Only Apes need AI, because they do not have intelligence. AI is a confession.

They are just mocking the people who still believe the News, people for whom (psychologically) there is no going back, because an admission of permanent deception would be equivalent to annihilation of their fictitious personhood.

So “hoarding of fuel” and “increased demand” are not the reasons for the increase in fuel prices, since the stockpiles have increased since the start of the conflict in the Middle East.

Voting implies consent to the existing “laws”. These are the terms and conditions of being re-presented:)

Likes don’t make right.

It is not that most academics, professionals, spiritual leaders and politicians don’t ‘know’ anything; they cannot even consistently define ‘truth’. Their speech about ‘truth’ has no meaning.

If you cannot formally define ‘truth’ without relying on contingent, undefined terms, but you use the term ‘truth’ as if it were meaningful, then your words have no stable meaning, and all you ever say is ‘I’. Every concept reduces to the primitive elements of consciousness - ‘I’, ‘and’ and ‘not’ - and the structure of contingent meaning is ‘not I and not-I, or else it is nothing.

The pre-requisite of freedom/independence (therefore conscious agency) is not to rely in your judgement on contingent premises asserted by anyone else. If you believe the news, or the government, or the experts, or your doctor, or your spiritual leader, or any other source of information, then your reality is determined by others and you cannot be free but only an instrument of their will.

They don’t need to add anything toxic or infectious to vaccines to harm you. Vaccines, by design, and by definition, damage the immune system, and then the job is finished by nature. It therefore makes sense for the perpetrators to sustain the controversy about ‘what is in the vaccines’ in order to maintain plausible deniability about the systemic intent of vaccination per se.

Vaccines are not intended to make you live longer. No vaccine manufacturer claims, or can legally claim, that their product does that. All we can prove (a priori) is that vaccines, by design, make everyone unhealthy. Everything else is confabulation.

Vaccination against any disease makes us more susceptible to every other disease, because all vaccines damage our healthy immune system.

A further question would be whether any nominal ‘disease’ is objectively a disease (objectively unhealthy) or a beneficial stage in the process of collective survival. The objective standard of health (explained in the attached article) necessitates that we ought to regard any endemic, viral or bacterial challenges as healthy, since they are statistically normal. The concept of disease is thus logically limited to species-atypical interventions, which includes vaccines and most pharmaceuticals.

https://substack.com/@michaelkowalik/note/c-91437447

The reason Australia does not mass produce or import cars that run on LPG or natural gas is because an abundant, local and secure fuel-source is not consitent with the agenda of our rulers.