CVE-2025-39727
CVE-2025-39727 is a security vulnerability in the Linux kernel, specifically within the memory management (mm) subsystem, affecting the swap handling mechanism. The issue occurs due to a potential buffer overflow in the setup_clusters() function. In the setup_swap_map() function, only bad pages within the range (0, last_page] are checked. However, if maxpages is less than last_page, setup_clusters() may access memory beyond its allocated buffer when processing a badpage with an index greater than or equal to maxpages. This can lead to undefined behavior, including system crashes, memory corruption, or privilege escalation under certain conditions.
⸻
Potential Impact
This vulnerability is serious because it resides in the Linux kernel, which operates at ring 0, giving full control over system resources. Potential consequences include:
1. Local Privilege Escalation (LPE):
• A user with local access could exploit this vulnerability to overwrite kernel memory structures, potentially gaining root privileges.
• Example: Modifying the cred structure of a process to escalate a low-privilege account to full administrative rights.
2. Denial of Service (DoS):
• The overflow may trigger a kernel panic, crashing the system.
• Example: A server handling swap-intensive workloads could become unavailable until rebooted.
3. Memory Corruption / Data Leakage:
• The buffer overflow could corrupt adjacent kernel memory, leading to unpredictable behavior. In some scenarios, it may allow reading sensitive kernel data.
Note: Unlike some other kernel vulnerabilities, remote exploitation is highly unlikely without local code execution, as attackers must influence the swap system or memory directly.
⸻
Technical Details
The vulnerability arises from improper bounds checking in setup_clusters():
If badpages[i] >= maxpages, clusters[] is accessed out-of-bounds, leading to a heap or stack memory corruption.
This memory corruption can have multiple outcomes:
• Overwriting critical kernel structures → privilege escalation.
• Overwriting control data → kernel panic (DoS).
• In rare cases, manipulating data to execute code in kernel context (requires bypassing SMEP/SMAP/KASLR).
⸻
Example Scenario
1. A Linux server (e.g., Ubuntu 24.04) is running a vulnerable kernel.
2. An attacker has local access (low-privilege user or compromised process).
3. The attacker runs a crafted program that injects invalid badpage entries into the swap system, triggering the overflow in setup_clusters().
4. Consequences may include:
• Escalating privileges to root.
• Crashing the system (DoS).
• Potentially corrupting kernel memory or leaking sensitive data.
Reference:
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39727
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/152c1339dc13ad46f1b136e8693de15980750835
#Kernel #Linux
CVE-2025-39727 is a security vulnerability in the Linux kernel, specifically within the memory management (mm) subsystem, affecting the swap handling mechanism. The issue occurs due to a potential buffer overflow in the setup_clusters() function. In the setup_swap_map() function, only bad pages within the range (0, last_page] are checked. However, if maxpages is less than last_page, setup_clusters() may access memory beyond its allocated buffer when processing a badpage with an index greater than or equal to maxpages. This can lead to undefined behavior, including system crashes, memory corruption, or privilege escalation under certain conditions.
⸻
Potential Impact
This vulnerability is serious because it resides in the Linux kernel, which operates at ring 0, giving full control over system resources. Potential consequences include:
1. Local Privilege Escalation (LPE):
• A user with local access could exploit this vulnerability to overwrite kernel memory structures, potentially gaining root privileges.
• Example: Modifying the cred structure of a process to escalate a low-privilege account to full administrative rights.
2. Denial of Service (DoS):
• The overflow may trigger a kernel panic, crashing the system.
• Example: A server handling swap-intensive workloads could become unavailable until rebooted.
3. Memory Corruption / Data Leakage:
• The buffer overflow could corrupt adjacent kernel memory, leading to unpredictable behavior. In some scenarios, it may allow reading sensitive kernel data.
Note: Unlike some other kernel vulnerabilities, remote exploitation is highly unlikely without local code execution, as attackers must influence the swap system or memory directly.
⸻
Technical Details
The vulnerability arises from improper bounds checking in setup_clusters():
// simplified conceptual example
for (i = 0; i < nr_badpages; i++) {
page = badpages[i];
// no check if page >= maxpages
clusters[page / CLUSTER_SIZE]++;
}
If badpages[i] >= maxpages, clusters[] is accessed out-of-bounds, leading to a heap or stack memory corruption.
This memory corruption can have multiple outcomes:
• Overwriting critical kernel structures → privilege escalation.
• Overwriting control data → kernel panic (DoS).
• In rare cases, manipulating data to execute code in kernel context (requires bypassing SMEP/SMAP/KASLR).
⸻
Example Scenario
1. A Linux server (e.g., Ubuntu 24.04) is running a vulnerable kernel.
2. An attacker has local access (low-privilege user or compromised process).
3. The attacker runs a crafted program that injects invalid badpage entries into the swap system, triggering the overflow in setup_clusters().
4. Consequences may include:
• Escalating privileges to root.
• Crashing the system (DoS).
• Potentially corrupting kernel memory or leaking sensitive data.
Reference:
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39727
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/152c1339dc13ad46f1b136e8693de15980750835
#Kernel #Linux
🔥1
usenix25-tlbsidechannel.pdf
1.1 MB
This is a research paper and it shows that some Linux kernel hardening tricks accidentally create TLB side-channel leaks that let an unprivileged attacker find where critical kernel objects live, for example heap objects, page tables and kernel stacks. The authors use allocator shaping plus Evict+Reload-style TLB measurements and show practical results on recent Intel CPUs and kernels.
این یه مقالهٔ تحقیقاتیه که نشون میده چندتا از مکانیزمهای سختسازی کرنل لینوکس به صورت ناخواسته الگوهای نشتی توی TLB درست میکنن و با این کار میشه آدرس اشیای حساس کرنل مثل ساختارهای heap، جداول صفحه و استک کرنل رو لو داد. روششون ترکیبیه از دستکاری تخصیصدهندهها و اندازهگیریهای شبیه Evict+Reload روی TLB و تو آزمایشها روی پردازندههای جدید اینتل و کرنلهای مدرن کار کرده.
#kernel #linux
این یه مقالهٔ تحقیقاتیه که نشون میده چندتا از مکانیزمهای سختسازی کرنل لینوکس به صورت ناخواسته الگوهای نشتی توی TLB درست میکنن و با این کار میشه آدرس اشیای حساس کرنل مثل ساختارهای heap، جداول صفحه و استک کرنل رو لو داد. روششون ترکیبیه از دستکاری تخصیصدهندهها و اندازهگیریهای شبیه Evict+Reload روی TLB و تو آزمایشها روی پردازندههای جدید اینتل و کرنلهای مدرن کار کرده.
#kernel #linux
👍2
Rust for Malware Development
https://github.com/Whitecat18/Rust-for-Malware-Development
@GoSecurity
#Rust #kernel #redteam #malware
https://github.com/Whitecat18/Rust-for-Malware-Development
@GoSecurity
#Rust #kernel #redteam #malware
GitHub
GitHub - Whitecat18/Rust-for-Malware-Development: Rust for malware Development is a repository for advanced Red Team techniques…
Rust for malware Development is a repository for advanced Red Team techniques and offensive malwares & Ransomwares, focused on Rust 🦀 - Whitecat18/Rust-for-Malware-Development
Kernel Callback Tables for Process Injection
https://github.com/0xHossam/KernelCallbackTable-Injection-PoC
@GoSecurity
#kernel #windows #exploitation #process
https://github.com/0xHossam/KernelCallbackTable-Injection-PoC
@GoSecurity
#kernel #windows #exploitation #process
GitHub
GitHub - 0xHossam/KernelCallbackTable-Injection-PoC: Proof of Concept for manipulating the Kernel Callback Table in the Process…
Proof of Concept for manipulating the Kernel Callback Table in the Process Environment Block (PEB) to perform process injection and hijack execution flow with very detailed explanation. - 0xHossam/...
Forwarded from Offensive Security (MNM)
UnderStanding The Linux Kernel 3rd Edition.pdf
5.3 MB