Forwarded from Joel Davis (censored)
Less than a quarter of Republican voters polled said they would prioritize choosing a "candidate who focuses on defeating radical 'woke' ideology in our schools, media and culture" over one who "focuses on restoring law and order in our streets and at the border."
About 65% of those Republicans polled said they would prefer the latter candidate.
This is why Trump is smoking DeSantis in the polls, the average Republican is far more concerned about crime (blacks) and immigration (browns) than "wokeness" (white libtards).
https://www.businessinsider.com/polling-suggests-woke-school-policies-arent-priority-gop-voters-2023-8
About 65% of those Republicans polled said they would prefer the latter candidate.
This is why Trump is smoking DeSantis in the polls, the average Republican is far more concerned about crime (blacks) and immigration (browns) than "wokeness" (white libtards).
https://www.businessinsider.com/polling-suggests-woke-school-policies-arent-priority-gop-voters-2023-8
Business Insider
Polling suggests that defeating 'woke' policies in schools and government is not a priority for most Republican voters
While some Republicans have assembled like woke-fighting Power Rangers, the effort might not be paying off among the voters they're trying to woo.
This subversive brown femoid, Ramsha Afridi, is back on Twitter. I remember her, lots of followers, always complained about Whites being nationalists while constantly shilling for brown nationalism and promoting immigration.
In these Tweets, by "low class ideas" she means White people having White countries and opposing "diversity."
Insane levels of audacity and subversiveness to claim the DR as her own movement and accuse the people whose movement it actually is of being "infiltrators."
Even if she is not talking about the DR specifically, anti-immigration / anti-diversity is the cornerstone of populism in the West. Trump ran on banning people like her from America.
In these Tweets, by "low class ideas" she means White people having White countries and opposing "diversity."
Insane levels of audacity and subversiveness to claim the DR as her own movement and accuse the people whose movement it actually is of being "infiltrators."
Even if she is not talking about the DR specifically, anti-immigration / anti-diversity is the cornerstone of populism in the West. Trump ran on banning people like her from America.
More Matt Walsh based moments released by libtards on Twitter. Here he's talking about race, culture, and the Anglo-Saxon heritage of America being replaced by Latinx immigrants.
"Race and culture are inseparable, go back through history, this is the way it works."
"Race and culture are inseparable, go back through history, this is the way it works."
Authors of new study claim that Otzi the Iceman, the most famous Early European Farmer, was coincidentally "dark-skinned" when all other EEF were light-skinned.
Check the study's supplementary materials and you'll see that he was basically identical to modern Sardinians and fairer than LBK EEF.
Amazing that scientists continually publish lies that are debunked by their own data.
Check the study's supplementary materials and you'll see that he was basically identical to modern Sardinians and fairer than LBK EEF.
Amazing that scientists continually publish lies that are debunked by their own data.
Third row in first image is what Early European Farmers looked like. Fair-skin with mostly brown hair and brown eyes but some instances of blue eyes and blondism, very similar to modern Sardinians who have 95% EEF ancestry.
Poor Early European Farmers get slandered 24/7: they were pacifists, feminists, egalitarian, matriarchal, brown and swarthy — all lies.
They also built Europe's biggest prehistoric structures, some of which were the largest buildings in the world at the time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCK1EZasxgk
No more EEF slander!
Poor Early European Farmers get slandered 24/7: they were pacifists, feminists, egalitarian, matriarchal, brown and swarthy — all lies.
They also built Europe's biggest prehistoric structures, some of which were the largest buildings in the world at the time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCK1EZasxgk
No more EEF slander!
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Javier Milei, Argentinian presidential candidate: "You can't give shit leftards an inch — they'll kill you. If you give them an inch they will use it to destroy you. You don't negotiate with trash."
Classical Liberalism bros, are we back?
Classical Liberalism bros, are we back?
"Conservatives" (right-wingers, people who would be regarded as "nazi fascist bigots" today) built the entirety of Western Civilization. It was steadily taken over by Leftoids beginning early 20th century. The RIght can't "build anything" today because of Leftoid lawfare and hegemony.
Try building an explicitly Right-Wing company and you'll get bombarded with "Civil Rights" lawsuits and blacklisted from the financial system by ESG social credit system.
Try building an explicitly Right-Wing company and you'll get bombarded with "Civil Rights" lawsuits and blacklisted from the financial system by ESG social credit system.
Perfect demonstration that "Neo-Liberalism" is just a Kapparot chicken used by libtards to absolve themselves of crimes against society.
https://twitter.com/planetofjah/status/1689847057610153984
https://twitter.com/planetofjah/status/1689847057610153984
https://t.iss.one/joeldavisx/2590
Argentina has very different circumstances to the West. It's population is mixed-race with highly variable ancestry from Amerindians and Europeans, which means highly variable IQ and competency relative to an ethnically homogenous nation.
A more free and meritocratic system would naturally allow competent Whites and people with high White admixture to rise to the top of society, have more kids, etc. And it would end welfare subsidization of less competent and intelligent people (who generally speaking have lower European admixture). There's no reason why a system like that couldn't outlaw libtards, gulag criminals, and so on, like Pinochet. "They violated the NAP."
But in the West, as I said here, authoritarianism is basically the only option. We aren't stuck with a mixed-race population, just a bunch of foreigners waiting to be kicked out. We need strong parties to implement mass deportation and clear out the libtards.
Argentina has very different circumstances to the West. It's population is mixed-race with highly variable ancestry from Amerindians and Europeans, which means highly variable IQ and competency relative to an ethnically homogenous nation.
A more free and meritocratic system would naturally allow competent Whites and people with high White admixture to rise to the top of society, have more kids, etc. And it would end welfare subsidization of less competent and intelligent people (who generally speaking have lower European admixture). There's no reason why a system like that couldn't outlaw libtards, gulag criminals, and so on, like Pinochet. "They violated the NAP."
But in the West, as I said here, authoritarianism is basically the only option. We aren't stuck with a mixed-race population, just a bunch of foreigners waiting to be kicked out. We need strong parties to implement mass deportation and clear out the libtards.
Adding to the post above: There is no one size fits all ideology. Different political systems work for different people under different circumstances and should correspond to their innate ethnic/racial characteristics.
A system with more freedom and internal competition, e.g. Classical Liberal Republic, would be beneficial for a homogeneous, high IQ, high trust, Northwest European society, leading to more innovation, faster advancement, etc.
But that would be completely inappropriate for a low IQ, low trust, highly criminal population. They would require a totalitarian dictatorship with Medieval-style punishments to keep them in line.
A system with more freedom and internal competition, e.g. Classical Liberal Republic, would be beneficial for a homogeneous, high IQ, high trust, Northwest European society, leading to more innovation, faster advancement, etc.
But that would be completely inappropriate for a low IQ, low trust, highly criminal population. They would require a totalitarian dictatorship with Medieval-style punishments to keep them in line.