The government (a terrorist organisation that controls your area) will give you instructions in case of critical emergency. Psst… aliens are logically impossible.

The conclusion that follows from the premises is always ‘baked into’ the premises. This is just what implication means, and the function of proof is to make that which is implicitly ‘baked in’, explicit.

The distinction/non-identity of countable units is preserved by the difference of their identification/position in the set, and thus does not require different symbols to express their count: 1+1+1 has the sense of p+q+r, where each term is a distinct unity, therefore 1p+1q+1r. When algebraic addition is concerned with the count of the terms of the unit-class (arithmetic), the differentiating terms are omitted and only the count of units is retained, hence 1+1+1, or {1, 1, 1}, which is defined as 3. All algebraic addition reduces to the unit-class.

Unity is irreducible, a fundamental property of identity, therefore sense. Every instance of consciousness is a unity.

The proposition p→(¬p→q) [*2.24, and its equivalent at *2.21 of Principia Mathematica] is formally correct, but it cannot be consistently interpreted as ‘from contradiction anything follows’, or that ‘contradiction implies any proposition’, because with contradiction being asserted as a premise one violates the law of non-contradiction, and the connective ‘implies’ loses its sense (it cannot be consistently interpreted to mean anything in particular). From contradiction nothing follows; contradiction has no synthetic sense (non-sense/null) and is the end of logical evaluation. By definition of implication, the above form is equivalent to p→¬(¬p∧¬q), therefore ¬(p∧¬p∧¬q), therefore (p∧¬p)→q, or (/)→q, which is equivalent to (/)→(/). Any instance of non-sense (/) is equivalent to every instance of non-sense: it is just non-sense (/). Another way, it does not make sense to say that ‘contradiction «implies» anything’, as this statement itself implies contradiction.

Measles is healthy, actually.

Human health cannot be decoupled from the endemic viral challenges under which it evolved. Prevention of the natural interaction with the virome must be considered contrary to health and likely to have severe evolutionary consequences, whereas endemic infections, being statistically normal, are by definition healthy.

Is the Great Reset cancelled, or are they still doing it?

Nothing escapes the law. If something escapes, it only proves that it is not ‘the law’.

Every reasonable person ought to know that to irreversibly alter the immune system of a healthy person is not healthcare but plain harm. To do so knowing that the healthy patient is coerced to submit to the harmful procedure (therefore not freely consenting) is irredeemably culpable. It is no excuse that the administering doctor wanted to save their lucrative career, or believed that causing universal harm is for the greater good. Every doctor who administered vaccines under a government mandate is culpable.

Doctors seem incompetent and irrational only because we are conditioned to believe that their job is to heal you and make you live longer. They are perfectly competent at doing their actual job.

There is no such thing as ‘hoarding fuel’. Petroleum is a commodity and anyone can invest in it as much as they like, take any degree of financial risk they like, speculate on future pricing, win or lose. The idea of rationing fuel (which may be the primary intention behind the “war with Iran”) is contrary to free-market principles. It is the pricing mechanism itself that determines the level of consumption.

I read this unusual review of Stanley Kubrick’s films. The author argues that the same theme is hidden in every one of his films: a timeless, inexplicable, ruthless, murderous structure for which the people in the film are merely vessels. The structure is made the most explicit as the “monolith” of the Space Odyssey. Nobody asks where it came from, nobody even notices it as something unusual, because it is the system we are completely immersed in, like fish in the sea. Everything is under its spell.

Only Apes need AI, because they do not have intelligence. AI is a confession.

They are just mocking the people who still believe the News, people for whom (psychologically) there is no going back, because an admission of permanent deception would be equivalent to annihilation of their fictitious personhood.

So “hoarding of fuel” and “increased demand” are not the reasons for the increase in fuel prices, since the stockpiles have increased since the start of the conflict in the Middle East.

Voting implies consent to the existing “laws”. These are the terms and conditions of being re-presented:)

Likes don’t make right.

It is not that most academics, professionals, spiritual leaders and politicians don’t ‘know’ anything; they cannot even consistently define ‘truth’. Their speech about ‘truth’ has no meaning.

If you cannot formally define ‘truth’ without relying on contingent, undefined terms, but you use the term ‘truth’ as if it were meaningful, then your words have no stable meaning, and all you ever say is ‘I’. Every concept reduces to the primitive elements of consciousness - ‘I’, ‘and’ and ‘not’ - and the structure of contingent meaning is ‘not I and not-I, or else it is nothing.