Measles is healthy, actually.

Human health cannot be decoupled from the endemic viral challenges under which it evolved. Prevention of the natural interaction with the virome must be considered contrary to health and likely to have severe evolutionary consequences, whereas endemic infections, being statistically normal, are by definition healthy.

Is the Great Reset cancelled, or are they still doing it?

Nothing escapes the law. If something escapes, it only proves that it is not ‘the law’.

Every reasonable person ought to know that to irreversibly alter the immune system of a healthy person is not healthcare but plain harm. To do so knowing that the healthy patient is coerced to submit to the harmful procedure (therefore not freely consenting) is irredeemably culpable. It is no excuse that the administering doctor wanted to save their lucrative career, or believed that causing universal harm is for the greater good. Every doctor who administered vaccines under a government mandate is culpable.

Doctors seem incompetent and irrational only because we are conditioned to believe that their job is to heal you and make you live longer. They are perfectly competent at doing their actual job.

There is no such thing as ‘hoarding fuel’. Petroleum is a commodity and anyone can invest in it as much as they like, take any degree of financial risk they like, speculate on future pricing, win or lose. The idea of rationing fuel (which may be the primary intention behind the “war with Iran”) is contrary to free-market principles. It is the pricing mechanism itself that determines the level of consumption.

I read this unusual review of Stanley Kubrick’s films. The author argues that the same theme is hidden in every one of his films: a timeless, inexplicable, ruthless, murderous structure for which the people in the film are merely vessels. The structure is made the most explicit as the “monolith” of the Space Odyssey. Nobody asks where it came from, nobody even notices it as something unusual, because it is the system we are completely immersed in, like fish in the sea. Everything is under its spell.

Only Apes need AI, because they do not have intelligence. AI is a confession.

They are just mocking the people who still believe the News, people for whom (psychologically) there is no going back, because an admission of permanent deception would be equivalent to annihilation of their fictitious personhood.

So “hoarding of fuel” and “increased demand” are not the reasons for the increase in fuel prices, since the stockpiles have increased since the start of the conflict in the Middle East.

Voting implies consent to the existing “laws”. These are the terms and conditions of being re-presented:)

Likes don’t make right.

It is not that most academics, professionals, spiritual leaders and politicians don’t ‘know’ anything; they cannot even consistently define ‘truth’. Their speech about ‘truth’ has no meaning.

If you cannot formally define ‘truth’ without relying on contingent, undefined terms, but you use the term ‘truth’ as if it were meaningful, then your words have no stable meaning, and all you ever say is ‘I’. Every concept reduces to the primitive elements of consciousness - ‘I’, ‘and’ and ‘not’ - and the structure of contingent meaning is ‘not I and not-I, or else it is nothing.

The pre-requisite of freedom/independence (therefore conscious agency) is not to rely in your judgement on contingent premises asserted by anyone else. If you believe the news, or the government, or the experts, or your doctor, or your spiritual leader, or any other source of information, then your reality is determined by others and you cannot be free but only an instrument of their will.

They don’t need to add anything toxic or infectious to vaccines to harm you. Vaccines, by design, and by definition, damage the immune system, and then the job is finished by nature. It therefore makes sense for the perpetrators to sustain the controversy about ‘what is in the vaccines’ in order to maintain plausible deniability about the systemic intent of vaccination per se.

Vaccines are not intended to make you live longer. No vaccine manufacturer claims, or can legally claim, that their product does that. All we can prove (a priori) is that vaccines, by design, make everyone unhealthy. Everything else is confabulation.

Vaccination against any disease makes us more susceptible to every other disease, because all vaccines damage our healthy immune system.

A further question would be whether any nominal ‘disease’ is objectively a disease (objectively unhealthy) or a beneficial stage in the process of collective survival. The objective standard of health (explained in the attached article) necessitates that we ought to regard any endemic, viral or bacterial challenges as healthy, since they are statistically normal. The concept of disease is thus logically limited to species-atypical interventions, which includes vaccines and most pharmaceuticals.

https://substack.com/@michaelkowalik/note/c-91437447