Beyond Liberalism
577 subscribers
825 photos
270 videos
59 files
516 links
Traditionalist channel. Posts are from the perspective of Traditional Perennialism and Traditionalist Christianity (Catholic and Orthodox) along with Eurasianism and Elite Theory.
Download Telegram
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Nick Fuentes on the Suicide of Liberal Ideology

When a nation or race becomes Liberal, it adopts a philosophical framework which encourages behaviour that ultimately leads to the complete end of that entity. This is due to Liberalism’s promotion of degeneracy and attempting to go against all of human nature, such aspects are perceivable in the realm of Transsexualism, Homosexuality, Hyper-Individualism, and the Denial of the Collective.
7
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Shahid King Bolsen on Charlie Kirk and Tyler Robinson

Dr. Bolsen speaks about the system and society of the west that engineers both those like Charlie Kirk as well as those like Tyler Robinson.
🔥1
I was just pondering earlier that the average American probably suffers from some form of Munchausen syndrome. The condition is defined as thus: a mental health condition that occurs when you appear sick, pretend to feel symptoms or intentionally make yourself ill.

Perhaps the most common example are LGBT Twitter bios where these people claim to have a myriad of disorders such as (but not limited to) PTSD, Gender Dysphoria, depression, anxiety, autism, etc.

Munchausen syndrome is not the disorder(s) in which the person claims to suffer from, rather, the real disorder is the belief in the supposed illnesses claimed.

What I propose is that being political is a type of mental disorder when we are talking about plebeians.

Historically, politics was reserved for the elites; the nobility. The nobility assumed the risk of political violence, and as compensation for that risk they received land and vast wealth. They also had the upbringing and training to handle such a task, and would have access to immense resources such as the king's court, archives, funding, etc., enabling them to fulfill their position. That is what sets apart the nobleman and the plebeian. A job tends to pay by the amount of risk assumed. For the nobleman, he risks not only his own life, but that of his family as well, from both foreign and domestic threats. He has the most on the line. And so I must stress, that being political is a full time profession.

When America extended the political sphere to the common man, the common man deluded himself into thinking that he is noble. How then, can a man who works, either in the field or the factory, have the time to understand the vastness of politics? Yet he attempts to anyways, and it consumes him. He assumes the risk of the noble without the benefits, and can't do nearly as well stepping up to the plate, and even if he had the potential to, he lacks the power to influence policy because his "nobility" only exists in his head.

In this scenario, the plebeian's claim to illness is his claim to nobility, but it is the claim itself that is the disorder (Munchausen syndrome).

The plebeian of sound mind is content in knowing that he does not have a choice.
💯4🤔1
The Duality of Neo-"Trads" in the West

On the one hand they advocate for the end of modernity, but on the other hand they oppose all forces that struggle against it.
👍52
Backgrounds and Thoughts

Demographic diversity is ultimately synonymous with neurological divergence. Similarly, demographic homogeneity is synonymous with neurological hegemony.
🤔3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
NEVER Defend Yourself.
(Machiavelli’s Trick to Flip the Power)

by Mindplicit

The moment you explain yourself, you've already lost.

this video, dissects the dark psychology behind why defending yourself destroys your power —and reveal Machiavelli's ancient strategy to flip the dynamic instantly. Learn how silence becomes a weapon, why explanations signal weakness, and the exact psychological techniques to become untouchable in any confrontation.

It's not about being passive.
It's about strategic dominance.

• Why your brain betrays you during accusations (and how to override it)

• The "Vacuum of Silence" technique that makes attackers crumble

• "Agree and Amplify" — The Jester's Dagger method

• How to seize the role of Judge instead of Defendant

• The "Fogging" technique that neutralizes any attack

• Building the internal architecture of true power
🤔2👏1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Movie: Kolberg (1945)

The movie Kolberg was made to celebrate the months of defiance by the city against Napoleon’s invasion, where the city’s siege was lifted by the signing of the peace treaty for the end of the War of the Fourth Coalition. The Prussians had held on for 3.5 months.
That Time Caesar Conquered the Senate by TheWanderingEuropean

In this video, TWE explores the early life of the figure Julius Caesar and what led to his political rise. These aspects would be emulated by men like Napoleon and Adolf Hitler. Caesar is such a legendary figure in European history that his name became the title for king in many countries like the German word ‘Kaiser.’ A Caesarian figure tends to be an extraordinary individual who uses the state of the time against his political rivals to centralise power around himself, many times including great military accomplishments.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Anatomy of a Revolution
by Ex Libris

What causes a political revolution? Once a revolution breaks out, what are the internal stages of its development? At a glance, the circumstances and content of any given political situation make each revolution seem unique—each is separated by a diversity of grievances, geographical conditions, ideological interpretations, and revolutionary aims. But by stepping back and viewing each revolution as a social process rather than a historical event, deeper structural affinities begin to emerge. By compositing elements from the French, Russian, American, and other revolutions, something like a revolution in general begins to take shape.

TIMESTAMPS

00:00​ The Ancien Régime
11:44​ The Rule of the Moderates
19:27​ The Reign of Terror
25:37​ Thermidor
36:29​ Conclusion
3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
THE GREAT MAN THEORY OF HISTORY
All Great Men Studied History the Same Way — Here's How
by ThinkingWest

Thomas Carlyle’s Great Man Theory is a controversial historical lens that argues world history is merely the biography of a select few figures. From Julius Caesar and Alexander the Great to Napoleon and Shakespeare, elite figures use creative genius and willpower to shape civilization. Carlyle’s "top-down" history contrasts Herbert Spencer’s social history and Howard Zinn’s "history from below." But Great Man theory is more than just history --Machiavelli and Plutarch believed it could be used to achieve real world success.

01:15​ Thomas Carlyle
02:23​ What Makes a Hero?
04:38​ 6 Types of Heroes
05:37​ Plutarch
06:20​ Machiavelli
07:50​ Social History
09:55​ Lessons from Great Men