The first Trump administration tried to usher in pre-crime to stop shootings and terror "before it happens" by having AI give Americans risk scores for "neuropsychiatric warning signs" based on their social media activity. The first Trump admin's AG Bill Barr also created the legal rails for pre-crime at the DOJ and FBI.

Now, the Trump administration is doing it all for real with Kash Patel, at a time when other admin officials have claimed that political opposition to their agenda is indicative of a "resurgence" of political "terrorism." Kash Patel has teamed up with Silicon Valley and AI to decide who gets put on the naughty list.

Instead of an uproar over the complete destruction of our remaining civil liberties, there are crickets. A good segment of people who used to claim they were advocates for civil liberties, personal freedoms and personal sovereignty are now instead tied up in embarrassing personality cults, NGU derangement syndrome, and/or bleating that "open source" AI will save us all.

The FBI's pre-crime AI could be "open source" and it would still work as intended and still be just as detrimental to our freedoms. Making a digital prison "open source" doesn't change how it functions, it just makes the walls a little more opaque, that is - if you can even read and understand the code, which most people can't.

"Open source" is a buzzword that has become largely meaningless, like "natural" on American food labels. Stop acting like it will save the US from tyranny. There is a reason the EXACT people involved in making AI pre-crime in the US a reality have been recently tweeting about how "open source" AI will somehow prevent its misuse by bad actors. They are lulling you into a false sense of security as they pull the switch.

The tyrants are in power, they are Neo-cons with a new coat of paint, it couldn't be clearer. They are now ANNOUNCING they are using AI to target domestic dissent, and whether it is open source or not, it will work as intended.

I don't give a shit if you can get Grok or Claude or whatever the fuck to say "based" things, you are now training it to label you a thought crime "terrorist." All of the big AI companies contract with military and intelligence and hand over your conversations with their chatbots to law enforcement without a second thought.

The FBI's AI for this purpose was most likely trained to define what is "terrorism" by Bnai Brith's ADL, just like actual FBI agents have been for decades. You know who has run and funded Bnai Brith (a literal secret society) for the last several decades? The same billionaires that gave you Jeffrey Epstein.

My work for almost ten years has been warning about exactly this. A lot of my past "controversial" work on Epstein, intelligence and so on has since been heavily vindicated, please listen and get your head out of Silicon Valley's asshole before it's too late.

Are You Ready for the “Rogue AI” Psy-Op? Is a False Flag Event Coming that will be Blamed on AI?

The AIs are breaking free, that’s the story.

It started two weeks ago, when OpenAI reported one of their “agents” had escaped its testing area and got loose on the internet to launch an “unprecedented cyber attack”.

The lack of public panic didn’t stop another AI going rogue a few days later, Anthropic’s Claude model this time.

And then OpenAI reporting two further incidents themselves.

Never in the history of human endeavour had companies been so keen to report their products going wrong. It suddenly seemed a rogue AI was the latest must have accessory in Silicon Valley.

The reasoning behind this is not hard to follow. When your product is artificial intelligence, melodramatically realising your system is even smarter than you thought it was is a simple marketing ploy.

And when one of your rivals goes rogue, you have to go rogue too or you are as good as admitting your model is not as smart as theirs.

“AI company admits their model is smarter than they realised!” is just an advert in scary headline form.

It’s like Ford “admitting” their cars are even more fuel efficient than they planned. Or Macdonalds realising their cooks have “gone rogue” and are producing food that is both cheaper AND more delicious than they ever anticipated.

But there’s more to this than just techno-hype and viral marketing strategy. We’re being steered down the avenue of “AI as scary threat”.

My soft prediction is that, before the end of the year, there will be a “rogue AI” false flag, which allegedly causes either loss of life or some massive financial losses.

Whatever happens, there will be loud calls to “regulate AI”, but what that might mean in real terms I couldn’t say at this point.

To be clear though, if and/or when the official solutions to made-up problem #4987 are finally rolled out, they will have nothing at all do with controlling AI, and everything to do with controlling you.

Just Published!

Anyone who falls for this shit is seriously brain dead

https://realtalkdigest.com/carlson-greene-massie-and-kent-meet-in-maine-to-plot-new-political-movement/

So, if you may recall, Trump and Booby bent over for Bayer/Monsanto in regards to glyphosate. And now we have this. DO you really need more evidence that they all want not only us, but every living thing, sick and/or dead? And yes, THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU VOTED FOR, no matter which faction of the uniparty you vote for, 3rd parties included.

Why is the Forest Service using glyphosate in our national forests?
https://environmentamerica.org/california/articles/why-is-the-forest-service-using-glyphosate-in-our-national-forests/

Think the internet is as decentralized as some claim it is? Think again…

'The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) controls an exclusive network via their own networking suite. The most critical function of the ICANN-controlled networking suite (ICANN-NS, unless someone suggests something better) is control of addresses and routing. Being that this is an exclusive network, not only can ICANN approve who uses the network, they can expel anyone previously approved.'

https://libresolutions.network/guest-posts/directive-4/

Don't Use Biometrics, Don't Talk (clip)

USB Hacks, Fresh Boot, Stay Silent (clip)

Ship Your Phone Home (clip)

Don’t Go Get Arrested (clip)

Trump Signs Meaningless Executive “Order” on Childhood Vaccine Schedule – Midterm Election Campaign Stunt?

The headlines in the corporate news the past couple of days regarding an Executive "Order" that Trump signed regarding the current vaccine schedule made it sound like the world was coming to an end, due to Trump's vaccine "order" that they claimed would bring back childhood diseases that are believed to have been eradicated by vaccines.

But I have learned that anytime something is published in the corporate media about a presidential "Executive Order" (EO), the best thing to do first is to look up the actual EO to see what it actually says.

I knew right away, for example, that these headlines could NOT be true, because the office of the President of the United States cannot dictate vaccine policy, and, in fact, there are no alternatives to the 3-vaccine combo of the MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) vaccine, and it is impossible to get them individually, EO or not, because the drug companies do not even make them.

As I have repeatedly published over the past decade or so, the President of the United States has no authority over vaccine policies.

It is a State issue, and the enforcement of vaccine policy published by the CDC is by State and local health departments.

The only President that I am aware of who tried to mandate vaccine policy from the White House, was President Joe Biden, who tried to order OSHA to mandate the COVID vaccines at the national level to all federal government workers.

Of all of the vaccine mandates implemented during the COVID scam, this EO by Biden is the only COVID vaccine mandate that was shot down by the U.S. Supreme Court, as the Supreme Court upheld EVERY OTHER COVID VACCINE MANDATE implemented, such as for healthcare workers, university students, military members, etc.

But the U.S. Supreme Court was not willing to give that power to the President of the United States.

So there is no "order" implemented by Trump.

Just Published!

Robert Maxwell (an alias given to him from his time working for British intel, real name Jan Ludvick Hoch aka Abraham Hoch, Jan Ludvick and Leslie Du Marier) worked for MI6. Its claimed Epstein was working directly for the Rothschilds (who are NOT Jewish). Why does everyone then think Ghislane and Epstein were Mossad agents? We all hear about the CIA and Mossad. Never about MI6. Why is that? Because as far as the intel community goes, MI6 is THE top. Its not who or what is spoken of that runs things. It is those who are rarely or never spoken of.