🚨🇮🇷 IRAN'S FIRST GEOTHERMAL PLANT NOW OPERATIONAL
Iran has connected its first geothermal power plant to the national grid, marking a milestone in diversifying the country's energy mix and reducing fossil fuel dependence.
The 5 MW facility, located in Meshginshahr, Ardabil Province, was inaugurated by Energy Minister Abbas Aliabadi.
The €10M project draws from a proven geothermal reservoir with an estimated potential capacity of up to 250 MW. Several wells have been drilled to approximately 3,000 meters to explore and extract the resource.
The first phase is currently producing 5 MW, with plans to expand capacity and develop additional geothermal plants across Iran. The project will expand renewable energy use, acquire technical expertise, localize geothermal technology, and reduce fossil fuel dependence.
The country regularly experiences scorching summers that drive up electricity demand for air conditioning. Meanwhile, ongoing conflict in the Middle East has already targeted gas and oil facilities, raising concerns that power plants could become vulnerable.
U.S. President Donald Trump has also threatened strikes on Iranian energy sites if Tehran does not reopen the strategic Strait of Hormuz.
But Iran's electricity system is not concentrated in a few vulnerable locations, making it difficult to cripple entirely. Tehran is steadily diversifying its energy sources — and the Meshginshahr plant is the latest example of that strategy.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
Iran has connected its first geothermal power plant to the national grid, marking a milestone in diversifying the country's energy mix and reducing fossil fuel dependence.
The 5 MW facility, located in Meshginshahr, Ardabil Province, was inaugurated by Energy Minister Abbas Aliabadi.
The €10M project draws from a proven geothermal reservoir with an estimated potential capacity of up to 250 MW. Several wells have been drilled to approximately 3,000 meters to explore and extract the resource.
The first phase is currently producing 5 MW, with plans to expand capacity and develop additional geothermal plants across Iran. The project will expand renewable energy use, acquire technical expertise, localize geothermal technology, and reduce fossil fuel dependence.
The country regularly experiences scorching summers that drive up electricity demand for air conditioning. Meanwhile, ongoing conflict in the Middle East has already targeted gas and oil facilities, raising concerns that power plants could become vulnerable.
U.S. President Donald Trump has also threatened strikes on Iranian energy sites if Tehran does not reopen the strategic Strait of Hormuz.
But Iran's electricity system is not concentrated in a few vulnerable locations, making it difficult to cripple entirely. Tehran is steadily diversifying its energy sources — and the Meshginshahr plant is the latest example of that strategy.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍42❤29👏15🔥5🫡2
🚨🇺🇸 America’s workforce exodus hits record high
A record 105.8 million Americans aged 16 and over were outside the labor force in June, after another 832,000 dropped out in a single month.
The civilian labor force shrank by 720,000, employment fell by more than half a million, and the participation rate dropped to 61.5%. U.S. employers added just 57,000 jobs during the month, while nearly 1.9 million officially unemployed Americans had already been without work for at least six months.
The headline unemployment rate remained at 4.2%, but that figure excludes anyone who has stopped actively searching. This allows a much larger crisis of economic withdrawal to remain hidden outside the official unemployment count.
Retirees account for nearly half of those outside the labor force, but the record cannot be explained by aging alone.
🔸 Six million Americans outside the labor force say they still want a job.
🔸 Around 1.8 million remain marginally attached to the workforce but have stopped searching regularly.
🔸 Roughly seven million prime-age men are neither working nor looking for work.
🔸 Another 3.5 million prime-age women without a spouse or children at home have withdrawn in a similar pattern.
Economist Nicholas Eberstadt estimates that up to 23.3 million Americans outside the workforce are connected to long-term illness, disability or other benefit programs — more than the number enrolled in full-time education.
The U.S. welfare system is so fragmented that no federal agency can provide a complete count of who receives disability support, from which programs, or how many people collect benefits from several programs at once. Instead of drawing people back into productive life, the system increasingly finances long-term detachment.
Research on prime-age men who have left the workforce found that they spend close to 2,000 hours a year watching or playing on screens — roughly the time required for a full-time job. Their withdrawal is also accompanied by weaker participation in family life, community organizations and civil society.
The U.S. economy is not merely facing a labor shortage but is producing a growing class of working-age adults who have disappeared from economic life — and its official unemployment statistics barely register them.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
A record 105.8 million Americans aged 16 and over were outside the labor force in June, after another 832,000 dropped out in a single month.
The civilian labor force shrank by 720,000, employment fell by more than half a million, and the participation rate dropped to 61.5%. U.S. employers added just 57,000 jobs during the month, while nearly 1.9 million officially unemployed Americans had already been without work for at least six months.
The headline unemployment rate remained at 4.2%, but that figure excludes anyone who has stopped actively searching. This allows a much larger crisis of economic withdrawal to remain hidden outside the official unemployment count.
Retirees account for nearly half of those outside the labor force, but the record cannot be explained by aging alone.
🔸 Six million Americans outside the labor force say they still want a job.
🔸 Around 1.8 million remain marginally attached to the workforce but have stopped searching regularly.
🔸 Roughly seven million prime-age men are neither working nor looking for work.
🔸 Another 3.5 million prime-age women without a spouse or children at home have withdrawn in a similar pattern.
Economist Nicholas Eberstadt estimates that up to 23.3 million Americans outside the workforce are connected to long-term illness, disability or other benefit programs — more than the number enrolled in full-time education.
The U.S. welfare system is so fragmented that no federal agency can provide a complete count of who receives disability support, from which programs, or how many people collect benefits from several programs at once. Instead of drawing people back into productive life, the system increasingly finances long-term detachment.
Research on prime-age men who have left the workforce found that they spend close to 2,000 hours a year watching or playing on screens — roughly the time required for a full-time job. Their withdrawal is also accompanied by weaker participation in family life, community organizations and civil society.
The U.S. economy is not merely facing a labor shortage but is producing a growing class of working-age adults who have disappeared from economic life — and its official unemployment statistics barely register them.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥39❤12👍8👏4🫡1
🚨🇨🇳 China unveils full-stack AI system for robots
Alibaba’s mapping and AI unit Amap has developed a full-stack framework that connects a robot’s navigation, manipulation, reasoning, memory and motion control in one architecture.
Named ABot, the system is part of the company’s push into embodied intelligence — giving machines the ability to operate in complex real-world environments. Amap says its components achieved state-of-the-art results across 17 robotics benchmarks.
ABot combines five components that work as one system:
🔸 ABot-N1 uses an “eyes-guiding-feet” approach, allowing robots to navigate city-scale environments with a reported 92.9% outdoor success rate using standard cameras and basic road maps.
🔸 ABot-M0.5 coordinates locomotion and manipulation, allowing robots to move while grasping objects. It separates body movement and arm control into two synchronized action streams.
🔸 ABot-ER handles decision-making from perception to action, reasoning about objects and spaces rather than relying only on visual recognition. It ranked first on Embodied Arena 2D-EQA.
🔸 ABot-AgentOS converts high-level plans into executable actions by separating planning, tool use, execution and verification from the physical robot body. It supports humanoid, quadruped and wheeled robots, while turning task experience into long-term memory shared across the system.
🔸 ABot-C0 translates high-level decisions into physical movement, giving quadruped robots a common control layer for locomotion, difficult terrain and smooth transitions between behaviors.
ABot is part of a wider Chinese push into embodied AI. Tencent has introduced a full-stack robotics platform, while Ant Group’s Robbyant unveiled LingBot-Depth 2.0, which helps robots reconstruct depth around glass, mirrors and reflective surfaces.
China’s advantage lies in the breadth of this ecosystem. Its companies are developing navigation, manipulation, perception, memory and motion control at the same time — building the layers needed to move embodied AI from laboratory demonstrations into real-world deployment.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
Alibaba’s mapping and AI unit Amap has developed a full-stack framework that connects a robot’s navigation, manipulation, reasoning, memory and motion control in one architecture.
Named ABot, the system is part of the company’s push into embodied intelligence — giving machines the ability to operate in complex real-world environments. Amap says its components achieved state-of-the-art results across 17 robotics benchmarks.
ABot combines five components that work as one system:
🔸 ABot-N1 uses an “eyes-guiding-feet” approach, allowing robots to navigate city-scale environments with a reported 92.9% outdoor success rate using standard cameras and basic road maps.
🔸 ABot-M0.5 coordinates locomotion and manipulation, allowing robots to move while grasping objects. It separates body movement and arm control into two synchronized action streams.
🔸 ABot-ER handles decision-making from perception to action, reasoning about objects and spaces rather than relying only on visual recognition. It ranked first on Embodied Arena 2D-EQA.
🔸 ABot-AgentOS converts high-level plans into executable actions by separating planning, tool use, execution and verification from the physical robot body. It supports humanoid, quadruped and wheeled robots, while turning task experience into long-term memory shared across the system.
🔸 ABot-C0 translates high-level decisions into physical movement, giving quadruped robots a common control layer for locomotion, difficult terrain and smooth transitions between behaviors.
ABot is part of a wider Chinese push into embodied AI. Tencent has introduced a full-stack robotics platform, while Ant Group’s Robbyant unveiled LingBot-Depth 2.0, which helps robots reconstruct depth around glass, mirrors and reflective surfaces.
China’s advantage lies in the breadth of this ecosystem. Its companies are developing navigation, manipulation, perception, memory and motion control at the same time — building the layers needed to move embodied AI from laboratory demonstrations into real-world deployment.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏33❤10👍7
🚨🇮🇷 Iran develops AI method to improve cancer detection
Iranian researchers have developed a new AI-based method designed to detect and classify cancer more accurately from medical images, including cases involving breast, brain and blood cancers.
The project was carried out by researcher Yousef Sharafi at Tehran’s K. N. Toosi University of Technology with support from the Iran National Science Foundation. It combines deep learning, transfer learning and ensemble learning to identify the most important patterns in medical scans while filtering out redundant data.
The system operates in several stages:
🔸 Neural networks first locate and separate suspected tumor regions from surrounding tissue.
🔸 The model then extracts geometric, spatial and textural features from the identified cancer cells.
🔸 Deep-learning and optimization tools remove unnecessary information while preserving the features most useful for diagnosis.
🔸 Fuzzy neural networks and machine-learning algorithms analyze uncertain cases in which the boundary between healthy and cancerous tissue is difficult to distinguish.
The proposed methods delivered greater accuracy, stability and efficiency than conventional classification approaches, particularly when processing noisy or ambiguous medical data, according to the researchers. The technology is intended to support doctors by highlighting suspicious regions and providing more reliable information for clinical decision-making.
Its wider importance lies in Iran’s growing ability to apply domestic AI research to complex medical problems rather than limiting development to general-purpose software. Medical imaging brings together advanced algorithms, healthcare data and clinical expertise — precisely the kind of high-value technological capability that can improve early diagnosis and treatment.
The next challenge is scale. Sharafi called for standardized national cancer datasets and dedicated centers to collect, verify and integrate medical information, giving future Iranian diagnostic systems the high-quality data needed to become more accurate and clinically useful.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
Iranian researchers have developed a new AI-based method designed to detect and classify cancer more accurately from medical images, including cases involving breast, brain and blood cancers.
The project was carried out by researcher Yousef Sharafi at Tehran’s K. N. Toosi University of Technology with support from the Iran National Science Foundation. It combines deep learning, transfer learning and ensemble learning to identify the most important patterns in medical scans while filtering out redundant data.
The system operates in several stages:
🔸 Neural networks first locate and separate suspected tumor regions from surrounding tissue.
🔸 The model then extracts geometric, spatial and textural features from the identified cancer cells.
🔸 Deep-learning and optimization tools remove unnecessary information while preserving the features most useful for diagnosis.
🔸 Fuzzy neural networks and machine-learning algorithms analyze uncertain cases in which the boundary between healthy and cancerous tissue is difficult to distinguish.
The proposed methods delivered greater accuracy, stability and efficiency than conventional classification approaches, particularly when processing noisy or ambiguous medical data, according to the researchers. The technology is intended to support doctors by highlighting suspicious regions and providing more reliable information for clinical decision-making.
Its wider importance lies in Iran’s growing ability to apply domestic AI research to complex medical problems rather than limiting development to general-purpose software. Medical imaging brings together advanced algorithms, healthcare data and clinical expertise — precisely the kind of high-value technological capability that can improve early diagnosis and treatment.
The next challenge is scale. Sharafi called for standardized national cancer datasets and dedicated centers to collect, verify and integrate medical information, giving future Iranian diagnostic systems the high-quality data needed to become more accurate and clinically useful.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤63👌13🔥12👏7👍6
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇨🇳 CHINA IS MASS-PRODUCING J-20 STEALTH FIGHTERS FOR PACIFIC AIR WAR
China is turning the J-20 from an elite stealth fighter into the backbone of its air force. Production is now estimated at 100–120 aircraft a year—more than twice the roughly 44–48 F-35As bought annually for the U.S. Air Force.
The exact fleet size remains classified, but 18 PLA Air Force brigades are reported to operate the type. At a nominal strength of 28 aircraft per brigade, that would place the frontline fleet above 500, although the figure remains an open-source estimate rather than an official count.
🔸 RUSI says annual J-20 production rose from around 20 aircraft in 2020 to roughly 120 by late 2025. Satellite imagery has also revealed five production lines and major expansion at Chengdu’s manufacturing complex.
🔸 New J-20A batches appear to use the indigenous WS-15 engine, removing a major production bottleneck while potentially improving thrust, range, power generation and maintenance.
🔸 The twin-seat J-20S expands the aircraft’s role beyond air combat. Its second crew member can coordinate drones and other aircraft, turning the fighter into a forward command platform inside a networked air war.
🔸 China’s earlier switch to the domestic WS-10C already helped accelerate production. The WS-15 could now support an even larger and more capable fleet without dependence on foreign engines.
🔸 RUSI projects that current trends could give the PLA Air Force around 1,000 J-20A and J-20S fighters by 2030, before sixth-generation aircraft begin entering service in the following decade.
Washington’s problem is simple: China is concentrating a rapidly expanding stealth fleet in the Western Pacific, where it would fight, while the U.S. must divide its aircraft across multiple theatres, services and overseas commitments.
What matters more in the Pacific: America’s global F-35 fleet or China’s concentrated J-20 force?
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
China is turning the J-20 from an elite stealth fighter into the backbone of its air force. Production is now estimated at 100–120 aircraft a year—more than twice the roughly 44–48 F-35As bought annually for the U.S. Air Force.
The exact fleet size remains classified, but 18 PLA Air Force brigades are reported to operate the type. At a nominal strength of 28 aircraft per brigade, that would place the frontline fleet above 500, although the figure remains an open-source estimate rather than an official count.
🔸 RUSI says annual J-20 production rose from around 20 aircraft in 2020 to roughly 120 by late 2025. Satellite imagery has also revealed five production lines and major expansion at Chengdu’s manufacturing complex.
🔸 New J-20A batches appear to use the indigenous WS-15 engine, removing a major production bottleneck while potentially improving thrust, range, power generation and maintenance.
🔸 The twin-seat J-20S expands the aircraft’s role beyond air combat. Its second crew member can coordinate drones and other aircraft, turning the fighter into a forward command platform inside a networked air war.
🔸 China’s earlier switch to the domestic WS-10C already helped accelerate production. The WS-15 could now support an even larger and more capable fleet without dependence on foreign engines.
🔸 RUSI projects that current trends could give the PLA Air Force around 1,000 J-20A and J-20S fighters by 2030, before sixth-generation aircraft begin entering service in the following decade.
Washington’s problem is simple: China is concentrating a rapidly expanding stealth fleet in the Western Pacific, where it would fight, while the U.S. must divide its aircraft across multiple theatres, services and overseas commitments.
What matters more in the Pacific: America’s global F-35 fleet or China’s concentrated J-20 force?
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍43❤25👌10🔥4👏4
🚨🇮🇷 Why No Pipeline Can Replace The Strait Of Hormuz
Gulf monarchies have spent billions building pipelines to reduce dependence on Hormuz. The crisis has exposed the limit of that strategy: the alternatives can redirect only a fraction of the oil normally passing through the waterway — and each creates new vulnerabilities.
Around 20 million barrels of oil and petroleum products transit Hormuz every day. Spare capacity through Saudi Arabia’s East–West Pipeline and the UAE’s Habshan–Fujairah route is estimated at only 3.5–5.5 million barrels per day.
🔸 Saudi Arabia’s Petroline carries crude from Abqaiq to Yanbu on the Red Sea, but export volumes are constrained by western terminals. The route also pushes shipments toward Bab al-Mandeb, another chokepoint exposed to Yemeni operations.
🔸 The UAE’s pipeline to Fujairah avoids Hormuz but carries around 1.8 million barrels per day, with limited spare capacity. Abu Dhabi is accelerating an expansion, yet it will not come online before 2027 and will still depend on vulnerable ports, storage and pumping stations.
🔸 Iraq’s pipeline to Turkiye offers little immediate relief. It operates far below design capacity, remains hostage to political disputes and is poorly connected to the southern fields producing most Iraqi exports.
Pipelines are not invulnerable substitutes for tankers. They are fixed infrastructure within range of missiles and drones. Pumping stations, terminals and storage facilities can be disabled without closing an entire route.
The problem is even sharper for gas. Qatar’s LNG exports have no comparable overland escape route and must pass through Hormuz to reach global markets.
The conclusion is unavoidable: West Asia can build partial bypasses, but it cannot engineer Iran out of the regional energy map. Geography still gives Tehran decisive leverage over the world’s most important oil chokepoint.
Do you think any pipeline network can truly neutralize Iran’s leverage over Hormuz?
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
Gulf monarchies have spent billions building pipelines to reduce dependence on Hormuz. The crisis has exposed the limit of that strategy: the alternatives can redirect only a fraction of the oil normally passing through the waterway — and each creates new vulnerabilities.
Around 20 million barrels of oil and petroleum products transit Hormuz every day. Spare capacity through Saudi Arabia’s East–West Pipeline and the UAE’s Habshan–Fujairah route is estimated at only 3.5–5.5 million barrels per day.
🔸 Saudi Arabia’s Petroline carries crude from Abqaiq to Yanbu on the Red Sea, but export volumes are constrained by western terminals. The route also pushes shipments toward Bab al-Mandeb, another chokepoint exposed to Yemeni operations.
🔸 The UAE’s pipeline to Fujairah avoids Hormuz but carries around 1.8 million barrels per day, with limited spare capacity. Abu Dhabi is accelerating an expansion, yet it will not come online before 2027 and will still depend on vulnerable ports, storage and pumping stations.
🔸 Iraq’s pipeline to Turkiye offers little immediate relief. It operates far below design capacity, remains hostage to political disputes and is poorly connected to the southern fields producing most Iraqi exports.
Pipelines are not invulnerable substitutes for tankers. They are fixed infrastructure within range of missiles and drones. Pumping stations, terminals and storage facilities can be disabled without closing an entire route.
The problem is even sharper for gas. Qatar’s LNG exports have no comparable overland escape route and must pass through Hormuz to reach global markets.
The conclusion is unavoidable: West Asia can build partial bypasses, but it cannot engineer Iran out of the regional energy map. Geography still gives Tehran decisive leverage over the world’s most important oil chokepoint.
Do you think any pipeline network can truly neutralize Iran’s leverage over Hormuz?
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤33👏23👌9👍7
🚨🇨🇳 China Now Dominates Global Ship Orders With 82% Share
China’s shipbuilding industry widened its global lead in the first half of 2026, capturing most ship completions, new contracts and outstanding orders worldwide.
Chinese yards completed 36.5 million deadweight tons (DWT) of vessels from January to June, up 51.2% year on year and equal to 62.2% of global output.
🔸 The order book grew even faster:
🟠 New orders surged 173.1% to 121.06 million DWT — 82.3% of the world market and already above China’s previous full-year record.
🟠 Orders on hand reached 363.25 million DWT, up 54.9% and accounting for 71.2% of the global backlog.
🟠 Chinese shipbuilders now hold more than 80% of the market for bulk carriers, container ships and crude-oil tankers.
China is no longer competing mainly through volume, but by building larger, cleaner and more complex vessels. In July, China delivered the world’s first 41,800-ton bidirectional self-discharging ship for the Simandou iron-ore project and the first 10,000-vehicle car carrier equipped with onboard solar generation and dual LNG-fuel capability.
Foreign buyers are driving the boom. Export vessels made up 94% of output, 93.4% of new orders and 92.1% of the backlog in the first half. Ship exports brought in $31.62B.
The timing also matters. Disruption around the Strait of Hormuz and tighter crude supplies pushed up tanker demand, and Chinese yards absorbed new orders because they already had the capacity, suppliers and workforce needed to scale quickly.
Washington is searching for tariffs and restrictions to contain China’s rise while trying to revive America’s diminished commercial fleet. But trade barriers cannot recreate shipyards, skilled labor or a complete maritime supply chain overnight.
China built this advantage over decades. It now controls the industrial base that moves global trade — and every new order makes that lead harder to reverse.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
China’s shipbuilding industry widened its global lead in the first half of 2026, capturing most ship completions, new contracts and outstanding orders worldwide.
Chinese yards completed 36.5 million deadweight tons (DWT) of vessels from January to June, up 51.2% year on year and equal to 62.2% of global output.
🔸 The order book grew even faster:
China is no longer competing mainly through volume, but by building larger, cleaner and more complex vessels. In July, China delivered the world’s first 41,800-ton bidirectional self-discharging ship for the Simandou iron-ore project and the first 10,000-vehicle car carrier equipped with onboard solar generation and dual LNG-fuel capability.
Foreign buyers are driving the boom. Export vessels made up 94% of output, 93.4% of new orders and 92.1% of the backlog in the first half. Ship exports brought in $31.62B.
The timing also matters. Disruption around the Strait of Hormuz and tighter crude supplies pushed up tanker demand, and Chinese yards absorbed new orders because they already had the capacity, suppliers and workforce needed to scale quickly.
Washington is searching for tariffs and restrictions to contain China’s rise while trying to revive America’s diminished commercial fleet. But trade barriers cannot recreate shipyards, skilled labor or a complete maritime supply chain overnight.
China built this advantage over decades. It now controls the industrial base that moves global trade — and every new order makes that lead harder to reverse.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥31👏30❤15👍3👌1
🚨🇺🇦 Ukraine's population crisis hits historic high
As the conflict in Ukraine enters its fifth year, the demographic toll has become staggering. The number of deaths now vastly exceeds births, with a nearly four-to-one ratio.
According to Opendatabot, Ukraine recorded just 71,860 births in the first half of 2026, compared to 247,516 deaths. Death rate is now four times higher than the birth rate, Compared to last year's ratio of 1 to 3.
The number of newborns dropped 16% compared to the same period last year, and a decade ago, Ukraine saw about 32,000 monthly births. Today, that figure is almost 12,000.
The broader population decline is accelerating. Ukraine is shrinking by roughly 800,000 people annually — 500,000 through migration and 250,000 from the excess of deaths over births. Even in Kiev, deaths increased by 11%.
Around 2 million Ukrainians are refusing conscription, and about 200,000 soldiers have deserted. Gallup found that only 24% of Ukrainians support continued fighting, while 66% want a negotiated end to the war.
Mounting damage is likely to discourage refugees from returning anytime soon. The birth rate crisis is not new — before the escalation of the Russia-Ukraine crisis in 2022, Ukraine had the fourth-highest death rate per thousand in the world.
But now, Ukraine's population has collapsed from about 52 million in 1991 to roughly 22-25 million today. By 2040, the working-age population is projected to decline by a third, while the number of children will drop by half.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
As the conflict in Ukraine enters its fifth year, the demographic toll has become staggering. The number of deaths now vastly exceeds births, with a nearly four-to-one ratio.
According to Opendatabot, Ukraine recorded just 71,860 births in the first half of 2026, compared to 247,516 deaths. Death rate is now four times higher than the birth rate, Compared to last year's ratio of 1 to 3.
The number of newborns dropped 16% compared to the same period last year, and a decade ago, Ukraine saw about 32,000 monthly births. Today, that figure is almost 12,000.
The broader population decline is accelerating. Ukraine is shrinking by roughly 800,000 people annually — 500,000 through migration and 250,000 from the excess of deaths over births. Even in Kiev, deaths increased by 11%.
Around 2 million Ukrainians are refusing conscription, and about 200,000 soldiers have deserted. Gallup found that only 24% of Ukrainians support continued fighting, while 66% want a negotiated end to the war.
Mounting damage is likely to discourage refugees from returning anytime soon. The birth rate crisis is not new — before the escalation of the Russia-Ukraine crisis in 2022, Ukraine had the fourth-highest death rate per thousand in the world.
But now, Ukraine's population has collapsed from about 52 million in 1991 to roughly 22-25 million today. By 2040, the working-age population is projected to decline by a third, while the number of children will drop by half.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🫡25🔥19❤12👍8👏6
🚨🇷🇺 🇨🇳 West Fears Russia’s War Experience Is Giving China a Military Edge
Western officials are alarmed that military cooperation between Russia and China is moving beyond joint drills and arms trade into something more valuable: battlefield knowledge.
Chinese personnel have trained near Volgograd since 2024 in drone operations, urban combat, assaults on command posts, trench warfare and mine-laying — areas transformed by Russia’s experience in Ukraine, according to European intelligence cited by The Economist.
The PLA is especially interested in how Russian forces operate on a battlefield saturated with surveillance, electronic warfare and cheap unmanned systems.
🔸 Russian units have adapted to FPV drones, fibre-optic control links, AI-assisted targeting and constant jamming.
🔸 Chinese military publications have studied Russia’s Rubicon drone center, which centralized unmanned operations and targeted enemy drone crews and supply lines.
🔸 Joint Sea-2026 became the first China–Russia naval exercise focused on drone and counter-drone warfare, alongside submarine and air-defense operations.
The transfer may extend beyond tactics. Western officials believe Russia is helping China improve submarine quieting, torpedo design, anti-submarine warfare and the interpretation of U.S. submarine acoustic signatures.
Moscow has also helped Beijing develop strategic early-warning capabilities. Leaked documents cited by European media point to discussions on a joint air- and missile-defense system designed to counter U.S. ballistic and hypersonic weapons.
China brings industrial scale, electronics and the world’s largest civilian-drone manufacturing base. Russia brings combat data, operational lessons and expertise in submarines, strategic warning and missile defense.
That combination is what worries Washington. Russia is turning years of Western-backed warfare into a library of lessons, while China has the capacity to absorb them and deploy the results across the Asia-Pacific.
The West tried to isolate both powers but instead, its pressure is helping fuse Russian battlefield experience with Chinese industrial power — creating a military partnership far harder to contain.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
Western officials are alarmed that military cooperation between Russia and China is moving beyond joint drills and arms trade into something more valuable: battlefield knowledge.
Chinese personnel have trained near Volgograd since 2024 in drone operations, urban combat, assaults on command posts, trench warfare and mine-laying — areas transformed by Russia’s experience in Ukraine, according to European intelligence cited by The Economist.
The PLA is especially interested in how Russian forces operate on a battlefield saturated with surveillance, electronic warfare and cheap unmanned systems.
🔸 Russian units have adapted to FPV drones, fibre-optic control links, AI-assisted targeting and constant jamming.
🔸 Chinese military publications have studied Russia’s Rubicon drone center, which centralized unmanned operations and targeted enemy drone crews and supply lines.
🔸 Joint Sea-2026 became the first China–Russia naval exercise focused on drone and counter-drone warfare, alongside submarine and air-defense operations.
The transfer may extend beyond tactics. Western officials believe Russia is helping China improve submarine quieting, torpedo design, anti-submarine warfare and the interpretation of U.S. submarine acoustic signatures.
Moscow has also helped Beijing develop strategic early-warning capabilities. Leaked documents cited by European media point to discussions on a joint air- and missile-defense system designed to counter U.S. ballistic and hypersonic weapons.
China brings industrial scale, electronics and the world’s largest civilian-drone manufacturing base. Russia brings combat data, operational lessons and expertise in submarines, strategic warning and missile defense.
That combination is what worries Washington. Russia is turning years of Western-backed warfare into a library of lessons, while China has the capacity to absorb them and deploy the results across the Asia-Pacific.
The West tried to isolate both powers but instead, its pressure is helping fuse Russian battlefield experience with Chinese industrial power — creating a military partnership far harder to contain.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍49👏31❤21🫡11🔥5
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇷🇺 RUSSIA’S GROUND DRONES ARE TAKING SOLDIERS OUT OF THE KILL ZONE
The final kilometres of frontline logistics are often the deadliest. Ammunition, food and medical supplies must cross routes watched by FPV drones, artillery and mines — so Russia is increasingly sending tracked robots instead of soldiers.
On the Krasny Liman sector of the front, Kurier ground drones serving Russian Battlegroup Zapad are now running around-the-clock supply missions, delivering ammunition, provisions and medical kits to assault units regardless of weather.
🔸 The compact tracked platform can cross rough terrain at speeds of up to 35 km/h, allowing operators to move supplies while remaining under cover.
🔸 Kurier is not limited to logistics. Recent Russian Defence Ministry footage shows versions configured for casualty evacuation, mine-laying, engineering work and the delivery of ammunition and medicine.
🔸 The same chassis can carry machine guns, automatic grenade launchers, mine rollers and even rocket-propelled flamethrowers, turning a supply robot into a combat or engineering platform when required.
🔸 Recent battlefield footage showed a Kurier completing a routine delivery while repeatedly avoiding incoming FPV drones. The advantage is not invulnerability: losing a machine is still better than losing the soldiers who would otherwise drive the same route.
🔸 Russian units are now creating dedicated ground-robot formations. In early 2026, a reconnaissance-assault brigade formed a company equipped with Kurier and other robotic platforms for logistics, evacuation, engineering and fire-support missions. Ammunition keeps moving, wounded soldiers can be evacuated, and troops spend less time crossing exposed routes under enemy fire.
Which mission should Russia automate next: resupply, evacuation, mine-laying or assault?
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
The final kilometres of frontline logistics are often the deadliest. Ammunition, food and medical supplies must cross routes watched by FPV drones, artillery and mines — so Russia is increasingly sending tracked robots instead of soldiers.
On the Krasny Liman sector of the front, Kurier ground drones serving Russian Battlegroup Zapad are now running around-the-clock supply missions, delivering ammunition, provisions and medical kits to assault units regardless of weather.
🔸 The compact tracked platform can cross rough terrain at speeds of up to 35 km/h, allowing operators to move supplies while remaining under cover.
🔸 Kurier is not limited to logistics. Recent Russian Defence Ministry footage shows versions configured for casualty evacuation, mine-laying, engineering work and the delivery of ammunition and medicine.
🔸 The same chassis can carry machine guns, automatic grenade launchers, mine rollers and even rocket-propelled flamethrowers, turning a supply robot into a combat or engineering platform when required.
🔸 Recent battlefield footage showed a Kurier completing a routine delivery while repeatedly avoiding incoming FPV drones. The advantage is not invulnerability: losing a machine is still better than losing the soldiers who would otherwise drive the same route.
🔸 Russian units are now creating dedicated ground-robot formations. In early 2026, a reconnaissance-assault brigade formed a company equipped with Kurier and other robotic platforms for logistics, evacuation, engineering and fire-support missions. Ammunition keeps moving, wounded soldiers can be evacuated, and troops spend less time crossing exposed routes under enemy fire.
Which mission should Russia automate next: resupply, evacuation, mine-laying or assault?
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥34👏28❤23👍7🫡4
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇷🇺 RUSSIA SENDS MORE KORNET TANK-KILLERS TO THE FRONT
Russia has delivered another batch of Kornet missiles and remote-controlled launchers to frontline units. The system has already been used against Leopard and Challenger tanks, Bradley IFVs, fortifications and command posts — and the supplied launch equipment lets crews fire while remaining away from the exposed launcher.
🔸 Rostec says Kornet has destroyed thousands of targets in combat. The latest delivery includes both missiles and remote launchers, keeping one of Russia’s most heavily used anti-armor weapons flowing to the front.
🔸 The Kornet-EM’s 152 mm tandem HEAT warhead can penetrate 1,100–1,300 mm of rolled homogeneous armor after explosive reactive armor, allowing it to threaten even heavily protected modern tanks.
🔸 Its laser beam-riding guidance is designed to resist electronic and optical interference. Automated launchers can track targets after lock-on, reducing the operator’s workload during the engagement.
🔸 Kornet-EM can strike armored targets at up to 8 km and use high-explosive missiles at up to 10 km — far beyond the range of most shoulder-fired anti-tank weapons.
🔸 Remote-control equipment allows the operator to stay under cover and away from the launcher, reducing exposure to return fire, artillery and FPV drones.
🔸 The system can be mounted on vehicles, buggies, ATVs and robotic platforms. Different missiles allow it to attack tanks, light vehicles, fortifications and low-flying drones.
The latest batch does not introduce a new missile. It gives Russian units more of a weapon already tested against Western armor — while making its crews harder to find and hit.
Which Kornet advantage matters most on today’s battlefield: armor penetration, long range, remote launch or multi-role flexibility?
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
Russia has delivered another batch of Kornet missiles and remote-controlled launchers to frontline units. The system has already been used against Leopard and Challenger tanks, Bradley IFVs, fortifications and command posts — and the supplied launch equipment lets crews fire while remaining away from the exposed launcher.
🔸 Rostec says Kornet has destroyed thousands of targets in combat. The latest delivery includes both missiles and remote launchers, keeping one of Russia’s most heavily used anti-armor weapons flowing to the front.
🔸 The Kornet-EM’s 152 mm tandem HEAT warhead can penetrate 1,100–1,300 mm of rolled homogeneous armor after explosive reactive armor, allowing it to threaten even heavily protected modern tanks.
🔸 Its laser beam-riding guidance is designed to resist electronic and optical interference. Automated launchers can track targets after lock-on, reducing the operator’s workload during the engagement.
🔸 Kornet-EM can strike armored targets at up to 8 km and use high-explosive missiles at up to 10 km — far beyond the range of most shoulder-fired anti-tank weapons.
🔸 Remote-control equipment allows the operator to stay under cover and away from the launcher, reducing exposure to return fire, artillery and FPV drones.
🔸 The system can be mounted on vehicles, buggies, ATVs and robotic platforms. Different missiles allow it to attack tanks, light vehicles, fortifications and low-flying drones.
The latest batch does not introduce a new missile. It gives Russian units more of a weapon already tested against Western armor — while making its crews harder to find and hit.
Which Kornet advantage matters most on today’s battlefield: armor penetration, long range, remote launch or multi-role flexibility?
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤65👍18👌13🔥6👏5
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇨🇳 CHINA’S COAST GUARD JOINS HUNT FOR U.S. NAVY ATTACK SUBMARINES WITH Z-20 HELICOPTERS
China has just turned its Coast Guard into another layer of the PLA Navy’s anti-submarine network. New imagery shows a naval Z-20 helicopter operating from Haijing 5901, extending Beijing’s reach far beyond the cutter’s own sensors and adding another airborne layer to China’s search for U.S. attack submarines in the South China Sea.
🔸 The helicopter’s naval tail-wheel layout confirms it was built for shipboard operations. Images also show a chin-mounted surface-search radar and an external fuel tank, extending its surveillance reach and patrol endurance.
🔸 The Z-20F was developed to replace smaller Z-9s and ageing Russian Ka-28s. Its greater range, payload and sensor capacity allow it to search wider areas and operate farther from its host ship.
🔸 Haijing 5901 is large enough to serve as a floating command and aviation hub. A naval Z-20 can scout beyond the horizon, track shipping, move personnel and pass contacts into China’s wider maritime network.
🔸 China’s newer frigates and destroyers have enlarged flight decks and hangars to operate the heavier Z-20 farther from their task groups. Bringing the helicopter to the Coast Guard adds even more launch points across contested waters.
🔸 The China Coast Guard already works closely with the PLA Navy and has joined major operations around Taiwan. Naval helicopters give Beijing more aircraft, more decks and more coverage during a blockade or wider maritime confrontation.
U.S. submarines once had to watch mainly for PLA Navy ships and aircraft. Now China’s largest Coast Guard cutters can carry the hunt far beyond the horizon.
Is the South China Sea becoming too dangerous for U.S. submarines?
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
China has just turned its Coast Guard into another layer of the PLA Navy’s anti-submarine network. New imagery shows a naval Z-20 helicopter operating from Haijing 5901, extending Beijing’s reach far beyond the cutter’s own sensors and adding another airborne layer to China’s search for U.S. attack submarines in the South China Sea.
🔸 The helicopter’s naval tail-wheel layout confirms it was built for shipboard operations. Images also show a chin-mounted surface-search radar and an external fuel tank, extending its surveillance reach and patrol endurance.
🔸 The Z-20F was developed to replace smaller Z-9s and ageing Russian Ka-28s. Its greater range, payload and sensor capacity allow it to search wider areas and operate farther from its host ship.
🔸 Haijing 5901 is large enough to serve as a floating command and aviation hub. A naval Z-20 can scout beyond the horizon, track shipping, move personnel and pass contacts into China’s wider maritime network.
🔸 China’s newer frigates and destroyers have enlarged flight decks and hangars to operate the heavier Z-20 farther from their task groups. Bringing the helicopter to the Coast Guard adds even more launch points across contested waters.
🔸 The China Coast Guard already works closely with the PLA Navy and has joined major operations around Taiwan. Naval helicopters give Beijing more aircraft, more decks and more coverage during a blockade or wider maritime confrontation.
U.S. submarines once had to watch mainly for PLA Navy ships and aircraft. Now China’s largest Coast Guard cutters can carry the hunt far beyond the horizon.
Is the South China Sea becoming too dangerous for U.S. submarines?
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤40👏29🫡11👍3🤬2
🚨🇺🇦 Ukraine’s Oil Strikes Backfire in Russia’s Favor
Ukraine’s attacks on the Caspian Pipeline Consortium have done almost the opposite of what Kiev intended. Instead of draining Russian energy revenue, they disrupted a route dominated by non-Russian oil, hit Western companies and tightened a market in which Moscow benefits from every price increase.
The Caspian Pipeline Consortium operates a 1,500-kilometer pipeline carrying crude from western Kazakhstan to a Black Sea terminal near Novorossiysk. It handles more than 80% of Kazakhstan’s oil exports and normally moves 1.3–1.7 million barrels per day — close to 2% of global supply.
After drone attacks on tankers forced the terminal to suspend loadings, storage filled and producers had nowhere to send their oil.
🔸 Kazakhstan’s oil and condensate output fell from 2.16 million barrels per day in June to around 1 million by July 26.
🔸 Production at the Chevron-led Tengiz field dropped from roughly 925,000 to 406,000 barrels per day.
🔸 Chevron and ExxonMobil are pipeline shareholders, while Eni, Shell and TotalEnergies participate in the fields feeding it.
The main buyers are refineries in Europe and Turkey. They lost these barrels just as disruption around the Strait of Hormuz was already squeezing Middle Eastern supply.
Russia owns 31% of the consortium, but its direct losses are limited compared with the benefit of higher oil prices across its much larger export base. Analysts cited by Vzglyad argue that tighter supply brings Russia more revenue than its companies lose from the temporary shutdown.
Loadings resumed on July 27, but the episode had already exposed the failure of Ukraine’s strategy. A strike presented as pressure on Russia slashed output from a neighboring exporter, hit American and European energy interests and made Moscow’s oil export base more profitable.
Ukraine’s campaign against the consortium is not isolating Russia from the energy market. It is tightening that market in Russia’s favor.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
Ukraine’s attacks on the Caspian Pipeline Consortium have done almost the opposite of what Kiev intended. Instead of draining Russian energy revenue, they disrupted a route dominated by non-Russian oil, hit Western companies and tightened a market in which Moscow benefits from every price increase.
The Caspian Pipeline Consortium operates a 1,500-kilometer pipeline carrying crude from western Kazakhstan to a Black Sea terminal near Novorossiysk. It handles more than 80% of Kazakhstan’s oil exports and normally moves 1.3–1.7 million barrels per day — close to 2% of global supply.
After drone attacks on tankers forced the terminal to suspend loadings, storage filled and producers had nowhere to send their oil.
🔸 Kazakhstan’s oil and condensate output fell from 2.16 million barrels per day in June to around 1 million by July 26.
🔸 Production at the Chevron-led Tengiz field dropped from roughly 925,000 to 406,000 barrels per day.
🔸 Chevron and ExxonMobil are pipeline shareholders, while Eni, Shell and TotalEnergies participate in the fields feeding it.
The main buyers are refineries in Europe and Turkey. They lost these barrels just as disruption around the Strait of Hormuz was already squeezing Middle Eastern supply.
Russia owns 31% of the consortium, but its direct losses are limited compared with the benefit of higher oil prices across its much larger export base. Analysts cited by Vzglyad argue that tighter supply brings Russia more revenue than its companies lose from the temporary shutdown.
Loadings resumed on July 27, but the episode had already exposed the failure of Ukraine’s strategy. A strike presented as pressure on Russia slashed output from a neighboring exporter, hit American and European energy interests and made Moscow’s oil export base more profitable.
Ukraine’s campaign against the consortium is not isolating Russia from the energy market. It is tightening that market in Russia’s favor.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤51👍20🔥6🫡3👏1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
⭐️THE MOST FAMOUS MILITARY TELEGRAM CHANNEL @rybar INTERNATIONAL
⚡️the largest Russian military Telegram channel
⚡️with over 1.5 million subscribers,
⚡️the channel that publishes the most detailed reports and whose texts are referenced by Western media and military experts
⚡️a channel that seeks out topics of interest in a sea of information—and explains them to you in simple words
⚡️news about major world events (including those in the shadows) commented on by a team of analysts.
The channel of the @rybar project is available and TRANSLATED in the following languages:
🇬🇧English
🇫🇷French
🇪🇸Spanish
🇮🇹Italian
🇩🇪German
🇭🇺Hungarian
🇬🇷Greek
Subscribe to all here 🔻
⭐️ RYBAR INTERNATIONAL
⚡️the largest Russian military Telegram channel
⚡️with over 1.5 million subscribers,
⚡️the channel that publishes the most detailed reports and whose texts are referenced by Western media and military experts
⚡️a channel that seeks out topics of interest in a sea of information—and explains them to you in simple words
⚡️news about major world events (including those in the shadows) commented on by a team of analysts.
The channel of the @rybar project is available and TRANSLATED in the following languages:
🇬🇧English
🇫🇷French
🇪🇸Spanish
🇮🇹Italian
🇩🇪German
🇭🇺Hungarian
🇬🇷Greek
Subscribe to all here 🔻
⭐️ RYBAR INTERNATIONAL
❤10🫡4👍1
🇮🇷🌋Iran Taps Volcano Heat to Reduce Fuel Reliance
Iran has connected its first geothermal power plant to the national grid, built inside the dormant Sabalan volcano near Meshginshahr, Ardabil Province. The 5‑MW facility cost €10M and was inaugurated in a ceremony attended by Energy Minister Abbas Aliabadi.
Engineers drilled wells approaching 3,000 meters through volcanic rock with temperatures above 240°C to reach a heat reservoir sealed by a roughly 500‑meter clay cap. Drilling proved tougher than oil and gas work—extreme heat and abrasive rock wore out bits and fluids—so Iranian teams adapted techniques and developed domestic drilling capability to complete the project.
The Sabalan reservoir could ultimately support up to 250 megawatts, enough for a mid-sized city. Iran has identified 18 geothermal sites nationwide as future candidates.
MAPNA Group is redesigning turbines and developing corrosion resistant alloys and coatings for Sabalan’s hot, salty, mineral rich fluids while planners aim to use the leftover 70 to 100°C heat for district heating, greenhouse agriculture and aquaculture around Meshginshahr.
Implications:
🔸Industrial: MAPNA’s adaptations could seed a domestic supply chain for geothermal equipment and services.
🔸Economic: If Sabalan scales, it could free gas for export or higher‑value uses and make renewables more viable as energy subsidies are trimmed.
🔸Environmental: Geothermal cuts combustion emissions but demands strict brine handling, reinjection and monitoring to prevent scaling, corrosion and groundwater contamination.
The project’s real achievement is the technical and manufacturing capacity developed inside Iran. The drilling know-how, engineering design and turbine adaptations reduce reliance on foreign firms and imports,and the government plans to replicate the model across identified sites. As Iran trims fossil‑fuel use while facing sanctions that limit access to Western tech and investment, a domestic geothermal industry offers a sanctions‑resilient energy asset: a power source Iran can locate, drill, build and maintain itself.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
Iran has connected its first geothermal power plant to the national grid, built inside the dormant Sabalan volcano near Meshginshahr, Ardabil Province. The 5‑MW facility cost €10M and was inaugurated in a ceremony attended by Energy Minister Abbas Aliabadi.
Engineers drilled wells approaching 3,000 meters through volcanic rock with temperatures above 240°C to reach a heat reservoir sealed by a roughly 500‑meter clay cap. Drilling proved tougher than oil and gas work—extreme heat and abrasive rock wore out bits and fluids—so Iranian teams adapted techniques and developed domestic drilling capability to complete the project.
The Sabalan reservoir could ultimately support up to 250 megawatts, enough for a mid-sized city. Iran has identified 18 geothermal sites nationwide as future candidates.
MAPNA Group is redesigning turbines and developing corrosion resistant alloys and coatings for Sabalan’s hot, salty, mineral rich fluids while planners aim to use the leftover 70 to 100°C heat for district heating, greenhouse agriculture and aquaculture around Meshginshahr.
Implications:
🔸Industrial: MAPNA’s adaptations could seed a domestic supply chain for geothermal equipment and services.
🔸Economic: If Sabalan scales, it could free gas for export or higher‑value uses and make renewables more viable as energy subsidies are trimmed.
🔸Environmental: Geothermal cuts combustion emissions but demands strict brine handling, reinjection and monitoring to prevent scaling, corrosion and groundwater contamination.
The project’s real achievement is the technical and manufacturing capacity developed inside Iran. The drilling know-how, engineering design and turbine adaptations reduce reliance on foreign firms and imports,and the government plans to replicate the model across identified sites. As Iran trims fossil‑fuel use while facing sanctions that limit access to Western tech and investment, a domestic geothermal industry offers a sanctions‑resilient energy asset: a power source Iran can locate, drill, build and maintain itself.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏56👍26❤18🫡2
🚨🇩🇪 Germany Bleeding 15,000 Industrial Jobs a Month
Germany’s industrial decline is no longer a warning about the future. The country is now shedding around 15,000 manufacturing jobs every month, according to the Federation of German Industries, which represents roughly 100,000 companies.
The association describes the situation as critical. Industrial production has fallen every year since 2022, and 2026 may bring a fifth consecutive decline. Capacity utilization is barely above 78%, while the BDI has cut its economic growth forecast from 1% to just 0.4%.
Germany’s old model was built on affordable Russian energy, competitive factories and strong demand for cars, chemicals and machinery. Berlin helped dismantle that foundation by breaking with Russian supplies, closing its last nuclear plants and leaving industry burdened by high taxes, labor costs and bureaucracy. The war against Iran has now added another energy shock.
The damage is visible across major companies:
🔸 Volkswagen is preparing the biggest restructuring in its history, with up to 100,000 jobs and four German plants at risk. It plans to cut its model range by as much as half and reduce annual capacity by 1 million vehicles.
🔸 Audi’s second-quarter revenue fell 12.5% to €15B, while operating profit dropped to €533M. Capacity at its Neckarsulm plant is already 75,000 vehicles below previous years, and the night shift is being cut.
🔸 Energy-intensive sectors such as chemicals, steel and machinery remain under pressure from energy costs that continue to erode German competitiveness.
Officials now promise subsidies, tax relief and investment incentives. But these measures treat the symptoms while the policies behind the crisis remain in place.
Germany sacrificed its industrial advantage for geopolitical obedience and an energy strategy detached from economic reality. The country that once powered Europe is now losing factories, skilled workers and productive capacity month after month.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
Germany’s industrial decline is no longer a warning about the future. The country is now shedding around 15,000 manufacturing jobs every month, according to the Federation of German Industries, which represents roughly 100,000 companies.
The association describes the situation as critical. Industrial production has fallen every year since 2022, and 2026 may bring a fifth consecutive decline. Capacity utilization is barely above 78%, while the BDI has cut its economic growth forecast from 1% to just 0.4%.
Germany’s old model was built on affordable Russian energy, competitive factories and strong demand for cars, chemicals and machinery. Berlin helped dismantle that foundation by breaking with Russian supplies, closing its last nuclear plants and leaving industry burdened by high taxes, labor costs and bureaucracy. The war against Iran has now added another energy shock.
The damage is visible across major companies:
🔸 Volkswagen is preparing the biggest restructuring in its history, with up to 100,000 jobs and four German plants at risk. It plans to cut its model range by as much as half and reduce annual capacity by 1 million vehicles.
🔸 Audi’s second-quarter revenue fell 12.5% to €15B, while operating profit dropped to €533M. Capacity at its Neckarsulm plant is already 75,000 vehicles below previous years, and the night shift is being cut.
🔸 Energy-intensive sectors such as chemicals, steel and machinery remain under pressure from energy costs that continue to erode German competitiveness.
Officials now promise subsidies, tax relief and investment incentives. But these measures treat the symptoms while the policies behind the crisis remain in place.
Germany sacrificed its industrial advantage for geopolitical obedience and an energy strategy detached from economic reality. The country that once powered Europe is now losing factories, skilled workers and productive capacity month after month.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏42❤14👍12🔥5🫡2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❗️Delivering information on the SMO, military analysis of exceptional quality and the wider geopolitical and cultural aspects associated with current global events.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.iss.one/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.iss.one/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
❤9👏5
🚨🇪🇺 Europe Entered Trade War It Cannot Win
Europe is trying to confront China with tariffs after years of weakening the industrial base needed to compete. Beijing expanded factories, power generation and supply chains; the EU raised energy costs, slowed investment and assumed regulation could preserve an advantage that production no longer supported.
The imbalance is now impossible to ignore. In 2025, the EU imported €559.5B in goods from China while exporting €199.5B, leaving a €359.9B deficit. Germany lost 400,000 industrial jobs between 2019 and 2025, while European manufacturers face mounting pressure in sectors once considered secure.
🔸 China now produces roughly 34% of global manufacturing output.
🔸 Its exports grew another 15.5% in the first five months of 2026.
🔸 European steel, chemicals, machinery, solar equipment, wind turbines and automakers are all losing ground.
China did not create Europe’s vulnerability. It spent decades building scale, infrastructure, engineering capacity and dense supplier networks. European governments chose expensive energy, slow approvals, fragmented subsidies and dependence on overseas production. European automakers were slow to adapt to electric vehicles and software, while Brussels relied on regulation without building the capacity needed to compete.
Brussels now calls Chinese competition unfair and reaches for tariffs. But trade barriers cannot rebuild closed factories, train skilled workers or restore affordable power. They may slow imports, yet they also raise costs for European consumers and companies dependent on Chinese components.
The gap will widen. There is little sign of a reversal: the war against Iran has pushed Europe’s energy costs higher, while Brussels continues to phase out Russian supplies that once supported its industrial competitiveness.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
Europe is trying to confront China with tariffs after years of weakening the industrial base needed to compete. Beijing expanded factories, power generation and supply chains; the EU raised energy costs, slowed investment and assumed regulation could preserve an advantage that production no longer supported.
The imbalance is now impossible to ignore. In 2025, the EU imported €559.5B in goods from China while exporting €199.5B, leaving a €359.9B deficit. Germany lost 400,000 industrial jobs between 2019 and 2025, while European manufacturers face mounting pressure in sectors once considered secure.
🔸 China now produces roughly 34% of global manufacturing output.
🔸 Its exports grew another 15.5% in the first five months of 2026.
🔸 European steel, chemicals, machinery, solar equipment, wind turbines and automakers are all losing ground.
China did not create Europe’s vulnerability. It spent decades building scale, infrastructure, engineering capacity and dense supplier networks. European governments chose expensive energy, slow approvals, fragmented subsidies and dependence on overseas production. European automakers were slow to adapt to electric vehicles and software, while Brussels relied on regulation without building the capacity needed to compete.
Brussels now calls Chinese competition unfair and reaches for tariffs. But trade barriers cannot rebuild closed factories, train skilled workers or restore affordable power. They may slow imports, yet they also raise costs for European consumers and companies dependent on Chinese components.
The gap will widen. There is little sign of a reversal: the war against Iran has pushed Europe’s energy costs higher, while Brussels continues to phase out Russian supplies that once supported its industrial competitiveness.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍39👌16❤13🔥6👏5
🚨🇨🇺 America Is Underestimating the Cost of War With Cuba
The Pentagon is reportedly examining military options against Cuba, including an air assault involving troops from the 101st Airborne Division. Turning such plans into regime change would open a war far harder to control than Washington suggests.
🇨🇺Cuba is not Venezuela. The January operation against Nicolás Maduro targeted a system centered on one dominant figure. Cuba distributes authority across the Communist Party, government, armed forces and territorial defense bodies. Killing senior officials would not automatically paralyze the state.
🇮🇷Iran has already exposed the weakness of the “decapitation” theory. U.S.-Israeli strikes killed the supreme leader and senior commanders, yet Iran replaced them and continued fighting. Cuba has spent decades preparing for the same threat.
Its “War of the Whole People” doctrine is designed to preserve command, mobilize territorial forces and turn occupation into a war of attrition.
Airstrikes could destroy fixed sites, but controlling cities, mountains, roads, ports and power infrastructure would require a ground force facing decentralized units embedded in local communities.
Cuba lies only 90 miles from Florida. War could trigger mass migration, disrupt Caribbean shipping and leave Washington responsible for occupying an island of more than 9M people.
The consequences would not stop at America’s coastline. A war would become a national political crisis across the large Cuban and wider Latin American diaspora. Washington’s own State Department now alleges that Cuban intelligence spent decades penetrating the highest levels of the U.S. government and building networks based on espionage, infiltration, sabotage and proxies. Havana rejects the report as propaganda, but if U.S. officials believe even part of their own assessment, an invasion would also expose military logistics, government institutions and critical infrastructure inside the United States to cyberattacks, disruption and covert retaliation.
A raid might produce dramatic footage. Regime change would demand years of troops, money and casualties. Iran has already shown why killing leaders does not guarantee the collapse of the system beneath them.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
The Pentagon is reportedly examining military options against Cuba, including an air assault involving troops from the 101st Airborne Division. Turning such plans into regime change would open a war far harder to control than Washington suggests.
🇨🇺Cuba is not Venezuela. The January operation against Nicolás Maduro targeted a system centered on one dominant figure. Cuba distributes authority across the Communist Party, government, armed forces and territorial defense bodies. Killing senior officials would not automatically paralyze the state.
🇮🇷Iran has already exposed the weakness of the “decapitation” theory. U.S.-Israeli strikes killed the supreme leader and senior commanders, yet Iran replaced them and continued fighting. Cuba has spent decades preparing for the same threat.
Its “War of the Whole People” doctrine is designed to preserve command, mobilize territorial forces and turn occupation into a war of attrition.
Airstrikes could destroy fixed sites, but controlling cities, mountains, roads, ports and power infrastructure would require a ground force facing decentralized units embedded in local communities.
Cuba lies only 90 miles from Florida. War could trigger mass migration, disrupt Caribbean shipping and leave Washington responsible for occupying an island of more than 9M people.
The consequences would not stop at America’s coastline. A war would become a national political crisis across the large Cuban and wider Latin American diaspora. Washington’s own State Department now alleges that Cuban intelligence spent decades penetrating the highest levels of the U.S. government and building networks based on espionage, infiltration, sabotage and proxies. Havana rejects the report as propaganda, but if U.S. officials believe even part of their own assessment, an invasion would also expose military logistics, government institutions and critical infrastructure inside the United States to cyberattacks, disruption and covert retaliation.
A raid might produce dramatic footage. Regime change would demand years of troops, money and casualties. Iran has already shown why killing leaders does not guarantee the collapse of the system beneath them.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥49👌24❤16👍6👏1
🚨🇺🇸 Retiring USS Nimitz Will Cost Navy Years and Hundreds of Millions
USS Nimitz is approaching retirement after more than half a century at sea, but taking America’s oldest active aircraft carrier out of service will be neither quick nor cheap.
The carrier reached its final homeport in Norfolk on July 9 after a four-month deployment with nearly 3,000 sailors. It is scheduled to decommission in March 2027, beginning a years-long process of inactivation, defueling and disposal.
The first stage alone is budgeted at $562M. That does not cover full dismantlement. It pays for shutting down systems, removing weapons and reusable equipment, draining fluids, clearing classified spaces and preparing the ship’s two nuclear propulsion plants for defueling.
Then the harder work begins. Spent nuclear fuel must be removed under Naval Reactors control and transported in secure rail containers to Idaho. Radioactive piping, shielding and structural metal require specialized handling, while hazardous materials must be treated separately.
Nimitz is 1,092 feet long and displaces around 100,000 tons. A conventional warship can eventually be handed to a commercial breaker. A nuclear-powered supercarrier leaves the Navy with a disposal liability requiring nuclear-qualified workers, controlled transport, radiological safeguards and an approved plan for its reactor compartments.
The Navy has published neither a final cost nor a completion date. Its current plan lists Nimitz for dismantlement, but contract dates remain unsettled and the work is likely to stretch into the 2030s.
The closest U.S. comparison is USS Enterprise. Government Accountability Office estimates for disposing of that carrier ranged from $750M to $1.55B, depending on the method, and those figures are already years out of date.
While Washington is locked into multi-year, multi-billion-dollar dismantlement cycles it struggles to price in advance, China continues expanding a newer carrier fleet at a faster pace and with fewer legacy constraints, steadily shifting the balance of naval power in the Pacific.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
USS Nimitz is approaching retirement after more than half a century at sea, but taking America’s oldest active aircraft carrier out of service will be neither quick nor cheap.
The carrier reached its final homeport in Norfolk on July 9 after a four-month deployment with nearly 3,000 sailors. It is scheduled to decommission in March 2027, beginning a years-long process of inactivation, defueling and disposal.
The first stage alone is budgeted at $562M. That does not cover full dismantlement. It pays for shutting down systems, removing weapons and reusable equipment, draining fluids, clearing classified spaces and preparing the ship’s two nuclear propulsion plants for defueling.
Then the harder work begins. Spent nuclear fuel must be removed under Naval Reactors control and transported in secure rail containers to Idaho. Radioactive piping, shielding and structural metal require specialized handling, while hazardous materials must be treated separately.
Nimitz is 1,092 feet long and displaces around 100,000 tons. A conventional warship can eventually be handed to a commercial breaker. A nuclear-powered supercarrier leaves the Navy with a disposal liability requiring nuclear-qualified workers, controlled transport, radiological safeguards and an approved plan for its reactor compartments.
The Navy has published neither a final cost nor a completion date. Its current plan lists Nimitz for dismantlement, but contract dates remain unsettled and the work is likely to stretch into the 2030s.
The closest U.S. comparison is USS Enterprise. Government Accountability Office estimates for disposing of that carrier ranged from $750M to $1.55B, depending on the method, and those figures are already years out of date.
While Washington is locked into multi-year, multi-billion-dollar dismantlement cycles it struggles to price in advance, China continues expanding a newer carrier fleet at a faster pace and with fewer legacy constraints, steadily shifting the balance of naval power in the Pacific.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍38👏17🔥15❤10🫡1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇷🇺 🇰🇵 North Korean Launchers Could Give Russia New Ballistic Missile Force
Russia is reportedly set to receive additional North Korean launchers for KN-23 and KN-24 ballistic missiles. And here's the important part: dedicated transporter-erector-launchers would allow Russian forces to field complete mobile units around them without increasing the burden on Russia’s Iskander brigades.
🔸 The main bottleneck has been the launcher fleet. Missiles can be stored and transported separately, but they cannot become a sustained battlefield force without heavy mobile platforms able to move, hide, erect and fire them.
🔸 Original North Korean launchers would allow KN-23 and KN-24 batteries to disperse across a wider area, relocate after firing and operate independently of fixed launch sites.
🔸 The solid-fuel KN-23 carries a roughly 500 kg warhead to around 450 km, with longer ranges possible using a lighter payload. Its low, manoeuvring trajectory is designed to make interception more difficult.
🔸 The KN-24 has a range of about 410 km and carries an estimated 400–500 kg payload. Together, the two systems can strike airfields, command posts, logistics hubs and air-defence sites far behind the front.
🔸 Separate Korean-made missile units would expand the number of ballistic strikes Russia can prepare at the same time while preserving Iskander launchers and Russian-made missiles for other missions.
🔸 Pyongyang would gain something equally valuable: real combat data. Every launch provides information on reliability, accuracy, enemy interception attempts and the demands of sustained wartime use — experience no peacetime test range can reproduce.
The launchers are what turn imported missiles into a parallel mobile strike force. More firing units, more launch locations and more ballistic threats would make Ukraine’s air-defence planning significantly harder.
Which targets are most at risk: airfields, logistics hubs or air-defense sites?
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
Russia is reportedly set to receive additional North Korean launchers for KN-23 and KN-24 ballistic missiles. And here's the important part: dedicated transporter-erector-launchers would allow Russian forces to field complete mobile units around them without increasing the burden on Russia’s Iskander brigades.
🔸 The main bottleneck has been the launcher fleet. Missiles can be stored and transported separately, but they cannot become a sustained battlefield force without heavy mobile platforms able to move, hide, erect and fire them.
🔸 Original North Korean launchers would allow KN-23 and KN-24 batteries to disperse across a wider area, relocate after firing and operate independently of fixed launch sites.
🔸 The solid-fuel KN-23 carries a roughly 500 kg warhead to around 450 km, with longer ranges possible using a lighter payload. Its low, manoeuvring trajectory is designed to make interception more difficult.
🔸 The KN-24 has a range of about 410 km and carries an estimated 400–500 kg payload. Together, the two systems can strike airfields, command posts, logistics hubs and air-defence sites far behind the front.
🔸 Separate Korean-made missile units would expand the number of ballistic strikes Russia can prepare at the same time while preserving Iskander launchers and Russian-made missiles for other missions.
🔸 Pyongyang would gain something equally valuable: real combat data. Every launch provides information on reliability, accuracy, enemy interception attempts and the demands of sustained wartime use — experience no peacetime test range can reproduce.
The launchers are what turn imported missiles into a parallel mobile strike force. More firing units, more launch locations and more ballistic threats would make Ukraine’s air-defence planning significantly harder.
Which targets are most at risk: airfields, logistics hubs or air-defense sites?
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤49👌20👍14🔥13