Forwarded from Ian's Intel
NYSE PARENT COMPANY INVESTS IN CRYPTO EXCHANGE OKX AT $25 BILLION VALUATION AS PART OF PUSH INTO BLOCKCHAIN-BASED STOCKS: FORTUNE
SOURCE
SOURCE
π1
what is up with people posting unnecessarily long X articles
i am convinced people are churning longer articles with AI just to hit the algo (X rewards articles more these days)
most of these articles drone on or beat around the bush longer than they should and its getting really annoying
we're in a weird time where people are using AI to generate long articles just for readers to use AI to summarise them
i don't understand this, just get to the point
i would like you so much more as a reader if youre concise
what happened to Feynman technique
any article on X more than 3 scrolls are usually a waste of time, unless you're writing the next harry potter, and this is coming from someone that reads at least 5 a day the past months
i tend to just skim through and stop at important or interesting parts of the longer articles these days
kinda ridiculous
i am convinced people are churning longer articles with AI just to hit the algo (X rewards articles more these days)
most of these articles drone on or beat around the bush longer than they should and its getting really annoying
we're in a weird time where people are using AI to generate long articles just for readers to use AI to summarise them
i don't understand this, just get to the point
i would like you so much more as a reader if youre concise
what happened to Feynman technique
any article on X more than 3 scrolls are usually a waste of time, unless you're writing the next harry potter, and this is coming from someone that reads at least 5 a day the past months
i tend to just skim through and stop at important or interesting parts of the longer articles these days
kinda ridiculous
π19π₯3
worst part is the comments are usually ai comments that repeat or rephrase a part of the article in the tone of "yeah you're so right!" as if they've read the whole thing
usually these are real profiles automating their replies, probably trying to hit impressions for monetisation (sorry if you're a real person replying like an AI)
idk fellas, make reading enjoyable again
usually these are real profiles automating their replies, probably trying to hit impressions for monetisation (sorry if you're a real person replying like an AI)
idk fellas, make reading enjoyable again
π3
Crypto Mumbles
any article on X more than 3 scrolls are usually a waste of time
in most cases, probably 90% of the time, you really don't need more than 3 scrolls to get your points across
except those indepth tutorials/dives/reports on complex topics or events
what do you mean you need 2000 words to tell me that oranges are orange
we gotta stop rewarding creators for posting nonsense articles
except those indepth tutorials/dives/reports on complex topics or events
what do you mean you need 2000 words to tell me that oranges are orange
we gotta stop rewarding creators for posting nonsense articles
π€5π2
Crypto Mumbles
what is up with people posting unnecessarily long X articles i am convinced people are churning longer articles with AI just to hit the algo (X rewards articles more these days) most of these articles drone on or beat around the bush longer than they shouldβ¦
X (formerly Twitter)
dpycm (@dpycm) on X
What Happened to Just Getting to the Point?
π€£3