Dugin about Ukraine and Russia
"Being Russia is an ontological imperative. Being and Russia. It is a fundamental military-philosophical question. And this is how it is for Russia now: to be or not to be.
In this case we can recall Putin's formula: Ukraine is representing Anti-Russia. Anti-Russia is representing the will to destroy Russia, followed by Russian non-existence. The West has staked precisely on this.
For Russia to be means the same as not to be for Anti-Russia. For Russia to exist, there must be no Anti-Russia. The logic is simple. Ukraine as such can exist, but Ukraine as Anti-Russia cannot. Shouldn't be. And it won't".
© A. G. Dugin
#duginview
@eurasianyouth
"Being Russia is an ontological imperative. Being and Russia. It is a fundamental military-philosophical question. And this is how it is for Russia now: to be or not to be.
In this case we can recall Putin's formula: Ukraine is representing Anti-Russia. Anti-Russia is representing the will to destroy Russia, followed by Russian non-existence. The West has staked precisely on this.
For Russia to be means the same as not to be for Anti-Russia. For Russia to exist, there must be no Anti-Russia. The logic is simple. Ukraine as such can exist, but Ukraine as Anti-Russia cannot. Shouldn't be. And it won't".
© A. G. Dugin
#duginview
@eurasianyouth
New Eurasian article about special operation in Ukraine!
https://telegra.ph/DUGIN-A-NEW-WORLD-ORDER-WILL-EMERGE-BASED-ON-THE-RESULTS-OF-SPECIAL-OPERATIONS-IN-UKRAINE-04-11-2
#duginview
@GeopoliticaEN
https://telegra.ph/DUGIN-A-NEW-WORLD-ORDER-WILL-EMERGE-BASED-ON-THE-RESULTS-OF-SPECIAL-OPERATIONS-IN-UKRAINE-04-11-2
#duginview
@GeopoliticaEN
Alexander Dugin's answers about the struggle against the hegemon | Part I
👉 The role of traditional religions
#duginview #hegemony #religion
@eurasianyouth
👉 The role of traditional religions
#duginview #hegemony #religion
@eurasianyouth
Alexander Dugin's answers about the struggle against the hegemon | Part 2
#Hegemony #Duginview
Is there internal contradictions in the structure of the global hegemon? What groups of interests collide within the decision centers?
https://telegra.ph/Are-there-internal-contradictions-in-the-structure-of-the-global-hegemon-What-groups-of-interests-collide-within-the-decision-ce-04-18
#Hegemony #Duginview
Is there internal contradictions in the structure of the global hegemon? What groups of interests collide within the decision centers?
https://telegra.ph/Are-there-internal-contradictions-in-the-structure-of-the-global-hegemon-What-groups-of-interests-collide-within-the-decision-ce-04-18
Telegraph
Are there internal contradictions in the structure of the global hegemon? What groups of interests collide within the decision…
They surely exist. Global hegemony is only ideal in theory. There are forces that are more hegemonic, and there are forces that less. Basically, it's about the difference between those representatives of the hegemony who want to turn everything into a network…
"Global hegemony is a modern Western capitalist society. In the last US election we clearly saw — half of it is from the hegemony of future, the other half is from the hegemony of past.
Half of the United States is in one historical hegemonic phase, the other half is in another. Two twins — one is an old twin grandfather in the form of Trump and the Republican Party, the other is in the form of Kamala Haris, BLM, Mad Max, who fearlessly destroys the window to pull out the washing machine.
The kingdom of chaos is the second half of America".
© A.G. Dugin
#duginview #hegemony #USA
@eurasianyouth
Half of the United States is in one historical hegemonic phase, the other half is in another. Two twins — one is an old twin grandfather in the form of Trump and the Republican Party, the other is in the form of Kamala Haris, BLM, Mad Max, who fearlessly destroys the window to pull out the washing machine.
The kingdom of chaos is the second half of America".
© A.G. Dugin
#duginview #hegemony #USA
@eurasianyouth
"Marx’s main work is not called «Communism» or «Socialism», he wrote a much more important thing — «Capital». Marx described the enemy and its structure, ontology. He, rejecting the enemy, built a positive model. This is the only right move. Marx showed one side of hegemony, a very deep and very important one.
Another thing is that later his teachings turned into scholastics, which do not work today, but they were right on its historical period".
© A.G. Dugin
#duginview #hegemony #communism
@eurasianyouth
Another thing is that later his teachings turned into scholastics, which do not work today, but they were right on its historical period".
© A.G. Dugin
#duginview #hegemony #communism
@eurasianyouth
„In principle, Eurasia and our space, the heartland Russia, remain the staging area of a new anti-bourgeois, anti-American revolution… The new Eurasian empire will be constructed on the fundamental principle of the common enemy: the rejection of Atlanticism, strategic control of the USA, and the refusal to allow liberal values to dominate us. This common civilizational impulse will be the basis of a political and strategic union.“
Aleksandr Dugin — The Basics of Geopolitics, 1997
#duginview #geopolitics
@eurasianyouth
Aleksandr Dugin — The Basics of Geopolitics, 1997
#duginview #geopolitics
@eurasianyouth
"The system of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin and Mao Zedong in China, was half of the world that was truly outside of the hegemony. On the border between the East and West camps was the necessary barrier.
Now, of course, they say: “What cruel KGB officers, how did they treat people who brought with them goods necessary for human life: porn, perfume, tights from the “free world”, and they treated them cruelly". But in fact it was hygiene, it was a sanitary removal of mold. The Soviet Union and the Chinese Communist State tried to protect themselves. China is still trying to protect itself from hegemony.
Today, left-liberal Marxism acts as the same ants that carry mold spores. We cannot continue to seriously rely on Marxism as a counter-hegemony, because today's Marxism is not the Marxism of the 1950s and 1960s. Until a certain moment, Marxists were a real bulwark against hegemony."
#marxism #hegemony #duginview
@eurasianyouth
Now, of course, they say: “What cruel KGB officers, how did they treat people who brought with them goods necessary for human life: porn, perfume, tights from the “free world”, and they treated them cruelly". But in fact it was hygiene, it was a sanitary removal of mold. The Soviet Union and the Chinese Communist State tried to protect themselves. China is still trying to protect itself from hegemony.
Today, left-liberal Marxism acts as the same ants that carry mold spores. We cannot continue to seriously rely on Marxism as a counter-hegemony, because today's Marxism is not the Marxism of the 1950s and 1960s. Until a certain moment, Marxists were a real bulwark against hegemony."
#marxism #hegemony #duginview
@eurasianyouth