Left-Wing elites aren't imposing multiracialism and immigration just to be nice to brown people, they genuinely hate White people and want to cause us as much suffering as possible.
White Leftists have negative in-group preference, meaning that they genuinely hate their own race and actively work against their own racial interests at every available opportunity.
They don't believe in equality, they believe that Whites are lazier, less intelligent, and more violent than Blacks, that Whites are oppressing Blacks, and that all Whites should feel guilty.
They are also extremely mentally ill.
And that's just the White Leftists. When you factor in that many elites are non-Whites who have anti-White revenge complexes and ethnic grievance vendettas, the malevolence of their policies becomes even more transparent.
White Leftists have negative in-group preference, meaning that they genuinely hate their own race and actively work against their own racial interests at every available opportunity.
They don't believe in equality, they believe that Whites are lazier, less intelligent, and more violent than Blacks, that Whites are oppressing Blacks, and that all Whites should feel guilty.
They are also extremely mentally ill.
And that's just the White Leftists. When you factor in that many elites are non-Whites who have anti-White revenge complexes and ethnic grievance vendettas, the malevolence of their policies becomes even more transparent.
Forwarded from American Krogan
I still can read French well enough, so I checked out this post on Twitter about Lola Daviet's murder.
Apparently, on the French tv show, Touche pas à mon poste, the French politician, Georges Fenech posited that Lola's killers specifically selected her for her blond hair and light eyes and asserted something called the "l'hypothèse des enfants zouhris."
The Magreb Obersvateur explains what that is here:
"They're called Zouhris children, in Morocco and Algeria. They're children with a very specific morphotype and characteristics. Indeed, they are often red-haired children with blue eyes or blond children with light eyes and they must present a continuous line which crosses the Palm of the hand."
Georges Fenech stated on Touche pas à mon poste that these children "are considered to have powers." He said that “Currently, there are plenty of cases being tried in Algeria. They are kidnapped, sacrificed. They drink their blood. There are satanic rites."
I haven't looked into this any further... but honestly considering some of the details of the case, I'm willing to at least entertain this as plausible.
Apparently, on the French tv show, Touche pas à mon poste, the French politician, Georges Fenech posited that Lola's killers specifically selected her for her blond hair and light eyes and asserted something called the "l'hypothèse des enfants zouhris."
The Magreb Obersvateur explains what that is here:
"They're called Zouhris children, in Morocco and Algeria. They're children with a very specific morphotype and characteristics. Indeed, they are often red-haired children with blue eyes or blond children with light eyes and they must present a continuous line which crosses the Palm of the hand."
Georges Fenech stated on Touche pas à mon poste that these children "are considered to have powers." He said that “Currently, there are plenty of cases being tried in Algeria. They are kidnapped, sacrificed. They drink their blood. There are satanic rites."
I haven't looked into this any further... but honestly considering some of the details of the case, I'm willing to at least entertain this as plausible.
Always great to see nationalist talking points going viral. We were citing this wolf study years ago.
Can't believe this is real, it looks like a Right-Wing shitpost
https://twitter.com/Microsoft/status/1583143019444068352
https://twitter.com/Microsoft/status/1583143019444068352
Forwarded from Genos Historia (Samuel Andrews)
I find Goths interesting because they are the forgotten member of the Germanic family. The “Eastern Germans.”
Germanic peoples moved south during the Iron age and Goths were the ones who went southeast.
They are important to history because they essentially brought an end to the Roman empire and for a little bit ruled most of southern Europe.
But their kingdoms didn’t last long and when their kingdoms fell they disappeared too.
They left the north and put all their energy into conquering the Roman world. Then when that failed they ‘went extinct.’
If they never invaded Rome I personally think there would be Gothic people in eastern Europe today.
Germanic peoples moved south during the Iron age and Goths were the ones who went southeast.
They are important to history because they essentially brought an end to the Roman empire and for a little bit ruled most of southern Europe.
But their kingdoms didn’t last long and when their kingdoms fell they disappeared too.
They left the north and put all their energy into conquering the Roman world. Then when that failed they ‘went extinct.’
If they never invaded Rome I personally think there would be Gothic people in eastern Europe today.
According to recent genetic studies (and my own research), by the late Roman Empire, a significant proportion of Italy was more ethnically Middle Eastern than European due to centuries of mass migration. See: The origin and legacy of the Etruscans and Ancient Rome: A genetic crossroads of Europe and the Mediterranean.
So, by decimating and depopulating Italy via the Gothic War and delivering the finishing blow to the collapsing Roman Empire, the Goths and other Germanic peoples saved Europe from devolving into a multiracial dump (as it is today). It wasn't their intention to save Europe from foreign colonization, of course, that was just a byproduct of their conquest.
Famous Romans, e.g. Juvenal, were complaining about foreign influence in Italy as early as the 1st century AD:
"Since the day when Roman poverty perished, no deed of crime or lust has been wanting to us; from that moment Sybaris and Rhodes and Miletus have poured in upon our hills [...] Filthy lucre first brought in amongst us foreign ways; wealth enervated and corrupted the ages with foul indulgences." (Satire 6: Against Women).
However, the ethnic replacement of native Italians was significantly accelerated by the Edict of Caracalla (212 AD), which granted full Roman citizenship to all free men of the empire. Before the edict, Roman citizenship was predominantly restricted to ethnic Italians. [Note: This fact was surprisingly acknowledged by the Etruscan study mentioned earlier].
Caracalla was half Arab on his mother's side and of North African Phoenician/Punic descent on his father's side. His edict is a perfect example of the Pūnica Fidēs ("Punic Faith"): Perfidious treachery. Septimius Severus, his father, was the first non-Italic Roman emperor. He was born in North Africa to an Italian mother and Punic father.
In the 23 years following the Edict of Caracalla, Rome had a succession of MENA emperors: Geta, Macrinus, Elagabalus (the tranny), and Severus Alexander. Their collective reigns culminated in the Crisis of the Third Century (235 - 284 AD), which almost collapsed the Roman Empire. It was eventually saved by two Illyrian Europeans, Aurelian and Diocletian. However, from this point onward, Rome was near continuously headed by non-Italian emperors.
So, Rome's first foreign emperor takes power and his son immediately ushers in the ethnic displacement of Italy's native population and centuries of foreign rule. Really makes you think.
Ultimately, the Romans sowed the seeds of their own downfall by giving subjugated foreigners access to their native political system; Severus was made a senator and easily climbed the ranks. A valuable lesson from history!
So, by decimating and depopulating Italy via the Gothic War and delivering the finishing blow to the collapsing Roman Empire, the Goths and other Germanic peoples saved Europe from devolving into a multiracial dump (as it is today). It wasn't their intention to save Europe from foreign colonization, of course, that was just a byproduct of their conquest.
Famous Romans, e.g. Juvenal, were complaining about foreign influence in Italy as early as the 1st century AD:
"Since the day when Roman poverty perished, no deed of crime or lust has been wanting to us; from that moment Sybaris and Rhodes and Miletus have poured in upon our hills [...] Filthy lucre first brought in amongst us foreign ways; wealth enervated and corrupted the ages with foul indulgences." (Satire 6: Against Women).
However, the ethnic replacement of native Italians was significantly accelerated by the Edict of Caracalla (212 AD), which granted full Roman citizenship to all free men of the empire. Before the edict, Roman citizenship was predominantly restricted to ethnic Italians. [Note: This fact was surprisingly acknowledged by the Etruscan study mentioned earlier].
Caracalla was half Arab on his mother's side and of North African Phoenician/Punic descent on his father's side. His edict is a perfect example of the Pūnica Fidēs ("Punic Faith"): Perfidious treachery. Septimius Severus, his father, was the first non-Italic Roman emperor. He was born in North Africa to an Italian mother and Punic father.
In the 23 years following the Edict of Caracalla, Rome had a succession of MENA emperors: Geta, Macrinus, Elagabalus (the tranny), and Severus Alexander. Their collective reigns culminated in the Crisis of the Third Century (235 - 284 AD), which almost collapsed the Roman Empire. It was eventually saved by two Illyrian Europeans, Aurelian and Diocletian. However, from this point onward, Rome was near continuously headed by non-Italian emperors.
So, Rome's first foreign emperor takes power and his son immediately ushers in the ethnic displacement of Italy's native population and centuries of foreign rule. Really makes you think.
Ultimately, the Romans sowed the seeds of their own downfall by giving subjugated foreigners access to their native political system; Severus was made a senator and easily climbed the ranks. A valuable lesson from history!
Crazy how gay marriage was illegal in every Anglosphere country (except Canada) not even 10 years ago, and now we've got infinite genders, transgender toddlers, and people who deny that biological sex even exists.
Turns out the "slippery slope" that we fell down was a vertical drop into a bottomless pit.
Turns out the "slippery slope" that we fell down was a vertical drop into a bottomless pit.
Gay marriage legalized in...
🇦🇺 Australia: 2017
🇺🇸 America: 2015
🇬🇧 Britain: 2014
🇳🇿 New Zealand: 2013
🇨🇦 Canada: 2005
🇦🇺 Australia: 2017
🇺🇸 America: 2015
🇬🇧 Britain: 2014
🇳🇿 New Zealand: 2013
🇨🇦 Canada: 2005
https://t.iss.one/MorgothsReview/3397
Yes exactly, same situation with the "Civil Rights" Revolution and the great replacement:
🇺🇸 American Civil Rights Act: 1964
🇬🇧 British Race Relations Act: 1965
🇳🇿 New Zealand Race Relations Act: 1971
🇦🇺 Australian Racial Discrimination Act:1975
🇨🇦 Canadian Human Rights Act: 1977
These acts introduced the Soviet concept of "hate speech" and legally enforce multiracialism and the integration of immigrants by criminalizing freedom of association.
They also coincided with the various open bordered immigration laws that were implemented from the 1960s to 1980s, as well as the various "Population Planning" white papers that were published in the 1960s and 1970s.
These documents were written by UN's World Bank, US National Security Council (for Henry Kissinger) and Planned Parenthood (for the Rockefeller Population Council).
They listed techniques to subversively destroy the birth rates of an ethnic group, all of which have been implemented in the West (feminism, abortion, homosexuality, sterilization, etc.).
So, within the space of two decades we got:
- Globalist elites explaining how they're going to destroy birth rates.
- Open border immigration laws designed to ethnically replace us.
- "Hate speech" laws designed to silence opposition to this ethnic replacement.
- "Civil Rights" laws that prevent people from organizing against or seceding from this evil plot.
And people still believe that there is no conspiracy!
Yes exactly, same situation with the "Civil Rights" Revolution and the great replacement:
🇺🇸 American Civil Rights Act: 1964
🇬🇧 British Race Relations Act: 1965
🇳🇿 New Zealand Race Relations Act: 1971
🇦🇺 Australian Racial Discrimination Act:1975
🇨🇦 Canadian Human Rights Act: 1977
These acts introduced the Soviet concept of "hate speech" and legally enforce multiracialism and the integration of immigrants by criminalizing freedom of association.
They also coincided with the various open bordered immigration laws that were implemented from the 1960s to 1980s, as well as the various "Population Planning" white papers that were published in the 1960s and 1970s.
These documents were written by UN's World Bank, US National Security Council (for Henry Kissinger) and Planned Parenthood (for the Rockefeller Population Council).
They listed techniques to subversively destroy the birth rates of an ethnic group, all of which have been implemented in the West (feminism, abortion, homosexuality, sterilization, etc.).
So, within the space of two decades we got:
- Globalist elites explaining how they're going to destroy birth rates.
- Open border immigration laws designed to ethnically replace us.
- "Hate speech" laws designed to silence opposition to this ethnic replacement.
- "Civil Rights" laws that prevent people from organizing against or seceding from this evil plot.
And people still believe that there is no conspiracy!
Telegram
Morgoth's Review
What this also tells you is that it's pretty obvious gay marriage was a top-down agenda and nothing whatsoever to do with responding to ''rights'' or the wishes of the general public.
https://t.iss.one/thuletide/3816
https://t.iss.one/thuletide/3816