More on digital dictatorship:

“And yet, for all of their hype and propaganda, the parent companies of these popular digital platforms are no less dedicated to the preservation of an imperialist status quo than their institutional predecessors, with all of the attendant silencing and repression this entails.

Big Tech’s handling of content critical of the Zionist state’s latest genocide of Palestinians in Gaza—described by former United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) spokesman Chris Gunnes as “the first genocide in the history of humanity that is livestreamed on television”—reveals that silencing is the norm. In this way, Big Tech companies reinforce Israeli settler colonialism through systemic anti-Palestinian policies. I analyze the meeting point between Big Tech and Zionist oppression of Palestinians as digital/settler-colonialism.”

https://www.projectcensored.org/refusing-the-language-of-silence/

“A Crime of Historic Proportions: UN Hands Gaza to its Killers”, rewards genocidaires.

What's most chilling is that most people just moved on to the next thing, as if the Covid op never happened, not factoring this fundamental tipping point in subsequent events, as if there were no lockstep operations -globally.
People just went back to pretending that Covid global lockstep op only happened in a vacuum. It was just a handful of incompetent politicians, hysterical media, panicking advisors. Selectively ignoring that the exact same anti-human and anti- scientific violations of human rights happened everywhere else, at exactly the same time, in exactly the same way, for exactly the same reason.
People chose hopium over reality. Chose to ignore the contradictions of BRICS public commitment to justice, sovereignty, & multipolarity, and the reality of their econ & military actions that prop up genocide & imperialism, the green thing, the new economic system, (digital) techno-fascist infrastructure, which undermines BRICS moral standing, thus revealing multipolarity is merely lipstick on a pig, a rebranding of the existing exploitative system.
••••••
"The greater tragedy is what it reveals about the complete absence of meaningful opposition to the forces destroying our world.
For years, millions of people placed their hopes in the rise of BRICS nations, or the supposed challenge to Western hegemony posed by Russia and the Global South. We convinced ourselves that somewhere, somehow, there existed powerful forces committed to justice, human rights, and the dignity of oppressed peoples.
Monday’s vote obliterated that illusion forever.
When the moment came to choose between Palestinian children and their own narrow interests, every major power chose themselves. When forced to decide between justice and convenience, they all chose convenience. When presented with the ultimate test of their proclaimed principles, they all revealed those principles to be empty propaganda."

https://open.substack.com/pub/bettbeat/p/a-crime-of-historic-proportions-un?r=7dnob&utm_medium=ios

This great piece by Steve Salaita about those in the USA who berate Palestine liberation advocates as "purists," could be applied to supporters of Russia and China today on the global scene, who are attacking anyone who wasn't happy with how Russia and China failed to support the Axis of Resistance and Palestine.
It’s as if we are living in a global Dems vs Reps theater. No Purists allowed, no global liberation movement, no 3rd worldism, no pan-Arabism, no pan-Africanism, no pan-Americanism....only pure power politics are the limits of your imagination.
https://stevesalaita.com/palestine-and-the-politics-of-purity/

Chaos and destruction of the world to continue until morale improves.

Super Creepy ‘The World Ahead 2026’ Magazine Cover Published By The Economist Shows the ruling parasites plan more carnage, wars, pestilence, and a financial crash for 2026.

Tyranny embedded in trump admin branding of the Genesis Mission as a grand AI revolution for progress and freedom, while simultaneously implementing a centralized, security-driven state apparatus that will restrict civil liberties. This contradiction exemplifies a the class war presented as innovation, as an emancipatory force, versus the reality of techno-fascist control of power and dominance. ⬇️

NEW - U.S. Department of Energy releases promotional video for Trump's AI project, Genesis Mission: "A new revolution begins."

@disclosetv

UK concludes "Exercise Pegasus," the largest pandemic simulation in nearly a decade, with the simulated virus enterovirus EV-D68, thought to originate from pigs and primarily killing children.

It looks like they are not giving up on the scamdemics!
🤮🤮🤮

Read more: https://www.disclose.tv/id/38675lannj/

Israel fortifying outposts in southern Lebanon in violation of ceasefire: Satellite imagery

Satellite imagery shows Israel continues to occupy and fortify military positions in southern Lebanon in violation of Lebanese sovereignty, one year after signing a ceasefire with Hezbollah.

@PressTV

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-requires-realpage-end-sharing-competitively-sensitive-information-and

Dynamic pricing in the rental market isn’t innovation — it’s institutionalized contempt for human need. Calling it “pricing efficiency” disguises the moral rot underneath: companies using algorithms to squeeze maximum rent from people who simply need shelter. Housing isn’t a luxury good; it’s a prerequisite for life, stability, and community.

The Justice Department’s move against RealPage exposes what many renters already knew — these systems don’t promote competition, they coordinate it. When landlords share sensitive rent data through one centralized algorithm, it stops being a market and becomes a cartel run by code. It’s not “dynamic pricing.” It’s algorithmic collusion that transforms basic human need (and suffering) into profit margins.

Another good analysis on Japan: Einar Tangen: The U.S. Instigates Japan-China Conflict
youtu.be/1s26Ygt0sIE

🇺🇸🇨🇳🇯🇵NEW VIDEO: Japan Eagerly Fills Role as US’ East Asia “Ukraine”

How to Support my Work (and thank you):
Buy Me A Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/TheNewAtlas
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/landdestroyer

Follow The New Atlas on Telegram: https://t.iss.one/brianlovethailand

On economic violence in the USA.
The poverty line lie.

This also serves the divide and conquer tactic. The forces who have nothing but utter contempt for humanity are playing with people’s lives, foisting misery, enslavement, and dependence on the masses thru economic starvation policies .
https://www.yesigiveafig.com/p/part-1-my-life-is-a-lie

Switzerland rejected Palantir software after a detailed risk assessment by its military and authorities deemed the risks unacceptable.

https://open.substack.com/pub/fackel/p/swiss-govt-rejects-palantir-citing?r=7dnob&utm_medium=ios

Switzerland rejected Palantir's software after a 20-page internal army evaluation report from December 4, 2024, concluded the risks were too high for military use, particularly for the "Informatiksystem Militärischer Nachrichtendienst" system.netzpolitik

Report Key Risks
The assessment highlighted unavoidable data outflows from Palantir's proprietary systems to the US, enabled by laws like the CLOUD Act, risking access by American intelligence. It also noted dependency on US personnel for implementation and maintenance, loss of data sovereignty, unpredictable costs without public pricing, privacy invasions from comprehensive data merging and AI analysis, and potential discriminatory profiling based on statistical patterns.netzpolitik

Private Company Issues
Palantir's US base and private structure amplify concerns over accountability, as technical insights into its software are limited, undermining claims of secure data isolation.

Ongoing US technical access remains unclear, heightening fears of external control.netzpolitik

Procurement Context
Despite years of Palantir's efforts—including CEO Alex Karp meeting Swiss officials—the Federal Office for Defence Procurement (armasuisse) deemed it non-compliant with tender criteria, recommending European or open-source alternatives to preserve *sovereignty*. The full report, obtained via 59 Öffentlichkeitsgesetz requests by Republik magazine, remains partially redacted in public disclosures.netzpolitik
https://netzpolitik.org/2025/schweiz-palantir-software-hat-verheerende-risiken/
https://cdn.repub.ch/s3/republik-assets/repos/republik/article-wie-palantir-hartnaeckig-den-schweizer-staat-umwarb/files/505a33d5-adbd-49f8-baca-5864df625564/armeestaab-evaluation.pdf
https://langenselbold.de/digitales-wissen/
https://netzpolitik.org
https://x.com/MichaelSeidlitz/status/1998364174527955281

Ten of thousands of Jews from more than 70 countries have participated in a genocide. The only globalised terror is Zionist terror. The only phrase we should be talking about as inspiring mass murder is “Israel has the right to defend itself.'"

https://www.donotpanic.news/p/lone-soldiers-and-dual-nationals

‎If you want to understand why the U.S. and Israel see Iran as such a threat, then this historic speech by Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, delivered earlier this month at the 16th Al Jazeera Forum held in Doha, offers good insight:

‎“Excellencies, Distinguished colleagues,
‎Ladies and gentlemen,

‎It is a privilege to address you at this distinguished forum and discuss the profound question of our region: Palestine.

‎Let me begin with a fact that the region has learned through decades of painful experience, and that the world is learning again at a terrible human cost: ‘Palestine is not one issue among many’.

‎Palestine is the defining question of justice in West Asia and beyond. It is the strategic and moral compass of our region. It is a test of whether international law has meaning, whether human rights have universal value, and whether global institutions exist to protect the weak — or merely to rationalise the power of the strong.

‎For generations, the Palestinian crisis was understood primarily as the consequence of an illegal occupation and the denial of an inalienable right: the right of a people to self-determination. But today, we must recognise that the crisis has moved far beyond the parameters of occupation alone. What we are witnessing in Gaza is not merely war. It is not a ‘conflict’ between equal parties. It is not an unfortunate byproduct of security measures. It is the deliberate destruction of civilian life on a massive scale. It is genocide.

[…]

‎But Palestine and Gaza is not only a humanitarian crisis. It has become the platform for something larger and more dangerous: an expansionist project pursued under the banner of ‘security’.

‎This project has three consequences — each of them profound, each of them alarming:

‎The first consequence is global. The Israeli regime’s conduct in Palestine, and the impunity granted to it, have deeply damaged the international legal order. We must say this clearly: the world is moving toward a condition where international law no longer is respected and governs international relations.

‎What is perhaps most dangerous is the precedent being established: that if a state has sufficient political cover and protection, it may bomb civilians, besiege populations, target infrastructure, assassinate individuals across borders, and still demand to be regarded as lawful.

‎This is not merely a Palestinian problem. It is a global problem.

‎We are witnessing not only the tragedy of Palestine, but the transformation of the world into a place where the law is replaced by force.

‎The second consequence is regional. Israel’s expansionist project has had a direct and destabilising impact on the security of all countries in the region.

‎The Israeli regime now openly violates borders. It breaches sovereignties. It assassinates official dignitaries. It conducts terrorist operations. It expands its reach in multiple theatres. And it does so, not discreetly, but with a sense of entitlement — because it has learned that international accountability will not come.

‎Let us be candid: if the Gaza issue is ‘settled’ through destruction and forced displacement — if that becomes the model — then the West Bank will be next. Annexation will become policy.

‎This is the essence of what has long been called the ‘Greater Israel’ project.

‎The question therefore is not whether Israel’s actions threaten Palestinians alone. The question is whether the region will accept a future in which borders are temporary, sovereignty is conditional, and security is determined not by law or diplomacy, but by the ambitions of a militarised occupier.

‎The third consequence is structural — and perhaps the most dangerous.

‎Israel’s expansionist project requires that neighboring countries be weakened — militarily, technologically, economically, and socially — so that the Israeli regime permanently enjoys the upper hand.

‎Under this project, Israel is free to expand its military arsenal without limits, including weapons of mass destruction that remain outside any inspection regime.

Yet other countries are demanded to disarm. Others are pressured to reduce defensive capacity. Others are punished for scientific progress. Others are sanctioned for building resilience.

‎Nobody should be confused: this is not arms control, it is not non-proliferation, it is not security.

‎It is the enforcement of permanent inequality: Israel must have a ‘military, intelligence and strategic edge’, and others must remain vulnerable. This is a doctrine of domination.

‎Ladies and gentlemen,

‎This is why the Palestinian question is not only a humanitarian issue. It is a strategic issue. It is not only about Gaza and the West Bank. It is about the future of our region and the rules of the world.

‎So what must be done?

‎It is not enough to express concern. It is not enough to issue statements. It is not enough to mourn. We need a coordinated strategy of action — legal, diplomatic, economic, and security-based — rooted in the principles of international law and collective responsibility.

‎First, the international community must support legal mechanisms without hesitation.

‎Second, there must be consequences for violations.

‎We call for comprehensive and targeted sanctions against Israel, including: an immediate arms embargo, ‎the suspension of military and intelligence cooperation,
‎restrictions on officials, and banning trade.

‎Third, we need a credible political horizon grounded in law. The international community must affirm: the end of occupation, the right of return and compensation in accordance with international law, and the establishment of a unified and independent Palestinian state with Al-Quds Al-Sharif as its capital.

‎Fourth, the humanitarian crisis must be treated as a matter of urgent international responsibility. Collective punishment must never be normalised.

‎Fifth, regional states must coordinate to protect sovereignty and deter aggression. The principle must be clear: security cannot be built on the insecurity of others.

‎And finally, the Islamic world, the Arab world, and the nations of the Global South must build a united diplomatic front.

‎The Organization of Islamic Cooperation, the Arab League, and regional organisations must move beyond symbolism toward coordinated action: legal support, diplomatic initiatives, economic measures, and strategic messaging.

‎This is not about confrontation. It is about preventing the region from being reshaped by force.

‎Dear colleagues,

‎Let no one miscalculate: a region cannot be kept stable by allowing one actor to act above the law. The doctrine of impunity will not produce peace; it will produce wider conflict.

‎The path to stability is clear: justice for Palestine, accountability for crimes, an end to occupation and apartheid, and a regional order built on sovereignty, equality, and cooperation.

‎If the world wants peace, it must stop rewarding aggression.

‎If the world wants stability, it must stop enabling expansionism.

‎If the world believes in international law, it must enforce it — consistently and without double standards.

‎And if the nations of this region seek a future free from perpetual war, they must recognise this fundamental truth: Palestine is not merely a cause for solidarity; it is the indispensable cornerstone of regional security.

‎Thank you”.

- Abbas Araghchi

Th words of a bloodthirsty psychopath.
⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️

NOW - Secretary of War Hegseth: "The two most powerful air forces in the world will have complete control of Iranian skies... B-2s, B-52s, B-1s, predator drones, fighters controlling the skies, picking targets, death and destruction from the sky all day long."

@disclosetv