Who Pays for Unions?
Tyler Cowen
If unions raise worker wages, who pays? We provide a comprehensive assessment of firm responses to increased unionization, using changes in the tax deductibility of union dues in Norway as a quasi-exogenous source of variation in firm-level union density. In the average private sector firm, higher union density raises labor costs and leads firms to contract employment and production, lowering profits without increasing the labor share. The incidence is shared: consumers bear part of the cost through higher prices, shareholders through lower profits, and the remainder is offset by productivity improvements. The total wage bill falls, with losses concentrated among less-attached “outsider” workers. Firm responses vary systematically by the degree of market competition. In manufacturing, where firms operate in less competitive product and labor markets, the response is reversed: the average firm expands employment and production, reduces labor markdowns, and does not experience profit declines. Instead, higher labor costs are largely passed on to consumers through higher prices, with the remainder offset by productivity gains. Workers benefit as both wages and employment rise. These patterns suggest that unions can offset employer monopsony power and that firm responses–and therefore who ultimately bears the cost-depend importantly on market structure. Overall, unionization in this setting primarily redistributes from consumers rather than shareholders and has effects that differ sharply across firms, including a reallocation toward larger and more productive firms. We rationalize these patterns using a partial-equilibrium model of union bargaining with product- and labor-market power.That is forthcoming in the QJE by Samuel Dodini, Anna Stansbury, and Alexander Willén.The post Who Pays for Unions? appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesThe Value of Behavioral PoliciesEstimating the Economic Value of Zoning ReformThe economics of H-1B immigration
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/QGOCXfz
Tyler Cowen
If unions raise worker wages, who pays? We provide a comprehensive assessment of firm responses to increased unionization, using changes in the tax deductibility of union dues in Norway as a quasi-exogenous source of variation in firm-level union density. In the average private sector firm, higher union density raises labor costs and leads firms to contract employment and production, lowering profits without increasing the labor share. The incidence is shared: consumers bear part of the cost through higher prices, shareholders through lower profits, and the remainder is offset by productivity improvements. The total wage bill falls, with losses concentrated among less-attached “outsider” workers. Firm responses vary systematically by the degree of market competition. In manufacturing, where firms operate in less competitive product and labor markets, the response is reversed: the average firm expands employment and production, reduces labor markdowns, and does not experience profit declines. Instead, higher labor costs are largely passed on to consumers through higher prices, with the remainder offset by productivity gains. Workers benefit as both wages and employment rise. These patterns suggest that unions can offset employer monopsony power and that firm responses–and therefore who ultimately bears the cost-depend importantly on market structure. Overall, unionization in this setting primarily redistributes from consumers rather than shareholders and has effects that differ sharply across firms, including a reallocation toward larger and more productive firms. We rationalize these patterns using a partial-equilibrium model of union bargaining with product- and labor-market power.That is forthcoming in the QJE by Samuel Dodini, Anna Stansbury, and Alexander Willén.The post Who Pays for Unions? appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesThe Value of Behavioral PoliciesEstimating the Economic Value of Zoning ReformThe economics of H-1B immigration
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/QGOCXfz
Will U.S. cities face a knock-on fiscal crisis from the feds?
Tyler Cowen
Federal money flows to cities in three flavors: direct transfers, indirect transfers, and what we call fiscal dark matter. Direct transfers are exactly what they sound like — money sent directly from the federal government to various localities. These include funds disbursed through programs like the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), which supports things like public infrastructure and neighborhood services.3 In 2022, direct transfers like the CDBG totaled $146.3 billion.4 That’s significant, but actually the smallest of the three categories.Less visible are the indirect transfers. These monies are initially awarded to state governments, which then allocate funds to municipal-level programs and services in accordance with state prerogatives. The cleanest example is probably K-12 education, which receives federal Title I dollars to pay for teachers and programs, but federal highway dollars work essentially the same way. All told, in 2022, the federal government handed down $1.1 trillion to state governments. That amounted to 36% of overall state revenue for that year and, depending on the individual state, ranged from roughly 22% to 50% of state revenue. How much of that ultimately flowed down to cities is hard to say, which is itself a problem: it’s difficult to even establish how exposed local governments are to a pullback in federal support of state budgets.The third category – our fiscal dark matter – is all the federal money spent into local communities that never shows up in a local budget. This includes housing subsidies like the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) and Section 8. It also includes food support programs like SNAP and even some direct funding for local food banks.Rightfully or not, when the flow of federal money in this category starts to dry up, the resulting problems will fall squarely on the mayor’s desk. After all, the median voter is never going to see increasing numbers of homeless encampments and think to blame the head of HUD.Here is the full piece by Jeff Fong.The post Will U.S. cities face a knock-on fiscal crisis from the feds? appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesWho Pays for Unions?Is this why China finds it so hard to inflate producer prices?The Value of Behavioral Policies
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/IQXoWCq
Tyler Cowen
Federal money flows to cities in three flavors: direct transfers, indirect transfers, and what we call fiscal dark matter. Direct transfers are exactly what they sound like — money sent directly from the federal government to various localities. These include funds disbursed through programs like the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), which supports things like public infrastructure and neighborhood services.3 In 2022, direct transfers like the CDBG totaled $146.3 billion.4 That’s significant, but actually the smallest of the three categories.Less visible are the indirect transfers. These monies are initially awarded to state governments, which then allocate funds to municipal-level programs and services in accordance with state prerogatives. The cleanest example is probably K-12 education, which receives federal Title I dollars to pay for teachers and programs, but federal highway dollars work essentially the same way. All told, in 2022, the federal government handed down $1.1 trillion to state governments. That amounted to 36% of overall state revenue for that year and, depending on the individual state, ranged from roughly 22% to 50% of state revenue. How much of that ultimately flowed down to cities is hard to say, which is itself a problem: it’s difficult to even establish how exposed local governments are to a pullback in federal support of state budgets.The third category – our fiscal dark matter – is all the federal money spent into local communities that never shows up in a local budget. This includes housing subsidies like the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) and Section 8. It also includes food support programs like SNAP and even some direct funding for local food banks.Rightfully or not, when the flow of federal money in this category starts to dry up, the resulting problems will fall squarely on the mayor’s desk. After all, the median voter is never going to see increasing numbers of homeless encampments and think to blame the head of HUD.Here is the full piece by Jeff Fong.The post Will U.S. cities face a knock-on fiscal crisis from the feds? appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesWho Pays for Unions?Is this why China finds it so hard to inflate producer prices?The Value of Behavioral Policies
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/IQXoWCq
The Binmen of Birmingham
Alex Tabarrok
I was on the British CapX Podcast talking about the Equality Act, riffing off my two posts Equality Act 2010 and The Apples and Oranges Tribunal. One thing I discussed in the podcast which I haven’t blogged on is the amazing Birmingham dustbin dispute.In 2010 an employment tribunal ruled that Birmingham City Council had discriminated against thousands of female workers — cooks, cleaners, care assistants, caretakers — who were denied bonuses paid to the mostly male binmen, gardeners, and gravediggers. Why were the binmen given bonuses? Well, refuse collection is filthy, heavy, outdoor work and not many people want to be gravediggers. Thus, these jobs command a premium for exactly the reason Adam Smith gave in 1776 — compensating differentials. Or was it sexism? Well, note first that there is nothing stopping women from becoming “binpersons” and indeed there are female binpersons and they earn the same bonuses as their male counterparts (just as with the Next case). Moreover, we can test the sexism versus compensating differentials theory. Let’s see what happened.Here’s the problem, which contributed to Birmingham going bankrupt in 2023. The council employs roughly 400 binmen and something like 6,000 women in comparable graded roles. Every extra pound paid to a binman therefore implied about fifteen pounds owed to the cooks and cleaners. The council simply didn’t have the money to pay everyone binman wages so they cut the binmen’s wages. But the market wage for collecting rubbish is what it is, so when Birmingham finally deleted the premium in January 2025, the binmen went on strike — and they are still on strike, nearly eighteen months later. The rubbish piled up, 17,000 tonnes of it, and the city declared a major incident.Here’s the most amazing part. The council hired an outside contractor to take over its rubbish collection and it now pays roughly triple its pre-strike outsourcing bill–more than it was paying its own employees. So much for sexism. Apparently the premium wasn’t a favor to men; it was the price of the job. If you want your rubbish picked up and your graves dug, you must pay the market wage. This was pure regulatory arbitrage, of course. Because the new binmen were contractors they legally had a different employer than the Council’s female caregivers and the Act’s comparator rules stop at the employer’s nexus.The government mandarins, of course, want to close the “loophole” adding yet another bureaucratic requirement to push the equal pay madness up the supply chain. The rubbish piles up.The post The Binmen of Birmingham appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesWill U.S. cities face a knock-on fiscal crisis from the feds?Estimating the Economic Value of Zoning ReformThe economics of H-1B immigration
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/cK3D6Lg
Alex Tabarrok
I was on the British CapX Podcast talking about the Equality Act, riffing off my two posts Equality Act 2010 and The Apples and Oranges Tribunal. One thing I discussed in the podcast which I haven’t blogged on is the amazing Birmingham dustbin dispute.In 2010 an employment tribunal ruled that Birmingham City Council had discriminated against thousands of female workers — cooks, cleaners, care assistants, caretakers — who were denied bonuses paid to the mostly male binmen, gardeners, and gravediggers. Why were the binmen given bonuses? Well, refuse collection is filthy, heavy, outdoor work and not many people want to be gravediggers. Thus, these jobs command a premium for exactly the reason Adam Smith gave in 1776 — compensating differentials. Or was it sexism? Well, note first that there is nothing stopping women from becoming “binpersons” and indeed there are female binpersons and they earn the same bonuses as their male counterparts (just as with the Next case). Moreover, we can test the sexism versus compensating differentials theory. Let’s see what happened.Here’s the problem, which contributed to Birmingham going bankrupt in 2023. The council employs roughly 400 binmen and something like 6,000 women in comparable graded roles. Every extra pound paid to a binman therefore implied about fifteen pounds owed to the cooks and cleaners. The council simply didn’t have the money to pay everyone binman wages so they cut the binmen’s wages. But the market wage for collecting rubbish is what it is, so when Birmingham finally deleted the premium in January 2025, the binmen went on strike — and they are still on strike, nearly eighteen months later. The rubbish piled up, 17,000 tonnes of it, and the city declared a major incident.Here’s the most amazing part. The council hired an outside contractor to take over its rubbish collection and it now pays roughly triple its pre-strike outsourcing bill–more than it was paying its own employees. So much for sexism. Apparently the premium wasn’t a favor to men; it was the price of the job. If you want your rubbish picked up and your graves dug, you must pay the market wage. This was pure regulatory arbitrage, of course. Because the new binmen were contractors they legally had a different employer than the Council’s female caregivers and the Act’s comparator rules stop at the employer’s nexus.The government mandarins, of course, want to close the “loophole” adding yet another bureaucratic requirement to push the equal pay madness up the supply chain. The rubbish piles up.The post The Binmen of Birmingham appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesWill U.S. cities face a knock-on fiscal crisis from the feds?Estimating the Economic Value of Zoning ReformThe economics of H-1B immigration
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/cK3D6Lg
Thursday assorted links
Tyler Cowen
1. “Next to rising oxygen levels and other contributing factors, the importance of feces in ancient ecosystems is often overlooked…”2. New publication on AI and institutions. Good people involved.3. Chicago boys in Chile.4. What kind of machine can a book make?5. Longevity firms push for medical deregulation in Montana (WSJ).6. OpenAI Economic Research Exchange.7. Victor Niederhoffer obituary. Do not forget Victor also was a world class checkers player, art collector, and a very good jazz bassist as well (yes I have heard him play) in addition to his other achievements.8. David Wolpe now has a Substack.9. The cyberattacks against the hedge funds.The post Thursday assorted links appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/7QKpmkb
Tyler Cowen
1. “Next to rising oxygen levels and other contributing factors, the importance of feces in ancient ecosystems is often overlooked…”2. New publication on AI and institutions. Good people involved.3. Chicago boys in Chile.4. What kind of machine can a book make?5. Longevity firms push for medical deregulation in Montana (WSJ).6. OpenAI Economic Research Exchange.7. Victor Niederhoffer obituary. Do not forget Victor also was a world class checkers player, art collector, and a very good jazz bassist as well (yes I have heard him play) in addition to his other achievements.8. David Wolpe now has a Substack.9. The cyberattacks against the hedge funds.The post Thursday assorted links appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/7QKpmkb
Solve for the (Refine) equilibrium
Tyler Cowen
We’re proud to announce that Refine has signed partnerships with two leading publishers in economics. Both the American Economic Association and the Econometric Society now use Refine’s AI-assisted technical verification as part of their publication processes.Here is the thread. And more comments here.The post Solve for the (Refine) equilibrium appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesWill U.S. cities face a knock-on fiscal crisis from the feds?More math breakthroughs from GPT modelsThe wisdom of Eli Dourado
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/MLfQXNj
Tyler Cowen
We’re proud to announce that Refine has signed partnerships with two leading publishers in economics. Both the American Economic Association and the Econometric Society now use Refine’s AI-assisted technical verification as part of their publication processes.Here is the thread. And more comments here.The post Solve for the (Refine) equilibrium appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesWill U.S. cities face a knock-on fiscal crisis from the feds?More math breakthroughs from GPT modelsThe wisdom of Eli Dourado
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/MLfQXNj
My excellent Conversation with Julia Ioffe
Tyler Cowen
Here is the audio, video, and transcript. Here is from the episode summary:Julia joined Tyler to discuss why so many of Russia’s great constructivist painters were women, why the tsarist government established women’s medical courses in 1872, changing attitudes towards abortion and birth control in the 20th century, why the Soviet regime turned prudish, how Khrushchev’s plan to “replace the dead” institutionalized single motherhood, Russian superwomen, why Jewish men were a prized commodity amid rampant antisemitism, the cultural significance of flowers, why a few Russian names still dominate, why Russian women think Western feminists have their priorities backwards, how gender attitudes and autocracy feed into each other, three underrated Russian novels, what she wants to write about next, and more.Excerpt:COWEN: I’m sure you’ve noticed that quite a few American men will marry Russian or Soviet women, but not so many American women want to marry Russian or Soviet men. It’s a kind of market test, right? Why exactly are the men so bad? Why are they such louts? Maybe that’s a rude way to put it, but surely in one’s mind, one asks that question, right?IOFFE: It’s a question that a lot of us who were living in Moscow in the late aughts and the teens were asking that all the time. I remember a friend of mine, a male Western TV correspondent, saying, “The women are so gorgeous here, but the men are so ugly and unfashionable.” He had lived all over the place and worked all over the place, and he said, “I’ve never seen such disparity,” and it was true.The women like me, Western women who were living and working in Moscow at the time, said, “We’ll just wait till we get home.” I think it’s because of what I talked about before, or what you and I talked about before, which is that so many men were killed in the first half of the 20th century, and so few demands were placed on them because they were seen as an endangered species, in general. They were a resource to be fought over and protected.In 1968, when the West was undergoing a sexual revolution, and women were fighting for more rights, more equality, the Soviets were talking about saving the men, protecting the men, and saying, “We’ve done enough for the women, but our men die young.” That’s after a lifetime of alcohol abuse, smoking, being largely irrelevant in the home, and obviously politically, because it’s a totalitarian system, so let’s work on protecting them.Soviet men, and then Russian men, became these coddled, spoiled children essentially, where on one hand, so little was asked of them that it’s the bigotry of low expectations. So little was asked of them, and very little was expected of them, and they rose to meet those very low expectations.On top of that, the idea of what made a man a manly man in Russia is he’s physically strong, but he dies a young death, or he dies an early death. He drinks a lot, he smokes a lot, he’s reckless, he’s careless, and takes a lot of risk, and that usually means an early death. If you have fewer men to begin with, and as a Russian woman, you see them dying early, and you’re fighting over them, what is the impetus for men to take care of themselves, to act better, be better, if there’s always going to be a beautiful, super competent woman to take him if you don’t want him?COWEN: These points you’re raising, historically, do you feel it’s been quite different for Soviet and Russian Jews or the same?IOFFE: I think it’s a little bit different. The caveat is, and I hate that I have to say this, Jews are people too, and subject to the same social forces that everybody else is, but culturally, Soviet Jews were more educated as a rule, more urban, and culturally came from a very family-centric tradition. Russian women, actually, for all the intense antisemitism in the Soviet Union, in Russia, Jewish men were actually a prized commodity for Russian women.COWEN: With ethnic Russian women?IOFFE: Yes. Ethnic Ukrainian women, you name it…
Tyler Cowen
Here is the audio, video, and transcript. Here is from the episode summary:Julia joined Tyler to discuss why so many of Russia’s great constructivist painters were women, why the tsarist government established women’s medical courses in 1872, changing attitudes towards abortion and birth control in the 20th century, why the Soviet regime turned prudish, how Khrushchev’s plan to “replace the dead” institutionalized single motherhood, Russian superwomen, why Jewish men were a prized commodity amid rampant antisemitism, the cultural significance of flowers, why a few Russian names still dominate, why Russian women think Western feminists have their priorities backwards, how gender attitudes and autocracy feed into each other, three underrated Russian novels, what she wants to write about next, and more.Excerpt:COWEN: I’m sure you’ve noticed that quite a few American men will marry Russian or Soviet women, but not so many American women want to marry Russian or Soviet men. It’s a kind of market test, right? Why exactly are the men so bad? Why are they such louts? Maybe that’s a rude way to put it, but surely in one’s mind, one asks that question, right?IOFFE: It’s a question that a lot of us who were living in Moscow in the late aughts and the teens were asking that all the time. I remember a friend of mine, a male Western TV correspondent, saying, “The women are so gorgeous here, but the men are so ugly and unfashionable.” He had lived all over the place and worked all over the place, and he said, “I’ve never seen such disparity,” and it was true.The women like me, Western women who were living and working in Moscow at the time, said, “We’ll just wait till we get home.” I think it’s because of what I talked about before, or what you and I talked about before, which is that so many men were killed in the first half of the 20th century, and so few demands were placed on them because they were seen as an endangered species, in general. They were a resource to be fought over and protected.In 1968, when the West was undergoing a sexual revolution, and women were fighting for more rights, more equality, the Soviets were talking about saving the men, protecting the men, and saying, “We’ve done enough for the women, but our men die young.” That’s after a lifetime of alcohol abuse, smoking, being largely irrelevant in the home, and obviously politically, because it’s a totalitarian system, so let’s work on protecting them.Soviet men, and then Russian men, became these coddled, spoiled children essentially, where on one hand, so little was asked of them that it’s the bigotry of low expectations. So little was asked of them, and very little was expected of them, and they rose to meet those very low expectations.On top of that, the idea of what made a man a manly man in Russia is he’s physically strong, but he dies a young death, or he dies an early death. He drinks a lot, he smokes a lot, he’s reckless, he’s careless, and takes a lot of risk, and that usually means an early death. If you have fewer men to begin with, and as a Russian woman, you see them dying early, and you’re fighting over them, what is the impetus for men to take care of themselves, to act better, be better, if there’s always going to be a beautiful, super competent woman to take him if you don’t want him?COWEN: These points you’re raising, historically, do you feel it’s been quite different for Soviet and Russian Jews or the same?IOFFE: I think it’s a little bit different. The caveat is, and I hate that I have to say this, Jews are people too, and subject to the same social forces that everybody else is, but culturally, Soviet Jews were more educated as a rule, more urban, and culturally came from a very family-centric tradition. Russian women, actually, for all the intense antisemitism in the Soviet Union, in Russia, Jewish men were actually a prized commodity for Russian women.COWEN: With ethnic Russian women?IOFFE: Yes. Ethnic Ukrainian women, you name it…
AI and Marginal Revolutions in Wastewater Treatment
Alex Tabarrok
An interesting paper from French economists, including recent Nobelist Philippe Aghion, looks at the savings from a predictive machine-learning model applied to wastewater treatment:This paper studies the environmental effects of a specialised AI aeration-control system deployed across French wastewater treatment plants operated by a global leader in water supply services. Exploiting quasi-experimental variation in both the timing of adoption and outages, we estimate the causal impact of AI on electricity use, carbon emissions, and energy expenditures. We find that full-time AI control reduces plants’ electricity consumption and carbon emissions by 5.4% and 6% respectively, and energy expenditures by 8.2%, resulting in negative abatement costs, while also improving water effluent quality. The additional electricity demand generated by AI models represents less than 1% of these savings. Beyond these effects, AI-equipped plants prove more resilient to high operational stress during extreme meteorological events and chemical pollutant peaks. They also improve load management by reallocating electricity consumption from peak to off-peak hours. Finally, we use the DICE model to assess the aggregate implications of our findings
in three diffusion scenarios. We find substantial global welfare gains from the CO2 reductions associated with this industrial AI use case.One annoyance: The authors frame the paper as a contrast to worries about AI’s energy use and environmental impact. But those objections are almost entirely innumerate and pretextual and casting the paper as a rebuttal lends them more credibility than they deserve.One note: Don’t misread the “less than 1%” line as being in the same units as the 5.4%, 6%, and 8.2% figures above it — it isn’t a comparable percentage-point offset. It means the AI system’s own electricity draw is a rounding error next to the savings it generates.More generally, the effect of AI will be through many, many improvements of this nature.The post AI and Marginal Revolutions in Wastewater Treatment appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesSolve for the (Refine) equilibriumThe Binmen of BirminghamWill U.S. cities face a knock-on fiscal crisis from the feds?
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/tOr4sDq
Alex Tabarrok
An interesting paper from French economists, including recent Nobelist Philippe Aghion, looks at the savings from a predictive machine-learning model applied to wastewater treatment:This paper studies the environmental effects of a specialised AI aeration-control system deployed across French wastewater treatment plants operated by a global leader in water supply services. Exploiting quasi-experimental variation in both the timing of adoption and outages, we estimate the causal impact of AI on electricity use, carbon emissions, and energy expenditures. We find that full-time AI control reduces plants’ electricity consumption and carbon emissions by 5.4% and 6% respectively, and energy expenditures by 8.2%, resulting in negative abatement costs, while also improving water effluent quality. The additional electricity demand generated by AI models represents less than 1% of these savings. Beyond these effects, AI-equipped plants prove more resilient to high operational stress during extreme meteorological events and chemical pollutant peaks. They also improve load management by reallocating electricity consumption from peak to off-peak hours. Finally, we use the DICE model to assess the aggregate implications of our findings
in three diffusion scenarios. We find substantial global welfare gains from the CO2 reductions associated with this industrial AI use case.One annoyance: The authors frame the paper as a contrast to worries about AI’s energy use and environmental impact. But those objections are almost entirely innumerate and pretextual and casting the paper as a rebuttal lends them more credibility than they deserve.One note: Don’t misread the “less than 1%” line as being in the same units as the 5.4%, 6%, and 8.2% figures above it — it isn’t a comparable percentage-point offset. It means the AI system’s own electricity draw is a rounding error next to the savings it generates.More generally, the effect of AI will be through many, many improvements of this nature.The post AI and Marginal Revolutions in Wastewater Treatment appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesSolve for the (Refine) equilibriumThe Binmen of BirminghamWill U.S. cities face a knock-on fiscal crisis from the feds?
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/tOr4sDq
Friday assorted links
Tyler Cowen
1. Denmark fact of the day.2. “Books that Tyler Cowen probably would like.”3. The tenure dismissal of Sanjay Reddy (NYT).4. Dell and Rambachan NBER video on the economics of AI. I have yet to view, but “self-recommending.”5. Anton Leicht on AI and how the concentration of power will evolve. Very good piece.6. Universities would prefer not to.7. Which polities can you really trust?8. GPT 5.6 is working on social choice theory.9. OpenAI 37-minute talk on the Book of Exodus.The post Friday assorted links appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/8BMwpqs
Tyler Cowen
1. Denmark fact of the day.2. “Books that Tyler Cowen probably would like.”3. The tenure dismissal of Sanjay Reddy (NYT).4. Dell and Rambachan NBER video on the economics of AI. I have yet to view, but “self-recommending.”5. Anton Leicht on AI and how the concentration of power will evolve. Very good piece.6. Universities would prefer not to.7. Which polities can you really trust?8. GPT 5.6 is working on social choice theory.9. OpenAI 37-minute talk on the Book of Exodus.The post Friday assorted links appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/8BMwpqs
The Queen song ’39
Tyler Cowen
I only recently learned what it is really about, namely very rapid travel into space and time dilation mattering for the return voyage.I had never before listened carefully to the lyrics. I heard the “’39” reference at the beginning, the mention of volunteeers sailing away, and the general nostalgic British music hall mood to the piece, and assumed it concerned the Second World War. But no, the volunteers sailing away are going to the stars, and their eventual return to the Earth will be for them a sad and tragic event, as everything they had known will be gone. You can listen to the song here.Here is one of the most direct excerpts:In the year of ’39 came a ship in from the blue
The volunteers came home that day
And they bring good news of a world so newly born
Though their hearts so heavily weigh
For the Earth is old and grey, little darling, we’ll away
But my love, this cannot be
Oh, so many years have gone though I’m older but a year
Your mother’s eyes, from your eyes, cry to meHere are the full lyrics. Brian May, who wrote the song, is not only a wonderful guitarist but he has a PhD in astrophysics.p.s. no synthesizers!The post The Queen song ’39 appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media CommentsAnd it is also the 39th song Queen released (counting all the ... by lastexposfanRelated StoriesMy excellent Conversation with Julia IoffeSolve for the (Refine) equilibriumWill U.S. cities face a knock-on fiscal crisis from the feds?
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/Z0leopY
Tyler Cowen
I only recently learned what it is really about, namely very rapid travel into space and time dilation mattering for the return voyage.I had never before listened carefully to the lyrics. I heard the “’39” reference at the beginning, the mention of volunteeers sailing away, and the general nostalgic British music hall mood to the piece, and assumed it concerned the Second World War. But no, the volunteers sailing away are going to the stars, and their eventual return to the Earth will be for them a sad and tragic event, as everything they had known will be gone. You can listen to the song here.Here is one of the most direct excerpts:In the year of ’39 came a ship in from the blue
The volunteers came home that day
And they bring good news of a world so newly born
Though their hearts so heavily weigh
For the Earth is old and grey, little darling, we’ll away
But my love, this cannot be
Oh, so many years have gone though I’m older but a year
Your mother’s eyes, from your eyes, cry to meHere are the full lyrics. Brian May, who wrote the song, is not only a wonderful guitarist but he has a PhD in astrophysics.p.s. no synthesizers!The post The Queen song ’39 appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media CommentsAnd it is also the 39th song Queen released (counting all the ... by lastexposfanRelated StoriesMy excellent Conversation with Julia IoffeSolve for the (Refine) equilibriumWill U.S. cities face a knock-on fiscal crisis from the feds?
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/Z0leopY
What I’ve been reading
Tyler Cowen
1. Mike Jay, Wireheads: An Unnatural History of Technology in the Brain. Much of this story is told through the lens of the accompanying science fiction and non-neuro trends in other parts of science. An excellent book, substantive on every page, and it will make you want to read some of the works he cites.2. Vasily Grossman, From the Front Line, Stalingrad-Treblinka-Berlin 1941-1945. Self-recommending, the best third of this volume is just stunningly good. You do not have to read the whole thing, as there is some degree of repetition.3. Forough Farrokhzad, Let Us Believe in the Beginning of the Cold Season. She died in a car crash in 1967 at the age of thirty-three, but it turns out she was an amazing poet. I usually do not enjoy poetry in translation, but this is so fiery and full of passion that I am happy to recommend it. Surely in the original Farsi it is better (and quite different?) yet.4. André Breton, Nadja. It is short, and fun enough to read. But one learns most books from the past are not masterpieces, and that surrealism as a movement — most of all in painting — was more important than the literary outputs of surrealism. Nadja, to me, sounds like a drag. Which is fine. But. What does Breton really think he is immortalizing here? At the end he writes “Beauty will be CONVULSIVE or not at all.” I do appreciate Breton for his understanding of Mexico, and for his cultivation of Haitian art.5. Emma Southon, Servus: How Slavery Made the Roman Empire. A very good and aggressively readable book about how terrible slavery was in the Roman Empire. A useful corrective to other sources as well. While my general view is that interpretative disputes over antiquity are difficult to resolve, I find her interpretations more intuitive and more convincing than the other side of the debate.The post What I’ve been reading appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesMy excellent Conversation with Julia Ioffe*Rome’s Age of Revolution**Redefining Global Health in the 21st Century*
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/gPiDrWL
Tyler Cowen
1. Mike Jay, Wireheads: An Unnatural History of Technology in the Brain. Much of this story is told through the lens of the accompanying science fiction and non-neuro trends in other parts of science. An excellent book, substantive on every page, and it will make you want to read some of the works he cites.2. Vasily Grossman, From the Front Line, Stalingrad-Treblinka-Berlin 1941-1945. Self-recommending, the best third of this volume is just stunningly good. You do not have to read the whole thing, as there is some degree of repetition.3. Forough Farrokhzad, Let Us Believe in the Beginning of the Cold Season. She died in a car crash in 1967 at the age of thirty-three, but it turns out she was an amazing poet. I usually do not enjoy poetry in translation, but this is so fiery and full of passion that I am happy to recommend it. Surely in the original Farsi it is better (and quite different?) yet.4. André Breton, Nadja. It is short, and fun enough to read. But one learns most books from the past are not masterpieces, and that surrealism as a movement — most of all in painting — was more important than the literary outputs of surrealism. Nadja, to me, sounds like a drag. Which is fine. But. What does Breton really think he is immortalizing here? At the end he writes “Beauty will be CONVULSIVE or not at all.” I do appreciate Breton for his understanding of Mexico, and for his cultivation of Haitian art.5. Emma Southon, Servus: How Slavery Made the Roman Empire. A very good and aggressively readable book about how terrible slavery was in the Roman Empire. A useful corrective to other sources as well. While my general view is that interpretative disputes over antiquity are difficult to resolve, I find her interpretations more intuitive and more convincing than the other side of the debate.The post What I’ve been reading appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesMy excellent Conversation with Julia Ioffe*Rome’s Age of Revolution**Redefining Global Health in the 21st Century*
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/gPiDrWL
*Restoring Childhood: How to Set Kids Free in the Age of Anxiety*
Tyler Cowen
That is the new book by Peter Gray, and it is very much a whole philosophy of child-rearing and also antidote to the current panic over social media. Excerpt:In preparation for this chapter, I spent weeks poring over the research literature pretaining to smartphones, social media, and teen mental health. It is clear to me that there is something close to a consensus among scientists most immersed in this research, which includes the following three conclusions: (1) Extensive research refutes the theory that effects of smartphones and social media account for a meaningful portion of the decline in teen mental health in the years following 2010. (2) Smartphones and social media can have both beneficial and harmful effects on teens’ mental health, which tend to cancel out when averaging. (3) Future research should focus on understanding better the ways teens use these tools and how to help them maximize the benefits and minimize the harm.Note that teen suffering also hit a peak around 1990 by many measures, yet that cannot have been caused by phones or social media. And European teen suicide rates were falling just as those in the United States were rising. This evidence is considered in further detail of course.Recommended, it is both easy to read and substantive.The post *Restoring Childhood: How to Set Kids Free in the Age of Anxiety* appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesWhat I’ve been readingMy excellent Conversation with Julia IoffeSolve for the (Refine) equilibrium
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/4rxPta7
Tyler Cowen
That is the new book by Peter Gray, and it is very much a whole philosophy of child-rearing and also antidote to the current panic over social media. Excerpt:In preparation for this chapter, I spent weeks poring over the research literature pretaining to smartphones, social media, and teen mental health. It is clear to me that there is something close to a consensus among scientists most immersed in this research, which includes the following three conclusions: (1) Extensive research refutes the theory that effects of smartphones and social media account for a meaningful portion of the decline in teen mental health in the years following 2010. (2) Smartphones and social media can have both beneficial and harmful effects on teens’ mental health, which tend to cancel out when averaging. (3) Future research should focus on understanding better the ways teens use these tools and how to help them maximize the benefits and minimize the harm.Note that teen suffering also hit a peak around 1990 by many measures, yet that cannot have been caused by phones or social media. And European teen suicide rates were falling just as those in the United States were rising. This evidence is considered in further detail of course.Recommended, it is both easy to read and substantive.The post *Restoring Childhood: How to Set Kids Free in the Age of Anxiety* appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesWhat I’ve been readingMy excellent Conversation with Julia IoffeSolve for the (Refine) equilibrium
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/4rxPta7
Saturday assorted links
Tyler Cowen
1. Possibly AI-written pieces that have won literary awards.2. HuggingFace co-founder on what happened, very good post.3. What do private insurers want from a Hormuz agreement?4. GPT Pro on burrito price worries.5. NoVa vs. MD, once again.6. Do people listen to female economists more?7. North Korea might be growing at 3.5% (Bloomberg).The post Saturday assorted links appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media Comments#1. The bad news arrives once we learn that artificial ... by Edward Burke
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/uFpz9Sj
Tyler Cowen
1. Possibly AI-written pieces that have won literary awards.2. HuggingFace co-founder on what happened, very good post.3. What do private insurers want from a Hormuz agreement?4. GPT Pro on burrito price worries.5. NoVa vs. MD, once again.6. Do people listen to female economists more?7. North Korea might be growing at 3.5% (Bloomberg).The post Saturday assorted links appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media Comments#1. The bad news arrives once we learn that artificial ... by Edward Burke
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/uFpz9Sj
The future of warfare? (from my email)
Tyler Cowen
As weapon systems increase in effectiveness, they will generally target one another rather than humans. Lower loss of life will ease conflict entry and hinder exit.Warfare will veer further from industrial competition into techno-industrial; the current appearance of parity between low tech and advanced actors reflects near zero deployment of advanced systems. As these deploy, their martial advantages will present clearly.The need for advanced ecosystems will lead to blocs able to combine human capital, techno-industrial capacity, and inputs. Logistics may be contested at elevated levels, changing the incentives around geographic size and increasing the value of inputs.Blocs may well engage in near constant warfare of various intensity levels. Bloc composition will be necessity driven, perhaps with increased fluidity.That is from an anonymous reader.The post The future of warfare? (from my email) appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media CommentsIn reply to rayward. What's the end goal? Destroy the enemies ... by WelpThe first sentence is absolutely correct. The rest of the post ... by raywardIsn’t this a good description of cyber warfare? And haven’t ... by DaveWRelated Stories*Restoring Childhood: How to Set Kids Free in the Age of Anxiety*Solve for the (Refine) equilibriumTaiwan fact of the day
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/XbmaRwY
Tyler Cowen
As weapon systems increase in effectiveness, they will generally target one another rather than humans. Lower loss of life will ease conflict entry and hinder exit.Warfare will veer further from industrial competition into techno-industrial; the current appearance of parity between low tech and advanced actors reflects near zero deployment of advanced systems. As these deploy, their martial advantages will present clearly.The need for advanced ecosystems will lead to blocs able to combine human capital, techno-industrial capacity, and inputs. Logistics may be contested at elevated levels, changing the incentives around geographic size and increasing the value of inputs.Blocs may well engage in near constant warfare of various intensity levels. Bloc composition will be necessity driven, perhaps with increased fluidity.That is from an anonymous reader.The post The future of warfare? (from my email) appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media CommentsIn reply to rayward. What's the end goal? Destroy the enemies ... by WelpThe first sentence is absolutely correct. The rest of the post ... by raywardIsn’t this a good description of cyber warfare? And haven’t ... by DaveWRelated Stories*Restoring Childhood: How to Set Kids Free in the Age of Anxiety*Solve for the (Refine) equilibriumTaiwan fact of the day
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/XbmaRwY
Is there a Balkan fertility paradox? (from my email)
Tyler Cowen
The Balkans may be the only region other than central Asia where fertility has increased from 2015 to 2026.*All of the highest fertility rates in Europe are in the Balkans. As of 2024: Montenegro (1.8), Bulgaria (1.73) Moldova (1.73), and Serbia (1.64) are top four. France was next at 1.61.Other balkan countries were generally about 1.5 (Slovenia, Croatia, Kosovo, Bosnia, and Slovakia), comparable to the highest non-gallic TFRs in Western Europe: Britain (1.55) and Ireland (1.47).The lowest Balkan countries (Macedonia, Romania, Albania, and Hungary) sit at ~1.35-1.4, which would be lowish for Western Europe, but extremely high for Southern Europe or the former Warsaw pact/USSR.During the post-soviet nadir, the Balkans had perhaps the lowest fertility in Europe. The rates rose circa 2010, and have recently continued to slowly rise.Ostensibly similar cultures/economies have no parallel increase (Ukraine, Belarus, Poland, and the Baltics).I don’t have any theory that would explain this pattern. Balkan men are famously unhelpful husbands and fathers, and the Balkans aren’t any more religious than Poland, Italy and Belarus.What could possibly be the deal?That is from Thomas Hanes.The post Is there a Balkan fertility paradox? (from my email) appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesThe Binmen of BirminghamWill U.S. cities face a knock-on fiscal crisis from the feds?Taiwan fact of the day
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/MYfXRIC
Tyler Cowen
The Balkans may be the only region other than central Asia where fertility has increased from 2015 to 2026.*All of the highest fertility rates in Europe are in the Balkans. As of 2024: Montenegro (1.8), Bulgaria (1.73) Moldova (1.73), and Serbia (1.64) are top four. France was next at 1.61.Other balkan countries were generally about 1.5 (Slovenia, Croatia, Kosovo, Bosnia, and Slovakia), comparable to the highest non-gallic TFRs in Western Europe: Britain (1.55) and Ireland (1.47).The lowest Balkan countries (Macedonia, Romania, Albania, and Hungary) sit at ~1.35-1.4, which would be lowish for Western Europe, but extremely high for Southern Europe or the former Warsaw pact/USSR.During the post-soviet nadir, the Balkans had perhaps the lowest fertility in Europe. The rates rose circa 2010, and have recently continued to slowly rise.Ostensibly similar cultures/economies have no parallel increase (Ukraine, Belarus, Poland, and the Baltics).I don’t have any theory that would explain this pattern. Balkan men are famously unhelpful husbands and fathers, and the Balkans aren’t any more religious than Poland, Italy and Belarus.What could possibly be the deal?That is from Thomas Hanes.The post Is there a Balkan fertility paradox? (from my email) appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesThe Binmen of BirminghamWill U.S. cities face a knock-on fiscal crisis from the feds?Taiwan fact of the day
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/MYfXRIC
One of the better pro-natalist Lieder
Tyler Cowen
The post One of the better pro-natalist Lieder appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesThe Queen song ’39Cross-ethnic casting
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/5kNy3qS
Tyler Cowen
The post One of the better pro-natalist Lieder appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesThe Queen song ’39Cross-ethnic casting
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/5kNy3qS
Pressure
Alex Tabarrok
Who would have thought that someone could make a gripping movie about predicting the weather? Nevertheless, Pressure delivers. To be sure, it’s predicting the weather for D-Day. Excellent cast. Hews very close to the truth. The two camps really did divide on theory versus past prediction and the weather was as portrayed. After the war, John F. Kennedy asked Eisenhower what gave the Allies the decisive advantage during the D-Day invasion, Eisenhower replied, “We had better meteorologists than the Germans.”I agree with Tyler’s earlier review: A truly excellent movie, one of the best of the year. Specifically, it concerns the meteorological forecasts (!) leading up to the D-Day invasion. Thematically, it is about the differences between Americans and Brits, how bureaucracy operates, the nature of leadership, and the proper role of science in government. It is like an old-style Hollywood movie. Most of the action takes place in only a few rooms, and with superb dialogue and performances. Although you all know how D-Day turns out, the movie still generates suspense on some of the major plot points.The post Pressure appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/z6ol5J1
Alex Tabarrok
Who would have thought that someone could make a gripping movie about predicting the weather? Nevertheless, Pressure delivers. To be sure, it’s predicting the weather for D-Day. Excellent cast. Hews very close to the truth. The two camps really did divide on theory versus past prediction and the weather was as portrayed. After the war, John F. Kennedy asked Eisenhower what gave the Allies the decisive advantage during the D-Day invasion, Eisenhower replied, “We had better meteorologists than the Germans.”I agree with Tyler’s earlier review: A truly excellent movie, one of the best of the year. Specifically, it concerns the meteorological forecasts (!) leading up to the D-Day invasion. Thematically, it is about the differences between Americans and Brits, how bureaucracy operates, the nature of leadership, and the proper role of science in government. It is like an old-style Hollywood movie. Most of the action takes place in only a few rooms, and with superb dialogue and performances. Although you all know how D-Day turns out, the movie still generates suspense on some of the major plot points.The post Pressure appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/z6ol5J1
JFK’s AI Voice
Alex Tabarrok
From Kennedy’s 1961 inaugural:“Ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.”“Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.”“United, there is little we cannot do… Divided, there is little we can do.”“If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.and from the 1962 moon speech at Rice University;We choose to do these things not because they are easy but because they are hard.and from Lyndon Johnson’s inaugural speech:John Kennedy’s death commands what his life conveyed—that America must move forward.On the 20th day of January, in 1961, John F. Kennedy told his countrymen that our national work would not be finished ‘in the first thousand days, nor in the life of this administration, nor even perhaps in our lifetime on this planet.’ But, he said, ‘let us begin.’ Today, in this moment of new resolve, I would say to all my fellow Americans, let us continue.Sound familiar?Were John F. Kennedy’s speeches written by an AI? Probably not. But were AI’s trained on the speech writer Ted Sorensen? It would appear so. Or to be more accurate, AIs have absorbed the Sorensen toolkit: symmetry, parallelism, antithesis, repetition, and the neatly turned reversal.Sorensen is considered a great stylist, and these are iconic lines. The problem with AI voice is not the techniques themselves. It is the overuse of them—their deployment to describe a trip to 7-Eleven with the same rhetorical flourishes once used to send men to the moon.I suspect that will be an easy problem to fix, so don’t expect AI voice to continue.Hat tip: murghThe post JFK’s AI Voice appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media Comments“I think if this country gets any kinder or gentler, it's ... by AlRelated StoriesMy excellent Conversation with Julia Ioffe*Rome’s Age of Revolution*Rothko show in Florence
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/w6IZRNC
Alex Tabarrok
From Kennedy’s 1961 inaugural:“Ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.”“Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.”“United, there is little we cannot do… Divided, there is little we can do.”“If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.and from the 1962 moon speech at Rice University;We choose to do these things not because they are easy but because they are hard.and from Lyndon Johnson’s inaugural speech:John Kennedy’s death commands what his life conveyed—that America must move forward.On the 20th day of January, in 1961, John F. Kennedy told his countrymen that our national work would not be finished ‘in the first thousand days, nor in the life of this administration, nor even perhaps in our lifetime on this planet.’ But, he said, ‘let us begin.’ Today, in this moment of new resolve, I would say to all my fellow Americans, let us continue.Sound familiar?Were John F. Kennedy’s speeches written by an AI? Probably not. But were AI’s trained on the speech writer Ted Sorensen? It would appear so. Or to be more accurate, AIs have absorbed the Sorensen toolkit: symmetry, parallelism, antithesis, repetition, and the neatly turned reversal.Sorensen is considered a great stylist, and these are iconic lines. The problem with AI voice is not the techniques themselves. It is the overuse of them—their deployment to describe a trip to 7-Eleven with the same rhetorical flourishes once used to send men to the moon.I suspect that will be an easy problem to fix, so don’t expect AI voice to continue.Hat tip: murghThe post JFK’s AI Voice appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media Comments“I think if this country gets any kinder or gentler, it's ... by AlRelated StoriesMy excellent Conversation with Julia Ioffe*Rome’s Age of Revolution*Rothko show in Florence
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/w6IZRNC
Sunday assorted links
Tyler Cowen
1. African use of Chinese AI (NYT). And what happened to Talenti gelato? (NYT) And the NIMBY brutalists who live in the Barbican (NYT).2. Modernist Gothic in Copenhagen.3. AI-generated Odyssey in Vietnam.4. Questions from Seb Krier.5. Time magazine has a special version that only the AIs can read.6. Tymofiy Mylovanov has a good summary of my greatest fear.The post Sunday assorted links appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/EsVdQbz
Tyler Cowen
1. African use of Chinese AI (NYT). And what happened to Talenti gelato? (NYT) And the NIMBY brutalists who live in the Barbican (NYT).2. Modernist Gothic in Copenhagen.3. AI-generated Odyssey in Vietnam.4. Questions from Seb Krier.5. Time magazine has a special version that only the AIs can read.6. Tymofiy Mylovanov has a good summary of my greatest fear.The post Sunday assorted links appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/EsVdQbz
Act like it is science
Tyler Cowen
I am seeing so many doom prognostications, or least severe worries, due to the OAI/HuggingFace incident and related stories. But virtually all of these I find underargued to say the least.So I have a simple request. If you are worried, and wish to persuade the doubters, try the methods of science. I would like to see the following:1. Your outline of how, say two or three years from now, we might estimate the additional cybersecurity costs from the AI break-ins. I am convinced that number is not zero, but give me your method please. If it helps, here is an estimate of past cybersecurity costs, done by top economists.2. Your current numerical estimate of what those costs might end up being, of course to be tested against what actually happens over time. Obviously, you can do this for a few different regulatory/safety scenarios. This is one simple way to prove yourself largely correct, albeit with a lag. (NB: you do not have to take this as a substitute for your preferred safety measurres. But please try to be specific in your predictions.)3. A list of what stocks or other assets you have shorted, now. Obviously if your answer to #2 is sufficiently low, you could answer here zero, as I would do. I expect costs, but not so high that we cannot muddle through and have expected positive stock returns.This would all help to make the discourse more scientific and less like an extended exercise in personal anxiety management.If it is all so important, surely this exercise is worth the effort?The post Act like it is science appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media CommentsStep 1: Insane paperclip type incident. People worried that we ... by skepticHarry Markowitz famously had to set up his own retirement ... by MelancholyYugaAh, yes, “isolated demands for rigor” in their full glory ... by K.1) No one is trying to convince *you*. If that's your standard, ... by FergusRelated StoriesSolve for the (Refine) equilibriumThe future of warfare? (from my email)*Restoring Childhood: How to Set Kids Free in the Age of Anxiety*
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/r8JNpbt
Tyler Cowen
I am seeing so many doom prognostications, or least severe worries, due to the OAI/HuggingFace incident and related stories. But virtually all of these I find underargued to say the least.So I have a simple request. If you are worried, and wish to persuade the doubters, try the methods of science. I would like to see the following:1. Your outline of how, say two or three years from now, we might estimate the additional cybersecurity costs from the AI break-ins. I am convinced that number is not zero, but give me your method please. If it helps, here is an estimate of past cybersecurity costs, done by top economists.2. Your current numerical estimate of what those costs might end up being, of course to be tested against what actually happens over time. Obviously, you can do this for a few different regulatory/safety scenarios. This is one simple way to prove yourself largely correct, albeit with a lag. (NB: you do not have to take this as a substitute for your preferred safety measurres. But please try to be specific in your predictions.)3. A list of what stocks or other assets you have shorted, now. Obviously if your answer to #2 is sufficiently low, you could answer here zero, as I would do. I expect costs, but not so high that we cannot muddle through and have expected positive stock returns.This would all help to make the discourse more scientific and less like an extended exercise in personal anxiety management.If it is all so important, surely this exercise is worth the effort?The post Act like it is science appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media Media CommentsStep 1: Insane paperclip type incident. People worried that we ... by skepticHarry Markowitz famously had to set up his own retirement ... by MelancholyYugaAh, yes, “isolated demands for rigor” in their full glory ... by K.1) No one is trying to convince *you*. If that's your standard, ... by FergusRelated StoriesSolve for the (Refine) equilibriumThe future of warfare? (from my email)*Restoring Childhood: How to Set Kids Free in the Age of Anxiety*
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/r8JNpbt
Do Faculty Affect Student Partisanship?
Tyler Cowen
We study whether Democratic college professors make their students more liberal. We link voter data to salary records from 33 state flagships and show that faculty skew Democratic, especially in the humanities and social sciences. We then use student transcripts from one flagship to estimate causal effects. Students become more liberal during college regardless of major and sort toward ideologically similar instructors. Exploiting plausibly random variation in when instructors teach courses, we find no effect of faculty partisanship on student partisanship. Text analysis shows exposure to liberal topics reflects student demand rather than instructor supply, leaving little room for indoctrination.That is from a new paper by Micah Baum, Joaquín Endara, and Annaliese Paulson. Via Jay Fan Bavel.The post Do Faculty Affect Student Partisanship? appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesMy excellent Conversation with Julia IoffeThe AEA presidential electionSolve for the (Refine) equilibrium
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/7PnsKbN
Tyler Cowen
We study whether Democratic college professors make their students more liberal. We link voter data to salary records from 33 state flagships and show that faculty skew Democratic, especially in the humanities and social sciences. We then use student transcripts from one flagship to estimate causal effects. Students become more liberal during college regardless of major and sort toward ideologically similar instructors. Exploiting plausibly random variation in when instructors teach courses, we find no effect of faculty partisanship on student partisanship. Text analysis shows exposure to liberal topics reflects student demand rather than instructor supply, leaving little room for indoctrination.That is from a new paper by Micah Baum, Joaquín Endara, and Annaliese Paulson. Via Jay Fan Bavel.The post Do Faculty Affect Student Partisanship? appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.MediaMedia Media Media Media Media Media MediaRelated StoriesMy excellent Conversation with Julia IoffeThe AEA presidential electionSolve for the (Refine) equilibrium
via Marginal Revolution https://ift.tt/7PnsKbN