Forwarded from Dr Palevsky
BREAKING: RFK Jr. says HHS believes they have FOUND "interventions" which caused a MASSIVE spike in autism in children
https://x.com/nicksortor/status/1960392825163374703?s=10
https://x.com/nicksortor/status/1960392825163374703?s=10
Forwarded from Dr Roger Hodkinson
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
RFK Jr. on Pfizer Trial: 23% Higher Death Rate in Vax Group Debunks "100% Effective" Myth
In a stunning exposé, RFK Jr. dismantles the narrative by highlighting the shocking results of the original Pfizer trial: a 23% higher all-cause mortality rate in the vaccinated group versus the placebo group after six months.
This alarming fact from the Pfizer's own clinical trial underpins what he calls the "data chaos" of the initial rollout.
He eviscerates the famed "100% effective" claim that emerged from that same trial, revealing it was built on a dataset of just three COVID deaths total—two in the placebo group and one in the vaccinated group. This statistically fragile result was disingenuously spun into a universal promise of complete protection.
Kennedy breaks down the brutal math from the trial data: to prevent a single COVID death, nearly 20,000 people had to be vaccinated. He argues that with the vaccine itself showing a higher mortality risk, this minuscule benefit would be instantly canceled out, potentially making the intervention net harmful.
This history makes the current shift so critical. Kennedy outlines the new FDA-approved vaccine’s stark reality: it is primarily for those 65+ or with profound comorbidities under a unique and telling agreement—every recipient becomes part of an actual clinical trial.
After years of mandates and declarations of "safe and effective" without robust long-term data, this new policy is a quiet admission. They are finally conducting the trial that should have been done first, using the public as participants.
Join 👉 https://t.iss.one/RogerHodkinson
In a stunning exposé, RFK Jr. dismantles the narrative by highlighting the shocking results of the original Pfizer trial: a 23% higher all-cause mortality rate in the vaccinated group versus the placebo group after six months.
This alarming fact from the Pfizer's own clinical trial underpins what he calls the "data chaos" of the initial rollout.
He eviscerates the famed "100% effective" claim that emerged from that same trial, revealing it was built on a dataset of just three COVID deaths total—two in the placebo group and one in the vaccinated group. This statistically fragile result was disingenuously spun into a universal promise of complete protection.
Kennedy breaks down the brutal math from the trial data: to prevent a single COVID death, nearly 20,000 people had to be vaccinated. He argues that with the vaccine itself showing a higher mortality risk, this minuscule benefit would be instantly canceled out, potentially making the intervention net harmful.
This history makes the current shift so critical. Kennedy outlines the new FDA-approved vaccine’s stark reality: it is primarily for those 65+ or with profound comorbidities under a unique and telling agreement—every recipient becomes part of an actual clinical trial.
After years of mandates and declarations of "safe and effective" without robust long-term data, this new policy is a quiet admission. They are finally conducting the trial that should have been done first, using the public as participants.
Join 👉 https://t.iss.one/RogerHodkinson
FULL VIDEO - Dr. David E Martin - EU Parliament Strasbourg
Full version of the viral clip from a few days ago. It was recorded on 13th Sept 2023
Full YT | Viral Clip: X | @NoVaccines
Full version of the viral clip from a few days ago. It was recorded on 13th Sept 2023
Full YT | Viral Clip: X | @NoVaccines
YouTube
Dr. David E Martin - Expert hearing - EU Parliament Strasbourg
Health & Democracy under WHO`s new proposed rules
Expert hearing EU Parliament Strasbourg - 13. September 2023
Contribution of Dr. David E Martin (USA)
English Version
Expert hearing EU Parliament Strasbourg - 13. September 2023
Contribution of Dr. David E Martin (USA)
English Version
Forwarded from Dr Roger Hodkinson
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Donald Trump just said autism and vaccines in the SAME sentence.
Listen to the end. He pointed out something shocking about the Amish — and said it TWICE for emphasis:
“I think I can say that there are certain groups of people [Amish] that don’t take vaccines and don’t take any pills that have NO AUTISM — that have NO AUTISM.”
His face was stone cold when he said this. He knew it would spark a firestorm, and he said it anyway.
Join 👉 https://t.iss.one/RogerHodkinson
Listen to the end. He pointed out something shocking about the Amish — and said it TWICE for emphasis:
“I think I can say that there are certain groups of people [Amish] that don’t take vaccines and don’t take any pills that have NO AUTISM — that have NO AUTISM.”
His face was stone cold when he said this. He knew it would spark a firestorm, and he said it anyway.
Join 👉 https://t.iss.one/RogerHodkinson
BASALT COLUMNS, ANYONE?
Melted buildings are the ultimate proof those running the world do so by trickery. Because its physical, everywhere and undeniable. Each person who realizes a false version of something, weakens the energy of deception and empowers the good souls by converting it into knowledge. @MeltedWorld
Melted buildings are the ultimate proof those running the world do so by trickery. Because its physical, everywhere and undeniable. Each person who realizes a false version of something, weakens the energy of deception and empowers the good souls by converting it into knowledge. @MeltedWorld
Forwarded from Dr. Ariyana Love (3rd channel!)
🚨 BOMBSHELL STUDY: 86% of PCR-Positive "COVID Cases" Were NOT Real Infections.
This means lockdowns, mandates & fear were built on fraudulent tests.
https://x.com/valerieanne1970/status/1991275744937365779?s=46
This means lockdowns, mandates & fear were built on fraudulent tests.
https://x.com/valerieanne1970/status/1991275744937365779?s=46
X (formerly Twitter)
Valerie Anne Smith (@ValerieAnne1970) on X
🚨 BOMBSHELL STUDY: 86% of PCR-Positive "COVID Cases" Were NOT Real Infections.
This means lockdowns, mandates & fear were built on fraudulent tests.
Global WHO standards amplified the same fraud everywhere.
Time for accountability—lives & livelihoods were…
This means lockdowns, mandates & fear were built on fraudulent tests.
Global WHO standards amplified the same fraud everywhere.
Time for accountability—lives & livelihoods were…
World Economic Forum Status WEF
Proof Governments aren't at the top
@NoVaccines | @Undoctrinate | @MeltedWorld
Proof Governments aren't at the top
@NoVaccines | @Undoctrinate | @MeltedWorld
Forwarded from Dr. Ariyana Love (3rd channel!)
Stay out of hospitals! Learn to naturally detox!
https://substack.com/@stopthoseshots/note/c-181329773?r=2juwfo&utm_medium=ios
https://substack.com/@stopthoseshots/note/c-181329773?r=2juwfo&utm_medium=ios
Substack
Stop The Shots (@stopthoseshots)
Government ordered hospitals to murder the un-vaccinated as part of the mass genocide.
Forwarded from Dr. Ariyana Love (3rd channel!)
OPETH, if someone hasnt heard them. Almost Dwarfs the entire of 70s progressive music, just one band who is as good or better than the laypersons favorites such as pink floyd. Also see Riverside, Lemur voice all of me/divided, Rush, Phideaux doomsday afternoon, idk....spur of moment post. Nightingale, Anekdoten, RPWL,getting another beer. Please drop into MELTED WORLD for how to trade silver, dethrone controllers PERFECTORS OF TRICKERY (DING! - the power of deceit instantly converts back into our power of knowledge) and reveal the hidden EMF world hidden in plain sight like evrything ... covered by a tissue paper veil of hell. Deceit overturned IS the power of knowledge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIo3lpXrc5A&list=RDnIo3lpXrc5A&start_radio=1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIo3lpXrc5A&list=RDnIo3lpXrc5A&start_radio=1
YouTube
Opeth - Reverie / Harlequin Forest (Audio)
Opeth's latest album Heritage is available now on Roadrunner Records. Download now on iTunes: https://smarturl.it/opeth-heritage-se
Opeth on iTunes: https://bit.ly/18vOLWq
Subscribe: https://bit.ly/171a3Ya
Site: https://www.opeth.com/home/
Facebook: https:/…
Opeth on iTunes: https://bit.ly/18vOLWq
Subscribe: https://bit.ly/171a3Ya
Site: https://www.opeth.com/home/
Facebook: https:/…
Forwarded from Dr Palevsky
Thimerosal to Be Banned from Use in All Vaccines in U.S.
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2025/08/thimerosal-to-be-banned-from-use-in-all-vaccines-in-u-s/
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2025/08/thimerosal-to-be-banned-from-use-in-all-vaccines-in-u-s/
The Vaccine Reaction
Thimerosal to Be Banned from Use in All Vaccines in U.S.
In 1999, the U.S Public Health Service, along with the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and vaccine manufacturers, jointly agreed that any potential risk from thimerosal, a mercury-based...
Forwarded from Sue H
• Share pathogen samples and genetic sequences - including synthetic or AI-created material - into an international system beyond national control.
• Allow the WHO to claim 20% of real-time production of vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics during a declared emergency.
- At least half to be donated at WHO's discretion. - The rest to be sold by the WHO at prices set internationally, not domestically.
• Require domestic laws to be aligned so they never conflict with PABS, potentially overriding biosafety, biosecurity, or export controls.
• Place enforcement under a new international Conference of the Parties, further reducing national sovereignty.
While the AU/UK/NZ submission was cautious and light on substance, other countries raised serious objections. Russia, for example, warned that states must retain the sovereign right to impose export controls.
ISN'T THE WHO MEANT TO BE A HEALTH ADVISER?
Originally, the World Health Organization was intended to be a technical health adviser, supporting countries with information while governments made their own sovereign decisions.
Under the amended Pandemic Regulations and the Pandemic Agreement, that role changes fundamentally. The WHO moves from adviser to decision-maker, with authority to coordinate responses, direct supply chains, and influence the production, pricing, and distribution of vaccines and medicines.
These functions closely resemble a global trade framework.
This shift is especially concerning given changes in WHO funding. No longer primarily funded by its member countries, a significant share of the WHO's budget now comes from earmarked contributions from large pharmaceutical interests and private foundations, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI, which benefit from pandemic declarations and WHO-directed responses.
When an organisation funded by interested parties is given expanded decision-making and trade-like powers, transparency, accountability, and national sovereignty are put at risk.
ACT NOW & SHARE this POST
• Allow the WHO to claim 20% of real-time production of vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics during a declared emergency.
- At least half to be donated at WHO's discretion. - The rest to be sold by the WHO at prices set internationally, not domestically.
• Require domestic laws to be aligned so they never conflict with PABS, potentially overriding biosafety, biosecurity, or export controls.
• Place enforcement under a new international Conference of the Parties, further reducing national sovereignty.
While the AU/UK/NZ submission was cautious and light on substance, other countries raised serious objections. Russia, for example, warned that states must retain the sovereign right to impose export controls.
ISN'T THE WHO MEANT TO BE A HEALTH ADVISER?
Originally, the World Health Organization was intended to be a technical health adviser, supporting countries with information while governments made their own sovereign decisions.
Under the amended Pandemic Regulations and the Pandemic Agreement, that role changes fundamentally. The WHO moves from adviser to decision-maker, with authority to coordinate responses, direct supply chains, and influence the production, pricing, and distribution of vaccines and medicines.
These functions closely resemble a global trade framework.
This shift is especially concerning given changes in WHO funding. No longer primarily funded by its member countries, a significant share of the WHO's budget now comes from earmarked contributions from large pharmaceutical interests and private foundations, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI, which benefit from pandemic declarations and WHO-directed responses.
When an organisation funded by interested parties is given expanded decision-making and trade-like powers, transparency, accountability, and national sovereignty are put at risk.
ACT NOW & SHARE this POST
Forwarded from Sue H
New Zealand is approaching two key decision points on new WHO pandemic treaties that would significantly expand the organisation's authority over future health emergencies.
These instruments would shift the WHO away from its original role as a technical health adviser, offering guidance while countries made their own decisions, toward a centralised decision-maker with influence over surveillance, border measures, supply chains, and the production and distribution of medical products. That is not what the WHO was originally designed for, and it is entirely appropriate for New Zealand to ask hard questions now, before these commitments lock in by default.
With ongoing media focus on old and emerging pathogens and future pandemic risks, are you willing to repeat the Covid experience under a system that grants the World Health Organization even greater authority, without full parliamentary scrutiny or public consent? If the answer is no, now is the time to speak up. (Read on)
A Summary of the Treaties and their Status:
The 2024 Amended Pandemic Regulations (Pandemic Regulations)
The Pandemic Regulations were adopted globally in May 2024 and are already legally binding in most countries. However, New Zealand is different because, thanks to your help, it rejected the last round of amendments. But we can't stop there!
New Zealand only has until 19 March 2026 to reject the IHR Amendments to remain under the WHO's 2005 pandemic rules.
If New Zealand does nothing, the amendments will take effect automatically. Silence is acceptance!
The Pandemic Agreement
The Pandemic Agreement is a separate and entirely new WHO treaty. It has been 'adopted' in principle, but it is still not finalised.
New Zealand likely voted “yes to the adoption” in May 2025, but the final signature cannot occur until the Pathogen Access & Benefit-Sharing (PABS) Schedule is agreed.
Concerningly, New Zealand submitted on the Pathogen Sharing schedule in September 2025, signalling alignment - without any public parliamentary debate.
Why This Matters
The Pandemic Regulations read less like temporary health measures and more like a permanent governance framework:
New global watchdog: NZ must create a National IHR Authority to implement WHO directives and report back (Article 4).
Speech control: “Risk communication” capacities include countering “mis- and disinformation” (Annex 1).
Digital ID hook: Health documents must meet WHO digital standards (Articles 35–36).
Border and traveller powers: Testing, quarantine, prophylaxis, and even compulsory medical exams may be ordered if a “public-health risk” is declared (Articles 23, 31–32).
Data sharing: Personal health data deemed “essential” may be shared internationally (Article 45).
An Open chequebook: A new WHO financing mechanism with no published costings for NZ (Article 44 bis).
The Pandemic Agreement creates the global trade framework to allow it all to happen. It gives greater control to the WHO and its funders. It enables the sharing of pandemic potential pathogens and imposes obligations on manufacturing, supply allocation, technology transfer, and cross-border access to medical products during a declared emergency.
THIS IS DONE THROUGH:
WHO becoming the “directing and coordinating authority” (Preamble, Article 1).
Mandatory surveillance across humans, animals, and the environment (“One Health” - Articles 4-5).
WHO-directed supply chains and “equitable” vaccine distribution (Article 13).
A binding Conference of the Parties to review compliance and issue decisions.
THE LAST CHINK IN THE PANDEMIC AGREEMENT:
The Pathogen Access & Benefit-Sharing Schedule
In August, the WHO asked countries to submit wording for the Pathogen Access & Benefit-Sharing (PABS) Schedule - the final piece required before the Pandemic Agreement can be signed.
Concerningly, New Zealand joined Australia, the UK, Norway, and Canada in a joint submission that would:
These instruments would shift the WHO away from its original role as a technical health adviser, offering guidance while countries made their own decisions, toward a centralised decision-maker with influence over surveillance, border measures, supply chains, and the production and distribution of medical products. That is not what the WHO was originally designed for, and it is entirely appropriate for New Zealand to ask hard questions now, before these commitments lock in by default.
With ongoing media focus on old and emerging pathogens and future pandemic risks, are you willing to repeat the Covid experience under a system that grants the World Health Organization even greater authority, without full parliamentary scrutiny or public consent? If the answer is no, now is the time to speak up. (Read on)
A Summary of the Treaties and their Status:
The 2024 Amended Pandemic Regulations (Pandemic Regulations)
The Pandemic Regulations were adopted globally in May 2024 and are already legally binding in most countries. However, New Zealand is different because, thanks to your help, it rejected the last round of amendments. But we can't stop there!
New Zealand only has until 19 March 2026 to reject the IHR Amendments to remain under the WHO's 2005 pandemic rules.
If New Zealand does nothing, the amendments will take effect automatically. Silence is acceptance!
The Pandemic Agreement
The Pandemic Agreement is a separate and entirely new WHO treaty. It has been 'adopted' in principle, but it is still not finalised.
New Zealand likely voted “yes to the adoption” in May 2025, but the final signature cannot occur until the Pathogen Access & Benefit-Sharing (PABS) Schedule is agreed.
Concerningly, New Zealand submitted on the Pathogen Sharing schedule in September 2025, signalling alignment - without any public parliamentary debate.
Why This Matters
The Pandemic Regulations read less like temporary health measures and more like a permanent governance framework:
New global watchdog: NZ must create a National IHR Authority to implement WHO directives and report back (Article 4).
Speech control: “Risk communication” capacities include countering “mis- and disinformation” (Annex 1).
Digital ID hook: Health documents must meet WHO digital standards (Articles 35–36).
Border and traveller powers: Testing, quarantine, prophylaxis, and even compulsory medical exams may be ordered if a “public-health risk” is declared (Articles 23, 31–32).
Data sharing: Personal health data deemed “essential” may be shared internationally (Article 45).
An Open chequebook: A new WHO financing mechanism with no published costings for NZ (Article 44 bis).
The Pandemic Agreement creates the global trade framework to allow it all to happen. It gives greater control to the WHO and its funders. It enables the sharing of pandemic potential pathogens and imposes obligations on manufacturing, supply allocation, technology transfer, and cross-border access to medical products during a declared emergency.
THIS IS DONE THROUGH:
WHO becoming the “directing and coordinating authority” (Preamble, Article 1).
Mandatory surveillance across humans, animals, and the environment (“One Health” - Articles 4-5).
WHO-directed supply chains and “equitable” vaccine distribution (Article 13).
A binding Conference of the Parties to review compliance and issue decisions.
THE LAST CHINK IN THE PANDEMIC AGREEMENT:
The Pathogen Access & Benefit-Sharing Schedule
In August, the WHO asked countries to submit wording for the Pathogen Access & Benefit-Sharing (PABS) Schedule - the final piece required before the Pandemic Agreement can be signed.
Concerningly, New Zealand joined Australia, the UK, Norway, and Canada in a joint submission that would: