Integrity always wins. Dragons always perish.

BREAKING NEWS: Nazis gather on the lawns of Buckingham Palace to show support for whatever cause the WEF urgently needs to discredit. Nevertheless, some experts in social engineering argue that hiring Nazi extras to “support” your adversary’s cause is unlikely to discredit them since ‘having Nazis on one’s side’ is not logically equivalent to ‘being on the side of Nazis’. Moreover, this strategy could backfire if the activists who use the slogan ‘You have Nazis on your side’ happen to support nativist supremacism, which is the core feature of (actual) Nazi ideology.

Looks like the drug cartel is moving their money elsewhere. I wonder what spooked them.

Every violation of the laws of sense creates a hole in consciousness, a space empty of meaning, so one could say that madness/irrationality is not a state of the Self but rather a state of the absense of Self, a pocket of unconsciousness within consciousness. It can be integrated into the Self by resolving its contradictions, thereby raising the level of consciousness to a new level, or it will work to undermine the integrity/wholeness of the Self, subverting our intentions, distorting our aims. Perhaps the best symbolic motif for this absense is ‘demon’. Every aspect of consciousness we abandon to nonsense becomes a province that is ripe for possession by another.

Nativist supremacism is the essence of Nazi ideology.

On the conflict between Dr Bay and the Plaintiffs in Parry v Secretary, Department of Health [2023] HCA 9

Dr Bay sought leave of the court to intervene in this case for the following reasons: https://qpp.life/babies The Plaintiff’s solicitor argued, countering Dr Bay’s concerns, that the new standing category applies only to administrative law and not to private persons (https://t.iss.one/c/1564420715/290787). I was under the impression that this kind of standing already existed, since green groups have taken the government to the Supreme Court for their logging practices, apparently using the public interest standing (without any injured party), so I do not see what the allegedly novel aspect is.

Based on the explanation by Dr Bay, linked above, his involvement is only intended to prevent the case of the plaintiffs from proceeding; he is not arguing against AHPRA or the Department of Health. Dr Bay implies that nobody except an injured person should be allowed to challenge the governmet’s compliance with the regulatory approval process for pharmaceutical products.

Dr Bay’s argument that the allegedly ‘new’ kind of standing would allow the courts to intervene in private health decisions of parents does not make sense; the government can already intervene under the existing legislation following a complaint by a doctor or a teacher, for example, take custody of a child from its parent if the life or wellbeing of the child were seriously in danger. Vaccine mandates are another kind of ongoing intervention into private health decisions.

It is also unclear to me what is Dr Bay’s legal standing for intervening in a case he is not a party to. It seems that allowing a private party to freely intervene (allow “special interest” standing) in an administrative case, seeking to disqualify the plaintiff’s action, is creating precisely the kind of precedent that Dr Bay says he wants to prevent. Imagine taking the government to court for medical overreach and some private person intervenes to disqualify your case. https://www.lawright.org.au/legal-information/going-to-court/standing-and-involvement-in-legal-proceedings/

Because NATO is not at war with Russia, but engaged in a collaborative effort to de-nationalise, de-populate and re-engineer the breadbasket of Europe, which also happens to be the land bridge between Asia and Europe, the strategic “pivot” of the World Island. Who needs friends when you have enemies like these.

BREAKING NEWS: The one world government NGO Oxfam, advises their operatives to avoid using the offensive term ‘Human’ and instead opt for a more inclusive ‘Whumyn’, as in ‘universal whumyn rights’:) https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/inclusive-language-guide-621487/

The most important lesson of the Russia:UkraineNATO conflict is that just because two groups are ‘fighting’ does not automatically mean they are not on the same side, working towards a common end.

The only possible cause of inflation are the recently historically low interest rates. Low interest rates simultaneously increase the volume of credit issued to home buyers (which are new funds that add 1:1 to the money supply in circulation) and increase the cost of housing. Supply chain issues do not alter the overall price level, since any extra money spent on one thing reduces the amount of money available to purchase other things, with the net effect on inflation being neutral. Only the supply of money under a steady volume of trade have any practical impact on inflation, according to the formula of exchange. In short, RBA caused the inflation, and they knew all along what they were doing.

Why do I think that this anti-trans activist, the trans-rights activists and the Nazi ‘extras’ all work for the same master, and neither gives a damn about women? Public rallies, megaphone diplomacy and simplistic slogans are designed to cause confrontation, designed to amplify the animosity, with no attempt to genuinely persuade or formulate a reasonable solution. A rational solution to this conflict looks like this: https://michaelkowalik.substack.com/p/gender-identity-on-trial

At least NATO and Russia agree on one thing: killing as many working class Ukrainian males as possible, one by arming and forcing them to fight to the last Ukrainian, and the other blowing them up because they are armed. Even Australia has contributed to the common cause.

Looks like Liberals have a problem with Women, not with Nazism.

A woman MP attends a protest for women’s safety. The protest is crashed by “Nazis”, and even though the MP does not in any way endorse Nazism she is publicly accused of being a Nazi sympathiser and faces expulsion from the Liberal party. A state premier from the same party dresses up in a Gestapo (Nazi death squad) uniform. He is still a state premier, forgiven by the same party, and instead society is blamed for misguiding this upstanding young man.

Let us analyse the symbolism of Perrottet wearing a Nazi uniform to a 21st birthday party.

Birthday is a celebration of birth, breading, bloodline, therefore of eugenics.

Party in his context is obviously the Nazi Party.

Number 21 is evidently the sum of the day, month and year of the terrorist attack on the WTC: 11+9+1=21

Therefore, Perrottet celebrated eugenics through acts of terrorism aimed at destroying the world trade, on behalf of the Nazi party.

This is clearly an impeachable offence;)

Statements of a person who denies the absolute validity of the law of non-contradiction cannot be understood, cannot be interpreted as meaning what they appear to mean since they could also mean the opposite. Someone who rejects the law of non-contradiction does not communicate anything.

The world as we know it is a meaningful product of the human mind (not of individual mind but of all human minds collectively). It is tautologically true that we cannot know anything apart from the world as we know it. In that sense, rational consciousness is the creator of the world, a world that could not exist without consciousness because it is a world only insofar as it is meaningful, but precisely for this reason it is structurally bound by the rules of meaning/sense. We can entertain and believe a lot of nonsense, harbour many contradiction, but this only means that our beliefs are false, that they do not correspond to objects in the world, not even to objects in our imagination, but are rather poorly constructed expressions that ultimately signify nothing apart from their constitutive parts. We may believe that we believe something that contains a contradiction, but we cannot even define/imagine that alleged something as a meaningful identity; it is just a cluster of words that do not make up a whole. AI as it is seems to be reflecting this human deficiency; it does not improve human consistency, it does not generate new meaning, only expands the scope and speed of access to the existing information (which it itself already corrupted), and its users can still cluster the information provided by AI with their contradictory beliefs, nonsensically, and yet believing that those bits amount to some profound insight, and act on it to their own (and other’s) peril. Without humanity improving its thought-consistency (fewer contradictions) AI can only amplify the impact of human errors. In that sense, AI constitutes a form of accelerationism, propelling us towards a bitter end, hoping that ‘salvation’ or the birth of ‘higher man’, will follow the inevitable collapse.

Looks like there is more to the story. Why would a female sexual safety advocate associate with extremist groups or have a barbie doll in a gestapo uniform as her profile picture? It seems my intuition was spot on: Keen and the “Nazis” are literally on the same team (which evidently includes Perrottet;) one big muppet show. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Letter-of-Motion-regarding-Moira-Deeming-20-March-2023.pdf

BREAKING NEWS: Andrew Giles, the Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs, announced that Jerome Allen (Jerry) Seinfeld, famous for his TV series “Seinfeld”, will be denied entry to the Commonwealth for his historical links to Nazism, in particular, for his collaboration with an Argentinian right wing extremist who goes by the name The Soup Nazi. Exhibit A: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqlQYBcsq54