Forwarded from /SCI/ Southern Cross Intelligence - (𝙱𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚣 🇦🇷🦅)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇦🇷⚽️🇩🇿 — At 17 minutes into the game, Lionel Messi scored an incredible goal against Algeria, putting Argentina ahead 1-0.
Forwarded from Tupi Report 🇧🇷 • #FreeVenezuela
Several polling firms are projecting Abelardo de la Espriella as the new president of Colombia due to the statistical margin separating the candidates.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Allen👻👽 🛸Kaal
introPlasma.pdf
6 MB
Plasma Physics
An Introduction to Laboratory, Space,
and Fusion Plasmas by Alexander Piel
An Introduction to Laboratory, Space,
and Fusion Plasmas by Alexander Piel
🔥1
Forwarded from Just My Opinion, Joe Lange
June 30, 2026
“I would encourage everyone to relax on the two big “losses” at the Supreme Court.
Step back.
There’s something bigger happening.
Though I missed most of the news happening yesterday.
Trump’s reaction to his loss on “mail in ballots” was eye opening to me, because Trump didn’t seem too phased by the ruling.
He used some wording in his response, which downplayed the ruling and I think that was the KEY.
youtu.be/xGSNlA7-vBA?si…
Did you catch the part everyone missed?
“basically, they’re keeping it a little way that it is now”
Reminder.
Trump isn’t trying to get rid of ALL mail in ballots.
Just the fraudulent ones.
The largest group of “mail in ballots” come from the military.
Anybody remember the Bush vs Gore election?
“Gov. George W. Bush sued election officials in 13 Florida counties today for rejecting the absentee ballots of members of the military serving abroad, capitalizing on an issue that has been a public relations boon to the Republicans and that could determine the fate of hundreds of votes for the presidency.”
nytimes.com/2000/11/23/us/…
Now if anybody’s vote should be protected, it should definitely be the people who are risking their lives to protect our freedoms.
Trump is going to protect the “mail in ballots” of our military personnel.
But why did Trump say, the Supreme Court ruling was basically keeping it “a little” the way it is now?
The Supreme Court didn’t prevent ballots received AFTER election day from being counted, but did require the ballots to be “postmarked” by election day.
Why is that a big deal?
GAME THEORY.
Trump AND the Supreme Court are in the process of removing the avenues for cheating through mail in ballots in the FUTURE, while at the same time, preventing the future lawsuits that try and prevent military ballots that were mailed by election day.
Don’t forget:
The U.S. Postal Service is refusing all “mail in ballots” that are not verified by the federal registry proving citizenship.
And the Postal Service owns a patent on blockchain technology associated with “mail in ballots.”
None of this is a coincidence.
What looked like a loss, actually helped cement in the Constitution, that ALL mail in ballots must be “postmarked” by election day.
Blockchain technology will be used to “prove” that postmark in the FUTURE.
Never forget that Trump is playing the “long game” and trying to establish as many legal “safeguards” as possible.
Same with the birthright citizenship “loss.”
It looks really bad, but most people are missing the same “playbook” by Kavanaugh, when Trump took his first loss at the Supreme Court over tariffs.
Trump purposely used a specific law on tariffs that was rejected by the Supreme Court.
He knew it would be rejected.
Trump was purposely “limiting” the broad use of that specific law by past presidents, so that presidents in the FUTURE, can’t use it to get rid of his tariffs.
What did Trump do?
The same day, he took Kavanaugh’s “advice” and reinstated the tariffs using the law that is now deemed Constitutional.
Kavanaugh just did the same thing with “birthright citizenship.”
He outlined the legal pathway that the Supreme Court will approve, for “ending” birthright citizenship.
From Senator Eric Schmitt:
——————
“The majority tried to constitutionalize unlimited birthright citizenship. But Justice Kavanaugh MAY have left Congress a door.”
“I’m filing legislation to walk through it.”
“And I’ll keep working on a constitutional amendment to restore American citizenship.”
———————
Rand Paul has also declared that he is for the amendment.
Have you noticed Rand has flipped and now supporting Trump?
Trump is playing the long game and this “loss,” will be turned into a “win” but more importantly, immigration law will be permanently changed to prevent birthright citizenship in the FUTURE.
https://x.com/joelange/status/2072010488679190800?s=61
What’s happened at the Supreme Court over the last two days, is not the end of the story.
The “end results” are what really matters and that’s the game that Trump is playing.”
“I would encourage everyone to relax on the two big “losses” at the Supreme Court.
Step back.
There’s something bigger happening.
Though I missed most of the news happening yesterday.
Trump’s reaction to his loss on “mail in ballots” was eye opening to me, because Trump didn’t seem too phased by the ruling.
He used some wording in his response, which downplayed the ruling and I think that was the KEY.
youtu.be/xGSNlA7-vBA?si…
Did you catch the part everyone missed?
“basically, they’re keeping it a little way that it is now”
Reminder.
Trump isn’t trying to get rid of ALL mail in ballots.
Just the fraudulent ones.
The largest group of “mail in ballots” come from the military.
Anybody remember the Bush vs Gore election?
“Gov. George W. Bush sued election officials in 13 Florida counties today for rejecting the absentee ballots of members of the military serving abroad, capitalizing on an issue that has been a public relations boon to the Republicans and that could determine the fate of hundreds of votes for the presidency.”
nytimes.com/2000/11/23/us/…
Now if anybody’s vote should be protected, it should definitely be the people who are risking their lives to protect our freedoms.
Trump is going to protect the “mail in ballots” of our military personnel.
But why did Trump say, the Supreme Court ruling was basically keeping it “a little” the way it is now?
The Supreme Court didn’t prevent ballots received AFTER election day from being counted, but did require the ballots to be “postmarked” by election day.
Why is that a big deal?
GAME THEORY.
Trump AND the Supreme Court are in the process of removing the avenues for cheating through mail in ballots in the FUTURE, while at the same time, preventing the future lawsuits that try and prevent military ballots that were mailed by election day.
Don’t forget:
The U.S. Postal Service is refusing all “mail in ballots” that are not verified by the federal registry proving citizenship.
And the Postal Service owns a patent on blockchain technology associated with “mail in ballots.”
None of this is a coincidence.
What looked like a loss, actually helped cement in the Constitution, that ALL mail in ballots must be “postmarked” by election day.
Blockchain technology will be used to “prove” that postmark in the FUTURE.
Never forget that Trump is playing the “long game” and trying to establish as many legal “safeguards” as possible.
Same with the birthright citizenship “loss.”
It looks really bad, but most people are missing the same “playbook” by Kavanaugh, when Trump took his first loss at the Supreme Court over tariffs.
Trump purposely used a specific law on tariffs that was rejected by the Supreme Court.
He knew it would be rejected.
Trump was purposely “limiting” the broad use of that specific law by past presidents, so that presidents in the FUTURE, can’t use it to get rid of his tariffs.
What did Trump do?
The same day, he took Kavanaugh’s “advice” and reinstated the tariffs using the law that is now deemed Constitutional.
Kavanaugh just did the same thing with “birthright citizenship.”
He outlined the legal pathway that the Supreme Court will approve, for “ending” birthright citizenship.
From Senator Eric Schmitt:
——————
“The majority tried to constitutionalize unlimited birthright citizenship. But Justice Kavanaugh MAY have left Congress a door.”
“I’m filing legislation to walk through it.”
“And I’ll keep working on a constitutional amendment to restore American citizenship.”
———————
Rand Paul has also declared that he is for the amendment.
Have you noticed Rand has flipped and now supporting Trump?
Trump is playing the long game and this “loss,” will be turned into a “win” but more importantly, immigration law will be permanently changed to prevent birthright citizenship in the FUTURE.
https://x.com/joelange/status/2072010488679190800?s=61
What’s happened at the Supreme Court over the last two days, is not the end of the story.
The “end results” are what really matters and that’s the game that Trump is playing.”
YouTube
Trump claims Supreme Court ruling on mail-in voting will lead to 'cheating'
The Supreme Court dealt President Donald Trump's agenda major blows June 29 when it comes to regulating the economy and targeting mail-in voting, but also issued a historic decision expanding his control over federal agencies.
In split decisions, the justices…
In split decisions, the justices…
Forwarded from LauraAboli (Laura Aboli)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Soon to be New UK PM Andy Burnham is one of ‘them’.
Anyone surprised?
Anyone surprised?
Forwarded from THE PROTZMANIAN’S=199 (Melissa - PROUD PROTZMANIAN)
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from IAMs are: The Rising V2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Kelce was doing his own bit of trouble-making, driving Parin's Delta 88 on that flo[a]tilla⁸⁸
Forwarded from 369 data
369 data
“The teaching is not the truth. Yet without the teaching, many would never know where to look. 965 362 1033 367
“The teaching is not the truth. Yet without the teaching, many would never know where to look.” 965 · 362 · 1033 · 367
This phrase captures a very Buddhist tension: the difference between the pointer and what is being pointed toward.
The teaching (dharma) is not identical to reality itself. It is a skillful means (upāya)—a method, map, or expression designed to guide someone toward direct understanding.
The teaching is like:
a map → not the territory,
a finger → not the moon,
a boat → not the shore.
Yet the map still matters because without it, someone unfamiliar with the terrain may not know which direction to walk.
So the paradox becomes:
The teaching cannot replace direct realization, but direct realization is often made possible through teachings.
It avoids two extremes:
Mistaking the teaching for the truth
“The words themselves are the reality.”
The symbol becomes more important than what it reveals.
Rejecting all teachings
“Since words are not reality, words are useless.”
The guide is discarded before the journey begins.
The middle way is:
Use the form without becoming trapped by the form.
⸻
Number Breakdown
965
9 + 6 + 5 = 20
2 + 0 = 2
Symbolically:
completion moving into relationship or connection.
⸻
362
3 + 6 + 2 = 11
1 + 1 = 2
Symbolically:
expression and care creating balance.
⸻
1033
1 + 0 + 3 + 3 = 7
Symbolically:
origin and expression leading toward reflection and wisdom.
⸻
367
3 + 6 + 7 = 16
1 + 6 = 7
Symbolically:
expression becoming insight.
⸻
Pattern
Number
Reduction
965
2
362
2
1033
7
367
7
Giving:
2 → 2 → 7 → 7
Within your symbolic approach, this can be read as:
relationship first, wisdom second.
The teaching creates a relationship between the seeker and the truth, but the final realization requires going beyond the teaching itself.
⸻
Zen-Style Reading
A student asks:
“Master, is the scripture the truth?”
The teacher replies:
“No.”
The student asks:
“Then should I throw away the scripture?”
The teacher replies:
“No.”
The student becomes confused.
The teacher points toward the horizon:
“The signpost is not the destination. But without the signpost, you may wander in the wrong direction.”
So your phrase expresses a classic Buddhist insight:
Form does not create truth, but form can become the doorway through which truth is encountered.
This phrase captures a very Buddhist tension: the difference between the pointer and what is being pointed toward.
The teaching (dharma) is not identical to reality itself. It is a skillful means (upāya)—a method, map, or expression designed to guide someone toward direct understanding.
The teaching is like:
a map → not the territory,
a finger → not the moon,
a boat → not the shore.
Yet the map still matters because without it, someone unfamiliar with the terrain may not know which direction to walk.
So the paradox becomes:
The teaching cannot replace direct realization, but direct realization is often made possible through teachings.
It avoids two extremes:
Mistaking the teaching for the truth
“The words themselves are the reality.”
The symbol becomes more important than what it reveals.
Rejecting all teachings
“Since words are not reality, words are useless.”
The guide is discarded before the journey begins.
The middle way is:
Use the form without becoming trapped by the form.
⸻
Number Breakdown
965
9 + 6 + 5 = 20
2 + 0 = 2
Symbolically:
completion moving into relationship or connection.
⸻
362
3 + 6 + 2 = 11
1 + 1 = 2
Symbolically:
expression and care creating balance.
⸻
1033
1 + 0 + 3 + 3 = 7
Symbolically:
origin and expression leading toward reflection and wisdom.
⸻
367
3 + 6 + 7 = 16
1 + 6 = 7
Symbolically:
expression becoming insight.
⸻
Pattern
Number
Reduction
965
2
362
2
1033
7
367
7
Giving:
2 → 2 → 7 → 7
Within your symbolic approach, this can be read as:
relationship first, wisdom second.
The teaching creates a relationship between the seeker and the truth, but the final realization requires going beyond the teaching itself.
⸻
Zen-Style Reading
A student asks:
“Master, is the scripture the truth?”
The teacher replies:
“No.”
The student asks:
“Then should I throw away the scripture?”
The teacher replies:
“No.”
The student becomes confused.
The teacher points toward the horizon:
“The signpost is not the destination. But without the signpost, you may wander in the wrong direction.”
So your phrase expresses a classic Buddhist insight:
Form does not create truth, but form can become the doorway through which truth is encountered.