What we're seeing on the world stage today is basically globalist mitosis.

We're presented with two competing versions of globalism (East vs West or "BRICS" vs "NATO") that have some minor differences (e.g. less LGBT in the East) but present a near-identical vision for humanity and how society should be structured (technocratic public-private partnerships, transhumanism, social credit systems, "sustainable development," and so on).

Easterners like Dugin create propaganda for Right-Wing audiences in the West (aiming to get them on board with Eastern globalism) by appealing to stuff like stereotypical big brain philosophy, "traditionalism" (while shilling transgenderism and Marxist Anthropology a la Franz Boas), and "anti-globalism" (while calling for the global genocide of White people because "all Westerners are racist").

Maybe the propaganda is convincing for some but just look at Eastern countries' response to the COVID hoax: They were all fully on board and, in some cases, even more totalitarian than the West (e.g. China). Plus, Iran, Russia, China, etc. are on board with digital identity, climate bullshit, etc etc.

The modern East vs West conflict can, at best, be described as two factions of globalists squabbling over who gets to be top dog. But even that doesn't take into account the fact that globalists have been intentionally collapsing the West for decades, while facilitating the rise of the East.

If the globalist endgame was really "Atlanticist supremacy" then why did they transform China into a world power, just as they did with the USSR? "Western" elites could easily have let both collapse under the weight of their retarded socialist policies.

I think the key to understanding modern politics is to recognize that nation-state governments have been completely overwhelmed and outmaneuvered by the amorphous globalist cabal, who seem to be everywhere at once. Even when they aren't directly sitting in government positions themselves, they're still meddling and "advising policy" behind the scenes at every level of governance, from local to federal/national and beyond.

I've recommended this video a few times in the past but I think it's a pretty good explanation: https://odysee.com/@MorgothReviews:5/the-elephant-and-the-whale-(and:2

Julian Huxley, first director of UNESCO and pioneer of transhumanism, called Karl Marx the "the true John the Baptist of Modern Social Science" and described the USSR as "a scientific experiment and the only one ever yet carried out in such a field and on such a scale."

https://t.iss.one/keith_woods/2561

So, you're mad that "conspiracy theorists" name the people and organizations responsible for destroying our societies, instead of claiming that vague abstract forces magically ruin everything, like you do?

And you're also mad that conspiracy theorists "moralize" by calling our enemies evil instead of... what? Moralizing by crying about Palestinians every day, like you do?

Call me an insane schizo conspiracy theorist, but I think the elites who rape kids and have normalized child genital mutilation and are trying to genocide us are evil. Pretty wacky idea, I know

Yeah I have dyslexia and can't spell but you're still a faggot https://t.iss.one/keith_woods/2563

French election results

The term "conversion therapy" is really a better description of the trans agenda. They use "therapy" (brainwashing) to convert children from their natural state into a deranged and mutilated state.

It's incredibly evil that parents who are trying to un-mindfuck their brainwashed children are demonized like this.

https://t.iss.one/OrlaredChan/5063

What a coincidence

Looks like the CCP are up to their old tricks, locking down their citizens and spreading propaganda to the West. Maybe COVID 3.0 incoming this winter? I suspect not but will not write it off.

Memoryholed: Chinese Communist COVID apocalypse propaganda published by Western media in early 2020

Edit: Just to clarify, the articles in the image are from 2020 but the text is referring to new videos of the Chinese lockdown (which I believe is not faked, unlike a lot of their earlier propaganda).

New article:
Political solutions: Yes, they exist

“There is no political solution” is a pretty common phrase in dissident politics but it doesn’t seem to mean anything other than “do nothing” or “do terrorism.” Pretty bad advice, to say the least.

Some thoughts I've wanted to put on record for a while and never got round to typing them up.

Older article, still relevant:
A Brief Introduction to Societal Collapse

"If you take one thing from this article, let it be this: Collapse is a process. It does not happen overnight. It may take decades, or even centuries, but you can be absolutely certain that this process has been set in motion."

I shouldn't re-use cover pics tbh that was lazy of me

»»https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/10/25/nwo-agenda-explained-covid-digital-identity-the-great-reset-fourth-industrial-revolution-transhumanism-agenda-21-etc/

GROOMERS MAD

Articles from the last 7 days. Keep it up, they're seething and terrified
https://i.imgur.com/ePHUAuj.jpg

Why is it that any time someone says "I don't want to live in a technocratic Communist dystopia," some guy who thinks we're still in the 1930s pops up to call them a "Liberal"?
https://t.iss.one/nativistconcern/205

Kinda reminds me of nationalists shilling for COVID tyranny because it was "based authoritarianism that would defeat the [so-called] Liberal world order."

Being a dissident is when you endorse your mortal enemies' power grabs. The more you shill for your enemies, the more of a dissident you are.

A response to this article by @Thuletide:

I admire Thuletide's work and there are aspects of his article I agree with. Namely: Terrorism is a bad idea, neo-Nazi LARPing won't achieve anything, and that there are areas of political and other activism which could be effective and are worth engaging in by those who have the resources to do so.

There are, however, a couple of points I disagree with and I'll go into a bit more detail on these...

'Hiding in the woods' is a common phrase thrown at those who seek to detach from the system. But it ignores the real motivation and long-term agenda of those seeking to extricate themselves from the System. Speaking for myself—someone who has been working towards a considerable level of detachment—my reasons for doing so are to regroup, relearn, rebuild and restore a certain level of freedom which only comes with independence. Detachment is not an end in itself, but a means-to-an-end. This is particularly applicable when you have children, for how can they ever challenge the System when they've grown up dependent upon it? I'd argue that this explains the failure of the Boomer generation to preserve our nations and our values; they were very well catered for by the System, and deep-down they cannot bring themselves to truly oppose it. A sort of Stockholm Syndrome.

It's true that They won't leave us alone, but a neglected factor in all of this is that of consent. There's a reason the chequered board is a key Masonic symbol and it's this: Society is a game, with rules and tactics. Victory (freedom and/or prosperity) is reserved for those who learn the rules and master the game. Most of what we suffer is by our own choice. Nobody forced us to remain citizens of this society, and when you know how the law works this becomes clear.

The uncomfortable truth is that this is not our society. It hasn't been for a long time. We're effectively tenants. I'm not talking about the land, the folk and the natural realm, but the hyper-technological veneer placed upon it: The statutes, the roads, the grid, the media/communication network, the financial system, and so on. Our ancestors may have been hired to help build these things, but they're not our creation (and what you create, you own). If you want to know how long we've been living within a system not our own, watch a documentary called Secrets in Plain Sight. Our enemy have rules to follow, and the less engaged we are with their system, the less power they hold over us.

In response to the accusation of 'cowardice', I'd argue that it requires far more courage to disengage from the State than to remain within its bosom. Learning and using the law properly is a more daunting task than reading political philosophy and casting a ballot every few years. And besides, it is a means-to-an-end; one of eventual confrontation but this time with a stronger, healthier, more knowledgeable generation of dissidents.

To conclude, my position is that right now there is no overall political solution. We can achieve regional victories (as @MarcMalone is doing with his America 21 initiative) but the Global System feeds upon our attention and will always have a way of digesting our forays into politics in a way which nourishes rather than harms it. Every political movement at this time will be spun by the omnipotent media to favour the Global Agenda. Not even victories in regional politics can change that, but those regional victories can balkanize society in a way which may be useful.

And who's to say we can't detach and engage in regional politics or other forms of activism to affect wider change?

I don't want to spend all of my time "infighting." It's actually very annoying. I would much prefer to dedicate my time to other things.

But I feel compelled to do it because I noticed that the DR was being driven off the rails and it seemed like nobody was willing to instigate "infighting" or even mildly criticize DR talking heads.

The DR has extremely cult-like behavior whereby media personalities become deified. They gather up a small following of dedicated fans who hang on their every word and then viciously gatekeep their audience by accusing any critics of being feds or whatever — regardless of how valid their criticisms are and how much evidence they have in support.

I think part of the problem is that the DR has no clearly defined set of first principles. This means that it invariably gets dragged down insane and counterintuitive paths.

In the past couple of years alone I've seen people:
- Shilling for Stalinist USSR as "le trad utopia."
- Shilling for Islam (including the Islamic conquest of Europe).
- Shilling for ChiComs and Socialism in general.
- Trying to ally with "based" Leftists (who do not exist and never did).
- Calling people "anti-White" because they don't care about Palestine or some other Third World tribal conflict.
- Spending all time trying to rehabilitate bad mustache man (aka the modern equivalent of Satan).
- Saying that they want hostile foreign civilizations to destroy and conquer our own.
- Saying that they want our entire civilization to be burned to the ground because le tribal hunter-gatherer LARP (I was guilty of this one, my bad).
- And most recently, celebrating anti-White terrorist attacks just because the perpetrator was a "based racist Hotep" or because the little White girls who were killed "would just grow up to be whores anyway."
- (Edit): And shilling for COVID vaccines, lockdowns, and even social credit systems (!) as "based authoritarianism" that will "defeat Liberalism."

Imagine how bad the DR would be without infighting?

Andy Ngo did a good rundown of the Brooklyn mass shooter: https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1514029565622075405

Seems to be a Black nationalist Communist hotep who posted about killing Whites many times.