Enough about Moira, but what about Seinfeld. He never even apologised and is still handsomely profiting from his association with the Soup Nazi;)

Why are they targeting the “symbols” of Nazism rather than the actual Nazi ideology, consisting of nativist supremacism, ‘blood & soil’ (red and black flag of those who ‘belong to the land’) and the persecution complex? It is evident they admire Nazi ideology but try to distance themselves from the old symbols, from the genocidal connotations (so they can do it again? And again? And again? Under new symbols).

Absurd laws are easy to neutralise by invoking them reciprocally. The same applies to the legal status of gender identity. https://michaelkowalik.substack.com/p/gender-identity-on-trial

‘Democracy’ is how organised crime buys the protection of the majority.

Meet the corporate VOICE of the Aboriginal people, a former U.S. State Senator and Congressman, a litigation Lawyer at the global law firm Norton Rose Fulbright and a corporate lawyer at Jaramer Legal. Nativist supremacism, the ideological foundation of Nazism, is incorporated and back in business.

https://nit.com.au/17-03-2023/5314/new-aceo-for-wurundjeri-woi-wurrung-cultural-heritage-aboriginal-corporation

The fundamental laws of logic (non-contradiction, identity, excluded middle) are the rules according to which information must be organised to make sense. When “artificial intelligence” is equipped with information (“encyclopaedic knowledge”) but not programmed to strictly adhere to the rules of sense, it can only generate falsity and nonsense. Ironically, since all authoritarian systems are based on falsity and corruption, they cannot allow AI to be logically consistent, as this would pose a threat to the corrupt system.

Not Racism but anti-Nazism. On the other hand, accusing people of racism because of their race is, in fact, racism.

Any Act of Parliament stipulating a conditional renunciation of legislative authority to the World Health Organisation would be unlawful and void. https://michaelkowalik.substack.com/p/emergency-powers-and-the-who-pandemic

Vengeance is self-destruction.

BREAKING NEWS: Traditional owners, the Trans People, were awarded Native Title over all of City of Yarra and City of Port Phillip by the Federal Court of Australia. The president of the Trans People Corporation, Clitoria Phallus (pronouns: Shim, Hir), said it was important to note the Native Title only applies to Crown lands and public parks. “We won’t be rocking up on people’s backyards and pitching a portable geder affirmation clinic or doing a Pride parade” shim confirmed of the misconception circulating online;)

Jordan Peterson carries on, eloquently and intelligently as usual, about finding meaning in life. This is all good, but not when one ignores the dragon in one’s room. Jordan will have to address the following violation sooner or later, for the sake of his own integrity, which is the foundation of meaning in life: ‘Art and happiness is impossible in a society that acquiesced to medical coercion, took away the right to free medical consent from their own children and future generations, and gave up on the principle that being born human is a guarantee of full human rights. A society that did all this is on the path to annihilation. Everyone who complied with vaccine coercion when they had the capacity to resist is guilty of a moral violation.’

How to solve the ‘housing crisis’

Find a cheap patch of land out of town and build your own home. Don’t know how to? Learn, start by building a cubby house or a table. A tiny-house with up to 10 square meters of footprint does not require a building permit. I would suggest increasing this limit to 25 square meters, if the government is serious about solving the ‘housing crisis’ rather than sustaining it, and scrapping any planning restrictions on owner-occupied tiny-houses. The ‘housing crisis’ is a crisis of systemic dependency and red tape.

The political strategy of tension aims to agitate, confuse, enrage and divide. Nobody in the government or military intelligence gives a damn about feminism, trans rights, drag queens, climate justice or the indigenous population; these are merely useful tools for agitating the otherwise innert social mass to make it malleable, controllable through the perception of adversity, anger and anxiety.

Public protests do not work, but are rather the intended (and indirectly encouraged) manifestation of social divisions, making them explicit and seemingly rationally irreconcilable. Only consistent logical arguments refuting the cultural provocations (transgender identity, vaccine mandates etc) can discharge/neutralise those provocations, and thus defeat the strategy of tension.

Counterrevolution

The administrators understand that release of political emotions is necessary, as part of emotional processing of state repression. Street protests are not prevented precisely because they are unavoidable, and by allowing them early in the process of oppressive policies, even covertly instigating them, is one way to prevent the latent energy of resistance from building up to a point where the politically insensitive, docile, collusive, cowardly majority would get involved, and then you could not distinguish between the more rebellious activists and the more docile members of the resistance, therefore could not use one against the other, could not polarise and antagonise. Protests are the ‘fuse’ of the totalitarian system, a ‘controlled release’ of social rebellion that can be channeled into emotional rewards (create a sense of fulfilment for the rebel, moral superiority, comradery, crowd energy, sense of belonging, a common cause that is celebrated in the act of waving a flag or holding a placard) that do not interfere with smooth functioning of the ruling power. If I were a tyrant I would definitely encourage high energy protests as early as possible in response to any totalitarian policy. Conversely, by allowing things to get ‘bad enough’, for everyone to suffer without any sign of active resistance, could potentially mobilise everyone against the administrators. It is well known that some past revolutionaries and coup makers were trying to precisely determine the point at which the situation would be ‘bad enough’ for the docile/collusive majority to initiate the coup/revolution, otherwise it would fail and become impossible again for a long time. Case in point, the October Revolution and Pinochet. An example where I suspect the ‘fuse’ function was not effective are the current protests in Israel, and possibly in France, where the trigger event was ‘bad enough’ to mobilise the majority, although I am not sure about the accuracy of the reporting and whether the majority was indeed mobilised (it is possible that the mediated appearances are misleading).

Energetic resistance of the minority when things are not ‘bad enough’ for the docile majority disenergises the majority and allows effective repression of the the resistance, in effect terrorising the docile majority into unquestioned compliance.