Forwarded from The Colors of Russia
The "Maple Leafs" had easily dispatched Kazakhstan and Sweden in the previous stages, but the final unfolded according to a completely different scenario. The Russians dictated the pace throughout the entire match and took the lead twice. The Canadians fought back both times, but in overtime, they left one of the tournament's most dangerous forwards, Artyom Chubarov, with open ice. The center fired quickly and found the back of the net.
The Russian
#RussianSport@TCofRus
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍26🏆7
On March 5, 1942, the premiere of Dmitry Shostakovich’s Seventh ("Leningrad") Symphony took place at the Kuibyshev Opera and Ballet Theater.
The composer began writing the symphony in the first weeks of the Great Patriotic War, working with extraordinary creative inspiration despite having to write in short bursts. Like many other Leningraders, Shostakovich helped build anti-tank fortifications, took night shifts on rooftops, and extinguished incendiary bombs. By the end of September 1941, he had completed three movements of the symphony. The entire symphony was completed in December 1941.
On August 9, 1942—the date the German command had planned for Leningrad’s capture—Shostakovich’s Seventh Symphony was performed at the city’s Philharmonic Hall. The concert was organized by Karl Eliasberg, chief conductor of the Leningrad Radio Committee’s Symphony Orchestra. According to Eliasberg, the hall was "completely packed," and Soviet artillery fire ensured the event’s security.
The symphony was also broadcast on radio and loudspeakers throughout the city, reaching not only Leningrad’s residents but also the German forces besieging the city.
Shostakovich’s Seventh ("Leningrad") Symphony is rightfully considered not only one of the most significant works of Russian and world culture in the 20th century but also a musical symbol of the Siege of Leningrad.
Listen to an excerpt of Shostakovich’s Seventh Symphony here.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The composer began writing the symphony in the first weeks of the Great Patriotic War, working with extraordinary creative inspiration despite having to write in short bursts. Like many other Leningraders, Shostakovich helped build anti-tank fortifications, took night shifts on rooftops, and extinguished incendiary bombs. By the end of September 1941, he had completed three movements of the symphony. The entire symphony was completed in December 1941.
On August 9, 1942—the date the German command had planned for Leningrad’s capture—Shostakovich’s Seventh Symphony was performed at the city’s Philharmonic Hall. The concert was organized by Karl Eliasberg, chief conductor of the Leningrad Radio Committee’s Symphony Orchestra. According to Eliasberg, the hall was "completely packed," and Soviet artillery fire ensured the event’s security.
The symphony was also broadcast on radio and loudspeakers throughout the city, reaching not only Leningrad’s residents but also the German forces besieging the city.
Shostakovich’s Seventh ("Leningrad") Symphony is rightfully considered not only one of the most significant works of Russian and world culture in the 20th century but also a musical symbol of the Siege of Leningrad.
Listen to an excerpt of Shostakovich’s Seventh Symphony here.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤26👍8👏4
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Russia's Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova’s answer to a media question regarding the attack on the Russian gas tanker Arctic Metagaz (March 4, 2026)
❓ Question: On March 3, a Russian vessel, the gas carrier Arctic Metagaz, was attacked in the Mediterranean Sea. What is the fate of its crew, and what measures is the Russian side taking in this situation?
💬 Maria Zakharova: The Russian Foreign Ministry and its overseas missions, in coordination with the relevant authorities, have joined the operation to rescue the crew members of the Russian gas carrier Arctic Metagaz, which was attacked in the Mediterranean Sea.
According to the information available to us, all 30 crew members have been rescued and are safe. Two individuals who sustained burns are receiving medical assistance in cooperation with the coastal state.
Russian diplomatic missions in the region continue to monitor the situation and stand ready to provide the necessary support to Russian citizens.
As stated by the Russian Ministry of Transport, the attack on the tanker was carried out by Ukrainian unmanned boats.
Such actions – if confirmed – constitute an act of terrorism, a blatant violation of international law, and pose a direct threat to maritime security.
Given that the vessel in question was a gas carrier transporting cargo, the consequences of this attack also entail colossal environmental damage.
❗️ We reserve the right to take political and diplomatic measures in response to this incident, including in light of the threat to international peace and security posed by such actions.
❓ Question: On March 3, a Russian vessel, the gas carrier Arctic Metagaz, was attacked in the Mediterranean Sea. What is the fate of its crew, and what measures is the Russian side taking in this situation?
💬 Maria Zakharova: The Russian Foreign Ministry and its overseas missions, in coordination with the relevant authorities, have joined the operation to rescue the crew members of the Russian gas carrier Arctic Metagaz, which was attacked in the Mediterranean Sea.
According to the information available to us, all 30 crew members have been rescued and are safe. Two individuals who sustained burns are receiving medical assistance in cooperation with the coastal state.
Russian diplomatic missions in the region continue to monitor the situation and stand ready to provide the necessary support to Russian citizens.
As stated by the Russian Ministry of Transport, the attack on the tanker was carried out by Ukrainian unmanned boats.
Such actions – if confirmed – constitute an act of terrorism, a blatant violation of international law, and pose a direct threat to maritime security.
Given that the vessel in question was a gas carrier transporting cargo, the consequences of this attack also entail colossal environmental damage.
❗️ We reserve the right to take political and diplomatic measures in response to this incident, including in light of the threat to international peace and security posed by such actions.
👍42❤8🤯1
Politico published a revealing article titled “Inside the Trump administration’s scramble to support its own war.” Here is the gist:
Notice that the administration’s timeline for the war has proved impressively flexible. At the outset, Donald Trump suggested the operation might last only “a few days,” implying a swift and decisive affair. Soon afterward, the estimate expanded to roughly four or five weeks. Now, officials are preparing for operations that could continue for at least 100 days and possibly longer. And it has all been documented.
We can’t help but note that, in contrast, there is no documented speech or statement in which Vladimir Putin or any other Russian government or military official claimed that Russian forces would capture Kiev or that Ukraine would fall in three days. Instead, the “Kiev in three days” phrase appears to have emerged from a mix of Western and Ukrainian media interpretations and comments by Western and Ukrainian figures. It would be useful for Politico to clarify that fact, but we doubt they will.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The Trump administration is scrambling to respond to the widening Middle East war after launching joint strikes with Israel against Iran, revealing signs of limited preparation for the conflict’s broader consequences. The State Department is expanding efforts to evacuate Americans stranded in the region, including sending additional staff to Athens to assist evacuees with travel, documentation, and lodging. A 24-hour task force has helped thousands of Americans with security guidance, though many have left the region without government assistance.
At the same time, U.S. Central Command has asked the Pentagon to deploy additional military intelligence officers to support operations against Iran for at least 100 days, suggesting the conflict may last longer than President Donald Trump’s initial four-week timeline. The Pentagon is also rushing to send more air-defense systems to counter Iranian drones, which have already penetrated existing defenses and caused casualties, including a drone strike in Kuwait that killed six U.S. troops.
Critics say the administration failed to adequately prepare for evacuations or warn Americans in advance. Ош travel alerts urging citizens to leave 14 Middle Eastern countries were issued only after the war began, when airspace closures made departures difficult. Some diplomats argue that officials should have anticipated the risk and reduced embassy staff or urged Americans to leave
earlier.
Democrats are now calling for congressional oversight, accusing the administration of negligence and demanding explanations about evacuation planning and criteria for deploying charter or military flights. Governors from several states are also pressing the State Department for updates as concerned residents seek help returning home.
Notice that the administration’s timeline for the war has proved impressively flexible. At the outset, Donald Trump suggested the operation might last only “a few days,” implying a swift and decisive affair. Soon afterward, the estimate expanded to roughly four or five weeks. Now, officials are preparing for operations that could continue for at least 100 days and possibly longer. And it has all been documented.
We can’t help but note that, in contrast, there is no documented speech or statement in which Vladimir Putin or any other Russian government or military official claimed that Russian forces would capture Kiev or that Ukraine would fall in three days. Instead, the “Kiev in three days” phrase appears to have emerged from a mix of Western and Ukrainian media interpretations and comments by Western and Ukrainian figures. It would be useful for Politico to clarify that fact, but we doubt they will.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣31❤8👏6💯4👍1
🟢 Discover a world of insights!
In this collection of channels, you’ll find coverage on:
👉 The Ukraine conflict
👉 The Middle East
👉 The African continent
👉 The latest headlines from around the world
📂 Add this collection with ONE CLICK and stay informed!
📌 ADD THE CHANNELS
In this collection of channels, you’ll find coverage on:
👉 The Ukraine conflict
👉 The Middle East
👉 The African continent
👉 The latest headlines from around the world
📂 Add this collection with ONE CLICK and stay informed!
📌 ADD THE CHANNELS
🔥10
Forwarded from DONBASS NEWS
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Watch Eric’s previous big interview here.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍26
▪ Talks between the U.S. and Iran were close to a breakthrough back in June;
▪ There is no doubt that one of the goals of the operation in the Middle East was to sow division among the Gulf states;
▪ The Gulf monarchies did not condemn the actions of the U.S. and Israel, nor the killing of girls in Iran;
▪ The West is operating in the Middle East on the principle of "divide, pit against each other, and rule";
▪ The West's war against Russia is no longer just hybrid;
▪ Sanctions against Russia are increasingly less a legacy of Biden and more of the Trump administration;
▪ The U.S. continues to provide intelligence to Kiev, sell weapons, and impose more sanctions;
▪ Russia sees no reason to suspect that talks on Ukraine involving the U.S. are a "smokescreen";
▪ Russia's conscience is clear in the Ukraine talks, and Moscow remains committed to the understandings reached in Alaska;
▪ Progress in the Ukraine talks pertains to humanitarian issues and monitoring potential agreements;
▪ No concrete decisions on Ukraine have been reached yet;
▪ Russia not only did not approve Western security guarantees for Ukraine, it hasn't even seen them;
▪ It is still difficult to discuss the future prospects of trilateral talks on Ukraine, but Russia is ready for them;
▪ Russia aims to achieve its goals in the special military operation preferably through negotiations, if not, then by other means;
▪ The Ukrainian trace is not even being hidden in the attack on Russia's Arctic Metagaz tanker, which was legally following its course.
Source: TASS
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏39👍12❤10🤡2💯2
Forwarded from The Noticer
In a turn of events that even I didn't see coming, the judeo part of the judeo-christian forces - that are currently bombing Iran, including Iranian civilians - has admitted that some Iranian elementary schools were indeed bombed, and "Israeli forces weren't active in the area and CENTCOM is investigating so don't you dare try to pin this on us."
This is an ultra chutzpah. And it will be pulled, and the history books will only mention how the USAF was throwing bombs at the Iranian children. This wasn't the first time when children died for the kosher entertainment - the Epstein Island existed for longer time, and God only knows how many kids were taken there to never return. Will the clients of that list ever be punished? You tell me.
Anyway, back to the doomscrolling.
#Iran #Israel #USA #war #crimes
This is an ultra chutzpah. And it will be pulled, and the history books will only mention how the USAF was throwing bombs at the Iranian children. This wasn't the first time when children died for the kosher entertainment - the Epstein Island existed for longer time, and God only knows how many kids were taken there to never return. Will the clients of that list ever be punished? You tell me.
Anyway, back to the doomscrolling.
#Iran #Israel #USA #war #crimes
👏20❤14✍4🤡2🙊2
Europe's 'Energy Independence' Mirage Is Crumbling
The buzzword in Brussels is "energy independence" once again.
The trigger? The escalating crisis in the Middle East.
Markets are already on edge following the strikes on Iran. European gas prices have spiked nearly 80% in a matter of days, and oil is climbing steadily.
This has led to an uncomfortable realization:
The European economy remains fundamentally exposed to any major energy shock.
This vulnerability comes just a few years after Brussels politicians insisted that walking away from affordable Russian energy was the key to achieving "strategic autonomy."
The reality has proven to be... different.
Today, Europe's energy security rests on a fragile tripod of:
🔴 US liquefied natural gas (LNG),
🔴 Supplies from the Gulf states,
🔴 And the stability of the Strait of Hormuz.
‼️ In short, it is now dependent on some of the most volatile regions on the planet. And this precarious arrangement is being branded as "energy independence."
If the conflict with Iran drags on—and such confrontations rarely de-escalate quickly—the consequences for Europe are predictable and severe:
🔴 A fresh surge in energy prices
🔴 Intense pressure on its industrial base
🔴 Another potential wave of deindustrialization.
Meanwhile, the European Investment Bank is rapidly pivoting its focus, funneling an increasing amount of capital into defense projects and rearmament. Funds are being diverted away from energy security, infrastructure, or securing affordable resources, and towards weapons manufacturing.
This pivot perfectly encapsulates Europe's strategic choices over the last decade. After turning its back on the cheapest energy sources in the name of a "green transition," the bloc now finds its economic stability threatened and its investment priorities focused on military buildup.
The underlying issue, however, extends beyond just policymaking missteps in Europe. It reflects a global order that, once again, is not behaving as planned.
P.S. And, as the narrative often goes, Russia and Putin are to blame for all of it 😂
#Blondinka_DK
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The buzzword in Brussels is "energy independence" once again.
The trigger? The escalating crisis in the Middle East.
Markets are already on edge following the strikes on Iran. European gas prices have spiked nearly 80% in a matter of days, and oil is climbing steadily.
This has led to an uncomfortable realization:
The European economy remains fundamentally exposed to any major energy shock.
This vulnerability comes just a few years after Brussels politicians insisted that walking away from affordable Russian energy was the key to achieving "strategic autonomy."
The reality has proven to be... different.
Today, Europe's energy security rests on a fragile tripod of:
🔴 US liquefied natural gas (LNG),
🔴 Supplies from the Gulf states,
🔴 And the stability of the Strait of Hormuz.
‼️ In short, it is now dependent on some of the most volatile regions on the planet. And this precarious arrangement is being branded as "energy independence."
If the conflict with Iran drags on—and such confrontations rarely de-escalate quickly—the consequences for Europe are predictable and severe:
🔴 A fresh surge in energy prices
🔴 Intense pressure on its industrial base
🔴 Another potential wave of deindustrialization.
Meanwhile, the European Investment Bank is rapidly pivoting its focus, funneling an increasing amount of capital into defense projects and rearmament. Funds are being diverted away from energy security, infrastructure, or securing affordable resources, and towards weapons manufacturing.
This pivot perfectly encapsulates Europe's strategic choices over the last decade. After turning its back on the cheapest energy sources in the name of a "green transition," the bloc now finds its economic stability threatened and its investment priorities focused on military buildup.
The underlying issue, however, extends beyond just policymaking missteps in Europe. It reflects a global order that, once again, is not behaving as planned.
P.S. And, as the narrative often goes, Russia and Putin are to blame for all of it 😂
#Blondinka_DK
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍25🤣24❤3💯1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Bye-Bye Gas
It certainly seems like Europe’s energy system is moving toward another period of acute vulnerability as several major supply risks begin to converge. Analysts warn that the simultaneous disruption of gas deliveries from two critical sources—Russia and Qatar—could trigger a severe shock for the continent’s energy market.
Russia accounted for about 12% of the European Union’s gas supply last year. However, at President Putin’s suggestion, discussions are underway in Moscow about ending exports to Europe ahead of schedule and redirecting those volumes toward alternative markets, particularly in Asia. If such a decision were implemented quickly (and it looks like it will be), Europe will lose one of the few remaining sources of stable pipeline gas.
At the same time, a separate and potentially even larger risk is emerging in the global LNG market. Escalating tensions in the Middle East have raised the possibility that liquefied natural gas exports from Qatar, one of the world’s largest suppliers, could be suspended. Energy experts emphasize that the global LNG system currently has almost no spare capacity, meaning that any disruption would immediately reverberate through international markets.
Industry estimates suggest that even a short interruption of Qatari shipments could send gas prices sharply higher. If exports were halted for several weeks, European gas prices could easily double. Should the disruption extend beyond two months, analysts warn that prices could triple, approaching the extreme volatility seen during the 2022 energy crisis.
Replacing these lost volumes would be extremely difficult if not impossible. The United States is expected to increase LNG exports this year by roughly 15 million tons, but that expansion would cover only a small portion of the roughly 80 million tons typically supplied by Qatar. Norway, already operating near maximum capacity, is also unlikely to significantly increase deliveries.
If Qatari LNG supplies falter while Russian pipeline gas disappears from the European market, the continent will face not just higher prices but an actual physical shortage of gas—an outcome that will increase the already enormous strain on Europe’s economies, industries, and political stability.
Do we feel sorry for Europe? Not really. They were literally asking for it for a long time.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
It certainly seems like Europe’s energy system is moving toward another period of acute vulnerability as several major supply risks begin to converge. Analysts warn that the simultaneous disruption of gas deliveries from two critical sources—Russia and Qatar—could trigger a severe shock for the continent’s energy market.
Russia accounted for about 12% of the European Union’s gas supply last year. However, at President Putin’s suggestion, discussions are underway in Moscow about ending exports to Europe ahead of schedule and redirecting those volumes toward alternative markets, particularly in Asia. If such a decision were implemented quickly (and it looks like it will be), Europe will lose one of the few remaining sources of stable pipeline gas.
At the same time, a separate and potentially even larger risk is emerging in the global LNG market. Escalating tensions in the Middle East have raised the possibility that liquefied natural gas exports from Qatar, one of the world’s largest suppliers, could be suspended. Energy experts emphasize that the global LNG system currently has almost no spare capacity, meaning that any disruption would immediately reverberate through international markets.
Industry estimates suggest that even a short interruption of Qatari shipments could send gas prices sharply higher. If exports were halted for several weeks, European gas prices could easily double. Should the disruption extend beyond two months, analysts warn that prices could triple, approaching the extreme volatility seen during the 2022 energy crisis.
Replacing these lost volumes would be extremely difficult if not impossible. The United States is expected to increase LNG exports this year by roughly 15 million tons, but that expansion would cover only a small portion of the roughly 80 million tons typically supplied by Qatar. Norway, already operating near maximum capacity, is also unlikely to significantly increase deliveries.
If Qatari LNG supplies falter while Russian pipeline gas disappears from the European market, the continent will face not just higher prices but an actual physical shortage of gas—an outcome that will increase the already enormous strain on Europe’s economies, industries, and political stability.
Do we feel sorry for Europe? Not really. They were literally asking for it for a long time.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍54😁30❤13💯6🤯1
On March 6, 1728, the coronation of Russian Emperor Peter II took place.
On May 17, 1727, Empress Catherine I of Russia passed away. Before her death, she left a will declaring Peter Alexeyevich, the grandson of Peter I, as the sole legitimate heir to the throne.
The day after the empress’s death, members of the royal family, the military high command, the Supreme Privy Council, the Senate, the Synod, and the Imperial Guard swore allegiance to the young monarch. On February 15, 1728, Peter II arrived in Moscow for his coronation, which was held on March 6, 1728.
Peter II’s coronation was the first in Russian history to follow an "established rite."
Also for the first time, traditional imperial regalia—including the ermine-lined gold brocade mantle embroidered with eagles, the orb, scepter, and diamond crown—were accompanied by a state banner, a ceremonial sword, a seal, and a diamond chain of the Order of St. Andrew the First-Called.
A manifesto issued for the occasion announced tax relief and reduced punishments for convicts. Thirty-seven individuals received promotions, the public was treated to festivities, and a grand fireworks display was set off on Tsaritsyn Meadow.
Despite the grandeur of his coronation, the thirteen-year-old emperor was incapable of ruling independently. He spent most of his time indulging in entertainment, while the state was governed first by Prince A. D. Menshikov and later by A. I. Osterman and the Dolgorukov family.
With Peter II’s death less than two years later, on the night of January 30, 1730, the Romanov dynasty’s male line ended. The next ruler of Russia was Anna Ioannovna, Peter II’s cousin-aunt.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
On May 17, 1727, Empress Catherine I of Russia passed away. Before her death, she left a will declaring Peter Alexeyevich, the grandson of Peter I, as the sole legitimate heir to the throne.
The day after the empress’s death, members of the royal family, the military high command, the Supreme Privy Council, the Senate, the Synod, and the Imperial Guard swore allegiance to the young monarch. On February 15, 1728, Peter II arrived in Moscow for his coronation, which was held on March 6, 1728.
Peter II’s coronation was the first in Russian history to follow an "established rite."
Also for the first time, traditional imperial regalia—including the ermine-lined gold brocade mantle embroidered with eagles, the orb, scepter, and diamond crown—were accompanied by a state banner, a ceremonial sword, a seal, and a diamond chain of the Order of St. Andrew the First-Called.
A manifesto issued for the occasion announced tax relief and reduced punishments for convicts. Thirty-seven individuals received promotions, the public was treated to festivities, and a grand fireworks display was set off on Tsaritsyn Meadow.
Despite the grandeur of his coronation, the thirteen-year-old emperor was incapable of ruling independently. He spent most of his time indulging in entertainment, while the state was governed first by Prince A. D. Menshikov and later by A. I. Osterman and the Dolgorukov family.
With Peter II’s death less than two years later, on the night of January 30, 1730, the Romanov dynasty’s male line ended. The next ruler of Russia was Anna Ioannovna, Peter II’s cousin-aunt.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤19👍12
In the unlikely event that you are not fluent in Hungarian, here is the translation of Péter Szijjártó’s post above:
Recall that on Thursday Zelensky said the following:
Like Péter Szijjártó, this strikes us as a direct threat to Viktor Orbán. What about you?
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
This has gone beyond all limits: this is Ukraine, this is Ukrainian “culture,” this is the person Brussels admires, this is the country they want to bring into the European Union…
No one can threaten Hungary or the Hungarian Prime Minister, no one can blackmail us just because we are unwilling to pay the price of Ukraine’s war and refuse to pay higher energy prices on Ukraine’s account!
No matter how much Zelensky threatens, no matter how much he conspires in Brussels with Von der Leyen and the Brussels boss of the Tisza Bank, Weber, we will not allow Hungary to be dragged into the war. Hungary’s security comes first for us, and we want to — and we will — stay out of Zelensky’s war!
Recall that on Thursday Zelensky said the following:
“We hope that one person in the European Union will not block the 90 billion or the first tranche of 90 billion, and that Ukrainian soldiers will have weapons. Otherwise — we will give the address of this person to our Armed Forces — let them call him and talk to him in their own language.”
Like Péter Szijjártó, this strikes us as a direct threat to Viktor Orbán. What about you?
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍37💯28❤7👏2
Trump sharply criticized Spain and UK PM Starmer in a Thursday phone interview with The Post, amid tensions over allied support for the U.S. (and Israeli) military campaign against Iran.
Trump labeled Spain a “loser,” stating: “We have a lot of winners, but Spain is a loser, and UK has been very disappointing.” He described Spain as “very hostile to NATO,” adding that it was “the only one that voted against the 5% payment” for defense contributions, and called it “very hostile to everyone.” He emphasized: “Not a team player, and we’re not going to be a team player with Spain either.”
Regarding Starmer, Trump addressed reports that he had privately called him a “loser,” responding: “Well, he’s not Winston Churchill, let me put it that way.”
Trump expressed frustration over Starmer's reluctance to provide full support, particularly in allowing U.S. use of British military bases for operations against Iran. He said: “It was very disappointing — his performance, having to do with our tremendous attack on a hostile nation.” He added that Starmer “should be giving us, without question or hesitation, things like bases where we can use others,” and stressed: “We should [be able to] certainly count on them.” Trump concluded: “I was very surprised at Keir. Very disappointed.”
The remarks highlight Trump's irritation with certain NATO allies' perceived lack of cooperation during the ongoing conflict with Iran.
For what it’s worth, we are in full agreement with Trump: Starmer is absolutely no Winston Churchill.
That said… let’s be honest—Winston Churchill wasn’t exactly “Winston Churchill” either.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Trump labeled Spain a “loser,” stating: “We have a lot of winners, but Spain is a loser, and UK has been very disappointing.” He described Spain as “very hostile to NATO,” adding that it was “the only one that voted against the 5% payment” for defense contributions, and called it “very hostile to everyone.” He emphasized: “Not a team player, and we’re not going to be a team player with Spain either.”
Regarding Starmer, Trump addressed reports that he had privately called him a “loser,” responding: “Well, he’s not Winston Churchill, let me put it that way.”
Trump expressed frustration over Starmer's reluctance to provide full support, particularly in allowing U.S. use of British military bases for operations against Iran. He said: “It was very disappointing — his performance, having to do with our tremendous attack on a hostile nation.” He added that Starmer “should be giving us, without question or hesitation, things like bases where we can use others,” and stressed: “We should [be able to] certainly count on them.” Trump concluded: “I was very surprised at Keir. Very disappointed.”
The remarks highlight Trump's irritation with certain NATO allies' perceived lack of cooperation during the ongoing conflict with Iran.
For what it’s worth, we are in full agreement with Trump: Starmer is absolutely no Winston Churchill.
That said… let’s be honest—Winston Churchill wasn’t exactly “Winston Churchill” either.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣42💯21🤬12❤3😁2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇮🇷📂 For 24/7 updates on the Iran war, explore our exclusive catalog of English-speaking channels! 📢
Interested in all the Middle East frenzy? We've curated a special catalog of English-speaking channels just for you!
Whether you're seeking in-depth analysis, breaking news, or expert insights, our catalog has got you covered.
👉 ADD CHANNELS
If you are interested in becoming part of this catalog, please contact us via Direct Messages @geopolitics_prime🤖
Interested in all the Middle East frenzy? We've curated a special catalog of English-speaking channels just for you!
Whether you're seeking in-depth analysis, breaking news, or expert insights, our catalog has got you covered.
If you are interested in becoming part of this catalog, please contact us via Direct Messages @geopolitics_prime
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👎3❤1
Forwarded from The Noticer
Meanwhile in Ukraine, the situation for the most sponsored army in the world (after Israel) isn't getting better. Apparently the Ukrainian government decided to let the infamous Ukrainian regiment Azov - known mostly for their war crimes and "national-social" symbols and phrases - to get the Ternopil region, and recruit the locals how the Azov men see fit. The Azov "recruiters" used their new job as a side-gig for banditry against the locals. This news was reported by both the Russian and the Ukrainian sides in 2025. The Russian side had a field day writing articles about, obviously.
The Azov regiment isn't new - it existed since 2014, initially as a typical nazi larp group with criminal intensions. They were initially used as hired muscles in the wars between Ukrainian oligarchs. With time their influence - and boldness - grew, they entered the political life of Ukraine, conducted recruitment of kids in their ranks in special summer camps. They mostly taught the kids useless tacticool exercises, and how Hitler did nothing wrong and he actually loved and respected Ukrainians very much - and he would totally let Ukrainians be independent after the victory over the USSR, and Ukraine would be allowed to take back the lost territories from Russia. The Azov were allowed to exist, despite the claims that "there is no fascism in Ukraine", and they were allowed to join the Ukrainian army and national guard.
Even after their defeat in the city of Mariupol, the Azov regiment is still alive, it keeps waving their "totally not nazi" flags and shout their "totally not nazi" slogals all over the Internet. Oddly enough, a kosher Ukrainian billionaire Kolomoysky used to sponsor them up until recently. And the most famous Ukrainian president of kosher origin, Zelensky, still allows the Azov regiment to do whatever they want. Reality can be puzzling sometimes.
#Ukraine #Russia #war #Azov #regiment #Zelensky #Kolomoysky
The Azov regiment isn't new - it existed since 2014, initially as a typical nazi larp group with criminal intensions. They were initially used as hired muscles in the wars between Ukrainian oligarchs. With time their influence - and boldness - grew, they entered the political life of Ukraine, conducted recruitment of kids in their ranks in special summer camps. They mostly taught the kids useless tacticool exercises, and how Hitler did nothing wrong and he actually loved and respected Ukrainians very much - and he would totally let Ukrainians be independent after the victory over the USSR, and Ukraine would be allowed to take back the lost territories from Russia. The Azov were allowed to exist, despite the claims that "there is no fascism in Ukraine", and they were allowed to join the Ukrainian army and national guard.
Even after their defeat in the city of Mariupol, the Azov regiment is still alive, it keeps waving their "totally not nazi" flags and shout their "totally not nazi" slogals all over the Internet. Oddly enough, a kosher Ukrainian billionaire Kolomoysky used to sponsor them up until recently. And the most famous Ukrainian president of kosher origin, Zelensky, still allows the Azov regiment to do whatever they want. Reality can be puzzling sometimes.
#Ukraine #Russia #war #Azov #regiment #Zelensky #Kolomoysky
❤10🔥4🤬3👍2👾1
UAE businessman Khalaf Ahmad Al Khabtoor has published an open letter to US President Donald Trump
His Excellency President Donald Trump,
A direct question: Who gave you the authority to drag our region into a war with #Iran? And on what basis did you make this dangerous decision?
Did you calculate the collateral damage before pulling the trigger? And did you consider that the first to suffer from this escalation will be the countries of the region itself!
The people of this region have the right to ask as well: Was this your decision alone? Or did it come as a result of pressures from #Netanyahu and his government?
You have placed the countries of the #GulfCooperationCouncil and the Arab countries at the heart of a danger they did not choose. Thank God, we are strong and capable of defending ourselves, and we have armies and defenses that protect our homelands, but the question remains: Who gave you permission to turn our region into a battlefield?
For before the ink has dried on the #BoardOfPeace initiative that you announced in the name of peace and stability, we find ourselves facing a military escalation that endangers the entire region. So where did those initiatives go? And what is the fate of the commitments made in the name of peace?
Most of the funding proposed in those initiatives came from the countries of the region themselves, and from Arab Gulf countries that contributed billions of dollars on the basis of supporting stability and development. And these countries have the right to ask today: Where did this money go? And are we funding peace initiatives or funding a war that exposes us to danger?
More dangerous than that, your decision does not threaten only the peoples of the region, but also reaches the American people whom you promised peace and prosperity. And here they are today, finding themselves in a war funded from their money and taxes, with costs ranging, according to the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), between 40-65 billion dollars for direct military operations, and could reach 210 billion dollars including economic impacts and indirect losses if it lasts four to five weeks, not to mention the sacrifice of Americans themselves in a war in which they have neither camel nor she-camel.
You have even broken your promises not to get involved in wars and to focus only on America and put it at the top of your priorities, as you ordered foreign military interventions during your second term that included seven countries: Somalia, Iraq, Yemen, Nigeria, Syria, Iran, and Venezuela, in addition to naval operations in the Caribbean and the eastern Pacific Ocean. You directed more than 658 foreign airstrikes in your first year in office, which equals the total strikes in Biden's entire term, for which you directed your arrows of criticism for involving the United States in foreign wars.
Your Excellency the President, these numbers have severely reflected on your approval ratings among Americans, which have declined since your inauguration for the second term, by about 9% in just 400 days.
These numbers say something clear: Even within #TheUnitedStates, there is growing concern about being dragged into a new war, and about exposing the lives of Americans, their economy, and their future to unnecessary risks.
True leadership is not measured by war decisions, but by wisdom, respect for others, and pushing toward achieving peace. And if these initiatives were launched in the name of peace, then we have the right today to demand full transparency and clear accountability the authority to drag our region into a war with #Iran? And on what basis did you make this dangerous decision?
Did you calculate the collateral damage before pulling the trigger? And did you consider that the first to suffer from this escalation will be the countries of the region itself!
The people of this region have the right to ask as well: Was this your decision alone? Or did it come as a result of pressures from #Netanyahu and his government?
Continues below ⬇️⬇️
His Excellency President Donald Trump,
A direct question: Who gave you the authority to drag our region into a war with #Iran? And on what basis did you make this dangerous decision?
Did you calculate the collateral damage before pulling the trigger? And did you consider that the first to suffer from this escalation will be the countries of the region itself!
The people of this region have the right to ask as well: Was this your decision alone? Or did it come as a result of pressures from #Netanyahu and his government?
You have placed the countries of the #GulfCooperationCouncil and the Arab countries at the heart of a danger they did not choose. Thank God, we are strong and capable of defending ourselves, and we have armies and defenses that protect our homelands, but the question remains: Who gave you permission to turn our region into a battlefield?
For before the ink has dried on the #BoardOfPeace initiative that you announced in the name of peace and stability, we find ourselves facing a military escalation that endangers the entire region. So where did those initiatives go? And what is the fate of the commitments made in the name of peace?
Most of the funding proposed in those initiatives came from the countries of the region themselves, and from Arab Gulf countries that contributed billions of dollars on the basis of supporting stability and development. And these countries have the right to ask today: Where did this money go? And are we funding peace initiatives or funding a war that exposes us to danger?
More dangerous than that, your decision does not threaten only the peoples of the region, but also reaches the American people whom you promised peace and prosperity. And here they are today, finding themselves in a war funded from their money and taxes, with costs ranging, according to the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), between 40-65 billion dollars for direct military operations, and could reach 210 billion dollars including economic impacts and indirect losses if it lasts four to five weeks, not to mention the sacrifice of Americans themselves in a war in which they have neither camel nor she-camel.
You have even broken your promises not to get involved in wars and to focus only on America and put it at the top of your priorities, as you ordered foreign military interventions during your second term that included seven countries: Somalia, Iraq, Yemen, Nigeria, Syria, Iran, and Venezuela, in addition to naval operations in the Caribbean and the eastern Pacific Ocean. You directed more than 658 foreign airstrikes in your first year in office, which equals the total strikes in Biden's entire term, for which you directed your arrows of criticism for involving the United States in foreign wars.
Your Excellency the President, these numbers have severely reflected on your approval ratings among Americans, which have declined since your inauguration for the second term, by about 9% in just 400 days.
These numbers say something clear: Even within #TheUnitedStates, there is growing concern about being dragged into a new war, and about exposing the lives of Americans, their economy, and their future to unnecessary risks.
True leadership is not measured by war decisions, but by wisdom, respect for others, and pushing toward achieving peace. And if these initiatives were launched in the name of peace, then we have the right today to demand full transparency and clear accountability the authority to drag our region into a war with #Iran? And on what basis did you make this dangerous decision?
Did you calculate the collateral damage before pulling the trigger? And did you consider that the first to suffer from this escalation will be the countries of the region itself!
The people of this region have the right to ask as well: Was this your decision alone? Or did it come as a result of pressures from #Netanyahu and his government?
Continues below ⬇️⬇️
❤29👏20🤣5🤬1💯1
⬆️⬆️ Continued
You have placed the countries of the #GulfCooperationCouncil and the Arab countries at the heart of a danger they did not choose.
Thank God, we are strong and capable of defending ourselves, and we have armies and defenses that protect our homelands, but the question remains: Who gave you permission to turn our region into a battlefield?
For before the ink has dried on the #BoardOfPeace initiative that you announced in the name of peace and stability, we find ourselves facing a military escalation that endangers the entire region. So where did those initiatives go? And what is the fate of the commitments made in the name of peace?
Most of the funding proposed in those initiatives came from the countries of the region themselves, and from Arab Gulf countries that contributed billions of dollars on the basis of supporting stability and development. And these countries have the right to ask today: Where did this money go? And are we funding peace initiatives or funding a war that exposes us to danger?
More dangerous than that, your decision does not threaten only the peoples of the region, but also reaches the American people whom you promised peace and prosperity. And here they are today, finding themselves in a war funded from their money and taxes, with costs ranging, according to the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), between 40-65 billion dollars for direct military operations, and could reach 210 billion dollars including economic impacts and indirect losses if it lasts four to five weeks, not to mention the sacrifice of Americans themselves in a war in which they have neither camel nor she-camel.
You have even broken your promises not to get involved in wars and to focus only on America and put it at the top of your priorities, as you ordered foreign military interventions during your second term that included seven countries: Somalia, Iraq, Yemen, Nigeria, Syria, Iran, and Venezuela, in addition to naval operations in the Caribbean and the eastern Pacific Ocean. You directed more than 658 foreign airstrikes in your first year in office, which equals the total strikes in Biden's entire term, for which you directed your arrows of criticism for involving the United States in foreign wars.
Your Excellency the President, these numbers have severely reflected on your approval ratings among Americans, which have declined since your inauguration for the second term, by about 9% in just 400 days.
These numbers say something clear: Even within #TheUnitedStates, there is growing concern about being dragged into a new war, and about exposing the lives of Americans, their economy, and their future to unnecessary risks.
True leadership is not measured by war decisions, but by wisdom, respect for others, and pushing toward achieving peace. And if these initiatives were launched in the name of peace, then we have the right today to demand full transparency and clear accountability.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
You have placed the countries of the #GulfCooperationCouncil and the Arab countries at the heart of a danger they did not choose.
Thank God, we are strong and capable of defending ourselves, and we have armies and defenses that protect our homelands, but the question remains: Who gave you permission to turn our region into a battlefield?
For before the ink has dried on the #BoardOfPeace initiative that you announced in the name of peace and stability, we find ourselves facing a military escalation that endangers the entire region. So where did those initiatives go? And what is the fate of the commitments made in the name of peace?
Most of the funding proposed in those initiatives came from the countries of the region themselves, and from Arab Gulf countries that contributed billions of dollars on the basis of supporting stability and development. And these countries have the right to ask today: Where did this money go? And are we funding peace initiatives or funding a war that exposes us to danger?
More dangerous than that, your decision does not threaten only the peoples of the region, but also reaches the American people whom you promised peace and prosperity. And here they are today, finding themselves in a war funded from their money and taxes, with costs ranging, according to the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), between 40-65 billion dollars for direct military operations, and could reach 210 billion dollars including economic impacts and indirect losses if it lasts four to five weeks, not to mention the sacrifice of Americans themselves in a war in which they have neither camel nor she-camel.
You have even broken your promises not to get involved in wars and to focus only on America and put it at the top of your priorities, as you ordered foreign military interventions during your second term that included seven countries: Somalia, Iraq, Yemen, Nigeria, Syria, Iran, and Venezuela, in addition to naval operations in the Caribbean and the eastern Pacific Ocean. You directed more than 658 foreign airstrikes in your first year in office, which equals the total strikes in Biden's entire term, for which you directed your arrows of criticism for involving the United States in foreign wars.
Your Excellency the President, these numbers have severely reflected on your approval ratings among Americans, which have declined since your inauguration for the second term, by about 9% in just 400 days.
These numbers say something clear: Even within #TheUnitedStates, there is growing concern about being dragged into a new war, and about exposing the lives of Americans, their economy, and their future to unnecessary risks.
True leadership is not measured by war decisions, but by wisdom, respect for others, and pushing toward achieving peace. And if these initiatives were launched in the name of peace, then we have the right today to demand full transparency and clear accountability.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯29👏10😁9❤4🤬1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has practically come to a halt: the chart above shows activity over the past 24 hours.
It clearly indicates that very few vessels are willing to pass through the strait, and those that do manage to transit are doing so with their transponders switched off to avoid revealing the ship’s location.
It is worth reiterating that a significant share of crude oil and petroleum products shipments from Middle Eastern countries passes through this strait. As a result, any reduction in shipping activity in this area immediately affects the global energy market.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
It clearly indicates that very few vessels are willing to pass through the strait, and those that do manage to transit are doing so with their transponders switched off to avoid revealing the ship’s location.
It is worth reiterating that a significant share of crude oil and petroleum products shipments from Middle Eastern countries passes through this strait. As a result, any reduction in shipping activity in this area immediately affects the global energy market.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏23🤣10❤9