Forwarded from Michael Kowalik
Malcolm, Please help make the fundamental laws of logic (non-contradiction, excluded middle, law of identity) and the logical fallacies stemming from violations of these laws a “cross-curriculum priority” for all students in primary and secondary schools. This is our only hope as a society. I have been suggesting this curriculum addition to the department of education and requested to join ACARA’s curriculum advisory committee but without any success.
The Greens exist only to show you how much worse things could be if you did not vote for the status quo.
Those who allege ‘stollen elections’ fail to understand that all elections are fake, although the scope of electoral deception is never greater than what it needs to be to achieve the required outcome. The illusion of fairness is part of the deception.
The irony of people who live on top of one another in concrete blocks, attracted to the most artificial, pretentious and disconnected trends, also vote “for the Environment”, blaming humanity for their own emptiness and contradictions.
If ALL the votes were for Dan Andrews (like they were for Stalin) you would start asking questions, have doubts about the integrity of the process, right? This is why not all the votes are for Dan Andrews.
Electoral Syllogism: Only human votes are valid. Those who vote for Dan Andrews are not human. Therefore, Dan Andrews did not win the election.
Forwarded from Normal (Michael Kowalik)
I expect Dan Andrews to “win” the Victorian election, precisely because this would humiliate Victorians the most. Dan’s stage persona is so exquisitely vile and morally perverse, a kafkaesque caricature of the anti-human. The populist theatre needs an emotive caricature in order to disgust, entertain, captivate, move, provoke, possibly even cure.
How to teach a child to be rational from an early age
Humans (especially children) are motivated less by gifts/rewards/trophies than by internal accomplishments of their will. Any reward for obedience is a lesser motivation than the power to respectfully disobey.
The formula I am proposing:
A) Set your rules and expectations applicable to a child.
B) If the child does not want to do something that is expected of them, ask them to give you reasons why the expectation is unreasonable at this time. If the reason given is unsatisfactory, explain why it failed. This way you are adhering to the same rules of argumentation that are expected from the child, and this imprints a principle.
C) If at the end of this process the child would demonstrate a reasonable effort to argue consistently and on relevant merits, a concession to the rules/expectations should be granted. The reward of ‘respectful disobedience’ then becomes a powerful incentive to argue more consistently, identify relevant merits, and (in time) to develop sufficient understanding not to dissent on inadequate merits.
Humans (especially children) are motivated less by gifts/rewards/trophies than by internal accomplishments of their will. Any reward for obedience is a lesser motivation than the power to respectfully disobey.
The formula I am proposing:
A) Set your rules and expectations applicable to a child.
B) If the child does not want to do something that is expected of them, ask them to give you reasons why the expectation is unreasonable at this time. If the reason given is unsatisfactory, explain why it failed. This way you are adhering to the same rules of argumentation that are expected from the child, and this imprints a principle.
C) If at the end of this process the child would demonstrate a reasonable effort to argue consistently and on relevant merits, a concession to the rules/expectations should be granted. The reward of ‘respectful disobedience’ then becomes a powerful incentive to argue more consistently, identify relevant merits, and (in time) to develop sufficient understanding not to dissent on inadequate merits.
Thanks to Dan Andrews, the waning Freedom Movement is now officially back in business. With an impending hustle for donations for hopeless court cases, quagmire class actions and electoral ambitions, I will humbly try to stay ahead of the curve:) https://michaelkowalik.substack.com/about
Forwarded from Normal (Michael Kowalik)
There is one question you can (and should) ask any online personality to determine whether they are genuine defenders of human rights or just fence-sitters playing both sides: ‘Do you support vaccine mandates for Measles or any other fully approved and extensively tested vaccines?’ Please let us know their views on this question.
Animals can be trained to act in a particular manner in familiar circumstance. Similarly, Homo sapiens can be trained to act as-if “morally” in familiar circumstances. The true test of morality is whether an individual would act morally in unfamiliar circumstances. Covid was an unfamiliar situation that exposed most individuals as incapable of moral discernment, trained animals (Homo sapiens) but not yet Human (Anthropos).
Individuals who fake the moral conscience by having learned what is morally expected by Humans in particular situations tend to ‘virtue signal’ and extrapolate their moral demands in order to validate their pretence. ‘Virtue signalling’ and the extrapolation of moral demands according to a fixed formula that disregards circumstantial differences or logical inconsistencies is the hallmark of fake moral conscience.