The term "conversion therapy" is really a better description of the trans agenda. They use "therapy" (brainwashing) to convert children from their natural state into a deranged and mutilated state.
It's incredibly evil that parents who are trying to un-mindfuck their brainwashed children are demonized like this.
https://t.iss.one/OrlaredChan/5063
It's incredibly evil that parents who are trying to un-mindfuck their brainwashed children are demonized like this.
https://t.iss.one/OrlaredChan/5063
Telegram
Late Stage Ireland
This guy spent 8 months covertly monitoring the private communications in a facebook group called 'Concerned Parents of Transgender/Non-binary Kids' for a documentary.
He describes what he found as "a cult practicing at home Conversion Therapy".
What…
He describes what he found as "a cult practicing at home Conversion Therapy".
What…
Looks like the CCP are up to their old tricks, locking down their citizens and spreading propaganda to the West. Maybe COVID 3.0 incoming this winter? I suspect not but will not write it off.
Memoryholed: Chinese Communist COVID apocalypse propaganda published by Western media in early 2020
Edit: Just to clarify, the articles in the image are from 2020 but the text is referring to new videos of the Chinese lockdown (which I believe is not faked, unlike a lot of their earlier propaganda).
Memoryholed: Chinese Communist COVID apocalypse propaganda published by Western media in early 2020
Edit: Just to clarify, the articles in the image are from 2020 but the text is referring to new videos of the Chinese lockdown (which I believe is not faked, unlike a lot of their earlier propaganda).
New article:
Political solutions: Yes, they exist
“There is no political solution” is a pretty common phrase in dissident politics but it doesn’t seem to mean anything other than “do nothing” or “do terrorism.” Pretty bad advice, to say the least.
Some thoughts I've wanted to put on record for a while and never got round to typing them up.
Political solutions: Yes, they exist
“There is no political solution” is a pretty common phrase in dissident politics but it doesn’t seem to mean anything other than “do nothing” or “do terrorism.” Pretty bad advice, to say the least.
Some thoughts I've wanted to put on record for a while and never got round to typing them up.
Thuletide
Political solutions: Yes, they exist
“There is no political solution” is a pretty common phrase in dissident politics but it doesn’t seem to mean anything other than “do nothing” or “do terrorism.&#…
Older article, still relevant:
A Brief Introduction to Societal Collapse
"If you take one thing from this article, let it be this: Collapse is a process. It does not happen overnight. It may take decades, or even centuries, but you can be absolutely certain that this process has been set in motion."
A Brief Introduction to Societal Collapse
"If you take one thing from this article, let it be this: Collapse is a process. It does not happen overnight. It may take decades, or even centuries, but you can be absolutely certain that this process has been set in motion."
Thuletide
A Brief Introduction to Societal Collapse
1200 words ‘The Collapse of Complex Societies’ by Joseph Tainter is one of the most important books on this subject. It’s an incredibly well-researched study of various societal c…
GROOMERS MAD
Articles from the last 7 days. Keep it up, they're seething and terrified
https://i.imgur.com/ePHUAuj.jpg
Articles from the last 7 days. Keep it up, they're seething and terrified
https://i.imgur.com/ePHUAuj.jpg
Why is it that any time someone says "I don't want to live in a technocratic Communist dystopia," some guy who thinks we're still in the 1930s pops up to call them a "Liberal"?
https://t.iss.one/nativistconcern/205
https://t.iss.one/nativistconcern/205
Telegram
Nativist Concern
Lately I've noticed an uptick in COVID schizo takes returning alongside Sun Tzu quotes and such.
We've seen footage of lockdown protests in China and word of food going short.
Now, this isn't a "psy-op" or Klaus Blofeld bringing back lockdowns. It's because…
We've seen footage of lockdown protests in China and word of food going short.
Now, this isn't a "psy-op" or Klaus Blofeld bringing back lockdowns. It's because…
Kinda reminds me of nationalists shilling for COVID tyranny because it was "based authoritarianism that would defeat the [so-called] Liberal world order."
Being a dissident is when you endorse your mortal enemies' power grabs. The more you shill for your enemies, the more of a dissident you are.
Being a dissident is when you endorse your mortal enemies' power grabs. The more you shill for your enemies, the more of a dissident you are.
Forwarded from The Fyrgen • ᚫᛚᚢ:ᚢᛚᚫ
A response to this article by @Thuletide:
I admire Thuletide's work and there are aspects of his article I agree with. Namely: Terrorism is a bad idea, neo-Nazi LARPing won't achieve anything, and that there are areas of political and other activism which could be effective and are worth engaging in by those who have the resources to do so.
There are, however, a couple of points I disagree with and I'll go into a bit more detail on these...
'Hiding in the woods' is a common phrase thrown at those who seek to detach from the system. But it ignores the real motivation and long-term agenda of those seeking to extricate themselves from the System. Speaking for myself—someone who has been working towards a considerable level of detachment—my reasons for doing so are to regroup, relearn, rebuild and restore a certain level of freedom which only comes with independence. Detachment is not an end in itself, but a means-to-an-end. This is particularly applicable when you have children, for how can they ever challenge the System when they've grown up dependent upon it? I'd argue that this explains the failure of the Boomer generation to preserve our nations and our values; they were very well catered for by the System, and deep-down they cannot bring themselves to truly oppose it. A sort of Stockholm Syndrome.
It's true that They won't leave us alone, but a neglected factor in all of this is that of consent. There's a reason the chequered board is a key Masonic symbol and it's this: Society is a game, with rules and tactics. Victory (freedom and/or prosperity) is reserved for those who learn the rules and master the game. Most of what we suffer is by our own choice. Nobody forced us to remain citizens of this society, and when you know how the law works this becomes clear.
The uncomfortable truth is that this is not our society. It hasn't been for a long time. We're effectively tenants. I'm not talking about the land, the folk and the natural realm, but the hyper-technological veneer placed upon it: The statutes, the roads, the grid, the media/communication network, the financial system, and so on. Our ancestors may have been hired to help build these things, but they're not our creation (and what you create, you own). If you want to know how long we've been living within a system not our own, watch a documentary called Secrets in Plain Sight. Our enemy have rules to follow, and the less engaged we are with their system, the less power they hold over us.
In response to the accusation of 'cowardice', I'd argue that it requires far more courage to disengage from the State than to remain within its bosom. Learning and using the law properly is a more daunting task than reading political philosophy and casting a ballot every few years. And besides, it is a means-to-an-end; one of eventual confrontation but this time with a stronger, healthier, more knowledgeable generation of dissidents.
To conclude, my position is that right now there is no overall political solution. We can achieve regional victories (as @MarcMalone is doing with his America 21 initiative) but the Global System feeds upon our attention and will always have a way of digesting our forays into politics in a way which nourishes rather than harms it. Every political movement at this time will be spun by the omnipotent media to favour the Global Agenda. Not even victories in regional politics can change that, but those regional victories can balkanize society in a way which may be useful.
And who's to say we can't detach and engage in regional politics or other forms of activism to affect wider change?
I admire Thuletide's work and there are aspects of his article I agree with. Namely: Terrorism is a bad idea, neo-Nazi LARPing won't achieve anything, and that there are areas of political and other activism which could be effective and are worth engaging in by those who have the resources to do so.
There are, however, a couple of points I disagree with and I'll go into a bit more detail on these...
'Hiding in the woods' is a common phrase thrown at those who seek to detach from the system. But it ignores the real motivation and long-term agenda of those seeking to extricate themselves from the System. Speaking for myself—someone who has been working towards a considerable level of detachment—my reasons for doing so are to regroup, relearn, rebuild and restore a certain level of freedom which only comes with independence. Detachment is not an end in itself, but a means-to-an-end. This is particularly applicable when you have children, for how can they ever challenge the System when they've grown up dependent upon it? I'd argue that this explains the failure of the Boomer generation to preserve our nations and our values; they were very well catered for by the System, and deep-down they cannot bring themselves to truly oppose it. A sort of Stockholm Syndrome.
It's true that They won't leave us alone, but a neglected factor in all of this is that of consent. There's a reason the chequered board is a key Masonic symbol and it's this: Society is a game, with rules and tactics. Victory (freedom and/or prosperity) is reserved for those who learn the rules and master the game. Most of what we suffer is by our own choice. Nobody forced us to remain citizens of this society, and when you know how the law works this becomes clear.
The uncomfortable truth is that this is not our society. It hasn't been for a long time. We're effectively tenants. I'm not talking about the land, the folk and the natural realm, but the hyper-technological veneer placed upon it: The statutes, the roads, the grid, the media/communication network, the financial system, and so on. Our ancestors may have been hired to help build these things, but they're not our creation (and what you create, you own). If you want to know how long we've been living within a system not our own, watch a documentary called Secrets in Plain Sight. Our enemy have rules to follow, and the less engaged we are with their system, the less power they hold over us.
In response to the accusation of 'cowardice', I'd argue that it requires far more courage to disengage from the State than to remain within its bosom. Learning and using the law properly is a more daunting task than reading political philosophy and casting a ballot every few years. And besides, it is a means-to-an-end; one of eventual confrontation but this time with a stronger, healthier, more knowledgeable generation of dissidents.
To conclude, my position is that right now there is no overall political solution. We can achieve regional victories (as @MarcMalone is doing with his America 21 initiative) but the Global System feeds upon our attention and will always have a way of digesting our forays into politics in a way which nourishes rather than harms it. Every political movement at this time will be spun by the omnipotent media to favour the Global Agenda. Not even victories in regional politics can change that, but those regional victories can balkanize society in a way which may be useful.
And who's to say we can't detach and engage in regional politics or other forms of activism to affect wider change?
I don't want to spend all of my time "infighting." It's actually very annoying. I would much prefer to dedicate my time to other things.
But I feel compelled to do it because I noticed that the DR was being driven off the rails and it seemed like nobody was willing to instigate "infighting" or even mildly criticize DR talking heads.
The DR has extremely cult-like behavior whereby media personalities become deified. They gather up a small following of dedicated fans who hang on their every word and then viciously gatekeep their audience by accusing any critics of being feds or whatever — regardless of how valid their criticisms are and how much evidence they have in support.
I think part of the problem is that the DR has no clearly defined set of first principles. This means that it invariably gets dragged down insane and counterintuitive paths.
In the past couple of years alone I've seen people:
- Shilling for Stalinist USSR as "le trad utopia."
- Shilling for Islam (including the Islamic conquest of Europe).
- Shilling for ChiComs and Socialism in general.
- Trying to ally with "based" Leftists (who do not exist and never did).
- Calling people "anti-White" because they don't care about Palestine or some other Third World tribal conflict.
- Spending all time trying to rehabilitate bad mustache man (aka the modern equivalent of Satan).
- Saying that they want hostile foreign civilizations to destroy and conquer our own.
- Saying that they want our entire civilization to be burned to the ground because le tribal hunter-gatherer LARP (I was guilty of this one, my bad).
- And most recently, celebrating anti-White terrorist attacks just because the perpetrator was a "based racist Hotep" or because the little White girls who were killed "would just grow up to be whores anyway."
- (Edit): And shilling for COVID vaccines, lockdowns, and even social credit systems (!) as "based authoritarianism" that will "defeat Liberalism."
Imagine how bad the DR would be without infighting?
But I feel compelled to do it because I noticed that the DR was being driven off the rails and it seemed like nobody was willing to instigate "infighting" or even mildly criticize DR talking heads.
The DR has extremely cult-like behavior whereby media personalities become deified. They gather up a small following of dedicated fans who hang on their every word and then viciously gatekeep their audience by accusing any critics of being feds or whatever — regardless of how valid their criticisms are and how much evidence they have in support.
I think part of the problem is that the DR has no clearly defined set of first principles. This means that it invariably gets dragged down insane and counterintuitive paths.
In the past couple of years alone I've seen people:
- Shilling for Stalinist USSR as "le trad utopia."
- Shilling for Islam (including the Islamic conquest of Europe).
- Shilling for ChiComs and Socialism in general.
- Trying to ally with "based" Leftists (who do not exist and never did).
- Calling people "anti-White" because they don't care about Palestine or some other Third World tribal conflict.
- Spending all time trying to rehabilitate bad mustache man (aka the modern equivalent of Satan).
- Saying that they want hostile foreign civilizations to destroy and conquer our own.
- Saying that they want our entire civilization to be burned to the ground because le tribal hunter-gatherer LARP (I was guilty of this one, my bad).
- And most recently, celebrating anti-White terrorist attacks just because the perpetrator was a "based racist Hotep" or because the little White girls who were killed "would just grow up to be whores anyway."
- (Edit): And shilling for COVID vaccines, lockdowns, and even social credit systems (!) as "based authoritarianism" that will "defeat Liberalism."
Imagine how bad the DR would be without infighting?
Andy Ngo did a good rundown of the Brooklyn mass shooter: https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1514029565622075405
Seems to be a Black nationalist Communist hotep who posted about killing Whites many times.
Seems to be a Black nationalist Communist hotep who posted about killing Whites many times.
Reminder to read Great Reset = Neo-Holodomor? ‘Food Chain Reaction’: A simulation like Operation Lockstep but for a global famine caused by food chain collapse
Related articles:
Operation Lockstep: 2010 Rockefeller Foundation paper perfectly “predicts” the COVID scamdemic [Full text]
Bill Gates and Rockefeller Foundations collaborate with the United Nations to produce guide for blockchain-based “vaccine passport” (digital identity)
Related articles:
Operation Lockstep: 2010 Rockefeller Foundation paper perfectly “predicts” the COVID scamdemic [Full text]
Bill Gates and Rockefeller Foundations collaborate with the United Nations to produce guide for blockchain-based “vaccine passport” (digital identity)
Thuletide
Great Reset = Neo-Holodomor? ‘Food Chain Reaction’: A simulation like Operation Lockstep but for a global famine caused by food…
In 2015, the WWF and Center for American Progress created an Event 201 or Operation Lockstep style simulation for a global “food chain crisis,” titled Food Chain Reaction.
Over the past 15 years, Blacks were 4.4 times more likely to commit mass murder in America than Whites.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10887679211043803
(Infographic from this Polish blog).
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10887679211043803
(Infographic from this Polish blog).
Whitepill statistics on race from the Incels Wiki "blackpill" section https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill
(This data is listed in the blackpill section because East Asians are overrepresented in inceldom so they seethe about White girls preferring White men)
(This data is listed in the blackpill section because East Asians are overrepresented in inceldom so they seethe about White girls preferring White men)
I had no idea that "Incels Wiki" even existed. Found it accidentally when looking for a study about spiteful mutants.
The site seems to contain a lot of useful data but not sure how healthy it would be for an incel to read this sort of stuff. Probably just make them worse.
Still, with ~33% of young men not getting laid in the last year, it's a pretty important social phenomenon to come to terms with and this website seems well researched.
The site seems to contain a lot of useful data but not sure how healthy it would be for an incel to read this sort of stuff. Probably just make them worse.
Still, with ~33% of young men not getting laid in the last year, it's a pretty important social phenomenon to come to terms with and this website seems well researched.