for persecuted South Africans."
"There's a genocide going on in South Africa... they kill people if they're White... So we said [to White South Africans]: 'You can come in, you get a greencard and a passport, you can stay in our country.'"
"People don't like talking about [the genocide]... The New York Times wrote a story about it years ago, the only story they ever wrote about it. I'm sure the reporter got fired immediately!"
"There's a genocide going on in South Africa... they kill people if they're White... So we said [to White South Africans]: 'You can come in, you get a greencard and a passport, you can stay in our country.'"
"People don't like talking about [the genocide]... The New York Times wrote a story about it years ago, the only story they ever wrote about it. I'm sure the reporter got fired immediately!"
This Pew survey saying 56% of adult zoomer women are tattooed is going viral on twitter and everybody is rightfully repulsed by its findings.
56% is a horrifying statistic but it's worth noting that zoomers are ~50% brown and having zero tattoos (for all age ranges) correlates with:
- being White (68% clean skin)
- heterosexuality (69% clean skin)
- higher income (79% clean skin)
- having a degree (76-79% clean skin)
Conversely, having a tattoo correlates with being brown, gay, poor, and uneducated.
So, it would be logical to assume that dirty-skin percentages among zoomers are being driven up by undesirables, but the situation is still diabolically bad.
Related: I discuss environmental vs. genetic influence on tattooing in these posts.
56% is a horrifying statistic but it's worth noting that zoomers are ~50% brown and having zero tattoos (for all age ranges) correlates with:
- being White (68% clean skin)
- heterosexuality (69% clean skin)
- higher income (79% clean skin)
- having a degree (76-79% clean skin)
Conversely, having a tattoo correlates with being brown, gay, poor, and uneducated.
So, it would be logical to assume that dirty-skin percentages among zoomers are being driven up by undesirables, but the situation is still diabolically bad.
Related: I discuss environmental vs. genetic influence on tattooing in these posts.
Women are dumb:
Many people are aware of sex differences in intelligence, but mistakenly believe this is limited to greater male variability (more male retards and geniuses, more average women), and that men and women have the same average IQ. This pattern is represented by the first graph, variations of which are often posted online.
However, this is not entirely accurate. It is true that men have greater IQ variability, but women also have lower average IQ than men. The male IQ advantage manifests from an early age and continues to increase until IQ plateaus. See images 2 to 5.
"The higher male g average and wider distribution transform into an exponentially increased male–female ratio at the high end of the g distribution, and this largely explains male dominance in society."
Sources:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.12.011
(Backup link).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.04.005
(Backup link).
Many people are aware of sex differences in intelligence, but mistakenly believe this is limited to greater male variability (more male retards and geniuses, more average women), and that men and women have the same average IQ. This pattern is represented by the first graph, variations of which are often posted online.
However, this is not entirely accurate. It is true that men have greater IQ variability, but women also have lower average IQ than men. The male IQ advantage manifests from an early age and continues to increase until IQ plateaus. See images 2 to 5.
"The higher male g average and wider distribution transform into an exponentially increased male–female ratio at the high end of the g distribution, and this largely explains male dominance in society."
Sources:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.12.011
(Backup link).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.04.005
(Backup link).
Addendum: IQ differences among children/adolescents are typically lower in more recent studies because tests have been modified in favor of females.
Telegram
Thuletide
Women are dumb:
Many people are aware of sex differences in intelligence, but mistakenly believe this is limited to greater male variability (more male retards and geniuses, more average women), and that men and women have the same average IQ. This pattern…
Many people are aware of sex differences in intelligence, but mistakenly believe this is limited to greater male variability (more male retards and geniuses, more average women), and that men and women have the same average IQ. This pattern…
Adolescent girls are more violent and controlling in relationships than adolescent boys.
"Contrary to common perceptions, boys report experiencing higher rates of violent and controlling behaviours from their partners compared to girls."
"Gender differences are most pronounced among younger teenagers. For 13-15-year-olds, 35% of boys in relationships report being hit, kicked or shoved by a partner, compared to 17% of girls. In the same age group, 34% of boys report experiencing sexual coercion, compared to 20% of girls."
Source:
Children, violence, and vulnerability (2024)
Nationally representative UK study
n=10,387 adolescents age 13-17
"Contrary to common perceptions, boys report experiencing higher rates of violent and controlling behaviours from their partners compared to girls."
"Gender differences are most pronounced among younger teenagers. For 13-15-year-olds, 35% of boys in relationships report being hit, kicked or shoved by a partner, compared to 17% of girls. In the same age group, 34% of boys report experiencing sexual coercion, compared to 20% of girls."
Source:
Children, violence, and vulnerability (2024)
Nationally representative UK study
n=10,387 adolescents age 13-17