Computing Forever / Dave Cullen is being harassed by masked intruders who are attacking his property and slandering him as a pedophile :
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6izxLwECuUCb/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6izxLwECuUCb/
Bitchute
A Message to My Harassers
Support my work here: https://computingforever.com/donate/
Support my work on Subscribe Star: https://www.subscribestar.com/dave-cullen
Follow me on Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/hybM74uIHJKf/
Buy How is This a Thing Mugs here: https://te…
Support my work on Subscribe Star: https://www.subscribestar.com/dave-cullen
Follow me on Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/hybM74uIHJKf/
Buy How is This a Thing Mugs here: https://te…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Mexican president calls out big pharma and the COVID "vaccine" hoax.
Forwarded from Disclose.tv
JUST IN - Science reporter, Alex Berenson, has been temporarily locked out by Twitter for quoting the results from a clinical trial by Pfizer.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/twitter-suspends-science-writer-after-he-posts-results-pfizer-clinical-test
@disclosetv
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/twitter-suspends-science-writer-after-he-posts-results-pfizer-clinical-test
@disclosetv
I've noticed that people who dislike me often call me a Libertarian. I have no idea why, I've never been a Libertarian or advocated anything remotely close to Libertarianism.
My "ideology" is basically just grumpy small town Reactionary, and my idealized economic views are closest to Distributism, even though I know it's totally unimplementable. I like nature and biology, I hate what modern technology has done to the world (even though I use it very often), and I'm a fan of thinkers like Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas. My views aren't really any more complicated than that.
Maybe it's because I hate Socialism and think that freedom is a good value for Whites to pursue? IDK.
My "ideology" is basically just grumpy small town Reactionary, and my idealized economic views are closest to Distributism, even though I know it's totally unimplementable. I like nature and biology, I hate what modern technology has done to the world (even though I use it very often), and I'm a fan of thinkers like Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas. My views aren't really any more complicated than that.
Maybe it's because I hate Socialism and think that freedom is a good value for Whites to pursue? IDK.
New short article
>My “ideology” / worldview
A few people asked me to write something like this some time ago, so here it is.
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/07/31/my-worldview/
>My “ideology” / worldview
A few people asked me to write something like this some time ago, so here it is.
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/07/31/my-worldview/
Thuletide
Am I a Libertarian? My “ideology” / worldview
There are only so many ways you can say “I’m pro-family, pro-religion, pro-ethnocentrism, pro-private property, pro-free enterprise (unless it betrays the nation), pro-hierarchy, pro-st…
Cheat sheet for decoding "woke" (anti-White/pro-Globalist) language
HD: https://i.imgur.com/ztEdiNd.png
I stole the idea from James Lindsay, but his version is full of Libtard nonsense that just confuses people even further.
HD: https://i.imgur.com/ztEdiNd.png
I stole the idea from James Lindsay, but his version is full of Libtard nonsense that just confuses people even further.
On the origin of the Corded Ware people
(quoted from Eurogenes blog)
There's been a lot of talk lately about the finding that the peoples associated with the Corded Ware and Yamnaya archeological cultures were close cousins (for instance, see here). As I've already pointed out, this is an interesting discovery, but, at this stage, it's difficult to know what it means exactly.
It might mean that the Yamnayans were the direct predecessors of the Corded Ware people. Or it might just mean that, at some point, the Corded Ware and Yamnaya populations swapped women regularly (that is, they practiced female exogamy with each other).
In any case, I feel that several important facts aren't being taken into account by most of the interested parties. These facts include, in no particular order:
- despite being closely related, the Corded Ware and Yamnaya peoples were highly adapted to very different ecological zones - temperate forests and arid steppes, respectively - and this is surely not something that happened within a few years and probably not even within a couple of generations
- both the Corded Ware and Yamnaya populations expanded widely and rapidly at around the same time, but never got in each others way, probably because they occupied very different ecological niches
- despite sharing the R1b Y-chromosome haplogroup, their paternal origins were quite different, with Corded Ware males rich in R1a-M417 and R1b-L51 and Yamnaya males rich in R1b-Z2103 and I2a-L699
I suppose it's possible that the Corded Ware people were overwhelmingly and directly derived from the Yamnaya population. But right now my view is that, even if they were, then the Yamnaya population that they came from was quite different from the classic, R1b-Z2103-rich Yamnaya that spread rapidly across the steppes.
Indeed, perhaps what we're dealing with here is a very early (proto?) Yamnaya gene pool located somewhere in the border zone between the forests and the steppes, that then split into two main sub-populations, with one of these groups heading north and the other south?
I do wonder what David Anthony would say if he was made aware of the above mentioned facts? Then again, perhaps he's already aware of them, and simply chose to ignore them when formulating his latest theory about the origin of the Corded Ware people?
(quoted from Eurogenes blog)
There's been a lot of talk lately about the finding that the peoples associated with the Corded Ware and Yamnaya archeological cultures were close cousins (for instance, see here). As I've already pointed out, this is an interesting discovery, but, at this stage, it's difficult to know what it means exactly.
It might mean that the Yamnayans were the direct predecessors of the Corded Ware people. Or it might just mean that, at some point, the Corded Ware and Yamnaya populations swapped women regularly (that is, they practiced female exogamy with each other).
In any case, I feel that several important facts aren't being taken into account by most of the interested parties. These facts include, in no particular order:
- despite being closely related, the Corded Ware and Yamnaya peoples were highly adapted to very different ecological zones - temperate forests and arid steppes, respectively - and this is surely not something that happened within a few years and probably not even within a couple of generations
- both the Corded Ware and Yamnaya populations expanded widely and rapidly at around the same time, but never got in each others way, probably because they occupied very different ecological niches
- despite sharing the R1b Y-chromosome haplogroup, their paternal origins were quite different, with Corded Ware males rich in R1a-M417 and R1b-L51 and Yamnaya males rich in R1b-Z2103 and I2a-L699
I suppose it's possible that the Corded Ware people were overwhelmingly and directly derived from the Yamnaya population. But right now my view is that, even if they were, then the Yamnaya population that they came from was quite different from the classic, R1b-Z2103-rich Yamnaya that spread rapidly across the steppes.
Indeed, perhaps what we're dealing with here is a very early (proto?) Yamnaya gene pool located somewhere in the border zone between the forests and the steppes, that then split into two main sub-populations, with one of these groups heading north and the other south?
I do wonder what David Anthony would say if he was made aware of the above mentioned facts? Then again, perhaps he's already aware of them, and simply chose to ignore them when formulating his latest theory about the origin of the Corded Ware people?
Blogspot
On the origin of the Corded Ware people
There's been a lot of talk lately about the finding that the peoples associated with the Corded Ware and Yamnaya archeological cultures were...
"Micro influencers" are being paid to shill the COVID "vaccine." Keep your eyes peeled — trust no vax shill.
My favorite history channels. Most are politically neutral.
Voices of the Past
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZnaCel6LdU
History Matters
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQktE-YKlJg
Survive the Jive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OB8eeVd7R_M
Dan Davis
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUVwT8zcS5Z_rYXnpomlbfg
History with Hilbert
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYjOYtGA8gI
Dovahhatty (shitposty satire, not an accurate source of info)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EOzr15h8S8&list=PLp5VE4P1YBhc05cDqiOazzTTu1WSh8MHg
Metatron
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8RUPySBMnc
Some I watch less often:
History Time
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_OFqGuLc7s
Historia Civilis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trrqslUpfdw
Fall of Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B965f8AcNbw
Lindybeige
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9X44PSwc9s
I maybe forgot a few but that should be enough content. Sharing because someone asked what Right-Wing content I watch but, to be honest, I don't really watch any. I mostly watch history stuff, anime, stuff for sports I do, travel vids, gardening stuff, podcasts about philosophy or whatever.
Voices of the Past
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZnaCel6LdU
History Matters
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQktE-YKlJg
Survive the Jive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OB8eeVd7R_M
Dan Davis
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUVwT8zcS5Z_rYXnpomlbfg
History with Hilbert
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYjOYtGA8gI
Dovahhatty (shitposty satire, not an accurate source of info)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EOzr15h8S8&list=PLp5VE4P1YBhc05cDqiOazzTTu1WSh8MHg
Metatron
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8RUPySBMnc
Some I watch less often:
History Time
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_OFqGuLc7s
Historia Civilis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trrqslUpfdw
Fall of Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B965f8AcNbw
Lindybeige
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9X44PSwc9s
I maybe forgot a few but that should be enough content. Sharing because someone asked what Right-Wing content I watch but, to be honest, I don't really watch any. I mostly watch history stuff, anime, stuff for sports I do, travel vids, gardening stuff, podcasts about philosophy or whatever.
YouTube
Japanese Historian Describes First Contact With Europeans // 16th cent. "Teppo-ki" // Primary Source
Get MagellanTV here: https://try.magellantv.com/voicesofthepast & get an exclusive offer extended to our viewers: an extra month FREE. MagellanTV is a new kind of streaming service run by filmmakers with 2,000+ documentaries! Check out our personal recommendation…
10 books I recommend:
1. Davies, Europe: A History 1996
2. Hamilton, Mythology 1942
3. Kenny, A New History of Western Philosophy 2010
4. Aristotle, Politics 350BC
5. Hobbes, Leviathan 1651
6. Machiavelli, Discourses on Livy 1531
7. Salter, On Genetic Interests 2003
8. Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morality 1887
9. Schmitt, Concept of the Political 1932
10. Tainter, Collapse of Complex Societies 1988
1. Davies, Europe: A History 1996
2. Hamilton, Mythology 1942
3. Kenny, A New History of Western Philosophy 2010
4. Aristotle, Politics 350BC
5. Hobbes, Leviathan 1651
6. Machiavelli, Discourses on Livy 1531
7. Salter, On Genetic Interests 2003
8. Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morality 1887
9. Schmitt, Concept of the Political 1932
10. Tainter, Collapse of Complex Societies 1988