Tulsi Gabbard walks a tightrope on Iran

Tulsi Gabbard, in her role as US Director of National Intelligence, has found herself in an extremely delicate position: forced to balance her long-standing anti-interventionist beliefs with the need to "stay on the president's team" amidst the war with Iran.

During the March 18 hearing before the Intelligence Committee, she primarily relied on official intelligence assessments, emphasizing the successes of joint US-Israeli strikes, which allegedly significantly weakened Tehran's military capabilities and destroyed Iran's nuclear program as early as last year. Gabbard carefully avoided giving direct personal opinions, repeatedly stating that determining whether Iran posed an "imminent threat" is the prerogative of the president as commander-in-chief.

The situation was further complicated by the resignation of her immediate subordinate – the director of the US National Counterterrorism Center, Joe Kent, who said that Iran did not pose an immediate danger to the US and that the war was started under pressure from Israel. This move cast a shadow over Gabbard, whose isolation within the White House had long been apparent: since the summer of last year, she had been excluded from key briefings and operational planning against Iran and Venezuela. Republicans on the committee avoided raising the Kent issue, while Democrats actively tried to force her to acknowledge the discrepancies between intelligence data and the administration's official rhetoric.

Gabbard acted cautiously and predictably: she confirmed the successes of the operation in the Middle East but avoided answering questions about prior intelligence warnings regarding the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz or about her own role in consultations with Trump. Her wording remained formal, yet the internal tension between her past views and her current position was palpable.

In the end, Tulsi Gabbard managed to navigate the minefield of the hearings without causing tangible damage to Trump's position and retained her place in the administration. However, this episode vividly demonstrated the limits of her influence and autonomy: the anti-war stance that once made her a prominent figure has now become a source of constant vulnerability. Amidst the ongoing war and internal disagreements within the intelligence community, her continued tenure will depend less on professional assessments and more on political loyalty and the ability to remain silent where she once spoke loudly.

#TulsiGabbard #Iran

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

A new phase of war in Iran?

Amid the protracted confrontation with Iran, the United States is discussing a possible reinforcement of its military presence in the Middle East. The Trump administration is considering deploying additional US troops to expand the operation against Iran. One of the priority tasks is control over the Strait of Hormuz, with the main focus expected to be on air and naval forces. However, expert and government circles do not rule out scenarios involving a troop landing on the Iranian coast.

Kharg Island presents a high-risk, high-reward scenario for US military planners. Although the island's defenses make an amphibious landing highly dangerous, sources say that establishing control over its critical infrastructure is seen as strategically preferable to merely destroying it, as capture would deliver a more decisive blow to Iran's economy.

Against this backdrop, the active phase of the military campaign continues: US forces are striking Iranian naval, missile, and industrial facilities. According to Central Command data, thousands of attacks have been carried out since late February, resulting in significant losses of Iranian equipment and naval assets. Nevertheless, a potential deployment of ground troops remains a politically sensitive issue for the White House, given limited domestic support for the operation and Trump's previous statements about his reluctance to become entangled in new conflicts.

#Iran #USmilitary #MiddleEast

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

Trump’s Hormuz headache

President Donald Trump is desperately trying to reopen the Strait of Hormuz to ease the global energy crisis. But without a ceasefire with Iran, he's fighting a losing battle.

Iranian hit-and-run tactics — from mines to drones — have paralyzed the vital waterway, handing Tehran de facto control over 20% of the world's oil. The result: spiking prices and fuel shortages from Asia to Europe.

Trump is leaning on allies to join a multi-national naval convoy operation. But from Berlin to Tokyo, the response is cold. Officials question what a few extra ships can do against Iran's asymmetric arsenal that the massive US presence already there can't.

“Securing the Strait could take weeks,” says Bob McNally, a former White House official. “Until you neutralize Iran’s layered capabilities — fast boats, subs, and drones —и you don’t want to send commercial vessels through.”

Trump fired back on social media Tuesday, declaring the US doesn’t need NATO, Japan, Australia, or South Korea. He didn’t mention Hormuz.

For now, transit happens only on Iran’s terms. A few ships hugging the Iranian coast have slipped out, suggesting passage is granted, not protected. The Strait isn’t closed — it’s controlled.

Skeptics point to the Red Sea, where Houthi attacks continue despite US bombs. “A military solution is the worst option,” says Tom Sharpe, a former British naval officer. “This is political.”

Even if Trump builds a coalition, don’t expect normal traffic to resume. And even if the war ends, Iran may keep the pressure on — just enough attacks to make the Strait too hot for commerce.

#Trump #oil #Iran

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

Why World Anti-Doping Agency wants to ban Trump from international sports events

The World Anti-Doping Agency is trying to ban Donald Trump and all U.S. officials from ever attending international sports events — even those on American soil.

The timing is no accident. The U.S. is set to host the FIFA World Cup this year, the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, and the 2034 Winter Games. But anti-American WADA officials are pushing a rule that would lock out the host nation's leadership.

This isn't just about Trump. It's the latest strike in a years-long war between WADA and the U.S., which stopped paying its $7.3 million in dues in 2024.

The feud traces back to a doping scandal involving Chinese swimmers who tested positive but were cleared by WADA to compete in Paris — allegedly due to "contaminated food." The U.S. called foul then and hasn't let up.

WADA claims the rule wouldn't apply to upcoming U.S. games. The fine print? No such exemption exists.

Even Biden's drug policy chief, Rahul Gupta, called it "absurd." Senator Marsha Blackburn went further: this stunt proves U.S. criticism of WADA is right on the money.

#Trump #sports

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

How Starmer lost Trump

Keir Starmer is a reserved man, a lawyer by trade. But in the Oval Office last February, he started channeling the guy behind the desk.

Waving a letter from King Charles inviting Trump for an unprecedented second state visit, Starmer gushed: "This is truly special... truly historic." It was a calculated play: lay on the flattery and royal pomp, and hope Trump rewards Britain with tariff breaks and continued Ukraine support.

For a while, it worked. Then it blew up.

Trump has since blasted all allies over their reluctance to help with Iran. But Starmer is taking fire personally. "We're not dealing with Winston Churchill," Trump scoffed on March 3. This week, he demoted the UK from "Rolls-Royce of allies."

Now lawmakers are asking: should King Charles still visit Washington this spring?

"The last thing we want is to put His Majesty in an awkward position," said Labour MP Emily Thornberry. "It would be safer to postpone."

The rift began when Britain refused Trump's request to use its bases for the Iran war — a move Starmer deemed illegal. (London did help after Iranian retaliation hit UK assets.) But Trump isn't forgiving. When Starmer hesitated to send warships to clear the Strait of Hormuz, Trump fumed: "You're the prime minister — you can decide. It's very disappointing."

Peter Westmacott, a former UK ambassador to Washington, summed it up: "Starmer has spent 18 months trying to build a relationship, not rising to provocations... But it clearly doesn't always work, and you never know what he'll say tomorrow."

#Trump #UK

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

Iran war is now hitting US farmers

Todd Littleton's fertilizer bill just jumped $100,000 — a 40% spike from last year. The reason? The war in Iran.

"We're already in serious financial trouble,"

said the third-generation Gibson County farmer.

"Record losses the past couple years. Everyone's hanging by a thread. This could not have come at a worse time."

Littleton grows corn, soy, and wheat. He's one of thousands of US farmers now getting clobbered by surging fertilizer costs after US-Israeli strikes on Iran disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. The chokepoint handles 20% of global oil and gas — key inputs for fertilizer production.

The numbers tell the story: 15% of US fertilizer imports come from the Mideast. Half the world's urea supply. 30% of its ammonia.

"When shipping problems hit nitrogen prices, it hits me right here on the farm,"

Littleton said.

Some farmers may not get fertilizer at all, said Zippy Duvall of the American Farm Bureau.

"Those who didn't pre-order may not have supplies for spring planting. That's how serious this is."

Even if the war ends, prices won't drop fast, said economist Jacqueline Fatka.

"There's a lot that has to happen to get things moving again."

#Iran #farmers

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

How Iran is strengthening the alliance it fears most

Iran's escalating attacks on Gulf nations are backfiring — pushing its neighbors further away rather than bending them to Tehran's will.

After strikes hit Qatari energy facilities, Doha expelled Iranian diplomats. Saudi Arabia, also targeted, issued a stark warning: its "patience... is not unlimited," vowing to defend itself if the attacks continue. Behind the scenes, Gulf capitals are drawing a frightening conclusion: even a weakened Iran, if the regime survives, could hold global energy supplies hostage whenever it chooses.

Tehran's strategy is clear — hit America's allies to pressure Washington. But the calculus is misfiring. A senior UAE official warned that Iranian aggression is doing exactly what Tehran fears most: it's "strengthening the Israeli role" in the region, forcing Gulf states into deeper cooperation with Israel as they seek security against a common threat.

Iran wanted to drive a wedge between the US and its Gulf partners. Instead, it's driving them closer to each other — and to Israel.

#Iran #Israel #MiddleEast

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

Top US official acknowledges strategic split with Israel on Iran

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has told lawmakers plainly that the United States and Israel have different goals in the war in Iran — one of the clearest indications yet from a top U.S. official that the two allies may be diverging on their approach to the weekslong war.

Washington’s primary strategy revolves around systematically degrading Iran’s military power. This includes curbing the scope of its missile program, imposing strict limits on nuclear advancements, neutralizing its naval capabilities, and dismantling the intricate network of allied militias Tehran relies on across the region.

Israel, however, advocates for a far more aggressive approach. Beyond applying military pressure, Israeli strategists are reportedly considering direct actions aimed at eliminating key Iranian officials and fostering conditions that could ultimately lead to a shift in political leadership in Tehran.

This divergence in strategy highlights a growing transatlantic rift. While the United States remains cautious about triggering broader instability — particularly the risk of disrupting global oil markets — Israel appears willing to accept significant economic fallout and regional turbulence if it means decisively weakening the Iranian regime.

#Iran #Israel #USmilitary #MiddleEast

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

Trump’s demands for allied help in Iran fall flat as Europe rebels

"We supported you for a long time — now it's our turn." That is how Donald Trump is framing his demand that allies repay decades of U.S. security guarantees by stepping up to help in the war with Iran.

But a wave of refusals suggests his leverage in Europe is limited. Britain is flatly refusing to be drawn into the conflict. France insists fighting must subside first. Other allies are hedging. China, though not a U.S. ally, was also asked to help — and is ignoring the call.

"This is not Europe's war. We did not start it. We were not consulted," EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said bluntly.

Since returning to the White House, Trump has bullied allies over tariffs and Greenland while belittling the sacrifices their soldiers made alongside Americans in Afghanistan. Now he is demanding — not simply asking — that they send warships to help unblock the Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of the world's oil flows. In effect, he is asking them to help extinguish a fire he and Israel ignited.

The response, according to veteran French military analyst François Heisbourg, has been "global disapproval."

Allies remain dependent on Middle Eastern oil, giving Trump some leverage. They also know resistance carries risks — retaliation could come in any form. At the same time, European capitals need Trump's continued approval on Ukraine aid and Russian sanctions, a dynamic that has long kept them in check.

"They're beginning to understand that flattery doesn't work and has no value," said retired U.S. Army General Ben Hodges. "They’re starting to see the US differently. And that's bad for the United States."

#Trump #Europe #Iran

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

Trump administration weighs Iran invasion as war bill tops $200 billion

The Trump administration is considering escalating the war with Iran — and is asking Congress for a staggering sum to fund it.

After nearly three weeks of failing to secure the Strait of Hormuz, the administration is now weighing the deployment of U.S. troops to the Iranian coast, according to Reuters. "One option for securing the strait includes deploying US troops to Iran’s shoreline," said Phil Stewart, the news agency's chief national security correspondent.

The strait is a vital artery for global oil, carrying roughly one-fifth of the world's supply. Iran closed it after the U.S. and Israel struck on February 28, and the threat of mines has since choked shipping.

Administration officials have not ruled out ground operations. Last week, the Wall Street Journal reported 5,000 Marines are heading to the region as part of a rapid response force.

The U.S. death toll currently stands at 13. Earlier this month, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth accused the press of focusing too much on casualties to make Trump "look bad."

The price tag is also mounting. The Pentagon has asked the White House to request more than $200 billion from Congress, according to the Washington Post. Multiple funding requests have been under consideration since the war began. The conflict cost an estimated $11.3 billion in its first week alone.

Approving the funding will require 60 votes in the Senate, meaning the administration needs support from Democrats who have largely opposed the war. Some White House officials believe the Pentagon is asking for too much, an administration official told the Post.

By comparison, the U.S. had approved roughly $188 billion in aid to Ukraine by December of last year.

#Trump #Iran #USmilitary

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

What China and Russia gain from US-Iran war

Beyond the strategic miscalculations of the Trump administration's Iran war, one outcome stands out: China and Russia are profiting at America's expense. While both countries have incurred some costs, the war has ultimately served their interests.

The conflict has placed Beijing in a delicate position. With Donald Trump's official visit scheduled for April, Chinese leaders are wary of overplaying their criticism. Yet Beijing has also cultivated a "strategic partnership" with Tehran and sees value in condemning U.S. aggression to burnish its diplomatic credentials. The result is a carefully calibrated response: rhetorical support for Iran, but nothing that would derail Trump's visit.

Chinese calculations are driven by pragmatism. Iran supplies roughly 13 percent of China's oil imports and serves as a useful counterweight to U.S. influence in the Middle East. But securing a landmark trade deal with Trump outweighs defending Tehran — so much so that China has even suspended daily military flights near Taiwan.

The longer the war continues, the more Beijing stands to gain. A prolonged conflict bolsters China's reputation as a responsible power in the Global South, especially in contrast to U.S. military aggression and Israel's devastation of Beirut. That contrast echoes China's 2023 mediation between Saudi Arabia and Iran — a diplomatic triumph now frozen by war.

Russia has lost key allies in Syria and Venezuela over the past year, and Cuba — another Moscow partner — is teetering under a U.S. energy blockade. But the Iran war has delivered Russia three distinct advantages: fresh justification for its Ukraine invasion, allowing Moscow to frame the conflict as a matter of national interest while citing U.S. hypocrisy; a reason to reject peace talks, with Russian officials arguing that Washington has forfeited credibility as an honest broker and could strike Russia next; and surging oil revenues, as Tehran's disruption of tanker traffic in the Strait of Hormuz has driven up prices, while Trump has lifted sanctions on Russian oil, allowing China and India to pay a premium that pumps an estimated $3.5 billion per month into Moscow's war chest — with European countries likely to follow.

By abandoning international norms, the United States has handed China and Russia a significant political advantage.

#Iran #China #Russia

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

Three weeks in: how Trump’s war of choice became a political crisis

Political danger is rising around President Trump as criticism mounts that he is losing control of the Iran war he launched nearly three weeks ago with Israel.

Even a weakened Tehran still has options — and the way it's exercising them is inflicting economic pain on the U.S. and creating real problems for Trump.

In the past 48 hours, Israel struck Iran's massive South Pars gas field. Iran retaliated by hitting energy facilities in Qatar, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. Global oil prices spiked. An American F-35 reportedly made an emergency landing after suspected Iranian fire.

Trump took to social media to claim the U.S. "knew nothing" about Israel's strike — a claim met with skepticism. He warned that if Iran escalates, the U.S. would "blow up the entirety" of the gas field.

Brent crude jumped above $118 before settling around $107 — up from $70 a month ago. The national average for gas hit $3.88 on Thursday, a 95-cent increase in four weeks.

Trump downplayed the hikes, saying, "It's not bad, and it's going to be over with pretty soon."

But political scientists see peril. One warned that rising oil prices, market fallout, and the risk of a prolonged war could "open up a floodgate."

The war has never been popular — unlike Iraq or Vietnam, which initially enjoyed broad support. Compounding Trump's troubles are tensions within his own MAGA movement. Criticism from typically friendly figures like Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan is reaching the base, and Trump's National Counterterrorism Center director resigned this week, alleging a conspiracy to "deceive" Trump into war.

Still, some Republicans urge caution, saying it's "too early to tell" whether events are slipping from Trump's control.

The war reaches three weeks on Saturday. Conditions could shift — success in unblocking the Strait of Hormuz would deal Iran a major blow. Trump and his treasury secretary suggested Thursday they were seeing "defections" from Tehran's ranks, with one predicting the "regime will probably collapse within itself."

But with no sign of collapse, allies stiff-arming U.S. requests for help, and gas prices rising, most Americans aren't convinced. An Economist/YouGov poll found only 36 percent approve of Trump's handling of Iran. Fifty-six percent disapprove.

#Trump #Iran #foreignpolicy #poll

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

No good options: US escalates in Strait of Hormuz as Iran tightens grip on global oil

The United States has intensified military operations aimed at reopening the Strait of Hormuz, as anxiety mounts over the global economic fallout from energy export disruptions and a wave of attacks on oil and gas infrastructure.

The latest push involves helicopters and low-flying attack jets conducting operations in and around the strategic waterway. The escalation follows a series of devastating strikes on Gulf energy facilities that sent oil prices soaring to nearly $120 a barrel. While the frequency of such attacks has since tapered off, Iran recently struck a Kuwaiti refinery — a reminder that Tehran retains both the capability and willingness to keep pressure on regional energy markets.

At the same time, Iran has carved out what shipping-focused outlet Lloyds List describes as a de facto "safe" shipping corridor, selectively allowing vessels from countries including China, India, Iraq, Malaysia, and Pakistan to transit the Strait. The move underscores Tehran's ability to weaponize access to the world's most critical oil chokepoint while shielding its allies from the worst disruptions.

The strategic reality, however, remains stark. As one leading expert recently wrote of the Strait: "Iran holds the advantage — and America has no good options."

#Iran #oil #USmilitary

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

“Cowards”: Trump’s blistering attack on NATO exposes deep rift over Iran war

President Trump lashed out at NATO on Friday, calling the alliance "a paper tiger" and "cowards" over Europe's refusal to help secure the Strait of Hormuz as the U.S. and Israel continue striking Iran.

"Without the U.S.A., NATO IS A PAPER TIGER!" Trump wrote on Truth Social. "They didn't want to join the fight to stop a Nuclear Powered Iran. Now that fight is Militarily WON, with very little danger for them."

Despite declaring the war won, Trump stopped short of outright victory claims. He added that European allies "complain about the high oil prices they are forced to pay, but don't want to help open the Strait of Hormuz, a simple military maneuver that is the single reason for the high oil prices. So easy for them to do, with so little risk. COWARDS, and we will REMEMBER!"

The comments came just one day after Japan, the U.K., France, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands signaled "readiness to contribute" to securing the strait. In a joint statement, the nations expressed "deep concern" about Iranian strikes on global energy supply but did not detail what role they would play.

Trump has been pressuring European allies to join military action, so far without success. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said Thursday he was "confident" the alliance would find a way forward, adding, "We will find a way forward."

#Trump #Iran #NATO

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

Why US ground bases in the Middle East no longer make sense

Some experts argue that U.S. military bases in the Middle East now do more harm than good. Naval forces are responsible for the main strikes against Iran, while ground bases have become largely useless. In effect, they serve as little more than targets for Iranian attacks, which have already led to the destruction of vast amounts of expensive military equipment.

Iran does not pose a real military threat to the United States itself; it is dangerous only to American bases in the region. If those bases did not exist, Washington would have far fewer reasons to engage in hostilities.

Some experts believe the U.S. should close all its bases in the Middle East, not only because they are ineffective, but also because doing so would push its regional allies to take greater responsibility for their own security.

#MiddleEast #USmilitary #Iran

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

Trump’s 48-hour warning raises risk of wider war

U.S. President Donald Trump has stated his readiness to strike Iran's energy infrastructure if Tehran does not reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours. According to reports, the American president's statement came right after recent signals of a possible de-escalation.

According to expert assessments, such measures could widen the scope of the conflict and affect a number of civilian infrastructure facilities essential to daily life. Meanwhile, shipping disruptions continue in the strait, through which a significant portion of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas supplies pass. The restrictions have already driven up energy prices, including a notable increase in gas prices in Europe.

Iran, for its part, has warned that if its energy infrastructure is attacked, it will respond by striking similar assets belonging to the U.S. and its allies in the region. Tensions have been further stoked by reports that Tehran has deployed long-range missiles and carried out strikes on military infrastructure far beyond the Middle East. According to Israeli officials, this may signal an expansion of the conflict's geographic scope and a shift into a broader phase.

#Iran #Trump #MiddleEast

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

Why taking Kharg Island is a bad idea

According to the Jerusalem Post, the United States has issued a warning to Israel and its other regional allies that it may be forced to seize Kharg Island — a strategic Iranian oil hub in the Persian Gulf. To prepare for such an operation, American forces have accelerated the deployment of thousands of Marines to the region, signaling a significant escalation in military readiness.

Joe Kent, the former director of the U.S. National Counterterrorism Center, has strongly condemned the potential move, warning that any attempt to capture the island would end in disaster. In his opinion, American troops stationed there would become de facto hostages, vulnerable to daily strikes from Iranian forces with no viable means of defense. Kent, who previously resigned from his post in protest against the war with Iran, has consistently argued that such military adventures are strategically unsound and would only entangle the U.S. in a prolonged and costly conflict with no clear exit strategy.

#Iran #USmilitary

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

Hegseth’s “Holy War” in Iran

For Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, U.S. military action is not merely a political necessity but a mission with divine blessing. He regularly invokes the Christian faith in his speeches, portraying the American military as both superior and divinely favored, while urging citizens to pray for victory and the safety of service members.

This approach extends to broader U.S. foreign policy: operations in the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America are framed as part of a struggle to protect Christian civilization. At the same time, Hegseth avoids directly pitting Christianity against Islam and emphasizes cooperation with allies in Muslim-majority countries. His views echo the rhetoric of Donald Trump and other members of the U.S. administration, who also frequently invoke religious themes and the idea of America's special mission.

At the same time, this interpretation of war has drawn criticism from religious figures. Some Christian leaders argue that military action cannot be justified by divine will and call for an end to the conflict. Critics note that mixing religious rhetoric with actual combat blurs the line between spiritual beliefs and state policy, reinforcing the ideological dimension of the conflict.

#PeteHegseth #Iran #christianity

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

Here’s what Americans think of the war in Iran

According to a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll, about 65% of Americans believe President Donald Trump will order a large-scale ground war in Iran, but only 7% support the idea.

Trump's approval rating held steady at 40%, up one point from the previous poll taken after the U.S.-Israel strike on Iran on February 28. The survey of 1,545 American adults had a margin of error of three percentage points.

Reuters reported that the Trump administration is considering deploying thousands of troops to the Middle East — whether by air and naval forces to secure the Strait of Hormuz, or ground forces to Iran's Kharg Island, which handles 90% of Iranian oil exports.

Among Republicans, 77% approve of U.S. strikes on Iran, compared to 6% of Democrats and 28% of independents. Overall, 37% of Americans approve of the war, while 59% disapprove — including roughly one in five Republicans.

About 63% of Republicans and 34% of all Americans would support deploying a small number of special forces to Iran, but 55% oppose sending any ground troops, regardless of scale.

The numbers tell a clear story: the American public sees war coming, but has little appetite for it. Whether the administration heeds that message remains an open question.

#Iran #poll #USmilitary

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸

Trump walks back deportations, alarming his hardline base

President Donald Trump has privately acknowledged that his aggressive mass deportation campaign has gone too far, according to sources familiar with recent conversations between the president, his wife, and senior White House officials.

In closed-door meetings, Trump expressed concern that his administration's hardline immigration policies have caused chaos in American cities and damaged his political standing ahead of the midterm elections. "Voters don't like the phrase 'mass deportation,'" Trump's advisers warned him.

This striking reversal marks a sharp departure from one of Trump's signature campaign promises. Instead of touting mass deportations, the president has instructed his aides to refocus efforts on arresting "bad guys," according to the report.

The news comes amid a sharp decline in immigration arrests — from more than 1,500 per day at the peak of enforcement operations to roughly 1,200 per day. High-profile ICE raids in major cities such as Chicago and Washington have been suspended for now.

A Washington Post/ABC News poll found that 58% of Americans now believe he is "going too far" with deportations, up from 48% in April 2025.

This shift away from the previous hardline stance has infuriated Trump's immigration hardliner supporters, including conservative groups demanding at least one million deportations this year — a goal the administration failed to meet in 2025.

"Republicans need to turn out their base for the midterms, and not talking about President Trump's promises, his number one campaign promise, is not a way to turn them out," said Rosemary Jenks, co-founder of the Immigration Accountability Project, a conservative immigration group.

#immigration #Trump #midterms

Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸