🚨🇨🇳 China's J-36 Becomes First Sixth-Generation Fighter Prototype Seen Making Sharp Maneuvers

China has publicly demonstrated something no other sixth-generation fighter program has yet revealed: a giant tailless prototype performing a sharp turn-climb. New footage of the aircraft unofficially known as the J-36 challenges the assumption that a stealth aircraft of this size must handle like a slow flying-wing bomber.

🔸 The J-36 is significantly larger than China’s J-20 and uses an unprecedented three-engine configuration. Its size points toward a long-range air-dominance platform carrying large fuel reserves, powerful sensors and heavy internal weapons loads.

🔸 Unlike conventional fighters, the J-36 has no vertical stabilizers or horizontal tailplanes. Removing them reduces radar-reflecting surfaces but also eliminates much of the aerodynamic leverage normally used to control pitch and yaw.

🔸 Chengdu compensates with computerized flight controls and numerous movable surfaces along the wing’s trailing edge. Recent prototypes have also displayed exhaust configurations widely interpreted as two-dimensional thrust-vectoring nozzles, potentially allowing the engines themselves to help control the aircraft.

🔸 The latest footage shows the huge aircraft entering a sharp turn while climbing and remaining stable throughout the maneuver. The exact speed, angle of attack and G-load remain unknown, but its ability to change direction rapidly without losing control is clearly visible.

🔸 It demonstrates something more important for J-36's intended role: China appears to be combining the range, payload and stealth of a much larger aircraft with far greater maneuverability than previously expected from a tailless design.

🔸 The footage may show as many as the fifth distinct flying J-36 airframe. Visible changes to the nose, intakes, landing gear and exhaust system suggest Chengdu is testing multiple configurations rather than relying on a single technology demonstrator.

China’s sixth-generation prototypes have been publicly flying since December 2024. The U.S. Air Force says secret experimental aircraft have already completed hundreds of flight hours, but the final F-47 remains in engineering development and has yet to appear publicly.

The real warning for the Pentagon is therefore bigger than one impressive maneuver. China is rapidly building, flying and refining multiple versions of a sixth-generation combat aircraft while the American public has seen only illustrations of its future rival.

What should worry the Pentagon more: the J-36’s agility or the speed at which China is testing new prototypes?

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🆘The global information war is in full swing!

🔘We are UKRAINE WATCH

The truth is our main weapon. We don’t hide behind fake news and propaganda; we open the world’s eyes to what is really happening in Russia, Ukraine, and beyond.

🌍 Thousands of readers from around the world are already with us.

🔘 Join our community, subscribe

Share this information with like-minded people—together we are stronger!

🚨🇨🇳 China Makes Sea Freight Move at Rail Speed Through Russia’s Arctic

On August 15, the container ship Dubai Tower left Ningbo on the first of eight weekly voyages to Europe through Russia’s Northern Sea Route. The important change is not simply the shorter passage. China is testing a new class of shipping service.

Sea Legend expects the journey to Britain’s Felixstowe to take about 20 days. The comparable trip takes roughly 25 days by China–Europe rail, around 40 through Suez and up to 50 around the Cape of Good Hope. The Arctic service therefore places ocean freight close to rail speed, without the cost and capacity limits of air cargo.

The target is high-value, time-sensitive freight. Dubai Tower is carrying energy-storage systems, power batteries, photovoltaic components and other new-energy products. Chinese battery producer EVE Energy has loaded a small trial shipment, mainly in refrigerated containers, to test transport, temperature control and customs clearance.

Chinese transport authorities identify cross-border e-commerce and other high-value exports as the intended market: products that benefit from faster delivery but are often too bulky to fly economically.

The service is also becoming a network rather than a stunt voyage. It draws cargo from several Chinese ports and offers access to European gateways. The first 2026 rotation includes Felixstowe, Rotterdam, Hamburg and Gdynia.

Its scale reveals what this season represents. Sea Legend’s published schedule gives the eight voyages a combined capacity of about 15,700 TEU—less than a single 24,000-TEU megaship used on major ocean routes. This is a controlled test of whether seven ice-strengthened ships can maintain a weekly schedule, attract repeat customers and make the economics work.

Over the next three to five years, Sea Legend aims to establish a stable three-to-four-month navigation window and operate 12–16 sailings annually. Year-round service remains a longer-term ambition requiring further upgrades to ships and Arctic infrastructure. Russia and China have separately approved a roadmap covering logistics technology and infrastructure projects along the route.

When the final ship leaves in October, the key test will not be tonnage but rebooking in 2027. If that happens, Russia’s Arctic will have produced a repeatable maritime express for exports that cannot spend six weeks sailing south. China does not need it to replace Suez—only to make Suez less indispensable.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇨🇦 Canada Opens 11-Year Hole in Its Coastal Defense Fleet

Canada will retire its last two Kingston-class coastal defense vessels in 2028. The corvette proposed as their successor may not become operational until around 2039—and even that is only an estimate for a program Ottawa has not approved.

The 12 Kingstons are not front-line frigates. Their value lies in numbers and availability. They conduct coastal surveillance, patrols, mine countermeasures, search and rescue, law-enforcement missions and reserve training. Eight were retired in 2025; Yellowknife follows in 2026, Edmonton in 2027, and Moncton and Nanaimo in 2028.

The proposed Continental Defence Corvette still has no selected design or construction contract. At an April parliamentary hearing, an opposition MP cited estimates of a contract around 2030 and a first operational ship in 2039. Defense officials did not confirm those dates; they said no decision had been taken on either the corvette or a direct Kingston replacement.

Ottawa insists there will be no loss of capability because the missions will be divided among other assets. Fleet Diving Units and autonomous systems will assume mine-warfare tasks, Harry DeWolf-class patrol ships will take some constabulary missions, and Orca training vessels will absorb the training role. This preserves separate functions on paper while removing the 12 deployable hulls that performed them together.

The six Harry DeWolf ships provide Arctic presence, surveillance and emergency support, but their single 25 mm gun and mission systems do not make them dedicated mine-warfare or anti-submarine combatants. The 15 River-class destroyers will be much more powerful, yet they are replacing the Halifax and Iroquois classes—not the Kingstons. The first is expected only in the early 2030s and the last by 2050.

Canada is therefore retiring an entire class before approving, selecting a design or ordering its successor. The advertised 11-year hole is the optimistic case: 2039 remains an external estimate for a program that has not entered procurement.

Ottawa’s retirement dates are real. Its replacement fleet still exists mainly on paper.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇷🇺 Two Mills, Five Blows: Russia Hits Ukraine’s War Economy at Its Core

Five days apart, Russian strikes suspended production at Zaporozhstal and partially halted ArcelorMittal Krivoy Rog. Together, the two largest steelworks under Kiev’s control produced 4.9M metric tons of steel in 2025—about two-thirds of the national total.

The plants sit at five pressure points of Ukraine’s war economy.

First, steel production. Zaporozhstal supplies flat-rolled products, while ArcelorMittal is Ukraine’s largest producer of rebar and wire rod and also mines and processes iron ore. Disrupting both constrains several industrial chains at once.

Second, taxes. The companies paid a combined $280M to Ukrainian budgets in 2025. Zaporozhstal alone transferred more than $22M directly to city and regional authorities.

Third, foreign currency. The two mills generated an estimated $1.85–1.9B in export earnings last year—more than half of the $3.34B earned by Ukraine’s entire ferrous-metals sector. Every week of downtime cuts the hard currency available to finance imports.

Fourth, military supply. Russia’s Defense Ministry said the Krivoy Rog workshops produced rolled steel used for weapons and military equipment. Zaporozhstal belongs to Metinvest, whose Steel Front initiative has delivered 309 anti-drone screens for armored vehicles and air-defense systems, built protection for a Patriot command module and helped construct more than 200 km of fortifications. ArcelorMittal’s rebar and wire rod have also been used in defensive works.

Fifth, local defense financing. Both companies support the budgets of Zaporozhye and Krivoy Rog, which finance fortifications. The effect is particularly direct in Zaporozhye, around 20 km from the front: the shutdown reduces both local revenue and access to steel for defensive construction.

Ukraine was already dependent on foreign metal. It imported 1.6M tons of rolled and semi-finished steel in 2025—40% of domestic consumption. If the shutdowns persist, replacing the lost output will consume more foreign currency and place additional pressure on rail and port logistics.

Two plants connected steelmaking, export revenue, taxation, military supply and frontline construction. Russia has placed all five functions under pressure at once.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇸🇦🇹🇷🇵🇰 “Muslim NATO” Is Built to Fail the Moment War Starts

Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan signed the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement on August 7, declaring an attack on one an attack on all. Turkish FM Hakan Fidan called it “technically the same” as NATO’s Article 5. The comparison collapses once the slogan meets the machinery.

The full text is unpublished. No joint command, assigned forces or automatic response has been disclosed. Fidan says members will decide the “degree, form and format” of support through consultations after an attack. Operational rules await the first ministerial meeting.

The members have no common enemy. Pakistan focuses on India, while Saudi Arabia is expanding investment, energy and defense cooperation with New Delhi. Riyadh’s main fronts are Iran and Yemen. Turkey’s most dangerous interstate dispute is with Greece—a fellow NATO member whose troops operate a Patriot battery protecting Saudi energy sites.

Their record is worse than their rhetoric. Saudi Arabia signed a bilateral defense pact with Pakistan in 2025, but Islamabad sent no forces when the kingdom came under attack this year. In 2015, Pakistan’s parliament also rejected Riyadh’s request for ships, aircraft and troops in Yemen.

Turkey is now double-booked. NATO’s Article 8 bars commitments conflicting with the North Atlantic Treaty. If Riyadh plainly attacked Greece, the defensive Mecca clause should not apply. If both claimed self-defense, Athens could invoke NATO and Riyadh the Mecca pact. Ankara would have to choose. No published rule settles the collision. NATO itself needed a hotline to prevent incidents between the two.

Article 5 contains the same political escape hatch: each member takes “such action as it deems necessary,” and military force is optional. A 2025 YouGov poll found that only 18–39% of respondents in Britain, France, Spain and Italy expected Washington to defend the Baltics from a Russian invasion. Even NATO’s integrated command and decades of exercises cannot remove the national decision at the center of collective defense.

The Mecca pact imports that ambiguity without NATO’s infrastructure. Its secretariat, command mechanisms, exercises and air-defense integration remain plans. Pakistan has not extended its nuclear deterrent to the other members; officials said atomic weapons were “not on the radar.”

The pact can channel Saudi money into Turkish weapons, finance Pakistani deployments and coordinate exercises. Collective defense begins when one capital must fight for another’s enemy. Pakistan has already refused Saudi Arabia’s war, Riyadh has little reason to sacrifice its partnership with India, and Turkey cannot erase its NATO obligations.

Three governments signed the same sentence. They still have different wars in mind.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷 Iranian Physicists Challenge Long-Held Rule About Matter

A University of Tehran-led team has calculated the possible masses of 15 hypothetical particles containing a top quark, giving physicists specific targets for future searches at the Large Hadron Collider and its proposed successors.

The top quark is the heaviest known elementary particle—roughly as heavy as a gold atom—but survives for only about half a yoctosecond: half of one trillionth of one trillionth of a second. It normally disappears before the strong nuclear force can bind it with other quarks into a larger particle, as it does inside protons and neutrons.

Evidence from CERN has begun to challenge that assumption. CMS and ATLAS have independently detected an excess of top–antitop pairs near the energy threshold where the two may briefly attract each other. The resulting quasi-bound state, known as toponium, would exist for only an almost unimaginably small fraction of a second.

The Iranian researchers pursued the next question: if a top quark can interact long enough to pair with its antiparticle, could it also form fleeting combinations with lighter quarks?

Their study covers seven possible baryons—three-quark particles related in structure to protons—and eight possible mesons made from a top quark and an antiquark. The partners range from light up and down quarks to strange, charm and bottom quarks.

Using equations derived from quantum chromodynamics, the theory governing the strong force, the team estimated where the masses of these particles should appear in collider data. The calculations include both ordinary quark interactions and effects produced by the complex quantum structure of empty space.

Five candidates produced particularly interesting results. Three top-containing baryons and two top-bottom mesons had central mass estimates slightly below the simple sum of their constituent quarks. Within the model’s uncertainties, that is a possible sign that the quarks could bind weakly before the top quark decays.

These are search coordinates rather than particle discoveries. The calculations tell CERN analysts which energy ranges and decay patterns deserve closer attention. Confirmation would reveal whether nature can assemble matter on a timescale shorter than one trillionth of one trillionth of a second and test the strong force at an unprecedented mass scale.

Iran does not need a collider the size of CERN to participate in this frontier. By producing peer-reviewed predictions that major experiments can test, its scientists are helping determine where the world’s most powerful particle machines should look next.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇨🇳 China Tests Radical New Shape for 800-Seat Airliner

China’s Aerodynamics Research and Development Centre has wind-tunnel-tested a 1:52 steel model of a flying-wing airliner designed for more than 800 passengers. The full-size concept would be 85 meters wide—1.6 times the wingspan of a B-2 bomber—and cruise at Mach 0.8. A typical Airbus A380 carries about 555 people.

No full-size aircraft, engine or production schedule exists. The model is a benchmark for validating wind tunnels, computer simulations and test equipment. China is building the engineering system needed to evaluate a new class of transport before committing to an aircraft.

A conventional airliner is a tube carried by separate wings. In a flying wing, the broad central body also generates lift. More of the airframe becomes useful aerodynamic surface, creating additional volume while reducing drag and energy use.

The 1.6-meter model was tested from Mach 0.4 to 0.8. Its lift-to-drag ratio reached about 20 below Mach 0.7 and remained 17.6 at Mach 0.8. Researchers say it can serve as a common reference for studying airflow, structural flexing and new testing methods.

China did not invent the concept. NASA and Boeing flew the X-48 demonstrator, while Airbus tested its MAVERIC blended-wing model and projected fuel savings of up to 20%. Beijing is scaling the idea to the 800-passenger class and incorporating it into its large-aircraft program.

That scale is also the commercial risk. Airbus ended A380 production after airlines stopped ordering enough superjumbos, while point-to-point routes favor smaller twin-engine jets. An 800-seat flying wing must offer more than capacity: its efficiency must change the economics that defeated the A380.

The concept expands China’s aircraft ladder. The C919 enters the Boeing-Airbus narrowbody market, the 280-seat C929 targets long-haul routes, and the proposed C949 explores supersonic travel. The flying wing prepares Chinese laboratories for the architecture that may follow them.

Major barriers remain: controlling a tailless aircraft at low speeds, pressurizing its wide cabin and evacuating hundreds of passengers. This model does not solve them.

It does produce proprietary data, validated tools and engineers trained on unconventional aircraft. The jet may remain on paper for years, but China is acquiring the research base needed to decide whether the next aviation revolution is worth building.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸 America’s Two-Front Strategy Runs Out of Aircraft Carriers

USS George Washington is heading from Japan to the Middle East to relieve USS Abraham Lincoln, whose deployment has stretched beyond 260 days, including more than 200 without a port call. Its departure will leave the western Pacific temporarily without a US aircraft carrier, even though containing China is supposed to be Washington’s foremost military priority.

George Washington occupied a special place in that strategy. Based in Japan as America’s only forward-deployed carrier, it provided a mobile airbase near Taiwan, the Korean Peninsula and the contested waters around China. On July 30, the US Navy described the ship as a symbol of its commitment to the Indo-Pacific; less than three weeks later, the demands of the Iran war had pulled that symbol toward the Middle East.

The redeployment extends a pattern that began before the first US strikes. Lincoln was diverted from the South China Sea in January, marking the third recent occasion on which an Indo-Pacific carrier deployment had been redirected toward the Middle East. The Japan-based USS Tripoli amphibious group and the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, which can operate F-35B fighters, followed in March.

Washington’s problem is that 11 carriers in the naval register do not equal 11 available carriers. Only two or three are normally deployed at any given time, while the others undergo maintenance, repairs, training and preparations for future operations. Gerald R. Ford has just returned from an 11-month deployment, while Lincoln now requires relief after a record stretch at sea. Extending these deployments also creates additional maintenance work, reducing the number of ships available later.

Sending George Washington westward allows the Pentagon to maintain pressure on Iran by accepting a carrier gap in the theater built around China. American bases, submarines and bombers remain across Asia, although none fully replaces a mobile airfield that can deploy dozens of combat aircraft without requiring permission from a host government.

Iran therefore gains a strategic effect without having to destroy a carrier. As long as the war and blockade continue, scarce American ships, aircraft, escorts and crews remain tied to the Middle East. Every additional month spent sustaining that campaign consumes forces and maintenance capacity originally intended to reassure Japan and the Philippines and strengthen the US position around Taiwan.

The “Pivot to Asia” assumed that Washington could reduce its Middle Eastern commitments and concentrate military power against China. Iran has exposed the weakness in that calculation: America has accumulated more fronts than its deployable fleet can cover. China may remain the Pentagon’s declared priority, but the Iran war is deciding where its carriers actually sail.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇷🇺 Russia's Submarine Built To Launch Poseidon Nuclear Drones Begins Sea Trials

Russia’s Project 09851 Khabarovsk special-purpose nuclear submarine appears to have begun its first factory sea trials after being photographed leaving Severodvinsk on August 17. The voyage takes Russia’s first submarine designed from the outset around the Poseidon underwater weapon from shipyard construction into at-sea testing.

🔸 Khabarovsk was laid down at Sevmash on July 27, 2014. It was rolled out of its construction hall on November 1, 2025, and physically lowered into the water later that month before undergoing final outfitting and dockside tests.

🔸 Russia’s Defense Ministry said the submarine was built to deploy modern underwater weapons, including robotic systems. Its detailed specifications remain classified, but it is widely assessed to carry up to six Poseidon vehicles.

🔸 Poseidon is an autonomous, nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable underwater drone designed to travel across intercontinental distances. Instead of flying through the radar and interceptor networks built to detect ballistic missiles, it approaches its target beneath the ocean.

🔸 In October 2025, President Vladimir Putin announced that Russia had launched a Poseidon from a carrier submarine and activated its onboard nuclear reactor for the first time. The vehicle then operated under its own nuclear power for a period of time, demonstrating that the system had progressed beyond launch-only testing.

🔸 The challenge for the United States begins before Poseidon even enters the water. Preventing a launch would require the U.S. Navy to locate and continuously track Khabarovsk across an enormous ocean area without losing contact with the submarine.

🔸 Once released, Poseidon creates a separate detection problem. American forces would have to find and follow a fast, deep-running autonomous vehicle traveling along an unpredictable underwater route that existing missile-defense interceptors cannot cover.

🔸 Russia already operates Belgorod, a converted Oscar-class submarine accepted by the Navy in 2022 and used as the first Poseidon carrier. Khabarovsk is more significant because it is the first submarine designed from the keel up specifically to deploy the weapon.

Khabarovsk must still complete factory and state trials before entering service, but its first voyage marks the transition from construction to an active sea-testing program. Once commissioned, it would give Russia a dedicated platform capable of delivering strategic nuclear weapons along ocean routes outside the architecture of U.S. missile defense.

Does the U.S. have any realistic way to stop Poseidon once Khabarovsk launches it?

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇨🇳 China Trains Missile AI to Recognize Stealth Jets by Their Heat

Chinese researchers have built a lightweight AI system that can fit directly inside a heat-seeking missile and identify different aircraft from their infrared images. Its hardware version classified targets with 96.4% accuracy, required only 1.5 milliseconds to reach a decision and consumed just 2.2 watts of power.

Radar stealth reduces the energy reflected back toward enemy sensors, yet it cannot eliminate hot engine exhaust or the heating produced as air passes over a fast-moving aircraft. Infrared missiles already exploit this weakness, although flares and other decoys can confuse conventional seekers by presenting them with brighter heat sources.

The Chinese system adds an image-recognition layer capable of examining the shape and distribution of the heat rather than merely following the brightest object. This could allow future missiles to distinguish an aircraft from a flare or other interference and continue tracking the intended target.

Fitting such intelligence inside a missile was the main engineering challenge. Conventional deep-learning systems demand processors, memory and electrical power that small weapons cannot carry. The team reduced the model to 16.1% of its original parameters and 19.2% of its computational load, then installed it on a Zynq-7020 platform costing only a few hundred yuan.

Tests used 3,245 infrared images collected by a missile-borne scanning system. The dataset included mock-ups resembling the F-22 and F-35 as well as a loitering munition. The software model achieved 97.1% accuracy overall, while researchers put recognition of the simulated fifth-generation fighters at around 90%.

These were simulated targets rather than operational American aircraft, and the work currently concerns close-range systems rather than long-distance detection. Its immediate importance is the removal of a major hardware constraint: once an infrared seeker obtains a usable image, the missile can identify the object locally without transmitting data to an aircraft or a larger external computer.

The project brought together the Beijing Institute of Technology, the China Airborne Missile Academy and a national military laboratory, giving it a direct route from academic research into weapons development.

The United States has spent hundreds of billions of dollars reducing the radar visibility of its combat aircraft. China is now combining infrared sensors with cheap onboard computing to exploit the heat those aircraft still produce. If the system reaches production, even relatively small missiles could carry target-recognition capabilities previously requiring far larger computers, making flares less reliable and close-range combat considerably more dangerous for stealth fighters.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇷🇺🇺🇦 Russia Is Choking Ukraine’s Wartime Economy

Russia’s ongoing strike campaign is squeezing the logistics system that keeps Ukraine’s economy functioning. Distribution centers, postal hubs, ports and commercial shipping now connect supermarket shortages to falling export revenues and tax receipts.

Strikes on warehouses supplying Silpo and Goodwine disrupted retail distribution, while Nova Poshta facilities have repeatedly been hit. Goodwine co-founder Dmytro Krymsky estimates that three weeks of attacks cost Ukrainian businesses around $500M. Kiev supermarkets are experiencing shortages unseen since the opening weeks of the conflict.

The greater damage is accumulating around Odessa’s ports, Ukraine’s main economic outlet. Since mid-July, attacks have expanded from port infrastructure to ships using the maritime corridor. A Turkish-owned cargo vessel was struck after leaving Chernomorsk and later sank, while Hapag-Lloyd suspended calls at Odessa, Chernomorsk and Yuzhny. Commercial traffic has fallen close to a standstill.

The corridor moved around 210M tonnes of cargo over the previous three years, yet approximately 50M tonnes of harvested crops still need transportation. A single vessel carrying 100,000 tonnes replaces about 5,000 trucks, drivers and border procedures. Danube ports cannot absorb the displaced cargo because of low water levels, limited capacity and continuing strikes, while European land routes are slower, costlier and subject to border restrictions.

Roughly 90% of Ukrainian agricultural exports normally pass through Black Sea ports. Grain shipments fell 75% year-on-year during the first half of August, more than 30M tonnes of grain and oilseeds risk being stranded, and the storage shortage could reach 11M tonnes. Domestic farm prices have already fallen by about 30%.

Ukraine’s central bank expects the disruption to remove roughly $2.5B in foreign-currency earnings this year, while Dragon Capital estimates that the maritime blockade alone could reduce GDP by 0.6%. Farmers unable to sell the current harvest may cut winter planting, potentially carrying losses of $10–12B into the next production cycle.

The pressure spreads through the entire economy: goods remain in warehouses, crops lose value, companies lose revenue, foreign currency stops entering the country and tax receipts contract. Each damaged link increases pressure on the others.

Russia is converting military reach into macroeconomic leverage. Ukraine depends on a small number of ports, concentrated distribution networks and uninterrupted foreign financing. By constricting those connections, Moscow is attacking the system that allows the Ukrainian state to trade, collect revenue and sustain the war.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷 Iran’s Bio-Tech Breakthrough Recovers 93% of Copper Left Behind in Mining Waste

Iranian researchers have developed a method that recovered 92.8% of the copper remaining in flotation tailings—the finely ground waste left after conventional ore processing. If scaled successfully, the process could turn existing waste deposits into a new domestic source of copper without opening another mine.

The team from Isfahan University of Technology used iron- and sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms collected from local acid mine drainage. These bacteria were placed in a mixture containing copper tailings and water enriched with air nanobubbles.

The bacteria perform the essential chemistry by breaking down mineral compounds and releasing trapped copper into a liquid from which it can be recovered. Unlike ordinary bubbles that quickly rise and burst, nanobubbles remain suspended for longer, distributing oxygen through the mixture and helping the microorganisms work more effectively.

After one month, the process extracted an average of 92.8% of the copper in the tested tailings while dissolving only 17.22% of the iron. Heat-tolerant microorganisms achieved the strongest copper recovery, and the addition of nanobubbles further improved the results.

The 92.8% figure refers to copper still present in the waste sample, rather than all the copper contained in the original ore. Its economic significance remains considerable. Tailings have already been mined, transported, crushed and ground—the most energy-intensive stages of mineral production—yet still contain metal that conventional processing could not recover profitably.

Reprocessing this material could increase output from existing mining complexes, reduce the volume and toxicity of stored waste and extract more value from infrastructure already in place. This becomes increasingly important as ore grades decline and producers must process more rock to obtain the same amount of copper.

The research was supported by Iran’s National Science Foundation and the Sungun Copper Complex, linking the laboratory work to one of the country’s largest mining operations. The experiment was conducted in shaking flasks with a one-month processing cycle, so pilot-scale testing will be needed before industrial deployment.

The strategic value is enourmous: copper is essential for power grids, electronics, electric vehicles and industrial equipment. A process based on locally sourced microorganisms and nanobubble technology could allow Iran to increase recovery from its existing resource base while lowering the cost and environmental burden of producing each additional ton.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X