It is not 'if you did nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide' but 'if you did nothing wrong, you have no reason to lie'. So why do politicians and the corporate media lie so much?

Putin made a pun during the interview that everyone seems to have misinterpreted. In accusing Carlson of blowing up Nordstream, and then saying “not you personally, but the CIA” he meant ‘the CIA did it and You Are a CIA operative.’ He didn’t say ‘you, the Americans did it’ but ‘you, the CIA did it’.

BREAKING NEWS: The People’s Republic of China has unveiled a new national flag design, to replace the original, “politically outdated” flag.

The brain is not where thought arises but where it physically appears (and moves the body)

When fascist states all over the world are ‘concerned’ about human rights abuses committed by an ally fascist state, you know it is really really bad.

Population level cybernetics always begins with small, innocuous requests, minimal sacrifices. ‘Just put a scarf over your face when you are passing others. Even a tissue will help.’ Once you agree to the first request, they already got you. Beyond that point it is just a balancing game of not asking for too much in one step. “A home-made mask will be just fine. You can choose your own fabric. “A surgical mask is necessary”. “You must also take this safe injection”. “One more time”. “And again, just like we practiced before”. “Remember how we did it the last time? You know the drill, it doesn’t hurt, so one more time”. “You are used to it now so there is no excuse not to wear the respirator and take the recommended injections”. “Now see that person over there? She is unvaccinated, she did it all to you. Make sure you let her know how you feel about that.” “Look, it is her again, mocking us all by not wearing a mask, unvaccinated. Here is a knife in case she gets too close to you. You have the right to defend yourself.”

The hypothetical objective of controlling social consciousness in the cybernetic, deterministic sense is a contradiction in terms. Consciousness is essentially non-deterministic, uncontrollable, and if it were controlled it would cease to be consciousness, or perhaps it never was.

The “root cause of vaccine hesitancy” is plain rationality. It is inherently irrational to trust the advise of people without being able to verify whether their advise is in your best interest. It is especially irrational to trust people in power, because of the asymmetry of interests and risks, and even more so when they have a track record of being consistently unethical, deceitful and murderous. The answer to power, insofar as it demands compliance against reason, must always be NO.

The most direct mode of cybernetics is to convince the target demographic to submit to “their” feelings. Submission to feelings is still submission to the authority of something other than the present, conscious You, and that something can then be systematically conditioned and controlled. Feelings and intuitions are mixed and conflated with the voice of the ruling power echoing in your mind; they are not your voice.

Here’s an idea. ALL opposition is controlled opposition. The only genuine players are those who are willing to deliberate in good faith, present reasons, and let reason prevail. OPPOSITION, in the political sense, is already an ideological commitment, already a dogma, a polarity without grounding, and without any hope of rational resolution. People on all sides of every debate have personal interests, some of which are universal, and those interests must be appealed to. This is the only way to reliably resolve conflicts.

Nothing will satisfy a nativist supremacist except Everything, slaves included, because nativism is not about moral liability, certainly not about equality, but about racial supremacy, period. “An ideal future would include a native title compensation scheme that incorporates compound interest” she says. I suspect this overt injustice is systemically incentivised not to help this “proud Kuku Yalanji, Waanyi, Wangan & Jagalingou, Wiri and Mununjali woman”, but to ultimately judge them collectively by their own measure. Give them plenty of rope, load the spring of resentment, then unleash the recoil; in short, white supremacism wearing a blackface. https://www.lawyersalliance.com.au/opinion/native-title-is-a-cultural-issue-not-just-a-legal-one

BREAKING NEWS: The virtual State of Ukraine announces the next stage of military conscription, requiring all Australian males aged 18-25 to report for duty. Prime Minister Albanese has welcomed the decision, emphasising the incentives attached to the current wave of conscription, which include the minimum compensation of honorary Ukrainian citizenship, a fully furnished apartment in Kiev and a suitably aged Ukrainian widow already maintaining the awarded real estate.

The most dangerous kind of misinformation is any misinformation disseminated by the authorities during public emergencies. What countermeasures could be implemented for this ultimate threat?

Every defensive strategy that is set in stone is bound to be decoded and defeated by the corrupt power. Only a strategy that is allowed to evolve, to change, to learn from its own effects, can reliably succeed. Strategic adaptation makes it impossible to discern from historical data what you really want. The corrupt adversary projects their own biases as your motivation, but they miss every time. A perfect strategy is when you want noting but simply adhere to what is right, the awareness of which may also evolve, guided by its effects, and changing you too, without resistance, which amounts to not even having a temporally fixed identity that could be targeted. When the strategy is historically indeterminate and You are historically indeterminate, the belligerent is left to fight consciousness itself.

The principal arguments are to this day not used by any lawyer in any challenge to the vaccine mandates. There must be a reason for this persistent omission, while reducing the matter to piece meal technicalities that leave the principle of lethal vaccine mandates ‘legally’ intact. https://michaelkowalik.substack.com/p/why-vaccine-mandates-are-unethical

A violation of the right to life does not require an actual killing of the person, but only the denial of the relevant ‘right’ of that person. The ‘right to life’ means that no person may be arbitrarily killed. If a person is coerced to accept conditions under which they may be arbitrarily killed, that person's ‘right’ to life has been denied, therefore violated. Vaccine mandates amount to coercing people to accept conditions under which any person may be arbitrarily killed, thus denying their individual right to life. Moreover, vaccine mandates deny the right to life in principle, therefore they deny the right to life of all people, even if they are not subject to the specific mandate.

The argument that a country under attack by an adversary using human shields has the right to kill those human shields in order to defend its innocent civilians implies that their own citizens have priority in regard to the right to life over the innocent human shields, which is racial or ethnic or nationalistic supremacism. It also implies that the right to life is not a human right but a privilege of the victor, might is right, therefore the law of the jungle, therefore neither moral law nor humanity matters, therefore the party making the argument are savages.

The view that ‘vaccine mandates are morally wrong because they amount to killing some people for the benefit of others’ is logically incompatible with the view that ‘proportionate killing of civilians for the sake of national security is morally right’ (unless the person holding these views does not regard the killed civilians as human).

Martin J didn't in his reasons for rejecting a breach of s 16, expressly consider Innes v Electoral Commission of Queensland (No 2) (2020) 5 QR 623 at [291]-[292], which held that a human right, as identified in the Act, will be engaged if its violation affects a class of persons.

There is no victory through violence.

The systems we have can only be as good as we ourselves are. In this sense, Reality is the only form of objective justice; it does not respect individuals apart from
challenging us and giving us feedback. The justice we get is blind and brutal because we, as a kind, are for the most part still blind and brutal.