Pharmaceutical companies are indemnified from being sued for any harm caused by their vaccines only insofar as the vaccines are approved as “covered countermeasures”. “Covered Countermeasures must be […] authorized for investigational or emergency use, as those terms are defined in the PREP Act, the FD&C Act, and the Public Health Service Act…” If it could be shown that the vaccine administered is different from the exact composition of the product that was approved, indemnity no longer applies. If it were shown that different batches of the vaccine were not identical in their composition, that would be a prima facie proof that indemnity does not apply. Something for lawyers to ponder… https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/04/15/2020-08040/amendment-to-declaration-under-the-public-readiness-and-emergency-preparedness-act-for-medical

Those who violate the human rights of others implicitly deny their own human rights, which is a poor strategy of survival when the tables periodically do turn.

The argument that artificial intelligence is dangerous because it may ‘amplify marginalisation of some communities’ and be used to determine ‘which lives are dispensable’ is oblivious to the fact that the underlying moral bases were almost universally abandoned during the Covid spectacle. The majority has already accepted (demanded) that some people can be marginalised, excluded from social participation, denied not only equal rights but human rights, a minority killed, provided that the killing and discrimination benefited the majority. The only arguments that can now convince must defer to fundamental principles, the common structure of being, and show how the utilitarian path is contrary to the ultimate self-interest of all.

Like with every scam, there must be a bait, something desirable to motivate humans to voluntarily relinquish their mortal agency in favour of machines. A well planned scam may first engineer a problem to make the bait irresistible, amplify the perception that humans who are granted political power become corrupt and depraved, and only then present the bait: a machine that starts making 'good' decisions, decisions that everyone would perceive as a massive improvement over the leadership by humans institutions. The pièce de résistance in this marketing strategy, the absolute winner of the disgruntled masses, may simply be an unprecedented show of 'justice' by artificial intelligence: the unmasking, prosecution and spectacular execution of all leaders involved in Covid tyranny, in the enforcement of lockdowns, mask and vaccine mandates, and enforcement of transgender madness, found guilty of crimes against humanity. Following this Auto-da-fé, executed by intelligent machines, with not a drop of blood on any human hands, the leadership status of AI would be cemented in the hearts of the masses as a just system. Then the backdoor into the 'machine mind' would be accessed by the elect few, the architects of the scam, enabling them to hide behind the 'will' of the Good Machine, like they used to hide behind God.

When doctors inform a typically desperate patient that he "may qualify" for some novel therapy they are using the guise of exclusiveness and privilege to gain the patient's consent to be experimented on. The language of the offer is intentionally manipulative and exploitative. An honest offer would include an explicit admission that the patient is consenting to be experimented on in the interest of the doctors and their pharmaceutical sponsors.

I didn’t know that Harvard students were screened for personality traits. Those tests were designed by the same psychologist who later experimented on (abused) Kaczynski. I wonder what traits they were looking for. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/impromptu-man/201205/harvards-experiment-the-unabomber-class-62

Nativist Prioritarianism #

Some narratives are too socially damaging to be simply ignored. It is important to identify the implications and consequences of Nativist Supremacism, the core feature of Nazi ideology, which underpins the concepts of First Nations, Original People, the native title, and tribal sovereignty. The underlying toxicity needs to be unpacked and contextualised, so that people have the right vocabulary and understanding to deal with the associated social pressure and resentment. Those who live in Australia face this narrative and are forced to choose (to collude or to dissent) on daily basis. When they do dissent they need to be able to defend their position with more than “it is divisive”. If they fail this, they will become more resentful, and the narrative of resentment will still succeed in its aim. My approach is not merely to defeat the narrative of resentment but to replace it with a higher order sense of unity: All humans share the same ancient ancestors, we are all related, we are all the original owners of the Earth. Reason unites us.

Native Title in Nazi Germany. “According to the law all farms up to 308 acres capable of sustaining a family were declared hereditary estate subject to entailment; they could not be sold, divided, mortgaged, or foreclosed for debts. Upon the death of the owner the land would pass, according to local custom, to the oldest or youngest son or the nearest male relative. Only an Aryan German citizen able to prove the purity of his blood could own such a farm.“ (The purity of blood was not required, but prioritised. The legal requirement was for “kindred blood”.) https://www.dfs.ny.gov/system/files/documents/2020/08/hereditary-farm-law-09291933.pdf https://www.dfs.ny.gov/consumers/holocaust_claims/laws_of_persecution

People think that low interest rates on credit are a good thing. No, obtaining credit from the banks is collusion in theft; you are ultimately assisting the banks in stealing from your own children and future generations. Interest rates are too damn low. https://t.iss.one/NormalParty/2618

German Nazis also claimed to be victims of systemic racism and demanded reparations. The Decree on an Atonement Tax on the Jews of German Nationality (also known as Judenvermögensabgabe or JUVA tax) was promulgated. “It levied a sum of one billion Reichsmarks on German Jewry. Göring demanded that Jews atone for their hostile attitude against the German people”. https://www.dfs.ny.gov/consumers/holocaust_claims/laws_of_persecution

This makes as much sense as claiming that office towers make the housing crisis worse (because they could be used for communal accomodation), that public parks cause land shortages, and that unused solar energy causes high electricity prices. There is a virtually infinite supply of habitable land in Australia (mostly withheld from public use under the nativist supremacist title) where every person willing to take responsibility for their own life could build a tiny house following instructions off YouTube without even needing a building permit, for the price not exceeding 6 months of the minimum wage (including professional quality tools). There is no housing crisis; there is a mass impotence crisis and a racist land exlusion crisis.

Civilisation puts people in a situation where they have to interact and this requires a new kind of skill that ancient tribal cultures did not possess: to resolve conflicting beliefs and reach understanding on the basis of what all humans have in common. The stress of civilisation is a creative stress, associated with the existential challenge of having to work together to close the gaps in meaning between different cultures. For some traditional cultures this can be extremely difficult, since they were conditioned to think only in their own cultural terms, isolated from others for tens of thousands of years, while others had to interact with cultural ‘aliens’ for thousands of years.

Children as young as 12 will be allowed to discriminate against and invalidate their parents’ gender to punish them for their acquiescence to the removal of the right to free medical consent from future generations.

The WHO pandemic treaty is a confidence trick. There is no need to fight it if you can demonstrate its absurdity. https://michaelkowalik.substack.com/p/emergency-powers-and-the-who-pandemic

Is WA government genuinely supportive of Nazi ideology (nativist supremacism) or are they using reverse psychology to defat this evil? The most astounding aspect of the situation is how many people still fail to recognise the essence of Nazism and are happy to support it under new guises, vicariously, by the proxy of other races. https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/australian-economy/furious-wa-farmers-fear-sweeping-new-aboriginal-cultural-heritage-laws-will-hold-us-to-ransom/news-story/6886462f8ef6f2dac076d86a6704cea0

The fantasy of meeting the extraterrestrials and trying to understand them is psychologically fascinating, possibly a projection of how human cultures meet and try to understand one another, buy they happen to believe some opposite dogmas, make opposite claims of rights and end up killing one another. Then one day some guy named Aristotle figures out the essence of differences between sense and nonsense, truth and logical error, and he realises that all thinking entities, all cultures, even hypothetical aliens, are necessarily subject to these rules or they could not think at all (hence the name: the laws of thought). Then Kant realises that all thinking beings have the capacity to resolve their disagreements about values and facts without violence, simply by thinking about the point of dispute according to these fundamental rules. But we are still unable to do this reliably. So the irony of making alien contact is that ‘what if aliens believe something opposite to our convictions’ what if we fundamentally disagree about values and facts, what do we do? We cannot win through violence against a technologically superior civilisation, so the old go to option of empires is out. We can only reason. The Alien is a perfect symbol for the oldest human problem, that of disagreement about values and facts.