New footage taken moments after left-wing domestic terrorist Alex Pretti was shot and killed while attacking ICE offers and resisting arrest while armed:

Officers search Pretti's corpse for his gun, proving they had no idea that he had already been disarmed moments before the shooting.

The fact that Pretti reached for his gun proves he was also unaware that he had been disarmed.

The fact that the gun misfired after it was taken from him proves that it was chambered and Pretti was walking around ready to shoot ICE officers.

1000% justified shooting.

US Miscegenation Data (ACS 2023)

Most racially loyal:
1. Hmong men (92%)
2. White women (88%)
3. White and Pakistani men (tied 86%)

Least racially loyal:
1. Laotian women (16%)
2. Japanese women (31%)
3. Filipino women (34%)

Only 3 populations had higher rates of miscegenation among men than among women:
- Whites (+2%)
- Blacks (+8%)
- Indians (+10%)

Whites mostly mix with:
- Hispanics (~9% for men, ~7% for women)
- Blacks (~2% for men, ~3% for women)

~3% of White men and ~2% of White women marry Asians, while ~1% of both marry "other" races. Only ~0.2% of White women marry Indian men.

Among Blacks and Hispanics, miscegenation correlates with higher IQ and socioeconomic status, while the inverse is true for Whites (see here).

Higher IQ among Blacks and Hispanics also correlates with higher levels of European ancestry (see here and here).

In America, approximately 12% of White women and 14% of White men are race-mixers.

This is a 2.5% increase among White women and 4% increase among White men since 2008-2016. Horrifying statistics overall, but considering the rapid decline of White demographics in America and omnipresent race-mixing propaganda, this data should be regarded as a small whitepill. Professed support for miscegenation is at an all time high, but mixed-race couples remain relatively rare.

See also: Studies have found that viewing interracial couples evokes an involuntary disgust response among non-mixed individuals.

Releasing the Epstein files may have been a huge mistake. Instead of exposing the truth, this massive flood of information, riddled with unsubstantiated nonsense, has muddied the waters beyond belief. Now I understand why Trump tried to stop this.

The masses have a greater lust for theatrics than facts, and while they often exhibit good instincts, their thinking is incredibly simplistic. Average people lack the intelligence and mental fortitude to parse documents of this nature, in terms of scale and content. When confronted by potential horrific scenarios, such as child rape and murder, they react like hysterical, superstitious medieval peasants; their already limited capacity for reason is reduced to nil.

The "truth" is filtered through viral social media posts written by illiterate imbeciles, leftists, schizophrenics, and grifter sensationalists, no more reliable than Snopes. People see decontextualized snippets of the most absurd accusations reported to the FBI by mentally ill lunatics — discredited within the files themselves — and assume that they must be true: "Why else would those things be in the files?"

Most people aren't going to read the DOJ press releases with disclaimers that state "The Epstein files contain fake, falsely submitted documents, videos, and photos, alongside completely unfounded and false claims with zero credibility"; they're going to read tweets by Red Pill Patriot Truth Factory [location, Pakistan] that claim:

"Trump has dead sex slaves buried under his golf course!"

"Bush Sr. ate feces from dismembered babies' intestines!"

"Epstein cut off a male sex slave's feet with a scimitar during a ritualistic sacrifice, then reattached them without leaving a scar (and the slave lived to tell the tale)!"

Are we closer to the truth now than before this release? I'm not so sure. I fear these ludicrous, baseless claims will become entrenched in popular consciousness, rather than the empirically proven facts.

Epstein files:

Email from Bob Trivers (Rutgers University, gay rights activist and member of the Homosexual Defense League) to Epstein, in which he promotes the idea of gender transitioning 3 year old children.

In the rest of his email, he explicitly discussed transgenderism in terms of sexual fetishism, pornography, etc. He argues that male troons are better than female because they have have penises and can thus cater to bisexual male fantasies:

"If your fantasy is to suck a man's dick [but] otherwise you are completely heterosexual, it would be nicer if the rest of the organism is female"

So, reading between the lines, it appears that he is arguing for the castration of three year old boys to groom them into being "sex workers."

"She was 18 and a half, you sick pedophile."

Age of first-time months in America, 1980 versus 2016.

In 1980, the percentage of 16-year-old first-time mothers was almost double that of 30-year-old first-time mothers. In 2016, the percentage of 18- and 30-year-old first-time mothers is practically equal.

Horrifying statistics. No wonder birth rates are so low.

New York Times (2018)

Dead Internet Theory ❌

Brown Internet Theory ✅

"The MAGA base is dissatisfied with the administration focusing on just deporting violent criminals... they want to see all illegals deported... would you support mass deportations of people who are otherwise law abiding?"

Trump: "Everybody. We're focusing on the criminals, we're focusing on killers... but ultimately, they all broke the law."

Do women really select for intelligence?

https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/do-women-really-select-for-intelligence-1ad
-------------------------------------------------
#dating

Digital identity panopticon update:

Discord will implement face scans and ID checks before users are granted "full access."

"Non-verified" users will be prohibited from seeing "any content Discord detects as graphic or sensitive."

Discord was hacked last year and the hackers were able to access government IDs used for age verification checks.

Evidence that this email was referring to a child:
Zero

Evidence that the female in question was raped:
Zero

Evidence that she was murdered:
Zero

Twitter likes:
>138,000

For years, I suspected Epstein was running a child sex trafficking ring, some sort of Mossad-linked blackmail operation, perhaps involving murder and weird rituals.

Then I looked at the evidence and realized that wasn't the case. Even after this recent release of over 3 million files, I have seen zero credible evidence that Epstein was running a child sex trafficking blackmail operation, let alone that he was a pedophile (i.e. attracted to prepubescents).

The more evidence that is released, the more obvious it becomes that Epstein was not running a "satanic pedophile blackmail network," the more adamantly the public believes that he was.

With the rampant feminist moral panic around age gap relationships, you'd think "50-year-old billionaire pervert paid late-teens and early-20s girls for sex and oil massages" would be enough to "cancel" him.

You'd think the masses would be happy that he wasn't raping and eating babies, but they desperately want it to be true, they clamor for the perverse spectacle.