Any statement implying that indigenous people have a superior social status or value compared to other citizens is an expression of nativist supremacism, a core feature of Nazi ideology. It is not possible to transcend tribal or racial resentment without acknowledging that All humans share the same ancient ancestors, that we are all related, that we are all the original owners of the Earth. Reason unites us. https://michaelkowalik.substack.com/p/open-letter-to-government-regarding

Those who assert that indigenous Australians have superior status than non-indigenous Australians are implicitly affirming that indigenous Germans always had superior status than non-indigenous Germans, and so on. In short, they endorse Nazi ideology by the proxy of another race and place.

The premise of Original Ownership is moot

If Original Ownership is a valid principle then any exclusive claim of ancestral ownership is predated by our common ancestors, on account of their earliest exclusive possession of the entire Earth, including the present day continent of Australia. All living humans are descendants of the same ancestors and are thus entitled to partake in the claim of original ownership. Consequently, the argument of original ownership is at best moot, trivially applicable to all of humanity and in relation to every place.

Whatever moral violations were committed among people in the past are irrelevant to the moral obligations of the people living today, do not negate the equality of rights and do not justify racial supremacism or vilification.

This is clearly progressing towards total self-erasure. The next ‘neutral’ emoji will be just an empty grey box, grey goo:) So fun!

A smart ruling class installs individuals of a minority race in the most prominent administrative positions, knowing that the majority will blame the race of the administrators instead of the ruling class for any abusive policies.

Racial supremacism destroys communities from within.

The crucial difference that is not emphasised is that those Aboriginal Australians who are politically and economically successful have relinquished the bonds of tribal tradition and embraced modern education, whereas those who adhere to tribal norms, or are lost in the nihilistic space between tradition and their rejection of modernity, are impoverished, unheard and alienated. I suggest that this alienation is a result of the indigenous culture itself, lacking the systematisation of meaning and the grounding of reason that the rest of humanity takes for granted. Tribal idiosyncrasies are incompatible with modernity and with the concept of universal humanity. It is tribalism itself that must be cured.

This is what Nativist Supremacism is essentially about; Nazi ideology. https://michaelkowalik.substack.com/p/open-letter-to-government-regarding

"The more skillfully the language of goodness is assumed, the greater the depravity”. https://substack.com/@janniklindquist/note/c-21332363

Tribalism is the attitude of loyalty on the basis of blood ties that ascribes higher moral status to members of the tribe than to other people. The tribal mindset considers wrongful acts done by members of the tribe to outsiders as less wrong or less deserving of restitution than the same acts done to members of the tribe by outsiders. Tribalism is affirmed by a stronger positive emphasis on identification with the tribe than with humanity.

The Rational Limits of Indigenous Rights

According to the U.N., people "are regarded as indigenous on account of descent from the populations which inhabited the country, or a geographical region to which the country belongs, at the time of conquest or colonization or the establishment of present state boundaries". https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/workshop_data_background.doc

The argument that all humans are indigenous people, with an equal claim on all of the Earth, neatly fits the above definition. Our common ancestors lived on Earth before any nations were formed, which includes all regions that were subsequently colonised. We also share a global culture, a common rationality, that makes us the same kind of people. All humans have the right not to be excluded from or limited in use of any territory in favour of specific races or ethnicities who falsely assert their exclusive, racial indigeneity and deny it of others.

According to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, "indigenous peoples are equal to all other peoples", not better, not more entitled, not more valuable or more important. The Declaration also affirms that "all doctrines, policies and practices based on or advocating superiority of peoples or individuals on the basis of national origin, racial, religious, ethnic or cultural differences are racist, scientifically false, legally invalid, morally condemnable and socially unjust", which is in conflict with the premise that a particular indigenous identity is entitled to special rights, special respect, special opportunities or privileged treatment. https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/un-declaration-rights-indigenous-peoples-1

Jeff Schmidt, the author of “Disciplined Minds: A Critical Look at Salaried Professionals and the Soul-Battering System that Shapes their Lives”, initiates an anti-discrimination lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Education, alleging that Affirmative Action (lower standards of academic performance for black and latino students) discriminates against black and latino students by relinquishing the departments responsibility to educate them as well as white and asian students. In short, Affirmative Action reinforces rather than alleviates the racial inequalities in education.

"The low goals make it as easy as possible for officials to say that schools are meeting their goals. That helps hide their failure to make students proficient in English and math and allows them to avoid serious consequences for that failure.

Note that private schools in D.C. comply with civil rights laws and do not have lower academic achievement goals for their black students. Black children who cannot afford private-school tuition deserve to attend public schools that are free of racial discrimination in academic achievement goals."

The practical intent of Affirmative Action is not to improve education of black students but "minimize the chance that the authorities will face consequences for failing to educate black students."

https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/dc-government-does-not-require-schools

‘Then we disconnect electricity and blame in on climate change. Ha ha!’

The Voice implies recognition of a seperate nation

Any state or federal law dictating exclusion, restrictions or conditions on the use of public land under the premise of native title or native heritage is, by force of section 10 of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975, unlawful and void. Similarly, any racial restrictions or conditions imposed on the use of private land under the premise of native heritage are, by force of the same section, unlawful and void.

This is possibly why they are trying to change the Constitution, to recognise a separate, racially homogenous and autonomous Nation that will be able to discriminate on the basis of race under the guise of citizenship.

The distinction between ‘public good’ and ‘private good’ is false, a category mistake between utility and morality. In the moral sense there is only ‘good/right’ and ‘bad/wrong’, and it is the same for everyone.