This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Democrats are shamelessly circulating a video of fentanyl zombies in Philadelphia, trying to mock Trump by claiming he wants to “run Venezuela” while insisting he can’t run our own country.
But this video does the exact opposite, it’s a perfect example of Democrats self-owning.
Let’s be clear: Philadelphia has been under unbroken Democratic leadership since 1952, over 70 years of failure. And the results speak for themselves.
The 5 U.S. cities/counties with the highest drug overdose death rates, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Nashville, Indianapolis, and Washington, D.C. all run by Democrats.
It’s past time Americans open their eyes and face the devastating consequences of decades of failed Democratic rule.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
But this video does the exact opposite, it’s a perfect example of Democrats self-owning.
Let’s be clear: Philadelphia has been under unbroken Democratic leadership since 1952, over 70 years of failure. And the results speak for themselves.
The 5 U.S. cities/counties with the highest drug overdose death rates, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Nashville, Indianapolis, and Washington, D.C. all run by Democrats.
It’s past time Americans open their eyes and face the devastating consequences of decades of failed Democratic rule.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
😢5💯3
BREAKING: The crypto market has added $260,000,000,000 to its market cap in the first 5 days of 2026
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
❤🔥2😁1
“Girls are more persistent in applying taught solutions, whereas boys are more likely to stray away from them and experiment.”
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯1
"google air line bags being stolen by fat black women"
"no they didnt"
"yes they did"
"no they didnt"
"yes they did"
"no they didnt"
"yes they did"
"no they didnt"
"yes they did"
"okay they did, here's the video"
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
"no they didnt"
"yes they did"
"no they didnt"
"yes they did"
"no they didnt"
"yes they did"
"no they didnt"
"yes they did"
"okay they did, here's the video"
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🫡6✍2👀2
How well can LLMs play poker?
As an experiment with students at Harvey Mudd, we pitted 17 models against each other across 20,000+ hands of Poker.
Models competed directly against each other in a shared environment, meaning they had to dynamically respond to decisions made by other participants.
Overall, GPT 5.2 was the top performer.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
As an experiment with students at Harvey Mudd, we pitted 17 models against each other across 20,000+ hands of Poker.
Models competed directly against each other in a shared environment, meaning they had to dynamically respond to decisions made by other participants.
Overall, GPT 5.2 was the top performer.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀1
The biggest wins I had in my trading career were in times like this.
At some point, in the next few weeks, something will come out. Something done differently or something completely new.
It will look uncertain. Someone will link it in your group chat and you will check it out.
You won't feel 100% sure. You will ask yourself if it is something that can actually blow up.
You won't have a reference point in recent history to understand how well it is going to perform.
PTSD from the last few months will tell you to pass because it isn't an established trade yet.
But within a day or two, it will be everywhere on your timeline and everyone will be FOMO-ing into it.
If you can trust your gut and ignore fear - you will make a LOT of money buying early.
I have countless examples of these trades over the years, my favorite one being minting 80 Nodemonkes. Nobody knew how it was going to turn out, and who in their right mind is going to buy jpegs on bitcoin?
3 days later and alien Nodemonkes were going for 10 btc each.
Recent example was Aster, but in different market conditions. It appeared at weird time and a lot of people midcurved it. I saw it at 8 cents but ended up buying around 15. It took over the whole timeline in 24 hours. Same happened with $CARDS before it.
Right now is prime time for play like this. People will ignore it, and you won't know what the play is until it appears. But when it does, if you have enough experience - you will catch that opportunity.
It doesn't matter if we keep pumping, chop for 2 more months, or dump a bit from here.
What matters is that selling and fear have almost been exhausted and risk on season is here. People are ready to make money.
Keep your eyes open and don't middlecurve new things. One play like this and you are good for the rest of the cycle.
It's not time for complacency.
Don't throw your money away gambling on old stuff with ton of bagholders.
Look for fresh opportunities with no ceiling set yet and you will make a LOT of money.
Retardio.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
At some point, in the next few weeks, something will come out. Something done differently or something completely new.
It will look uncertain. Someone will link it in your group chat and you will check it out.
You won't feel 100% sure. You will ask yourself if it is something that can actually blow up.
You won't have a reference point in recent history to understand how well it is going to perform.
PTSD from the last few months will tell you to pass because it isn't an established trade yet.
But within a day or two, it will be everywhere on your timeline and everyone will be FOMO-ing into it.
If you can trust your gut and ignore fear - you will make a LOT of money buying early.
I have countless examples of these trades over the years, my favorite one being minting 80 Nodemonkes. Nobody knew how it was going to turn out, and who in their right mind is going to buy jpegs on bitcoin?
3 days later and alien Nodemonkes were going for 10 btc each.
Recent example was Aster, but in different market conditions. It appeared at weird time and a lot of people midcurved it. I saw it at 8 cents but ended up buying around 15. It took over the whole timeline in 24 hours. Same happened with $CARDS before it.
Right now is prime time for play like this. People will ignore it, and you won't know what the play is until it appears. But when it does, if you have enough experience - you will catch that opportunity.
It doesn't matter if we keep pumping, chop for 2 more months, or dump a bit from here.
What matters is that selling and fear have almost been exhausted and risk on season is here. People are ready to make money.
Keep your eyes open and don't middlecurve new things. One play like this and you are good for the rest of the cycle.
It's not time for complacency.
Don't throw your money away gambling on old stuff with ton of bagholders.
Look for fresh opportunities with no ceiling set yet and you will make a LOT of money.
Retardio.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
❤🔥2🙏2💯1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
I had to look this up -
50% of "exceptional” creatives visa applications, usually reserved for athletes or education, are for Only Fans Models and "content creators"
And they're being approved.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
50% of "exceptional” creatives visa applications, usually reserved for athletes or education, are for Only Fans Models and "content creators"
And they're being approved.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀2🔥1
Okay so I need to talk about what’s happening with Yann LeCun because this is genuinely one of the wildest exits I’ve ever seen in tech.
For those who don’t know—LeCun is one of the “godfathers of AI.” Not a marketing title. The man literally won the Turing Award (basically the Nobel Prize of computer science) for helping invent deep learning. He’s been at Meta for over a decade as their Chief AI Scientist. An absolute legend.
So here’s what happened.
Zuckerberg got frustrated. Llama wasn’t moving fast enough. The AI race was heating up and Meta felt like it was falling behind. So what does Zuck do? He drops $14 BILLION on Scale AI and hires its 28-year-old co-founder, Alexandr Wang, to run a brand new “Superintelligence Lab.”
And then—and this is the part that still blows my mind—he makes Wang… LeCun’s boss.
Think about that for a second. A 65-year-old Turing Award winner. Four decades of groundbreaking research. The guy who helped BUILD this entire field. Now reporting to someone whose company… labels data. (Scale AI is impressive, don’t get me wrong, but they don’t actually build AI models. They annotate training data for other companies.)
LeCun just did an interview with the Financial Times and honestly? He chose violence.
Called Wang “young” and “inexperienced.” Said he has “no experience with research or how you practice research, how you do it. Or what would be attractive or repulsive to a researcher.”
And then dropped this absolute gem: “You don’t tell a researcher what to do. You certainly don’t tell a researcher like me what to do.”
I mean. The man said what he said.
But wait—it gets better. Or worse, depending on how you look at it.
LeCun straight up confirmed that Meta’s team “fudged” the Llama 4 benchmark results. Like, actually manipulated them. Used different models on different tests to make the numbers look better. Remember when everyone was suspicious about those benchmarks back in April? Yeah. Turns out they were right to be.
Apparently Zuckerberg was furious when this came out internally. LeCun says he “lost confidence in everyone who was involved” and basically sidelined the entire GenAI team.
And here’s the thing that really gets me—LeCun has been saying for YEARS that LLMs are a “dead end.” That you can’t get to real intelligence just by predicting the next word. That we need “world models” that actually understand physical reality, not just language patterns.
Everyone at Meta wanted him to stop saying this publicly. Bad for the narrative, you know? But LeCun refused.
His exact words: “I’m not gonna change my mind because some dude thinks I’m wrong. I’m not wrong.”
That’s not arrogance. That’s a scientist who’s seen enough hype cycles to know when something doesn’t add up.
So now he’s out. Launching his own company called AMI Labs—Advanced Machine Intelligence. They’re targeting a $3 billion valuation. Building those world models he’s been talking about. Says he’ll have a “baby version” ready within a year.
Oh, and apparently French President Macron personally texted him after the news dropped. LeCun won’t say what the message said but like… the man is getting DMs from heads of state now.
I don’t know if LeCun is right about everything. Maybe LLMs will surprise us. Maybe Meta will figure it out. But when one of the three people who literally invented modern AI walks out the door saying your entire strategy is fundamentally flawed?
I don’t know man. I’d at least ask some questions.
The AI wars just got very, very interesting
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
For those who don’t know—LeCun is one of the “godfathers of AI.” Not a marketing title. The man literally won the Turing Award (basically the Nobel Prize of computer science) for helping invent deep learning. He’s been at Meta for over a decade as their Chief AI Scientist. An absolute legend.
So here’s what happened.
Zuckerberg got frustrated. Llama wasn’t moving fast enough. The AI race was heating up and Meta felt like it was falling behind. So what does Zuck do? He drops $14 BILLION on Scale AI and hires its 28-year-old co-founder, Alexandr Wang, to run a brand new “Superintelligence Lab.”
And then—and this is the part that still blows my mind—he makes Wang… LeCun’s boss.
Think about that for a second. A 65-year-old Turing Award winner. Four decades of groundbreaking research. The guy who helped BUILD this entire field. Now reporting to someone whose company… labels data. (Scale AI is impressive, don’t get me wrong, but they don’t actually build AI models. They annotate training data for other companies.)
LeCun just did an interview with the Financial Times and honestly? He chose violence.
Called Wang “young” and “inexperienced.” Said he has “no experience with research or how you practice research, how you do it. Or what would be attractive or repulsive to a researcher.”
And then dropped this absolute gem: “You don’t tell a researcher what to do. You certainly don’t tell a researcher like me what to do.”
I mean. The man said what he said.
But wait—it gets better. Or worse, depending on how you look at it.
LeCun straight up confirmed that Meta’s team “fudged” the Llama 4 benchmark results. Like, actually manipulated them. Used different models on different tests to make the numbers look better. Remember when everyone was suspicious about those benchmarks back in April? Yeah. Turns out they were right to be.
Apparently Zuckerberg was furious when this came out internally. LeCun says he “lost confidence in everyone who was involved” and basically sidelined the entire GenAI team.
And here’s the thing that really gets me—LeCun has been saying for YEARS that LLMs are a “dead end.” That you can’t get to real intelligence just by predicting the next word. That we need “world models” that actually understand physical reality, not just language patterns.
Everyone at Meta wanted him to stop saying this publicly. Bad for the narrative, you know? But LeCun refused.
His exact words: “I’m not gonna change my mind because some dude thinks I’m wrong. I’m not wrong.”
That’s not arrogance. That’s a scientist who’s seen enough hype cycles to know when something doesn’t add up.
So now he’s out. Launching his own company called AMI Labs—Advanced Machine Intelligence. They’re targeting a $3 billion valuation. Building those world models he’s been talking about. Says he’ll have a “baby version” ready within a year.
Oh, and apparently French President Macron personally texted him after the news dropped. LeCun won’t say what the message said but like… the man is getting DMs from heads of state now.
I don’t know if LeCun is right about everything. Maybe LLMs will surprise us. Maybe Meta will figure it out. But when one of the three people who literally invented modern AI walks out the door saying your entire strategy is fundamentally flawed?
I don’t know man. I’d at least ask some questions.
The AI wars just got very, very interesting
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀3
BREAKING: BlackRock and other ETFs have just bought $694 million worth of Bitcoin.
Largest inflow in 3 months!
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Largest inflow in 3 months!
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
The US may establish control over Greenland in the coming months, according to Politico.
This could happen ahead of the US midterm elections in November and on the occasion of the 250th anniversary of US independence on July 4, experts and officials interviewed by the publication note. The risk is described as "real and serious".
Washington's methods are likely to differ from the Venezuelan scenario: instead of a military operation, political influence, particularly attempts to bribe local politicians, may be used.
The seizure of Greenland could seriously divide NATO and EU allies even more than the issue of supporting Ukraine. Copenhagen is unlikely to receive the same support as Kiev, experts emphasize.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
This could happen ahead of the US midterm elections in November and on the occasion of the 250th anniversary of US independence on July 4, experts and officials interviewed by the publication note. The risk is described as "real and serious".
Washington's methods are likely to differ from the Venezuelan scenario: instead of a military operation, political influence, particularly attempts to bribe local politicians, may be used.
The seizure of Greenland could seriously divide NATO and EU allies even more than the issue of supporting Ukraine. Copenhagen is unlikely to receive the same support as Kiev, experts emphasize.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🔥3⚡1