Hypothesis: Covid was not a bio-weapon but an engineered, self-propagating cure for cancer, and the vaccine was engineered to prevent the cure from working on the majority of people and thus avert a population-wide increase of life-expectancy.

My ancestors, the original owners of the Earth.

The health authorities and politicians who supported lockdowns and vaccine mandates will be hunted down and prosecuted with the same intergenerational zeal as Nazi collaborators.

Conversation on the topic of tyrannical legislation being introduced in W.A.: https://t.iss.one/Aussie_News/30563

Everything is bursting at the seams, everywhere. Tension is building and likely will be released everywhere simultaneously, like a chain reaction. The time necessary for extreme endurance will likely be relatively short provided one has adequate health and the physical capacity to look after themselves, reason with others, work together, help someone else.

Email to Senator Malcolm Roberts (09.12.2022)

Dear Senator,

A new study in Nature looked at the attitudes of the Vaccinated towards the Unvaccinated, and vice versa. The study is interesting but a more informative study could be conducted. Would Senator Roberts be willing to reach our to academics in relevant disciplines to form a research team to conduct the proposed study. I would be interested in participating, if invited.
Conceptual Outline:

Covid pandemic and the associated public health response was possibly the biggest test of moral conscience in human history since WWII. The test would not work without the vaccine mandates and the associated exclusion and vilification of the unvaccinated, so in this sense the mandates were indispensable and our temporary exclusion worthwhile. If Covid vaccines were entirely optional there would be no clear moral challenge. Human responses to vaccine mandates can be categorised as follows: a) those who demanded medical coercion and the removal of human rights from the unvaccinated; b) those who tacitly acquiesced to medical coercion and the removal of human rights from the unvaccinated; c) those who submitted to medical coercion but disagreed with the removal of human rights from the unvaccinated; d) those who disagreed with the mandates but complied only due to existentially critical economic stress; e) those who absolutely refused to submit to medical coercion and rejected the mandates on principle. I would like to see the percentages for these categories, and for a much bigger sample of the population than the recent study.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05607-y

I expect that some research funding would be necessary to conduct a large survey in Australia, say 1 million participants, via professional survey organisations.

My response to article in the BMJ Journal of Medical Ethics was published: https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2022/12/05/jme-2022-108449.responses#the-proportionality-principle-is-the-wrong-ethical-standard-for-vaccine-mandates

Gender theory is officially over. Daily Mail concedes that an adult human male means “man”, without asking him how he identifies.

How did millions of different animal species including Homo sapiens manage to survive millions of years of evolution without inclusive sex education? If healthy sexual reproduction is that easy to accomplish then what is sexual education really for?

A good example of poor logic that passes for “philosophy” these days. The authors argue, in essence, that if your right of medical consent violates their “right” of consent to acts of nature, then you should comply with their non-consent to your non-consent, because something something science. The paper commits to an infinitely regressive formula of consent, according to which every person has the right not to consent to every other person’s non-consent, which is nonsense. On this view, if humanity poses a health risk to me, and I do not consent to that risk, then humans do not have the right to exist, because ME, but, by the same logic, I also do not have the right to exist and can be exterminated to minimise the risk to others. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phac005

“Died suddenly” is not a subversive concept but a meme intentionally propagated by the corporate media, plastered all over the news, leaving the dots for you to “connect”. They want you to think it, they want you to believe it. The question is WHY?

Imagine living the rest of your life ‘knowing’ you’re a ticking time bomb. That’s what makes it easier for me to forgive the people who treated the unvaccinated as lepers. We might have done it tough for a short while, but it’s nothing compared to the harsh lesson that they will have to endure for the rest of their lives. Why - all part of the fake awakening. They want people to connect the dots. The media are reporting on every single death, health condition of even the lowest profile actors and athletes. They want everyone (collectively) to come to the conclusion that the vaccines have caused this. SADS is also another concept that they have intentionally plastered everywhere.

A question for those tribal separatists who think that Putin will save them: how many sovereign tribal nations are there in Russia?

Another question for those tribal separatists who think that Iran will save them: how does Iran normally execute political protestors?

Hypothesis: There is no ‘conflict’ in Ukraine, but a collaborative effort between NATO and Russia to de-nationalise and re-engineer the food-basket of Europe.

Some ideological structures are intentionally built to collapse. The energy of the collapse can then be used as the spring-board for radical charge.

Unless you pay your doctor more than she is paid by the Pharmamafia, unless your doctor is more afraid of you than she is afraid of the Pharmamafia, she is not your doctor; she is their doctor, and you are the sucker.