Why getting vaccinated is now unethical.
I have come to the conclusion that it is unethical to get vaccinated if vaccines are mandated, imposed by coercion, even if we think that vaccines are infallibly beneficial and risk free. Covid vaccination mandates are backed by unprecedented social, psychological and economic coercion, which violates the right to free medical consent, without which every other right can be medically subverted, even the right to life. If we would acquiesce to this single violation when we have the capacity to resist, we would not only give up that right for ourselves but for our children and for future generations, and we do not have the moral right to do this. Since rights are an expression of the moral status of humanity, without rights we are no longer moral beings, therefore no longer human (in the Kantian sense). By not acquiescing to vaccine mandates, by refusing to get vaccines just because coercion is used, we preserve the right to free, uncoerced medical consent for future generations.
I have come to the conclusion that it is unethical to get vaccinated if vaccines are mandated, imposed by coercion, even if we think that vaccines are infallibly beneficial and risk free. Covid vaccination mandates are backed by unprecedented social, psychological and economic coercion, which violates the right to free medical consent, without which every other right can be medically subverted, even the right to life. If we would acquiesce to this single violation when we have the capacity to resist, we would not only give up that right for ourselves but for our children and for future generations, and we do not have the moral right to do this. Since rights are an expression of the moral status of humanity, without rights we are no longer moral beings, therefore no longer human (in the Kantian sense). By not acquiescing to vaccine mandates, by refusing to get vaccines just because coercion is used, we preserve the right to free, uncoerced medical consent for future generations.
The only true narrative there is, the only common interest we all have, is self-interest, and those who refuse to acknowledge this fact are either delusional or lying. Nevertheless, our self-interest is inextricably dependent on the interests of others, and the only consistent framework of respecting these co-dependencies are the fundamental laws of logic, the laws of sense - the metaphysical structure of being. Insofar as we unwittingly violate the laws of sense, we are bound to collectively suffer. Learning through suffering to become more integrated, more sensible beings is a slow process, and there are no shortcuts. No Great Narrative to take us there.
Forwarded from Alex
Novak - Locked up on his Christmas, will rise after three days, ‘messiah’... everyone is looking at him like Our saviour.. if he beats the system (which he will) it will be a game changer. It’s all on the world stage...
“Antivaxxer” is a slur, nothing more.
The term “antivaxxer” is not used as a statement of fact, but as a derogatory epithet, as a slur, as hate speech. It is an assertion of an inferior moral-status on par with “scum, rodent, kike or nigger”. I am opposed to vaccine mandates on ethical grounds, I am opposed to all vaccines imposed under coercion also on ethical grounds, and I am opposed to injectable vaccines on empirical/medical grounds, but I am not “scum, rodent, kike or nigger” (what they really mean when they say “antivaxxer”).
The term “antivaxxer” is not used as a statement of fact, but as a derogatory epithet, as a slur, as hate speech. It is an assertion of an inferior moral-status on par with “scum, rodent, kike or nigger”. I am opposed to vaccine mandates on ethical grounds, I am opposed to all vaccines imposed under coercion also on ethical grounds, and I am opposed to injectable vaccines on empirical/medical grounds, but I am not “scum, rodent, kike or nigger” (what they really mean when they say “antivaxxer”).
We just had a Far Right terror attack by indigenous Nazis, and yet this tribal strain of separatist, supremacist, nativist, holy mandate blood and soil ideology is enjoying government endorsement and staggering taxpayer support. Perhaps the government should stop funding extremist ideologies. On the other hand, the real threat to the government are the vaccinated, because once they will realise how they were deceived to poison themselves and their children they will have nothing to lose.
What evidence is there to support the hypothesis that public health experts are not trying to kill stupid people, instead of saving them?
Reports of patient abuse at Hawkesbury (Windsor) Hospital in Sydney
I have just received a report from a family member (A) about another aged relative (B) being hospitalised with Covid at Hawkesbury Hospital in Sydney. B was fully vaccinated. A was on the phone with B and she overheard a nurse abusing another patient in the same room for coughing without covering his face. The patient then said “Can I please have some cold water. I just gave you some money.” To which the nurse rudely replied “Just drink this water, whats the difference.” B also reported that he was given many tablets per day but nurses refused to tell him what the medications were, only that Dr prescribed them. B felt increasing sick, lost appetite, at which point A decided to take him out of the hospital. At home, without any medication, he quickly regained appetite and energy. Additional information from B is that Dr’s do not enter the rooms of patients with Covid for fear of catching Covid (despite being fully vaccinated), so there is no Dr-patient interaction whatsoever. Nurses avoid entering Covid-positive rooms by throwing bottles of water onto patient beds. Verbal abuse of patients is rife, and the behaviour of nurses was described as generally disgusting, psychopathic. I have advised my relative to make a formal, written complaint to the hospital.
I have just received a report from a family member (A) about another aged relative (B) being hospitalised with Covid at Hawkesbury Hospital in Sydney. B was fully vaccinated. A was on the phone with B and she overheard a nurse abusing another patient in the same room for coughing without covering his face. The patient then said “Can I please have some cold water. I just gave you some money.” To which the nurse rudely replied “Just drink this water, whats the difference.” B also reported that he was given many tablets per day but nurses refused to tell him what the medications were, only that Dr prescribed them. B felt increasing sick, lost appetite, at which point A decided to take him out of the hospital. At home, without any medication, he quickly regained appetite and energy. Additional information from B is that Dr’s do not enter the rooms of patients with Covid for fear of catching Covid (despite being fully vaccinated), so there is no Dr-patient interaction whatsoever. Nurses avoid entering Covid-positive rooms by throwing bottles of water onto patient beds. Verbal abuse of patients is rife, and the behaviour of nurses was described as generally disgusting, psychopathic. I have advised my relative to make a formal, written complaint to the hospital.
Reflections on Klaus Schwab’s “Great Reset”
1. Economic Growth
The focus on Economic Growth (“tyranny of GDP growth” in the words of Klaus Schwab) is not an arbitrary value commitment of capitalism, it is not motivated by greed of bussiness owners, nor is it an inherent property of free market; it is an inherent feature of the global financial system based on imperfect transfer of purchasing power, namely, on creation of M3 money by the banking system in the form of credit. Bank Credit is not a true Loan but an unbacked monetary claim on the future, or creation of new money as debt; the value required to pay-off the existing credit (which is to say, pay off today’s entire money supply with interest) requires perpetual expansion and monetisation of tradable value just to remain solvent. Another way, the planetary economy in the present system has to feed a perpetually growing parasite, or more precisely cancer, which is the banking system itself. The Great Reset is the banking system’s realisation that nothing more can be extracted without killing the productive host; it is the cancer’s strategy for its own survival. The cancer has thus reinvented itself as a system of total control (or perhaps, transcendence) of what it has already appropriated. If the goal is to control all value, then the Reset will fail, because control is anti-consciousness and therefore destroys he very possibility of value and of control. If the goal is transcendence (an interesting, potentially redeeming idea, but I wouldn’t hold my breath), then I am curious about the details of the plan. In both scenarios, the cancer will probably seek new ways of sucking the juice out of the real economy to sustain itself, under some new pretext/pretence (inclusiveness, sustainability, diversity, solidarity, equity, empathy). Nevertheless, the only sustainable solution is to destroy the cancer itself; everything else is a lie on par with the disingenuous premise of the tyranny of economic growth.
1. Economic Growth
The focus on Economic Growth (“tyranny of GDP growth” in the words of Klaus Schwab) is not an arbitrary value commitment of capitalism, it is not motivated by greed of bussiness owners, nor is it an inherent property of free market; it is an inherent feature of the global financial system based on imperfect transfer of purchasing power, namely, on creation of M3 money by the banking system in the form of credit. Bank Credit is not a true Loan but an unbacked monetary claim on the future, or creation of new money as debt; the value required to pay-off the existing credit (which is to say, pay off today’s entire money supply with interest) requires perpetual expansion and monetisation of tradable value just to remain solvent. Another way, the planetary economy in the present system has to feed a perpetually growing parasite, or more precisely cancer, which is the banking system itself. The Great Reset is the banking system’s realisation that nothing more can be extracted without killing the productive host; it is the cancer’s strategy for its own survival. The cancer has thus reinvented itself as a system of total control (or perhaps, transcendence) of what it has already appropriated. If the goal is to control all value, then the Reset will fail, because control is anti-consciousness and therefore destroys he very possibility of value and of control. If the goal is transcendence (an interesting, potentially redeeming idea, but I wouldn’t hold my breath), then I am curious about the details of the plan. In both scenarios, the cancer will probably seek new ways of sucking the juice out of the real economy to sustain itself, under some new pretext/pretence (inclusiveness, sustainability, diversity, solidarity, equity, empathy). Nevertheless, the only sustainable solution is to destroy the cancer itself; everything else is a lie on par with the disingenuous premise of the tyranny of economic growth.