Forwarded from Russian MFA ๐ท๐บ
#DebunkingMyths
The on-going attempts to blame Russia for "weaponising" grain and food supplies are completely without merit.
โ๏ธ Faัts: Russia is a responsible member of the global food market. It is the Western illegitimate sanctions that are in fact damaging global food security.
We are deeply concerned about a possible food crisis and are well aware of the importance of supplies of socially important commodities, including food, to the socio-economic development of countries in Asia, Africa, Latin America and the Middle East and the achievement of SDGs.
The illegitimate unilateral restrictions imposed by the EU, the US and their satellites remain the main obstacle to normal export relations between Russia (and Belarus) and buyers of grain and fertilizers.
#Think4Yourself
The on-going attempts to blame Russia for "weaponising" grain and food supplies are completely without merit.
โ๏ธ Faัts: Russia is a responsible member of the global food market. It is the Western illegitimate sanctions that are in fact damaging global food security.
We are deeply concerned about a possible food crisis and are well aware of the importance of supplies of socially important commodities, including food, to the socio-economic development of countries in Asia, Africa, Latin America and the Middle East and the achievement of SDGs.
The illegitimate unilateral restrictions imposed by the EU, the US and their satellites remain the main obstacle to normal export relations between Russia (and Belarus) and buyers of grain and fertilizers.
#Think4Yourself
Forwarded from Russian MFA ๐ท๐บ
#DebunkingMyths
โ Myth: Russia is using energy supplies for political purposes.
โ Faัts: It is the EU which, by imposing or planning to impose further unilateral sanctions against Russian energy supplies, is politicizing the energy sphere, attempting to use interdependences between energy consumers and suppliers as an instrument of political pressure, while damaging its own economy and the well-being of its citizens and aggravating what is already a precarious situation in the global energy markets.
Unfounded allegations that Moscow is using energy supplies for political aims are part and parcel of the fact-twisting information warfare unleashed by the EU and the US, the latter seeking to increase its LNG exports to the EU.
#Think4Yourself
โ Myth: Russia is using energy supplies for political purposes.
โ Faัts: It is the EU which, by imposing or planning to impose further unilateral sanctions against Russian energy supplies, is politicizing the energy sphere, attempting to use interdependences between energy consumers and suppliers as an instrument of political pressure, while damaging its own economy and the well-being of its citizens and aggravating what is already a precarious situation in the global energy markets.
Unfounded allegations that Moscow is using energy supplies for political aims are part and parcel of the fact-twisting information warfare unleashed by the EU and the US, the latter seeking to increase its LNG exports to the EU.
#Think4Yourself
Forwarded from Russian MFA ๐ท๐บ
#DebunkingMyths
โ Myth: The Russian operation in Ukraine has led to a significant drop in food, animal feed and fertiliser availability, price increases for food, energy and fertilisers, and has aggravated global food insecurity.
โ Fact: Russia is not at fault for the current food security crisis. A sharp increase in prices on the commodities and raw materials markets began as early as 2020, causing concern in the EU even then, โ long before current events. The reason lies in the EUโs own errors in of its macroeconomic, energy, climate and food policies in recent years.
In trying to rebuild the world system of economic relations to its own advantage and impose its own rules, the EU fell into a trap created by its own ambitions. Under the circumstances, the West used Russiaโs special military operation in Ukraine and Donbas as an excuse to conceal its own mistakes from the world public and its own citizens. In reality, a bad situation was made worse by the reckless anti-Russia sanctions.
#Think4Yourself
โ Myth: The Russian operation in Ukraine has led to a significant drop in food, animal feed and fertiliser availability, price increases for food, energy and fertilisers, and has aggravated global food insecurity.
โ Fact: Russia is not at fault for the current food security crisis. A sharp increase in prices on the commodities and raw materials markets began as early as 2020, causing concern in the EU even then, โ long before current events. The reason lies in the EUโs own errors in of its macroeconomic, energy, climate and food policies in recent years.
In trying to rebuild the world system of economic relations to its own advantage and impose its own rules, the EU fell into a trap created by its own ambitions. Under the circumstances, the West used Russiaโs special military operation in Ukraine and Donbas as an excuse to conceal its own mistakes from the world public and its own citizens. In reality, a bad situation was made worse by the reckless anti-Russia sanctions.
#Think4Yourself
Forwarded from Russian MFA ๐ท๐บ
Fighting the EU's ยซfakesยป
#QUOTE1
High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell, 19 September:
๐ฌ Look at the statistics: two thirds of the Ukrainian exports have gone to Africa, to the Middle East and Asia.
#FACTS:
According to the data of the Joint Coordination Center (JCC), as of September 21 this year, only 5 out of 185 vessels with Ukrainian grains and other food products were directed to the countries in most need according to the UN classification of Sub-Saharan Africa:
๐ฉ๐ฏ Djibouti,
๐ฐ๐ช Kenya,
๐ธ๐ด Somalia,
๐ธ๐ฉ Sudan.
Another 3 vessels head towards countries at risk of food shortages in the Middle East and Asia (๐พ๐ชYemen and ๐ง๐ฉBangladesh).
According to the JCC, 93 of the 185 vessels mentioned were heading for the EU. The EU accounts for about 40% of the total shipments.
๐ So it is the EU, not the world's poorest countries, which is the biggest beneficiary of the Ukrainian grain export deal.
#DebunkingMyths
#QUOTE1
High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell, 19 September:
๐ฌ Look at the statistics: two thirds of the Ukrainian exports have gone to Africa, to the Middle East and Asia.
#FACTS:
According to the data of the Joint Coordination Center (JCC), as of September 21 this year, only 5 out of 185 vessels with Ukrainian grains and other food products were directed to the countries in most need according to the UN classification of Sub-Saharan Africa:
๐ฉ๐ฏ Djibouti,
๐ฐ๐ช Kenya,
๐ธ๐ด Somalia,
๐ธ๐ฉ Sudan.
Another 3 vessels head towards countries at risk of food shortages in the Middle East and Asia (๐พ๐ชYemen and ๐ง๐ฉBangladesh).
According to the JCC, 93 of the 185 vessels mentioned were heading for the EU. The EU accounts for about 40% of the total shipments.
๐ So it is the EU, not the world's poorest countries, which is the biggest beneficiary of the Ukrainian grain export deal.
#DebunkingMyths