In the case of vaccine mandates, doctors do not administer the procedure if consent is not given; rather, economic or social sanctions are imposed on those who did not consent to the medical procedure. This amounts to coercion, and coercion in regard to medical consent negates the possibility of consent, which must be voluntary. For the same reason, coercion to engage in sex amounts to rape even if no physical force was used but the coerced person complied with the sexual demands out of fear of consequences. It follows that vaccine mandates preclude the possibility of valid consent in principle, and amount to intentional bodily harm, even if complied with without the use of physical force. And yet this is precisely the point that all institutions imposing the mandates simply ignore.
Ironically, I have not heard this argument being explicitly raised in ANY of the court proceedings against vaccine mandates. Another ignored argument is the fact that vaccine mandates violate the right to life by coercing employees and students to engage in an activity where a certain percentage of participants are expected to die as a direct result of their participation. So my main question is: why have ALL lawyers who are so prominent on Telegram ignored these obvious lines of legal attack? I have shared these arguments on their channels to no effect except being banned by some for asking this question.
Ironically, I have not heard this argument being explicitly raised in ANY of the court proceedings against vaccine mandates. Another ignored argument is the fact that vaccine mandates violate the right to life by coercing employees and students to engage in an activity where a certain percentage of participants are expected to die as a direct result of their participation. So my main question is: why have ALL lawyers who are so prominent on Telegram ignored these obvious lines of legal attack? I have shared these arguments on their channels to no effect except being banned by some for asking this question.
The existing restrictions, including mandatory self-isolation, are the Crisis. To solve this crisis all we need is to remove all restrictions and simply ignore Covid. Within a month, everyone will have had the Covid Cold. (Nevertheless, the majority of the population would benefit from more brutal lockdowns, because most people can evolve only through suffering. I am in a Nietzchean mood today.)
Forwarded from Sanjeev Sabhlok PUBLIC CHANNEL (Sanjeev Sabhlok)
Hello there! Do your eyes glaze over when you see this chart about Sweden which had no lockdowns, no border closures, no masks.
(If so, you are likely to be in a state of hysteria: try to snap out of it.)
(If so, you are likely to be in a state of hysteria: try to snap out of it.)
Left vs Right
The fundamental distinction between left and right wing ideologies is their different regard for tribe/race prioritarianism and its native customs. All race or tribe focussed nationalistic ideologies and movements are right wing. If these are also associated with nativist prioritarianism or markers of racial supremacy, they are regarded as extreme right. On the other hand, non-nativist socialism and communism were aimed to transcend race and native traditions, with more universal aspirations about universal dependency on the ideological elite, typically accomplished via removal of general property rights. Both Left and Right are socialistic in their essence but with different aims. Neither Left nor Right is ethical or rational; both are particularly aggressive against individual freedom of thought.
The fundamental distinction between left and right wing ideologies is their different regard for tribe/race prioritarianism and its native customs. All race or tribe focussed nationalistic ideologies and movements are right wing. If these are also associated with nativist prioritarianism or markers of racial supremacy, they are regarded as extreme right. On the other hand, non-nativist socialism and communism were aimed to transcend race and native traditions, with more universal aspirations about universal dependency on the ideological elite, typically accomplished via removal of general property rights. Both Left and Right are socialistic in their essence but with different aims. Neither Left nor Right is ethical or rational; both are particularly aggressive against individual freedom of thought.
Why getting vaccinated is now unethical.
I have come to the conclusion that it is unethical to get vaccinated if vaccines are mandated, imposed by coercion, even if we think that vaccines are infallibly beneficial and risk free. Covid vaccination mandates are backed by unprecedented social, psychological and economic coercion, which violates the right to free medical consent, without which every other right can be medically subverted, even the right to life. If we would acquiesce to this single violation when we have the capacity to resist, we would not only give up that right for ourselves but for our children and for future generations, and we do not have the moral right to do this. Since rights are an expression of the moral status of humanity, without rights we are no longer moral beings, therefore no longer human (in the Kantian sense). By not acquiescing to vaccine mandates, by refusing to get vaccines just because coercion is used, we preserve the right to free, uncoerced medical consent for future generations.
I have come to the conclusion that it is unethical to get vaccinated if vaccines are mandated, imposed by coercion, even if we think that vaccines are infallibly beneficial and risk free. Covid vaccination mandates are backed by unprecedented social, psychological and economic coercion, which violates the right to free medical consent, without which every other right can be medically subverted, even the right to life. If we would acquiesce to this single violation when we have the capacity to resist, we would not only give up that right for ourselves but for our children and for future generations, and we do not have the moral right to do this. Since rights are an expression of the moral status of humanity, without rights we are no longer moral beings, therefore no longer human (in the Kantian sense). By not acquiescing to vaccine mandates, by refusing to get vaccines just because coercion is used, we preserve the right to free, uncoerced medical consent for future generations.