Liberation
You pay a greater price for being so nice and deferential than for consciously showing your Shadow. First, to follow the latter path you must begin by respecting your own opinions more and those of others less, particularly when it comes to your areas of expertise, to the field you have immersed yourself in. Trust your native genius and the ideas you have come up with.
Second, get in the habit in your daily life of asserting yourself more and compromising less. Do this under control and at opportune moments. Third, start caring less what people think of you. You will feel a tremendous sense of liberation. Fourth, realize that at times you must offend and even hurt people who block your path, who have ugly values, who unjustly criticize you. Use such moments of clear injustice to bring out your Shadow and show it proudly. Fifth, feel free to play the impudent, willful child who mocks the stupidity and hypocrisy of others.
Finally, flout the very conventions that others follow so scrupulously.
In general, consider this a form of exorcism. Once you show these desires and impulses, they no longer lie hidden in corners of your personality, twisting and operating in secret ways. You have released your demons and enhanced your presence as an authentic human. In this way, the Shadow becomes your ally.
Unfortunately there is no doubt about the fact that man is, as a whole, less good than he imagines himself or wants to be. Everyone carries a shadow, and the less it is embodied in the individual’s conscious life, the blacker and denser it is.
~ Carl Jung.
#HumanNature
♡ ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ 🔕💪
ˡᶦᵏᵉ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ ᵏⁱⁿᵈˡʸ ᵘⁿᵐᵘᵗᵉ
ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉˡ
Join now👇👇👇
@Laws_of_Human_Nature
You pay a greater price for being so nice and deferential than for consciously showing your Shadow. First, to follow the latter path you must begin by respecting your own opinions more and those of others less, particularly when it comes to your areas of expertise, to the field you have immersed yourself in. Trust your native genius and the ideas you have come up with.
Second, get in the habit in your daily life of asserting yourself more and compromising less. Do this under control and at opportune moments. Third, start caring less what people think of you. You will feel a tremendous sense of liberation. Fourth, realize that at times you must offend and even hurt people who block your path, who have ugly values, who unjustly criticize you. Use such moments of clear injustice to bring out your Shadow and show it proudly. Fifth, feel free to play the impudent, willful child who mocks the stupidity and hypocrisy of others.
Finally, flout the very conventions that others follow so scrupulously.
In general, consider this a form of exorcism. Once you show these desires and impulses, they no longer lie hidden in corners of your personality, twisting and operating in secret ways. You have released your demons and enhanced your presence as an authentic human. In this way, the Shadow becomes your ally.
Unfortunately there is no doubt about the fact that man is, as a whole, less good than he imagines himself or wants to be. Everyone carries a shadow, and the less it is embodied in the individual’s conscious life, the blacker and denser it is.
~ Carl Jung.
#HumanNature
♡ ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ 🔕💪
ˡᶦᵏᵉ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ ᵏⁱⁿᵈˡʸ ᵘⁿᵐᵘᵗᵉ
ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉˡ
Join now👇👇👇
@Laws_of_Human_Nature
👍46❤14💯3
Do you enjoy reading this channel?
Perhaps you have thought about placing ads on it?
To do this, follow three simple steps:
1) Sign up: https://telega.io/c/Laws_of_Human_Nature
2) Top up the balance in a convenient way
3) Create an advertising post
If the topic of your post fits our channel, we will publish it with pleasure.
Perhaps you have thought about placing ads on it?
To do this, follow three simple steps:
1) Sign up: https://telega.io/c/Laws_of_Human_Nature
2) Top up the balance in a convenient way
3) Create an advertising post
If the topic of your post fits our channel, we will publish it with pleasure.
👍8❤3
Stoicism
It is a system of ethics examining how to lead a virtuous life and find joy in the face of adversity. The core of Stoic thinking is based on logic and reason as a means of understanding oneself and one’s surroundings. Its focus is on moral autonomy and responsibility – Stoics believe individuals have control over their own destiny, provided they think logically, live virtuously, and exercise their free will. As such, Stoics strive to remain indifferent to external matters in order to focus more fully on cultivating their character, which can be done by remaining true to virtuous ideals like temperance, courage, wisdom, justice, and moderation.
At its heart Stoicism teaches self-discipline: stability in life comes when we learn not to respond emotionally or hastily to events outside our control—like loss or pain—and instead focus on what is within our power—our thoughts and actions toward others. Instead of seeing misfortune as something outside ourselves we must tackle them head-on, Stoics emphasize changing our attitudes towards it; accepting it valiantly as part of the human condition rather than fighting it futilely with regret or envy.
The philosophy also places importance on mindfulness; thoughtfully considering the implications and subtleties of decisions before making them rather than allowing passions or immediate desires be a knee-jerk guide. Ultimately Stoicism demands thoughtful consideration and strategic action in order for one to avoid being overwhelmed by emotions while achieving peace amidst chaotic environments and confidently embracing any exigencies life may present.
#HumanNature
♡ ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ 🔕💪
ˡᶦᵏᵉ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ ᵏⁱⁿᵈˡʸ ᵘⁿᵐᵘᵗᵉ
ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉˡ
Join now👇👇👇
@Laws_of_Human_Nature
It is a system of ethics examining how to lead a virtuous life and find joy in the face of adversity. The core of Stoic thinking is based on logic and reason as a means of understanding oneself and one’s surroundings. Its focus is on moral autonomy and responsibility – Stoics believe individuals have control over their own destiny, provided they think logically, live virtuously, and exercise their free will. As such, Stoics strive to remain indifferent to external matters in order to focus more fully on cultivating their character, which can be done by remaining true to virtuous ideals like temperance, courage, wisdom, justice, and moderation.
At its heart Stoicism teaches self-discipline: stability in life comes when we learn not to respond emotionally or hastily to events outside our control—like loss or pain—and instead focus on what is within our power—our thoughts and actions toward others. Instead of seeing misfortune as something outside ourselves we must tackle them head-on, Stoics emphasize changing our attitudes towards it; accepting it valiantly as part of the human condition rather than fighting it futilely with regret or envy.
The philosophy also places importance on mindfulness; thoughtfully considering the implications and subtleties of decisions before making them rather than allowing passions or immediate desires be a knee-jerk guide. Ultimately Stoicism demands thoughtful consideration and strategic action in order for one to avoid being overwhelmed by emotions while achieving peace amidst chaotic environments and confidently embracing any exigencies life may present.
#HumanNature
♡ ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ 🔕💪
ˡᶦᵏᵉ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ ᵏⁱⁿᵈˡʸ ᵘⁿᵐᵘᵗᵉ
ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉˡ
Join now👇👇👇
@Laws_of_Human_Nature
👍26❤14🥰1🤡1
Empowerment through Choice: Shaping Your Own Destiny
In this world, there are two types of people: those who choose, and those who are chosen. The ones who choose are the ones who have agency, who are in control of their own destiny. They are the ones who make the decisions, who take the risks, and who shape their own lives. The ones who are chosen are the ones who are at the mercy of others, who are subject to the whims of fate. They are the ones who are told what to do, who are given opportunities, and who are defined by the choices of others.
In a world where so much is out of our control, it is essential to be the one who does the choosing. When we choose, we take responsibility for our own lives. We decide what we want to do, who we want to be, and where we want to go. We create our own destiny, rather than letting it be created for us. Of course, choosing is not always easy. It often means making difficult decisions, taking risks, and facing challenges. But it is also the only way to truly live our lives to the fullest. When we choose, we are in control of our own destiny. We are the masters of our own fate.
The power of choice lies in our ability to exercise autonomy over our lives. When we take the reins and become active decision-makers, we break free from the shackles of external influences and societal expectations. By embracing autonomy, we transcend the role of a passive participant, allowing ourselves to pursue our individual desires, aspirations, and values. Whether it's choosing a career path, defining personal relationships, or pursuing our passions, being the one who does the choosing empowers us to live life on our own terms.
When we become the ones who choose, we become beacons of inspiration for others. By embracing our own agency and following our passions, we demonstrate the transformative power of choice. Our courage and determination inspire those around us to take charge of their own lives and become active decision-makers. In this way, we create a ripple effect, empowering others to embrace their own agency and shape their destinies.
The choice is yours. Here are some tips for being the one who does the choosing:
• Be clear about your goals and values: What do you want to achieve in life? What is important to you? Once you know what you want, you can start making decisions that will help you achieve your goals.
• Don't be afraid to take risks: If you want to achieve something great, you need to be willing to step outside of your comfort zone and take some risks.
• Don't be afraid to fail: Everyone fails sometimes. The important thing is to learn from your mistakes and keep moving forward.
• Be confident in your decisions: Once you've made a decision, believe in yourself and your ability to make the right choice.
Being the one who does the choosing is not always easy, but it is essential if you want to live a happy, fulfilling life. So start today by taking control of your own life and making the decisions that are right for you.
#HumanNature
♡ ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ 🔕💪
ˡᶦᵏᵉ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ ᵏⁱⁿᵈˡʸ ᵘⁿᵐᵘᵗᵉ
ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉˡ
Join now👇👇👇
@Laws_of_Human_Nature
In this world, there are two types of people: those who choose, and those who are chosen. The ones who choose are the ones who have agency, who are in control of their own destiny. They are the ones who make the decisions, who take the risks, and who shape their own lives. The ones who are chosen are the ones who are at the mercy of others, who are subject to the whims of fate. They are the ones who are told what to do, who are given opportunities, and who are defined by the choices of others.
In a world where so much is out of our control, it is essential to be the one who does the choosing. When we choose, we take responsibility for our own lives. We decide what we want to do, who we want to be, and where we want to go. We create our own destiny, rather than letting it be created for us. Of course, choosing is not always easy. It often means making difficult decisions, taking risks, and facing challenges. But it is also the only way to truly live our lives to the fullest. When we choose, we are in control of our own destiny. We are the masters of our own fate.
The power of choice lies in our ability to exercise autonomy over our lives. When we take the reins and become active decision-makers, we break free from the shackles of external influences and societal expectations. By embracing autonomy, we transcend the role of a passive participant, allowing ourselves to pursue our individual desires, aspirations, and values. Whether it's choosing a career path, defining personal relationships, or pursuing our passions, being the one who does the choosing empowers us to live life on our own terms.
When we become the ones who choose, we become beacons of inspiration for others. By embracing our own agency and following our passions, we demonstrate the transformative power of choice. Our courage and determination inspire those around us to take charge of their own lives and become active decision-makers. In this way, we create a ripple effect, empowering others to embrace their own agency and shape their destinies.
The choice is yours. Here are some tips for being the one who does the choosing:
• Be clear about your goals and values: What do you want to achieve in life? What is important to you? Once you know what you want, you can start making decisions that will help you achieve your goals.
• Don't be afraid to take risks: If you want to achieve something great, you need to be willing to step outside of your comfort zone and take some risks.
• Don't be afraid to fail: Everyone fails sometimes. The important thing is to learn from your mistakes and keep moving forward.
• Be confident in your decisions: Once you've made a decision, believe in yourself and your ability to make the right choice.
Being the one who does the choosing is not always easy, but it is essential if you want to live a happy, fulfilling life. So start today by taking control of your own life and making the decisions that are right for you.
#HumanNature
♡ ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ 🔕💪
ˡᶦᵏᵉ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ ᵏⁱⁿᵈˡʸ ᵘⁿᵐᵘᵗᵉ
ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉˡ
Join now👇👇👇
@Laws_of_Human_Nature
❤31👍11🤯1
Do not live in a Hurry
To know how to separate things is to know how to enjoy them. Many finish their fortune sooner than their life: they run through pleasures without enjoying them, and would like to go back when they find they have over-leaped the mark. Postilions of life, they increase the ordinary pace of life by the hurry of their own calling. They devour more in one day than they can digest in a whole life-time; they live in advance of pleasures, eat up the years beforehand, and by their hurry get through everything too soon. Even in the search for knowledge there should be moderation, lest we learn things better left unknown. We have more days to live through than pleasures. Be slow in enjoyment, quick at work, for men see work ended with pleasure, pleasure ended with regret.
#HumanNature
♡ ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ 🔕💪
ˡᶦᵏᵉ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ ᵏⁱⁿᵈˡʸ ᵘⁿᵐᵘᵗᵉ
ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉˡ
Join now👇👇👇
@Laws_of_Human_Nature
To know how to separate things is to know how to enjoy them. Many finish their fortune sooner than their life: they run through pleasures without enjoying them, and would like to go back when they find they have over-leaped the mark. Postilions of life, they increase the ordinary pace of life by the hurry of their own calling. They devour more in one day than they can digest in a whole life-time; they live in advance of pleasures, eat up the years beforehand, and by their hurry get through everything too soon. Even in the search for knowledge there should be moderation, lest we learn things better left unknown. We have more days to live through than pleasures. Be slow in enjoyment, quick at work, for men see work ended with pleasure, pleasure ended with regret.
#HumanNature
♡ ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ 🔕💪
ˡᶦᵏᵉ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ ᵏⁱⁿᵈˡʸ ᵘⁿᵐᵘᵗᵉ
ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉˡ
Join now👇👇👇
@Laws_of_Human_Nature
❤24👍5👌4🤔2
No one can see above himself: Understanding Others through Self-Reflection
Our perception of the world is limited by our own experiences, biases, and assumptions. This means that we can never truly understand another person's perspective, no matter how hard we try. However, we can get closer to understanding others by reflecting on our own experiences and biases. We are all limited by our own perspective and experiences. We can only see and understand what we are capable of seeing and understanding. This is why it is so important to be open-minded and to surround ourselves with people who are different from us. By doing so, we can expand our horizons and learn to see the world in new and different ways.
“No one can see above himself. By this I mean that a person can see in another only as much as he himself possesses, and he can understand another only in proportion to his own mind. If the latter is very small for him, then even the greatest spiritual gifts will not have any effect on him, and in the bearer of them he will notice only one low quality, i.e. weaknesses and shortcomings of character and temperament” - Friedrich Schiller
A person's ability to perceive and comprehend others is inherently limited by their own qualities, mind, and experiences. The idea that we can only see in others what we possess within ourselves offers a fascinating perspective on the complexities of human interactions and relationships. Human beings possess an innate tendency to view the world through their own subjective lenses. Our thoughts, beliefs, and biases shape the way we perceive and interpret the actions, qualities, and intentions of those around us. Consequently, our understanding of others is constrained by the limits of our own mind. If we possess a narrow perspective or limited intellectual faculties, it becomes exceedingly challenging to recognize and appreciate the virtues and depths of individuals who surpass us in those very aspects.
A person with a small mind, whether due to lack of education, closed-mindedness, or an unwillingness to grow, is prone to reducing others to their own level. In such cases, even the most exceptional spiritual or intellectual gifts fail to elicit any positive impact on the individual. Instead, they become fixated on the perceived weaknesses and shortcomings of character and temperament in those who surpass them. The inability to recognize and appreciate the unique qualities and contributions of others stems from their own limited capacity for self-reflection and understanding.
To overcome the limitations imposed by our own minds, it is imperative to engage in continuous self-reflection and personal growth. By introspecting, exploring our beliefs and biases, and expanding our intellectual horizons, we can broaden our understanding of others. Through self-reflection, we develop the capacity to recognize and appreciate the qualities and virtues that surpass our own, rather than being consumed by envy or judgment.
Empathy serves as a powerful tool in transcending the limitations of perception. By placing ourselves in the shoes of others, we can gain a deeper understanding of their experiences, emotions, and perspectives. Empathy allows us to bridge the gap between our own limitations and the unique qualities possessed by others, fostering a sense of connection and appreciation.
Furthermore, cultivating humility is essential in fostering a mindset that is receptive to learning from others. Recognizing our own limitations and acknowledging the expertise and wisdom of others, regardless of their station in life, enables us to expand our intellectual and emotional capacities. Humility encourages us to approach every interaction with an open mind, ready to learn and grow.
#HumanNature
♡ ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ 🔕💪
ˡᶦᵏᵉ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ ᵏⁱⁿᵈˡʸ ᵘⁿᵐᵘᵗᵉ
ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉˡ
Join now👇👇👇
@Laws_of_Human_Nature
Our perception of the world is limited by our own experiences, biases, and assumptions. This means that we can never truly understand another person's perspective, no matter how hard we try. However, we can get closer to understanding others by reflecting on our own experiences and biases. We are all limited by our own perspective and experiences. We can only see and understand what we are capable of seeing and understanding. This is why it is so important to be open-minded and to surround ourselves with people who are different from us. By doing so, we can expand our horizons and learn to see the world in new and different ways.
“No one can see above himself. By this I mean that a person can see in another only as much as he himself possesses, and he can understand another only in proportion to his own mind. If the latter is very small for him, then even the greatest spiritual gifts will not have any effect on him, and in the bearer of them he will notice only one low quality, i.e. weaknesses and shortcomings of character and temperament” - Friedrich Schiller
A person's ability to perceive and comprehend others is inherently limited by their own qualities, mind, and experiences. The idea that we can only see in others what we possess within ourselves offers a fascinating perspective on the complexities of human interactions and relationships. Human beings possess an innate tendency to view the world through their own subjective lenses. Our thoughts, beliefs, and biases shape the way we perceive and interpret the actions, qualities, and intentions of those around us. Consequently, our understanding of others is constrained by the limits of our own mind. If we possess a narrow perspective or limited intellectual faculties, it becomes exceedingly challenging to recognize and appreciate the virtues and depths of individuals who surpass us in those very aspects.
A person with a small mind, whether due to lack of education, closed-mindedness, or an unwillingness to grow, is prone to reducing others to their own level. In such cases, even the most exceptional spiritual or intellectual gifts fail to elicit any positive impact on the individual. Instead, they become fixated on the perceived weaknesses and shortcomings of character and temperament in those who surpass them. The inability to recognize and appreciate the unique qualities and contributions of others stems from their own limited capacity for self-reflection and understanding.
To overcome the limitations imposed by our own minds, it is imperative to engage in continuous self-reflection and personal growth. By introspecting, exploring our beliefs and biases, and expanding our intellectual horizons, we can broaden our understanding of others. Through self-reflection, we develop the capacity to recognize and appreciate the qualities and virtues that surpass our own, rather than being consumed by envy or judgment.
Empathy serves as a powerful tool in transcending the limitations of perception. By placing ourselves in the shoes of others, we can gain a deeper understanding of their experiences, emotions, and perspectives. Empathy allows us to bridge the gap between our own limitations and the unique qualities possessed by others, fostering a sense of connection and appreciation.
Furthermore, cultivating humility is essential in fostering a mindset that is receptive to learning from others. Recognizing our own limitations and acknowledging the expertise and wisdom of others, regardless of their station in life, enables us to expand our intellectual and emotional capacities. Humility encourages us to approach every interaction with an open mind, ready to learn and grow.
#HumanNature
♡ ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ 🔕💪
ˡᶦᵏᵉ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ ᵏⁱⁿᵈˡʸ ᵘⁿᵐᵘᵗᵉ
ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉˡ
Join now👇👇👇
@Laws_of_Human_Nature
👍23❤11
Separate Correlation From Causation: How to understand what truly needs to be addressed to solve a problem
In efforts to understand why certain events happen, we must go looking for instigating factors. It’s only logical that we try to find a previous event directly responsible for causing the event we’re looking at. This is what we should spend our time trying to fix, but it turns out that we might be spending all of our time on the wrong issue. We’re fooled into confusing correlation for causation. Therefore, separating correlation from causation is essential to avoid making incorrect assumptions.
Correlation is a statistical term. It shows that two individual elements or variables share similar traits or trends—“ice cream and homicides both increased.” That’s all there is to correlation: two things behave similarly in this way or that way. Correlation does not describe why or how the relationship between two items is the way it is; it doesn’t give a reason. It just says, “These two things are generally doing the same thing at the same time.”
Causation, on the other hand, is an effort to establish the reason things happen—also referred to as “cause and effect.” The message of causation is: “This thing changed, which in turn caused this other thing to change.” To believe that the increase in ice cream sales caused the increase in homicides is a logical mistake. This is countered by the phrase correlation doesn’t imply causation—just because two events are similar doesn’t mean one is causing the other one to happen.
#HumanNature
♡ ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ 🔕💪
ˡᶦᵏᵉ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ ᵏⁱⁿᵈˡʸ ᵘⁿᵐᵘᵗᵉ
ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉˡ
Join now👇👇👇
@Laws_of_Human_Nature
In efforts to understand why certain events happen, we must go looking for instigating factors. It’s only logical that we try to find a previous event directly responsible for causing the event we’re looking at. This is what we should spend our time trying to fix, but it turns out that we might be spending all of our time on the wrong issue. We’re fooled into confusing correlation for causation. Therefore, separating correlation from causation is essential to avoid making incorrect assumptions.
Correlation is a statistical term. It shows that two individual elements or variables share similar traits or trends—“ice cream and homicides both increased.” That’s all there is to correlation: two things behave similarly in this way or that way. Correlation does not describe why or how the relationship between two items is the way it is; it doesn’t give a reason. It just says, “These two things are generally doing the same thing at the same time.”
Causation, on the other hand, is an effort to establish the reason things happen—also referred to as “cause and effect.” The message of causation is: “This thing changed, which in turn caused this other thing to change.” To believe that the increase in ice cream sales caused the increase in homicides is a logical mistake. This is countered by the phrase correlation doesn’t imply causation—just because two events are similar doesn’t mean one is causing the other one to happen.
#HumanNature
♡ ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ 🔕💪
ˡᶦᵏᵉ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ ᵏⁱⁿᵈˡʸ ᵘⁿᵐᵘᵗᵉ
ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉˡ
Join now👇👇👇
@Laws_of_Human_Nature
❤7👍6🔥2
Separate Correlation From Causation 2/2
In a lot of cases, correlations are nothing more than flukes or chance, yet we rapidly jump to causal thoughts. When evaluating cause and effect, the default mental model should always be to separate correlation from causation and not assume a causal relationship unless you can definitively say so. As we gain more life experience, causal factors become a little more complex. There are more conditions, underlying motives, and elements that affect events. Sometimes it’s hard to point to a singular cause, because it’s hard to say that it acted alone or wasn’t the product of multiple mini-causes.
This process involves looking past the immediate reason things happen (the proximate cause) and searching for certain greater, more fundamental basis that things happen (the root cause). The proximate cause is to the root cause as correlation is to plain causation. Solving for the former (proximate cause; correlation) won’t rid you of your troubles. Getting rid of the proxima causes is a more critical and profound way of discovering the real answers and explanations for events. Quality thinking means going past the proximate cause—which is usually just a physical sequence of cues—and understanding the factors, thinking or emotional patterns, or environmental elements that set the groundwork for something happening.
Differentiating between proximate and root causes makes one keep going in the discovery process—whereas, left to one’s own instincts, they might just stop asking once they identify the immediate cause or even when they see a vague correlation. By going deeper you’ll get a better understanding of why things happen and be better positioned to deal with problems.
#HumanNature
♡ ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ 🔕💪
ˡᶦᵏᵉ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ ᵏⁱⁿᵈˡʸ ᵘⁿᵐᵘᵗᵉ
ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉˡ
Join now👇👇👇
@Laws_of_Human_Nature
In a lot of cases, correlations are nothing more than flukes or chance, yet we rapidly jump to causal thoughts. When evaluating cause and effect, the default mental model should always be to separate correlation from causation and not assume a causal relationship unless you can definitively say so. As we gain more life experience, causal factors become a little more complex. There are more conditions, underlying motives, and elements that affect events. Sometimes it’s hard to point to a singular cause, because it’s hard to say that it acted alone or wasn’t the product of multiple mini-causes.
This process involves looking past the immediate reason things happen (the proximate cause) and searching for certain greater, more fundamental basis that things happen (the root cause). The proximate cause is to the root cause as correlation is to plain causation. Solving for the former (proximate cause; correlation) won’t rid you of your troubles. Getting rid of the proxima causes is a more critical and profound way of discovering the real answers and explanations for events. Quality thinking means going past the proximate cause—which is usually just a physical sequence of cues—and understanding the factors, thinking or emotional patterns, or environmental elements that set the groundwork for something happening.
Differentiating between proximate and root causes makes one keep going in the discovery process—whereas, left to one’s own instincts, they might just stop asking once they identify the immediate cause or even when they see a vague correlation. By going deeper you’ll get a better understanding of why things happen and be better positioned to deal with problems.
#HumanNature
♡ ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ 🔕💪
ˡᶦᵏᵉ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ ᵏⁱⁿᵈˡʸ ᵘⁿᵐᵘᵗᵉ
ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉˡ
Join now👇👇👇
@Laws_of_Human_Nature
👍8🔥5❤1
Breaking your Upper Limit
Most people hold themselves back from real happiness. Most people don’t want to be happy, which is why they aren’t. They just don’t realize this is the case. People are programmed to chase their foremost desire at almost any cost. (Imagine the adrenaline-fueled superhuman powers people develop in life-or-death emergencies.) It’s just a matter of what that foremost desire is. Often enough, it’s comfort. Or familiarity. There are many reasons people thwart the feeling of happiness, but a lot of them have to do with assuming it means giving up on achieving more.
Nobody wants to believe happiness is a choice, because that puts responsibility in their hands. It’s the same reason people self-pity: to delay action, to make an outcry to the universe, as though the more they state how bad things are, the more likely it is that someone else will change them. Happiness is not a rush of positive emotion elicited by random events that affirm the way you think something should go. Not sustainable happiness, anyway. The real stuff is the product of an intentional, mindful, daily practice, and it begins with choosing to commit to it. Everybody has a happiness tolerance—an upper limit. It is the capacity for which we allow ourselves to feel good. Some psychologists call it the “baseline,” the amount of happiness we “naturally” feel, and eventually revert back to, even if certain events or circumstances shift us temporarily.
The reason we don’t allow those shifts to become baselines is because of the upper limit—as soon as our circumstances extend beyond the amount of happiness we’re accustomed to and comfortable feeling, we unconsciously begin to self-sabotage. We are programmed to seek what we’ve known. So even though we think we’re after happiness, we’re actually trying to find whatever we’re most accustomed to, and we project that on whatever actually exists, over and over again.
#HumanNature
♡ ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ 🔕💪
ˡᶦᵏᵉ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ ᵏⁱⁿᵈˡʸ ᵘⁿᵐᵘᵗᵉ
ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉˡ
Join now👇👇👇
@Laws_of_Human_Nature
Most people hold themselves back from real happiness. Most people don’t want to be happy, which is why they aren’t. They just don’t realize this is the case. People are programmed to chase their foremost desire at almost any cost. (Imagine the adrenaline-fueled superhuman powers people develop in life-or-death emergencies.) It’s just a matter of what that foremost desire is. Often enough, it’s comfort. Or familiarity. There are many reasons people thwart the feeling of happiness, but a lot of them have to do with assuming it means giving up on achieving more.
Nobody wants to believe happiness is a choice, because that puts responsibility in their hands. It’s the same reason people self-pity: to delay action, to make an outcry to the universe, as though the more they state how bad things are, the more likely it is that someone else will change them. Happiness is not a rush of positive emotion elicited by random events that affirm the way you think something should go. Not sustainable happiness, anyway. The real stuff is the product of an intentional, mindful, daily practice, and it begins with choosing to commit to it. Everybody has a happiness tolerance—an upper limit. It is the capacity for which we allow ourselves to feel good. Some psychologists call it the “baseline,” the amount of happiness we “naturally” feel, and eventually revert back to, even if certain events or circumstances shift us temporarily.
The reason we don’t allow those shifts to become baselines is because of the upper limit—as soon as our circumstances extend beyond the amount of happiness we’re accustomed to and comfortable feeling, we unconsciously begin to self-sabotage. We are programmed to seek what we’ve known. So even though we think we’re after happiness, we’re actually trying to find whatever we’re most accustomed to, and we project that on whatever actually exists, over and over again.
#HumanNature
♡ ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ 🔕💪
ˡᶦᵏᵉ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ ᵏⁱⁿᵈˡʸ ᵘⁿᵐᵘᵗᵉ
ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉˡ
Join now👇👇👇
@Laws_of_Human_Nature
👍23❤17🤔2👏1🤯1
Enjoy our content? Advertise on this channel and reach a highly engaged audience! 👉🏻
It's easy with https://Telega.io. As the leading platform for native ads and integrations on Telegram, it provides user-friendly and efficient tools for quick and automated ad launches.
⚡️ Place your ad here in three simple steps:
1 Sign up: https://telega.io/c/Laws_of_Human_Nature
2 Top up the balance in a convenient way
3 Create your advertising post
If your ad aligns with our content, we’ll gladly publish it.
Start your promotion journey now!
It's easy with https://Telega.io. As the leading platform for native ads and integrations on Telegram, it provides user-friendly and efficient tools for quick and automated ad launches.
⚡️ Place your ad here in three simple steps:
1 Sign up: https://telega.io/c/Laws_of_Human_Nature
2 Top up the balance in a convenient way
3 Create your advertising post
If your ad aligns with our content, we’ll gladly publish it.
Start your promotion journey now!
👍11❤5💩1
Enjoy our content? Advertise on this channel and reach a highly engaged audience! 👉🏻
It's easy with Telega.io. As the leading platform for native ads and integrations on Telegram, it provides user-friendly and efficient tools for quick and automated ad launches.
⚡️ Place your ad here in three simple steps:
1 Sign up
2 Top up the balance in a convenient way
3 Create your advertising post
If your ad aligns with our content, we’ll gladly publish it.
Start your promotion journey now!
It's easy with Telega.io. As the leading platform for native ads and integrations on Telegram, it provides user-friendly and efficient tools for quick and automated ad launches.
⚡️ Place your ad here in three simple steps:
1 Sign up
2 Top up the balance in a convenient way
3 Create your advertising post
If your ad aligns with our content, we’ll gladly publish it.
Start your promotion journey now!
👍6❤2🤩1💩1
The Morality Conundrum: Good, Evil, and Hypocrisy
In the course of our lives, we are often tempted to act upon our innate desires, even when they conflict with prevailing wisdom. Many times, we find ourselves yearning for things and actions that threaten to disrupt the social order and the professed civility of the modern world.
The prominent among our forefathers tried multiple ways to establish certain “ground rules” to be obeyed by all. Sometimes, these took the form of divine will, purportedly conveyed through kings who were said to represent the will of the gods. At other times, a saintly figure would prescribe a moral code. In many other cases, the will of the people would form the basis of morality and ethics.
The downside of such moral codes is glaring—the imposition of the will of the majority over the unwilling minority. Another problem is the abuse of authority and hypocrisy—the tendency of people, especially those in positions of power, to bend the rules to suit their convenience and to exempt themselves and their close associates from punitive measures intended to enforce the moral code.
In recent times, there have been several advocates of the individual will and of a rather subjective morality—people who seek secular and non-centralized methods of resolving social conflicts and moral conundrums. This argument centers on the ideas of personal autonomy and the right to make choices based on the individual’s perspective and will. The problem with these forms of moral standards is that they are more prone to subjective interpretations of good and evil. Moreover, it is difficult and impractical to make large groups of people agree on some core values in the absence of a central authority.
Whether you favor centralized control over ethics and morality or consider individual freedom to be paramount, it is undeniable that decisions are usually made by those who wield power. It can be argued that power is the very basis of morality. What actions would lead one to Heaven or Hell—or what acts are likely to land someone in jail—are defined by those who possess the power to do so at any given time. Actions that would have resulted in serious harm or even death in bygone centuries may now be considered fair and even admirable. Conversely, things once deemed “normal” or praiseworthy in the past can now be considered evil and inhuman.
This makes it all the more imperative for us, as a collective, to be careful in deciding the basis of the moral values of our age, and even more crucial to ensure that those in positions to prescribe the criteria of good and evil are truly suited for the task.
In the course of our lives, we are often tempted to act upon our innate desires, even when they conflict with prevailing wisdom. Many times, we find ourselves yearning for things and actions that threaten to disrupt the social order and the professed civility of the modern world.
The prominent among our forefathers tried multiple ways to establish certain “ground rules” to be obeyed by all. Sometimes, these took the form of divine will, purportedly conveyed through kings who were said to represent the will of the gods. At other times, a saintly figure would prescribe a moral code. In many other cases, the will of the people would form the basis of morality and ethics.
The downside of such moral codes is glaring—the imposition of the will of the majority over the unwilling minority. Another problem is the abuse of authority and hypocrisy—the tendency of people, especially those in positions of power, to bend the rules to suit their convenience and to exempt themselves and their close associates from punitive measures intended to enforce the moral code.
In recent times, there have been several advocates of the individual will and of a rather subjective morality—people who seek secular and non-centralized methods of resolving social conflicts and moral conundrums. This argument centers on the ideas of personal autonomy and the right to make choices based on the individual’s perspective and will. The problem with these forms of moral standards is that they are more prone to subjective interpretations of good and evil. Moreover, it is difficult and impractical to make large groups of people agree on some core values in the absence of a central authority.
Whether you favor centralized control over ethics and morality or consider individual freedom to be paramount, it is undeniable that decisions are usually made by those who wield power. It can be argued that power is the very basis of morality. What actions would lead one to Heaven or Hell—or what acts are likely to land someone in jail—are defined by those who possess the power to do so at any given time. Actions that would have resulted in serious harm or even death in bygone centuries may now be considered fair and even admirable. Conversely, things once deemed “normal” or praiseworthy in the past can now be considered evil and inhuman.
This makes it all the more imperative for us, as a collective, to be careful in deciding the basis of the moral values of our age, and even more crucial to ensure that those in positions to prescribe the criteria of good and evil are truly suited for the task.
❤23👏3👍1🤔1
The subjective nature of wisdom
As humans, we often assume that wisdom is universal—that what’s true in one man’s life must apply equally well to another. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Imagine a primitive man (Mr A), who has spent his entire life in the cold solitude of snowy mountains. His routine involves seeking warmth, conserving body heat, and surviving icy winds. Let’s now picture him talking to another primitive man (Mr B) who has lived forever in a scorching desert.
Mr B tells him how difficult desert life is, but Mr A finds it hard to believe it could be any worse than his own frozen abode. He’s inclined to think that if he were to live where Mr B does, his life would be very comfortable. Similarly, Mr B would find it difficult to accept that a life without scorching heat could be any less than a paradise.
Both Mr A & Mr B have a mere theoretical understanding of the other man’s situation. They’re unaware of the other man’s lived experience. Even if they offer each other well-intentioned advice, it’s unlikely to be useful to the other due to the absence of context.
We are often quick to prescribe solutions to others based on our own experience, forgetting that life’s terrain shifts under every pair of feet. What soothes one person might scorch another. True empathy requires listening rather than merely assuming things.
Before we offer counsel, we ought to pause and ask ourselves,” Do I truly know their ‘climate’—the storms they weather, the heat they bear”? The wise do not pretend their story fits every landscape; they acknowledge the diversity of human experience.
As humans, we often assume that wisdom is universal—that what’s true in one man’s life must apply equally well to another. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Imagine a primitive man (Mr A), who has spent his entire life in the cold solitude of snowy mountains. His routine involves seeking warmth, conserving body heat, and surviving icy winds. Let’s now picture him talking to another primitive man (Mr B) who has lived forever in a scorching desert.
Mr B tells him how difficult desert life is, but Mr A finds it hard to believe it could be any worse than his own frozen abode. He’s inclined to think that if he were to live where Mr B does, his life would be very comfortable. Similarly, Mr B would find it difficult to accept that a life without scorching heat could be any less than a paradise.
Both Mr A & Mr B have a mere theoretical understanding of the other man’s situation. They’re unaware of the other man’s lived experience. Even if they offer each other well-intentioned advice, it’s unlikely to be useful to the other due to the absence of context.
We are often quick to prescribe solutions to others based on our own experience, forgetting that life’s terrain shifts under every pair of feet. What soothes one person might scorch another. True empathy requires listening rather than merely assuming things.
Before we offer counsel, we ought to pause and ask ourselves,” Do I truly know their ‘climate’—the storms they weather, the heat they bear”? The wise do not pretend their story fits every landscape; they acknowledge the diversity of human experience.
❤33🔥6💩2
Cogito, ergo sum
One of the most notable quotes in Philosophy is René Descartes’s first principle: Cogito, ergo sum. It’s a Latin phrase which means “I think, therefore I am”. That which cannot think, does not exist. Ancient Greek philosophers such as Aristotle and Parmenides have expressed similar views regarding consciousness and existence.
While there have been critiques of the said phrase and what it intrinsically implies, most philosophers agree that our ability to think, to perceive and to be conscious of it affirms our existence. It can, therefore, also be argued that thinking is a critical part of our existence. Socrates’s dictum “ὁ δὲ ἀνεξέταστος βίος οὐ βιωτὸς ἀνθρώπῳ” which may be literally translated as “but the unexamined life is not livable for a man” supports this statement.
While the wise men eternally argue over the specifics of virtues and moral principles that ought to govern our lives and whether dogma should prevail over individual will, certain views are generally accepted by thinkers separated by time and location. Some of these have been summarised below:
1. Clarity of thought requires discernment. To see things as they truly are, to distinguish between the matters which are worthy of one’s attention and the ones which are not, and to focus on substance rather than appearance which can oft be misleading.
2. Peace of mind needs rational nonchalance. The world, by design, is chaotic. One needs to decide whether certain matters ought to be addressed or left to unfold. Human agency has its limits and one must be aware of them.
3. Humility often requires a candid assessment of the self and the external factors. It helps to view oneself without disguise and self-deception.
4. Endurance can be forged only by braving adversity. True strength necessitates that one engage with the challenges of existence. Suffering can teach us what comfort blinds us to.
5. Pace towards one’s goal requires letting go of vain and detrimental things. Progress often requires pruning of one or more aspects of one’s life.
While contemplating crucial matters, one must keep in mind that humans have their own preconceptions and as Pliny the Younger said,”Omnis enim prejudicatus est in suae ipsius judicio (Everyone is prejudiced in favour of his own powers of discernment).” Therefore, proper care must be taken to ensure that introspection and examination do not delude us and that we do not let our emotions lead us astray.
One of the most notable quotes in Philosophy is René Descartes’s first principle: Cogito, ergo sum. It’s a Latin phrase which means “I think, therefore I am”. That which cannot think, does not exist. Ancient Greek philosophers such as Aristotle and Parmenides have expressed similar views regarding consciousness and existence.
While there have been critiques of the said phrase and what it intrinsically implies, most philosophers agree that our ability to think, to perceive and to be conscious of it affirms our existence. It can, therefore, also be argued that thinking is a critical part of our existence. Socrates’s dictum “ὁ δὲ ἀνεξέταστος βίος οὐ βιωτὸς ἀνθρώπῳ” which may be literally translated as “but the unexamined life is not livable for a man” supports this statement.
While the wise men eternally argue over the specifics of virtues and moral principles that ought to govern our lives and whether dogma should prevail over individual will, certain views are generally accepted by thinkers separated by time and location. Some of these have been summarised below:
1. Clarity of thought requires discernment. To see things as they truly are, to distinguish between the matters which are worthy of one’s attention and the ones which are not, and to focus on substance rather than appearance which can oft be misleading.
2. Peace of mind needs rational nonchalance. The world, by design, is chaotic. One needs to decide whether certain matters ought to be addressed or left to unfold. Human agency has its limits and one must be aware of them.
3. Humility often requires a candid assessment of the self and the external factors. It helps to view oneself without disguise and self-deception.
4. Endurance can be forged only by braving adversity. True strength necessitates that one engage with the challenges of existence. Suffering can teach us what comfort blinds us to.
5. Pace towards one’s goal requires letting go of vain and detrimental things. Progress often requires pruning of one or more aspects of one’s life.
While contemplating crucial matters, one must keep in mind that humans have their own preconceptions and as Pliny the Younger said,”Omnis enim prejudicatus est in suae ipsius judicio (Everyone is prejudiced in favour of his own powers of discernment).” Therefore, proper care must be taken to ensure that introspection and examination do not delude us and that we do not let our emotions lead us astray.
❤24
Perils of an unexamined life
During his trial in Athens around 399 BCE, the renowned Greek philosopher Socrates declared that “the unexamined life is not worth living” (ὁ δὲ ἀνεξέταστος βίος οὐ βιωτὸς ἀνθρώπῳ). He had been accused of impiety and corrupting the youth through his relentless questioning of the Athenian beliefs. His defiance ultimately led to his death sentence.
It is pertinent to examine the reasons behind his stance and unwillingness to cease his inquiry into various facets of life. It wasn’t mere bravado that made him defiant but his commitment to εὐδαιμονία (virtuous well-being). While humans can exist without ever engaging in rational scrutiny of their lives, such a life is devoid of wisdom and moral growth and can be equated with that of animals.
An unexamined life breeds profound risks, such as -
1. Ignorance masquerading as wisdom: One may cling to irrational beliefs and act based on biases, dogmas and grudges. An ignorant populace is easily manipulated by propaganda.
2. Erosion of moral values: In the absence of rational introspection, one may be guided entirely by one's whims and fancies. Socrates argues that virtue stems from knowledge. Hence, lack of self-reflection tends to atrophy virtues like justice and courage.
3. Existential despair: In our chaotic world, lack of discernment leaves one vulnerable to the nefarious tactics of the immoral elements of our society which fuel fear, uncertainty and dread and use these to their advantage.
4. Emotional hollowness: Relentless pursuit of resources and pleasure without contemplation leads to diminishing returns in terms of material happiness. A man on an endless quest for physical possessions and vain glory is bound to get crushed by the weight of his own never-ending desires.
It is, therefore, crucial to examine one’s life calmly and rationally, to ensure that one doesn’t suffer the disappointment of chasing pointless goals and the despair caused by the lack of a higher purpose beyond physicality.
During his trial in Athens around 399 BCE, the renowned Greek philosopher Socrates declared that “the unexamined life is not worth living” (ὁ δὲ ἀνεξέταστος βίος οὐ βιωτὸς ἀνθρώπῳ). He had been accused of impiety and corrupting the youth through his relentless questioning of the Athenian beliefs. His defiance ultimately led to his death sentence.
It is pertinent to examine the reasons behind his stance and unwillingness to cease his inquiry into various facets of life. It wasn’t mere bravado that made him defiant but his commitment to εὐδαιμονία (virtuous well-being). While humans can exist without ever engaging in rational scrutiny of their lives, such a life is devoid of wisdom and moral growth and can be equated with that of animals.
An unexamined life breeds profound risks, such as -
1. Ignorance masquerading as wisdom: One may cling to irrational beliefs and act based on biases, dogmas and grudges. An ignorant populace is easily manipulated by propaganda.
2. Erosion of moral values: In the absence of rational introspection, one may be guided entirely by one's whims and fancies. Socrates argues that virtue stems from knowledge. Hence, lack of self-reflection tends to atrophy virtues like justice and courage.
3. Existential despair: In our chaotic world, lack of discernment leaves one vulnerable to the nefarious tactics of the immoral elements of our society which fuel fear, uncertainty and dread and use these to their advantage.
4. Emotional hollowness: Relentless pursuit of resources and pleasure without contemplation leads to diminishing returns in terms of material happiness. A man on an endless quest for physical possessions and vain glory is bound to get crushed by the weight of his own never-ending desires.
It is, therefore, crucial to examine one’s life calmly and rationally, to ensure that one doesn’t suffer the disappointment of chasing pointless goals and the despair caused by the lack of a higher purpose beyond physicality.
❤10
The Noble Façade of Equality and Justice
Human civilisation relies on certain principles and conventions that are held to be the foundations of a just society. It is widely believed that in the absence of these ideals, humans shall fall prey to their chaotic, brute nature. The two most significant of these ideals are: Equality and Justice.
It is undeniable that humans intrinsically crave power - over their own destinies as well as the lives and choices of others. This is where hypocrisy comes into play, for beneath the noble rhetoric of Equality and Justice lies raw self-interest, whether in an individual way or for the ingroup.
One may consider the case of the French Revolution as a classic example of this hypocrisy. The quest for "liberté, égalité, fraternité" devolved into dictatorship and guillotines for rivals, rather than universal well-being.
Contemporary examples of this hypocrisy have become ubiquitous. What began as the demand for ‘equality of opportunity’ has ended up as irrational demands such as ‘equality of outcome’ and ‘proportionate representation irrespective of merit’. On the flip side, the opponents of such ideologies have their own biases and prejudices. Their notion of equality also revolves around their own self-interest.
While the notion of justice appears to be rooted in neutrality and impartiality, it’s often no more than a rationalised justification of retaliation and ‘payback’. Both sides in a conflict claim to seek justice and restore order; their notions of ‘justice’ being diametrically opposed. Grave sins of their own folk appear nominal, while minor flaws in the opponent camp are magnified to dehumanise them.
In the words of Nietzsche: “Moralität ist Herden-Instinkt im Einzelnen” (Morality is herd-instinct in the individual). Humans are innately hierarchical; to command a strong position in the hierarchy is always the real purpose of all demands pertaining to equality, equity and justice. The theoretical equality people often inanely glamorise is inherently against hierarchies. However, those who condemn existing hierarchies seek to create new ones that benefit them.
What ought one do then? Must one pick the most beneficial side as per his self-interest and profess unconditional loyalty to it? Should each man go his own way, deviating from the established norms? Is it prudent to create a new ‘way’ and persuade others to follow it? Such questions are better left to the judgement of individuals. There’s no optimal solution that suits everyone. What does matter is awareness and rational choice in critical matters.
Human civilisation relies on certain principles and conventions that are held to be the foundations of a just society. It is widely believed that in the absence of these ideals, humans shall fall prey to their chaotic, brute nature. The two most significant of these ideals are: Equality and Justice.
It is undeniable that humans intrinsically crave power - over their own destinies as well as the lives and choices of others. This is where hypocrisy comes into play, for beneath the noble rhetoric of Equality and Justice lies raw self-interest, whether in an individual way or for the ingroup.
One may consider the case of the French Revolution as a classic example of this hypocrisy. The quest for "liberté, égalité, fraternité" devolved into dictatorship and guillotines for rivals, rather than universal well-being.
Contemporary examples of this hypocrisy have become ubiquitous. What began as the demand for ‘equality of opportunity’ has ended up as irrational demands such as ‘equality of outcome’ and ‘proportionate representation irrespective of merit’. On the flip side, the opponents of such ideologies have their own biases and prejudices. Their notion of equality also revolves around their own self-interest.
While the notion of justice appears to be rooted in neutrality and impartiality, it’s often no more than a rationalised justification of retaliation and ‘payback’. Both sides in a conflict claim to seek justice and restore order; their notions of ‘justice’ being diametrically opposed. Grave sins of their own folk appear nominal, while minor flaws in the opponent camp are magnified to dehumanise them.
In the words of Nietzsche: “Moralität ist Herden-Instinkt im Einzelnen” (Morality is herd-instinct in the individual). Humans are innately hierarchical; to command a strong position in the hierarchy is always the real purpose of all demands pertaining to equality, equity and justice. The theoretical equality people often inanely glamorise is inherently against hierarchies. However, those who condemn existing hierarchies seek to create new ones that benefit them.
What ought one do then? Must one pick the most beneficial side as per his self-interest and profess unconditional loyalty to it? Should each man go his own way, deviating from the established norms? Is it prudent to create a new ‘way’ and persuade others to follow it? Such questions are better left to the judgement of individuals. There’s no optimal solution that suits everyone. What does matter is awareness and rational choice in critical matters.
❤6🔥4
Countering Dogma
Countless prominent philosophers have emphasised the importance of rational thinking in human life. However, we often abandon reason in favour of the most pernicious enemy of intellect and rationality – commonly known as dogma.
The term ‘dogma’ refers to a set of principles or beliefs that have been accepted as being true, and one may not debate or challenge them. Authority figures and even common people ostracise and punish those who dare question the irrationality of such beliefs.
Generally, we use the word dogma to refer to religious fundamentalism, but dogmatic behaviour manifests in several facets of human life. From culture to politics, from education to science, dogma exists everywhere.
Here are the most common types of dogma:
1. Religious dogma: Religious authorities and their ardent followers preach and propagate divine revelations, commandments, moral codes and metaphysical ‘truths’. Over the past two millennia, it seems to have caused more destruction, violence and stifling of the intellect than the other forms of dogma. It turns rational men into fanatics and sane men into bloodthirsty maniacs by means of totalitarian control of their lives.
2. Socio-cultural dogma: Another common form of dogma pervades our society and culture in the form of traditions and rituals. While many beliefs and traditions are reasonable, many unethical traditions and social ills persist, often despite laws meant to counter them. It seems that legal solutions are inadequate to end such corrupt practices. Active resistance is required.
3. Political dogma: This form of dogma is a comparatively new phenomenon compared to religious dogma and socio-cultural dogma. However, it’s no less dangerous in terms of the damage it has caused to human society. Some ideologies preach irrational class warfare to the detriment of everyone, while others propagate animosity on racial/ethnic lines. The prominent leaders of such ideologies pit common men against one another while engaging in unethical megalomania.
4. Scientific dogma: This type of dogma is less obvious than the others, but it is, in no way, less dangerous. One would expect the domain of science to be free from bias and dogmatic attitudes, but humans, being human, attach their emotions to their closely held beliefs, thereby hampering scientific progress.
Why does dogma exist?
The world is vast and full of uncertainty. The human mind is curious but seeks simple and definitive answers. This predicament forms the basis of dogma and the authority that it carries.
From the olden times, wise men and/or men with authority have provided answers to various questions about metaphysical ‘truths’, moral conduct, et cetera. Sages, prophets, and scholars have prescribed solutions based on contemporary understandings.
However, the fact that these answers and solutions can become outdated or later found incorrect and irrational usually does not sit well with their followers. Chaos ensues.
How to counter dogma?
Countering any dogma carries inherent risks. Millions have lost their livelihoods, their dignity, their social standing, and even their lives, challenging irrational, sheepish behaviour. However, their sacrifice has given birth to a better society.
There are several ways to resist and counter the influence of dogma, even without resorting to force. Just as print media gave a strong voice to the opponents of religious dogma, modern forms of communication have further democratised the expression of individual opinions.
It is crucial to note that dogma shall always exist in one form or another, for one form of dogma often succeeds another. The quest for rational thought and action has no end.
Countless prominent philosophers have emphasised the importance of rational thinking in human life. However, we often abandon reason in favour of the most pernicious enemy of intellect and rationality – commonly known as dogma.
The term ‘dogma’ refers to a set of principles or beliefs that have been accepted as being true, and one may not debate or challenge them. Authority figures and even common people ostracise and punish those who dare question the irrationality of such beliefs.
Generally, we use the word dogma to refer to religious fundamentalism, but dogmatic behaviour manifests in several facets of human life. From culture to politics, from education to science, dogma exists everywhere.
Here are the most common types of dogma:
1. Religious dogma: Religious authorities and their ardent followers preach and propagate divine revelations, commandments, moral codes and metaphysical ‘truths’. Over the past two millennia, it seems to have caused more destruction, violence and stifling of the intellect than the other forms of dogma. It turns rational men into fanatics and sane men into bloodthirsty maniacs by means of totalitarian control of their lives.
2. Socio-cultural dogma: Another common form of dogma pervades our society and culture in the form of traditions and rituals. While many beliefs and traditions are reasonable, many unethical traditions and social ills persist, often despite laws meant to counter them. It seems that legal solutions are inadequate to end such corrupt practices. Active resistance is required.
3. Political dogma: This form of dogma is a comparatively new phenomenon compared to religious dogma and socio-cultural dogma. However, it’s no less dangerous in terms of the damage it has caused to human society. Some ideologies preach irrational class warfare to the detriment of everyone, while others propagate animosity on racial/ethnic lines. The prominent leaders of such ideologies pit common men against one another while engaging in unethical megalomania.
4. Scientific dogma: This type of dogma is less obvious than the others, but it is, in no way, less dangerous. One would expect the domain of science to be free from bias and dogmatic attitudes, but humans, being human, attach their emotions to their closely held beliefs, thereby hampering scientific progress.
Why does dogma exist?
The world is vast and full of uncertainty. The human mind is curious but seeks simple and definitive answers. This predicament forms the basis of dogma and the authority that it carries.
From the olden times, wise men and/or men with authority have provided answers to various questions about metaphysical ‘truths’, moral conduct, et cetera. Sages, prophets, and scholars have prescribed solutions based on contemporary understandings.
However, the fact that these answers and solutions can become outdated or later found incorrect and irrational usually does not sit well with their followers. Chaos ensues.
How to counter dogma?
Countering any dogma carries inherent risks. Millions have lost their livelihoods, their dignity, their social standing, and even their lives, challenging irrational, sheepish behaviour. However, their sacrifice has given birth to a better society.
There are several ways to resist and counter the influence of dogma, even without resorting to force. Just as print media gave a strong voice to the opponents of religious dogma, modern forms of communication have further democratised the expression of individual opinions.
It is crucial to note that dogma shall always exist in one form or another, for one form of dogma often succeeds another. The quest for rational thought and action has no end.
❤18🔥1
The Tolerance Paradox (Part I)
Human nature is inherently prone to divisiveness and conflict. Therefore, it seems logical that encouraging tolerance of diverse beliefs, opinions and behaviour would reduce, and possibly minimise, conflict and resulting violence.
However, even a cursory glance at the world around us reveals an entirely different state of affairs. It is apparent that many, if not most, people advocate tolerance only to push their viewpoints for broader acceptance, while vilifying others' viewpoints.
It's crucial to weigh the different aspects of the matter at hand if one is to judge when, where, and how much tolerance is appropriate under a given set of conditions.
The potential of harmonious growth
Given the diversity of human society, respect for differing opinions, faiths, customs, and ways of life enhances social harmony and can lead to better living conditions for everyone.
Socio-economic growth tends to be more rapid in societies with fewer conflicts and a focus on education, scientific progress and intellectual growth.
Respect for others, even those who are less powerful and/or prosperous, reduces the risk of abuse of power. If a society provides ample opportunities for even the lower strata, it reduces resentment toward the more privileged.
Individual freedom and dignity require respect for individual opinions and choices rather than dogmatic compliance.
On the other hand, societies where people regularly clash over trivial matters tend to lack growth across most aspects of life.
(To be continued in Part II)
Human nature is inherently prone to divisiveness and conflict. Therefore, it seems logical that encouraging tolerance of diverse beliefs, opinions and behaviour would reduce, and possibly minimise, conflict and resulting violence.
However, even a cursory glance at the world around us reveals an entirely different state of affairs. It is apparent that many, if not most, people advocate tolerance only to push their viewpoints for broader acceptance, while vilifying others' viewpoints.
It's crucial to weigh the different aspects of the matter at hand if one is to judge when, where, and how much tolerance is appropriate under a given set of conditions.
The potential of harmonious growth
Given the diversity of human society, respect for differing opinions, faiths, customs, and ways of life enhances social harmony and can lead to better living conditions for everyone.
Socio-economic growth tends to be more rapid in societies with fewer conflicts and a focus on education, scientific progress and intellectual growth.
Respect for others, even those who are less powerful and/or prosperous, reduces the risk of abuse of power. If a society provides ample opportunities for even the lower strata, it reduces resentment toward the more privileged.
Individual freedom and dignity require respect for individual opinions and choices rather than dogmatic compliance.
On the other hand, societies where people regularly clash over trivial matters tend to lack growth across most aspects of life.
(To be continued in Part II)
❤11👍1
The Tolerance Paradox (Part II)
While it may seem that a society that accepts every viewpoint with equal respect would be a utopia, the ground reality is that not everyone is willing to work together for a common goal.
No matter how good a system is, there will always be flaws. There will always be people who would exploit the goodness of others for their nefarious purposes.
Complacency, apathy and tolerance for the intolerant
While a society that respects diversity tends to be more productive and harmonious, there comes a point where the flaws become too serious to ignore. Often in moderately to highly liberal societies, degenerate behaviour begins to flourish, to the detriment of the otherwise harmonious folk.
Addictions, unhealthy habits and degeneracy become normalised as 'choice', and the media tends to promote this narrative of 'choices without consequences'.
Moral values erode and give way to ideas like 'moral relativism' where there is no such thing as a bad or unethical action as long as one can label it as 'choice' or 'freedom'. In such a society, nothing is off-limits as people's behaviour degrades to a new low now and then.
Some inherently intolerant people and ideologies take advantage of a highly tolerant society to further their own agenda, which is anything but tolerant of others, all the while demanding respect and tolerance for themselves.
Extreme levels of tolerance lead to policies that can undo millennia of progress by elevating incompetent people in the name of DEI.
Resentment in society builds up when it appears that tolerance isn't universal and only a few people use it to shame others into compliance and submission.
Conclusion
It is, therefore, prudent to consider which matters are better left to individual choice and which matters require strict enforcement of socio-legal rules and regulations.
For example, matters of socio-cultural customs and practices ought to be left to individual choice, so long as such choices do not promote unethical practices.
On the other hand, when the matter at hand concerns the well-being of the populace, such as public safety and public health, individual choice can sometimes be quite irrational and capricious. For example, smoking in public, and songs that promote substance abuse and violent crime.
While it may seem that a society that accepts every viewpoint with equal respect would be a utopia, the ground reality is that not everyone is willing to work together for a common goal.
No matter how good a system is, there will always be flaws. There will always be people who would exploit the goodness of others for their nefarious purposes.
Complacency, apathy and tolerance for the intolerant
While a society that respects diversity tends to be more productive and harmonious, there comes a point where the flaws become too serious to ignore. Often in moderately to highly liberal societies, degenerate behaviour begins to flourish, to the detriment of the otherwise harmonious folk.
Addictions, unhealthy habits and degeneracy become normalised as 'choice', and the media tends to promote this narrative of 'choices without consequences'.
Moral values erode and give way to ideas like 'moral relativism' where there is no such thing as a bad or unethical action as long as one can label it as 'choice' or 'freedom'. In such a society, nothing is off-limits as people's behaviour degrades to a new low now and then.
Some inherently intolerant people and ideologies take advantage of a highly tolerant society to further their own agenda, which is anything but tolerant of others, all the while demanding respect and tolerance for themselves.
Extreme levels of tolerance lead to policies that can undo millennia of progress by elevating incompetent people in the name of DEI.
Resentment in society builds up when it appears that tolerance isn't universal and only a few people use it to shame others into compliance and submission.
Conclusion
It is, therefore, prudent to consider which matters are better left to individual choice and which matters require strict enforcement of socio-legal rules and regulations.
For example, matters of socio-cultural customs and practices ought to be left to individual choice, so long as such choices do not promote unethical practices.
On the other hand, when the matter at hand concerns the well-being of the populace, such as public safety and public health, individual choice can sometimes be quite irrational and capricious. For example, smoking in public, and songs that promote substance abuse and violent crime.
❤12👍6
Power - the core arbiter of morality
It is generally believed that moral values are based on principles innate to the human psyche. To many of us, the ideals of equality and justice seem as natural as the desire to survive and prosper.
However, if one were to look beneath the surface of the supposed ‘noble human values’, one would find that the basis of these morals is not rooted in abstract ideas but in the exercise of power by those who wield it the most at a point in time.
Slavery and the lesser humans
Human history is rife with instances of slavery, in its various forms, being considered not only normal but in accordance with the natural order of things. Things like enslavement of people from other tribes and the race-based hierarchy have been considered morally justifiable by their contemporary ethical standards.
Colonialism and civilisation
Odd as it may seem to those unaware of the rationale behind colonialism, those who engaged in colonial conquests have often attempted to justify and even glorify their actions by claiming to ‘bring civilisation to the uncivilised’.
Democracy
The definition of democracy makes it seem like the perfect form of government. But the root of the problem lies in human nature. The innate desire to impose one’s will over others is universal. Whether it be a powerful minority exerting control over the masses or the majority overpowering the minority by sheer force of numbers.
Fundamentalism
Any form of dogma, religious fundamentalism in particular, seeks to eliminate dissent and assume control of society under the pretence of working for the greater good. Often, the messengers and representatives of purported divine entities have prescribed inhumane atrocities upon those who refuse to accept the said dogma.
Hypocrisy
Not only does the balance, or the imbalance, of power decide who gets to define moral values, but it also determines where the moral values apply and who is free to ignore them.
It does, therefore, stand to reason that moral values, are not necessarily the symbols of virtue that they’re often claimed to be. They are but an extension of the human psyche’s desire for control. They can often act as a form of manipulation and authority while acting behind the veil of noble intentions.
It is generally believed that moral values are based on principles innate to the human psyche. To many of us, the ideals of equality and justice seem as natural as the desire to survive and prosper.
However, if one were to look beneath the surface of the supposed ‘noble human values’, one would find that the basis of these morals is not rooted in abstract ideas but in the exercise of power by those who wield it the most at a point in time.
Slavery and the lesser humans
Human history is rife with instances of slavery, in its various forms, being considered not only normal but in accordance with the natural order of things. Things like enslavement of people from other tribes and the race-based hierarchy have been considered morally justifiable by their contemporary ethical standards.
Colonialism and civilisation
Odd as it may seem to those unaware of the rationale behind colonialism, those who engaged in colonial conquests have often attempted to justify and even glorify their actions by claiming to ‘bring civilisation to the uncivilised’.
Democracy
The definition of democracy makes it seem like the perfect form of government. But the root of the problem lies in human nature. The innate desire to impose one’s will over others is universal. Whether it be a powerful minority exerting control over the masses or the majority overpowering the minority by sheer force of numbers.
Fundamentalism
Any form of dogma, religious fundamentalism in particular, seeks to eliminate dissent and assume control of society under the pretence of working for the greater good. Often, the messengers and representatives of purported divine entities have prescribed inhumane atrocities upon those who refuse to accept the said dogma.
Hypocrisy
Not only does the balance, or the imbalance, of power decide who gets to define moral values, but it also determines where the moral values apply and who is free to ignore them.
It does, therefore, stand to reason that moral values, are not necessarily the symbols of virtue that they’re often claimed to be. They are but an extension of the human psyche’s desire for control. They can often act as a form of manipulation and authority while acting behind the veil of noble intentions.
❤12