Schopenhauer published the revolutionary philosophical work 'The World as Will and Representation.' Rejecting traditional rationalism and metaphysics prevalent in European thought, the young philosopher delved into the existential rawness hidden by reason. The book posed a direct challenge to eminent figures in conceptual philosophy like Hegel and Fichte. However, Schopenhauer's deconstructionist approach, focusing on the 'life' of living beings with bodies instead of metaphysical concepts was unconventional for his time, and philosophers did not express much interest.

(5)

The comprehension of the world relies on intellectual elements like time, space, and causality. However, these elements portray the world as phenomena (multiple objects in parallel and succession in terms of time and space) rather than revealing it as a substance, challenging Kant's perspective. Schopenhauer, aligning with Kant, sees everything as representations. He objectively examines them, even considering one's body as a starting point for understanding the world. In essence, the body is merely a representation. Schopenhauer contemplates these representations in the objective aspects of time, space, and causality, emphasizing that his viewpoint is not conceptual.

Similar to Kant, Schopenhauer asserts that the world can be understood through experience. The graspable world, in this context, is not the actuality but the phenomenon, the conceptual world. Rejecting idealistic philosophies like Hegel's, Schopenhauer aims to understand the world through will rather than reason. According to him, reason is a brain phenomenon limited by the will: a byproduct of the will. Therefore, understanding the world requires approaching it through will, not reason. Schopenhauer argues that intellect, the capacity for human cognitive activity, is limited and originates from the will. The will objectifies through various things, and the world objectified by the will is termed the world of representation. The existence of the world as a will beyond time, space, and causality constraints can be confirmed through our bodies. Experiencing the world as will happens not through the subjectivity-objectivity distinction but through intuition and contemplation.

(6)

Ikki Kita's understanding of Japan's role in the World.

Passage read from "An Outline Plan For The Reorganization of Japan"

Read the Full Article on Ikki Kita:

Ikki Kita: The Philosopher of Imperial Japan

THE SOCIOLOGY OF NAZI RACE SCIENCE
by The Facifist

There is a common belief today that Nazi race science embraced the concept of “scientific racism” (also referred to as “race realism”), which was prevalent in the intellectual circles of liberal democracies like England, France, and the United States. It is often claimed that the decline of scientific racism in the latter half of the 20th century was partly due to its association with Nazism, which had fallen out of favor. However, this notion is misleading.

The most striking irony is that the rejection of scientific racism as a “pseudoscience” in the 21st century did not originate from progressive liberal thinkers in the latter part of the 20th century, but rather from National Socialist intellectuals in the 1930s. The Nazis viewed the core ideas of scientific racism as a means to uphold the “supremacy of the bourgeois spirit” and to “fortify its (liberal) hegemony”.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE

Alexander Dugin on Robert Sarah

According to illiberal philosopher Alexander Dugin, there are two excellent points about Cardinal Robert Sarah:

1.) He is Traditional

2.) He is more authentic and less fraudulent

"Multipolarity" -- a moralizing cope, masquerading as a political theory
by Richard Spencer

Spencer critiques the underlying assumptions of Aleksandr Dugin's 4th political theory. His analysis is spot on as usual.

Nick Fuentes on the Suicide of Liberal Ideology

When a nation or race becomes Liberal, it adopts a philosophical framework which encourages behaviour that ultimately leads to the complete end of that entity. This is due to Liberalism’s promotion of degeneracy and attempting to go against all of human nature, such aspects are perceivable in the realm of Transsexualism, Homosexuality, Hyper-Individualism, and the Denial of the Collective.

I was just pondering earlier that the average American probably suffers from some form of Munchausen syndrome. The condition is defined as thus: a mental health condition that occurs when you appear sick, pretend to feel symptoms or intentionally make yourself ill.

Perhaps the most common example are LGBT Twitter bios where these people claim to have a myriad of disorders such as (but not limited to) PTSD, Gender Dysphoria, depression, anxiety, autism, etc.

Munchausen syndrome is not the disorder(s) in which the person claims to suffer from, rather, the real disorder is the belief in the supposed illnesses claimed.

What I propose is that being political is a type of mental disorder when we are talking about plebeians.

Historically, politics was reserved for the elites; the nobility. The nobility assumed the risk of political violence, and as compensation for that risk they received land and vast wealth. They also had the upbringing and training to handle such a task, and would have access to immense resources such as the king's court, archives, funding, etc., enabling them to fulfill their position. That is what sets apart the nobleman and the plebeian. A job tends to pay by the amount of risk assumed. For the nobleman, he risks not only his own life, but that of his family as well, from both foreign and domestic threats. He has the most on the line. And so I must stress, that being political is a full time profession.

When America extended the political sphere to the common man, the common man deluded himself into thinking that he is noble. How then, can a man who works, either in the field or the factory, have the time to understand the vastness of politics? Yet he attempts to anyways, and it consumes him. He assumes the risk of the noble without the benefits, and can't do nearly as well stepping up to the plate, and even if he had the potential to, he lacks the power to influence policy because his "nobility" only exists in his head.

In this scenario, the plebeian's claim to illness is his claim to nobility, but it is the claim itself that is the disorder (Munchausen syndrome).

The plebeian of sound mind is content in knowing that he does not have a choice.

Republished and updated:

https://fascio.substack.com/p/anti-imperialism-critiqued-ac3

Racist liberals 🤝 Duginist anti-racists

https://www.eurosiberia.net/p/why-the-nazis-were-anti-white

NEVER Defend Yourself.
(Machiavelli’s Trick to Flip the Power)
by Mindplicit

The moment you explain yourself, you've already lost.

this video, dissects the dark psychology behind why defending yourself destroys your power —and reveal Machiavelli's ancient strategy to flip the dynamic instantly. Learn how silence becomes a weapon, why explanations signal weakness, and the exact psychological techniques to become untouchable in any confrontation.

It's not about being passive.
It's about strategic dominance.

• Why your brain betrays you during accusations (and how to override it)

• The "Vacuum of Silence" technique that makes attackers crumble

• "Agree and Amplify" — The Jester's Dagger method

• How to seize the role of Judge instead of Defendant

• The "Fogging" technique that neutralizes any attack

• Building the internal architecture of true power

Movie: Kolberg (1945)

The movie Kolberg was made to celebrate the months of defiance by the city against Napoleon’s invasion, where the city’s siege was lifted by the signing of the peace treaty for the end of the War of the Fourth Coalition. The Prussians had held on for 3.5 months.

That Time Caesar Conquered the Senate by TheWanderingEuropean

In this video, TWE explores the early life of the figure Julius Caesar and what led to his political rise. These aspects would be emulated by men like Napoleon and Adolf Hitler. Caesar is such a legendary figure in European history that his name became the title for king in many countries like the German word ‘Kaiser.’ A Caesarian figure tends to be an extraordinary individual who uses the state of the time against his political rivals to centralise power around himself, many times including great military accomplishments.

Anatomy of a Revolution
by Ex Libris

What causes a political revolution? Once a revolution breaks out, what are the internal stages of its development? At a glance, the circumstances and content of any given political situation make each revolution seem unique—each is separated by a diversity of grievances, geographical conditions, ideological interpretations, and revolutionary aims. But by stepping back and viewing each revolution as a social process rather than a historical event, deeper structural affinities begin to emerge. By compositing elements from the French, Russian, American, and other revolutions, something like a revolution in general begins to take shape.

TIMESTAMPS

00:00​ The Ancien Régime
11:44​ The Rule of the Moderates
19:27​ The Reign of Terror
25:37​ Thermidor
36:29​ Conclusion

THE GREAT MAN THEORY OF HISTORY
All Great Men Studied History the Same Way — Here's How
by ThinkingWest

Thomas Carlyle’s Great Man Theory is a controversial historical lens that argues world history is merely the biography of a select few figures. From Julius Caesar and Alexander the Great to Napoleon and Shakespeare, elite figures use creative genius and willpower to shape civilization. Carlyle’s "top-down" history contrasts Herbert Spencer’s social history and Howard Zinn’s "history from below." But Great Man theory is more than just history --Machiavelli and Plutarch believed it could be used to achieve real world success.

01:15​ Thomas Carlyle
02:23​ What Makes a Hero?
04:38​ 6 Types of Heroes
05:37​ Plutarch
06:20​ Machiavelli
07:50​ Social History
09:55​ Lessons from Great Men