George’ Webb Task Force Orange Journal
Pops Then Psy-Ops

<picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!wOR5!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F4bb82c7a-bbeb-48f6-bb8b-36d108168311_1199x1312.png <svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Pops Then Psy-Ops From Political Assassination to Psychological Operations: How the Violence of the Sixties Changed the American Mind

By George Webb

There is an expression from the intelligence world that has stayed with me throughout my investigation of the 1960s: Pops.

Gunshots. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!yW6X!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F5273e960-d3c3-497d-92c7-83432deee85a_784x1168.jpeg

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Assassinations.

Political problems solved with bullets.

But what I have come to believe after years of following the JFK assassination, the RFK assassination, Marilyn Monroe, Robert Allen Hale, Laurel Canyon, Charles Manson and the strange intersection of intelligence, organized crime, defense contracting and Hollywood is that the strategy eventually became considerably more sophisticated. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!nePV!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbf3633eb-d307-400a-a642-d51f4facfd60_1536x1024.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line First came the pops. Pop the JFK sexual lures before and after popping JFK. But with RFK add a twist - pop the lures, and then psyops the Country. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!-KyR!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F26518c0d-a484-4d1a-9ff7-e4a34db002ea_1168x784.jpeg

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Let’s call it anti-war protesters are really hippie cult killers psy-ops.

The assassination of a political leader removes one person.

A psychological operation can move an entire population. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!GLrP!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2a3d8a48-fcc9-4e95-b0f1-26be0e4f8806_2010x1044.jpeg

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Sharon Tate was the replacement for Marilyn Monroe as an RFK lure and Southern California in 1968. That distinction is the subject of this article. The Pops

John F. Kennedy was murdered in Dallas on November 22, 1963.

Robert F. Kennedy was mortally wounded at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles shortly after midnight on June 5, 1968, and died the following day. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!ThHE!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F412c731b-29cc-4f31-bc61-d02e9ab10ee5_1145x1374.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Marilyn Monroe was used as a sexual lure for both JFK and RFK in Santa Monica California in 1962 just before her death.

Martin Luther King Jr. had been murdered only two months earlier.

Three enormous political figures were gone in less than five years.

Whatever conclusions readers ultimately reach about those assassinations, their political consequences were enormous. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!YCou!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F5208c945-5f69-439b-b0e5-5aad8fb2fb90_1320x2851.jpeg

&l[...]

t;svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line The story of Robert Alan Hale as a Recruiter of sexual lures for JFK and RFK is hardly known, and his involvement with the JFK and assassinations has also been lost to history. He is the original Manson, believing that if he killed women, they became part of his harem in the afterlife. He raped his older daughters, repeatedly, younger daughters in his cult before he was finally arrested. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!YBBc!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbb013c86-7401-43b5-b649-1763a6fceaa9_1290x1254.jpeg

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Robert Allen Hale took the name Sundance to infiltrate into the music scene in Southern California in 1968. Jack Nicholson stayed on his New Mexico ranch for a while around the time of the making of the movie Easy Rider.

JFK had increasingly contentious relationships with his military and intelligence establishment over Cuba, the Bay of Pigs and Cold War policy. The historical debate over precisely what Kennedy intended to do in Vietnam continues, and I don’t pretend that one presidential directive settles that debate. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!LDS-!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F39754ec6-088f-4ef0-9b32-967616b52c03_1536x1024.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Charles Manson always referred to an unnamed sniper in the woods at Spahn Ranch. I cover this extensively in my series Echoes of Laurel Canyon and Fed Manson. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!B-lD!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F072d5889-22bd-4c52-acdd-82b66c69d135_1290x1791.jpeg

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Charles Manson recorded with the Beach Boys in 1968, lived in Beach Boys Dennis Wilson’s mansion with eighteen girls mostly brought from Haight Ashbury LSD experiments, and drove Dennis Wilson’s Rolls Royce to shittle girls to Hollywood LSD parties.

What matters to my investigation is that Kennedy’s murder profoundly altered the political landscape in which Vietnam escalated.

Then came Robert Kennedy.

By 1968, RFK had emerged as a formidable Democratic presidential candidate openly criticizing the Vietnam War.

And then he was shot.

For me, those aren’t simply two murder mysteries.

They are political inflection points.

That is why I have spent years examining the people and networks around them rather than simply asking who pulled a trigger.

My JFK Files — The Angleton Angle series examines those intelligence relationships beginning with James Jesus Angleton, the CIA’s legendary counterintelligence chief and liaison to both the FBI and Israeli intelligence. (George Webb’s Intelligence Network)

The larger question has always been: Who benefited when the pops stopped? Enter the Hales

One family keeps appearing in my investigation.

The Hales.

My series A Hale Of Bullets Change American History lays out my investigative theory concerning I.B. Hale, his sons and the extraordinary number of intersections I believe deserve much more scrutiny.

I called Part One: “The Story Of The Hale Assassins That Changed Everything In US History.”

That is my thesis, not a finding by a court or government investigation.

But it is a thesis built around relationships I think investigators should examine rather than dismiss.

Robert Allen Hale becomes particularly important when the investigation moves west—from Dallas toward California and eventually Hollywood.

My later article “Candace Does CHAOS — A Word And A Name To Consider” makes the argument explic[...]

itly: Robert Allen Hale is the missing piece in the history you know.

The conventional histories of JFK, Manson and Laurel Canyon treat these episodes as separate universes.

I don’t.

That is the central difference between my investigation and the conventional narrative. Before Epstein, There Was Political Compromise

Political assassination is only half of this story.

The other half is compromise.

Sexual access.

Surveillance.

Hollywood.

Organized crime.

Intelligence collection.

And women placed close to powerful men.

One of the most important figures in this story is Marilyn Monroe.

Marilyn’s relationships with both John and Robert Kennedy have generated decades of reporting, speculation and mythology. The responsible way to approach that history is to distinguish documented relationships from the much larger claims subsequently built around them.

But the intelligence question is legitimate: Who was watching?

Who recorded what?

Who knew about the relationships?

Who possessed compromising information?

And what happened to the people who possessed it?

My own investigation places the Marilyn Monroe story inside a broader Hollywood compromise architecture, rather than treating her death merely as celebrity tragedy.

That investigation is now part of what I call Operation Hollywood.

My Substack roadmap describes the subject explicitly as: “Marilyn Monroe / JFK compromise.”

It places that investigation alongside Laurel Canyon, Lookout Mountain and the larger intersection between Hollywood and influence operations. (George Webb’s Intelligence Network)

The question isn’t whether every actress was an intelligence operative.

That would be absurd.

The question is whether Hollywood’s extraordinary access to politicians made celebrity relationships useful for surveillance and compromise. Robert Kennedy Comes to Los Angeles

Then the story reaches June 1968.

Robert Kennedy wins the California Democratic primary.

He goes to the Ambassador Hotel.

Shortly after midnight, he is shot.

Sirhan Sirhan was convicted of the murder. Any alternative account has to begin by acknowledging that fact.

But my investigation asks a different question: Who was around Kennedy, and who helped construct the social environment around powerful politicians in Los Angeles?

That leads into the Hollywood circle surrounding Sharon Tate and Roman Polanski.

I have been investigating whether those Hollywood relationships—and particularly claims concerning efforts to bring Kennedy into Hollywood social circles—were part of a larger compromise environment.

That proposition requires considerably more documentary proof before it can be stated as historical fact.

But it provides an important investigative question:

If Hollywood personalities were useful because they could provide extraordinary access to political figures, what happened to those people after the politician they were supposed to reach was dead?

An asset can become a liability remarkably quickly. From the Ambassador Hotel to Cielo Drive

Fourteen months after RFK’s assassination, Sharon Tate was murdered at 10050 Cielo Drive.

So was Abigail Folger.

So were Wojciech Frykowski, Jay Sebring and Steven Parent.

The following night, Leno and Rosemary LaBianca were murdered.

Charles Manson and members of his circle became synonymous with the killings.

America didn’t merely experience another homicide.

America experienced a cultural shock.

That difference is critical.

Because the Tate murders were not confined to a police blotter.

They became mythology.

Hollywood was terrified.

The counterculture suddenly looked dangerous.

The hippie who had previously represented flowers, music, sexual liberation and opposition to Vietnam could now be represented by something entirely different: Manson.

Drugged.

Brainwashed.

Cultish.

Violent.[...]

Murderous.

And that is where my investigation changes from pops to psy-ops. Murder Plus Fear

An assassination removes the target.

A psychological operation changes everyone watching.

That is the multiplier. Murder + publicity + fear = social transformation.

After the Tate murders, wealthy Hollywood figures understandably became concerned about personal security.

Doors were locked.

Security systems appeared.

Bodyguards became more attractive.

And that raises an intelligence question that deserves consideration without pretending we already know the answer: Who gets closer to a protected celebrity—the stranger outside the gate, or the security professional invited through it?

Security can protect someone.

Security can also create access.

That doesn’t prove that Hollywood security was systematically infiltrated.

It tells investigators where to look. The Manson Compromise

This is the territory I explore in Echoes Of Laurel Canyon.

In my January 2026 compilation, I subtitled the first five chapters: “Music, Drugs, Meet Murder.”

The series examines my hypothesis that the anti-war counterculture became a target for influence and disruption—and that sex, drugs, celebrity access and eventually spectacular violence helped transform its public image.

I describe this concept as the Manson Compromise.

Before Epstein’s mansion, there was the mansion culture surrounding the Los Angeles music scene.

Sex.

Drugs.

Rock ‘n’ roll.

Young women.

Famous musicians.

Powerful visitors.

And LSD everywhere.

The historical record establishes that American intelligence agencies experimented extensively with LSD and other behavioral techniques during the Cold War. That fact does not establish that every acid party in Laurel Canyon was CIA-directed.

My investigation asks something narrower: Where did documented intelligence programs intersect with documented people, locations and social networks?

That is why Laurel Canyon matters. Robert Allen Hale Returns

Robert Allen Hale is the figure I believe conventional treatments of the Manson story largely overlook.

In Echoes Of Laurel Canyon — Part Twelve, I examined Reeve Whitson and what I describe as the intelligence-surveillance architecture around Laurel Canyon.

The article explicitly connects that investigation with I.B. Hale and Robert Allen Hale.

Part Thirteen expands the hypothesis under the provocative title: “CIA Choices — Overthrow Guatemala Or Los Angeles?”

Part Fourteen asks an even darker question: “Only Compromising Activity Recorded — Mass Murders Not Recorded.”

These aren’t declarations that every element has been proved.

They are investigative propositions.

But put together, they create a radically different map of Los Angeles in the 1960s. What Happens When the Assets Become Liabilities?

That brings us to the uncomfortable part of this investigation.

After RFK was dead and after the counterculture began moving from useful political and cultural phenomenon toward national-security problem, what happened to the people who knew how those networks worked?

Hollywood’s late-1960s and early-1970s landscape contains an extraordinary number of premature deaths.

Some were murders.

Some were suicides.

Some were drug overdoses.

Some were accidents.

The famous “27 Club” would eventually become cultural shorthand for artists dying extraordinarily young.

Brian Jones died at 27.

Jimi Hendrix died at 27.

Janis Joplin died at 27.

Jim Morrison died at 27.

Those deaths have individual documented circumstances, and their shared age is not evidence that they were murdered by one organization.

But an investigator shouldn’t stop at the numerology anyway.

The better question is: What happened to the wider social network around Laurel Canyon as drugs became more potent, addiction increased, relationships[...]

fractured and people possessing potentially valuable information died?

That’s a much more testable question.

Follow the people.

Follow the houses.

Follow the doctors.

Follow the drugs.

Follow the security personnel.

Follow the recording studios.

Follow the defense and intelligence connections.

Follow the surveillance. The Genius of Fear

The most powerful weapon wasn’t LSD.

It wasn’t even a gun.

It was fear.

Imagine the psychological transformation.

Before Manson, Middle America looks at the counterculture and sees long hair, marijuana, free love and children refusing to fight in Vietnam.

Parents may dislike it.

They may consider it immoral.

But it is still recognizable as youthful rebellion.

After Manson, the same parent can be encouraged to see something much more frightening: Your daughter could join a cult. Your son could become a drug addict. Your children could be brainwashed. Those peaceful hippies could become murderers.

Whether anyone deliberately engineered that transformation is the historical question my investigation is pursuing.

But there is little question that the cultural transformation itself occurred.

Manson became the nightmare face of the counterculture. Pops Then Psy-Ops

And that’s the progression I think deserves investigation.

First: Pops.

JFK.

RFK.

Political figures physically removed from history.

Then: Ops.

Operations involving surveillance, compromise, drugs, cultural influence and information.

Finally: Psy-Ops.

Not simply eliminating a person.

Changing what millions of Americans believed.

Changing what parents feared.

Changing what young people trusted.

Changing what Americans thought when they saw long hair, communes, psychedelic music and anti-war protesters.

One bullet can change an election.

One terrifying story repeated millions of times can change a generation.

That is the transition I am investigating. Pops remove people. Psy-ops reorganize populations. The Robert Allen Hale Question

This is why I keep returning to Robert Allen Hale.

Not because I am asking readers to accept a grand unified conspiracy on faith.

Quite the opposite.

I am asking readers to examine the connective tissue.

My George Webb Investigates Case File explains the philosophy behind this method: I don’t regard JFK, Hollywood, Laurel Canyon and the later intelligence stories as automatically isolated events merely because conventional histories place them in different books. (George Webb’s Intelligence Network)

Look at the relationships.

Look at chronology.

Look at geography.

Look at money.

Look at surveillance.

Look at who had access.

And most importantly: Look at who was useful before an event—and who became dangerous afterward.

That’s where investigations begin.

Not with a conclusion.

With a map. Follow the Series

These are the George Webb Substack articles I was able to verify directly while preparing this piece: A Hale Of Bullets Change American History — Part One: The Story Of The Hale Assassins That Changed Everything In US History
The beginning of my Hale investigation. (George Webb’s Intelligence Network) JFK Files — The Angleton Angle — Part One: CIA Mastermind Exposed In New JFK Files With Liaison Role To FBI And Israel
The opening of my James Jesus Angleton/JFK investigation. (George Webb’s Intelligence Network) JFK Files — The Angleton Angle — Part Three: Dead FBI Agent’s Society
My continuation of the JFK intelligence-file investigation. (George Webb’s Intelligence Network) Echoes Of Laurel Canyon — Chapter One To Five: Music, Drugs, Meet Murder
The consolidated starting point for the Laurel Canyon investigation and my transition from political assassination toward cultural influence operations. (George Webb’s Intelligence Network) Echoes Of Laurel Canyon[...]

— Part Twelve: A Name You Don’t Know — Reeve Whitson, CIA’s Shadow Of Laurel Canyon
Whitson, surveillance and the Hale connection. (George Webb’s Intelligence Network) Echoes Of Laurel Canyon — Part Thirteen: CIA Choices — Overthrow Guatemala Or Los Angeles?
My Operation Hollywood hypothesis. (George Webb’s Intelligence Network) Echoes Of Laurel Canyon — Part Fourteen: Only Compromising Activity Recorded — Mass Murders Not Recorded
The compromise-versus-murder question surrounding Cielo Drive. (George Webb’s Intelligence Network) Echoes Of Laurel Canyon — Part Sixteen: Mossad Godfathers Vs. Italian Godfathers
The investigation’s organized-crime/intelligence dimension. (George Webb’s Intelligence Network) Candace Does CHAOS — A Word And A Name To Consider: Robert Allen Hale Is The Missing Piece In The History You Know
My more recent return to Hale and the Manson investigation. (George Webb’s Intelligence Network) Start Here: Roadmap To Deep State Takedown
My broader investigation index, including Operation Hollywood, the Marilyn Monroe/JFK compromise investigation, Laurel Canyon and Lookout Mountain. (George Webb’s Intelligence Network)

There are additional Hale, JFK and RFK installments in my archive that I have not linked here because I would rather omit a link than invent one. They should be added to this index as their exact Substack URLs are verified. The Question That Remains

The twentieth century taught intelligence services that killing a leader could change history.

But it also taught them something potentially much more powerful.

You don’t necessarily have to kill millions of people to control millions of people.

You can frighten them.

Give them an unforgettable image.

Give them a villain.

Give them a cult.

Give them drugs.

Give them a mansion.

Give them beautiful victims.

Give television the pictures.

And allow the population to do the rest.

That is the dividing line I want readers to keep in mind as we continue through Operation Hollywood. Pops kill the individual. Psy-ops target the audience.

And somewhere between Dallas, the Ambassador Hotel, Laurel Canyon and Cielo Drive, I believe that transition is worth investigating.

Great Ideas with Peter Duke

George’ Webb Task Force Orange Journal
The Last Jarrah — Part Two

<picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!MOhU!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fe8049fd2-2c3c-409a-90ea-2ea0610424e4_1536x1024.png <svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line The Last Jarrah — Part Two <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!UKFx!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F30c52641-966d-4347-a874-d71fadd8ddd1_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line The Twenty-Five-Year Window: EIJ, the Jarrah Intelligence Question, and the Pentagon Ledger

By George Webb <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Hud0!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1cd5c325-2651-4449-b91e-e0679b524fa0_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Three months before September 11, Osama bin Laden did not suddenly enter the story. He had been involved with the Afghan jihad, al-Qaeda, and Ayman al-Zawahiri’s Egyptian network for years.

What happened in 2001 was the formal merger of Egyptian Islamic Jihad with al-Qaeda.

That distinction may be more important than it sounds.

A merger tells us which name appeared on the organization at the end. It does not necessarily tell us where the planners, operational experience, communications channels, financial conduits, or intelligence penetrations began. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!NVua!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F5802e773-3c59-43d6-af62-b7a5dc00f738_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line In Part One of The Last Jarrah, I started with one name.

Jarrah.

For most Americans, that name means Ziad Jarrah, the Lebanese member of the Hamburg group whom the 9/11 Commission identified as the pilot-hijacker of United Airlines Flight 93.

But there was another Jarrah.

Ali al-Jarrah. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Umsg!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2a7aeef6-8c7a-4272-acdb-cc91e2385083_1024x1536.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Years after September 11, Lebanese authorities alleged that Ali al-Jarrah—a cousin of Ziad Jarrah—had worked for Israeli intelligence for approximately twenty-five years.

Not twenty-five weeks.

Not twenty-five months.

Twenty-five years. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!8OK_!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F424cfabc-cc5f-4508-bde7-d4ed169742c0_1374x1145.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line If that chronology is substantially correct, Ali’s alleged intelligence relationship began around 1983. It existed before the 9/11 operation, during the 9/11 operation, and for years afterward.

That does not prove that Ali handled Ziad.

It does not prove that Ali knew what Ziad was doing.

And it does not prove that Israeli intelligence directed the September 11 attacks.

But it creates an intelligence question that should have been asked long ago:

How deeply had Israeli intelligence mapped the people, families, communications, and financial channels surrounding the radical networks of Lebanon and Egypt before 9/11? <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!_5SK!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F11[...]

2da085-da80-4e72-adf1-c551c2999a12_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Start With What Is Documented

On May 18, 2009, Lebanon transmitted a letter to the United Nations describing alleged Israeli espionage operations on Lebanese territory. The document identified Ali Dib El-Jarrah and Youssef Dib El-Jarrah among those arrested. Lebanon alleged that the men confessed to spying for Israel, including identifying coordinates of sensitive Lebanese positions. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!D8DD!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F205419eb-4e8a-435d-947e-86b7b8ef78a1_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Contemporary reporting described Ali’s alleged work as photographing military positions, facilities, and supply routes; communicating with handlers; and receiving money and equipment. Reporting also identified him as a cousin of Ziad Jarrah while cautioning that the two men were approximately twenty years apart and did not appear to have known each other well.

That caution belongs in the story.

So does the family connection. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!3RCn!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2a18a424-6ce1-4746-9555-073a8c509898_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Here is the evidentiary line I will not cross without documents: I have not found a public record proving that Ali financed Egyptian Islamic Jihad, helped create it, recruited Ziad, handled Ziad, or passed information about the 9/11 plot to Israeli intelligence.

Those claims would require bank records, handler reports, communications intercepts, interrogation transcripts, or credible witness testimony. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!80C2!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F5928425e-111d-476b-94f3-4f57da029a3b_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line The public record does establish something narrower but still remarkable: Lebanese authorities alleged that an Israeli intelligence asset had existed inside the extended family of a central 9/11 operative for almost two decades before the attacks.

That is not a conclusion.

It is a very good lead.

And good investigations begin by refusing to throw away leads simply because they complicate the official story.

Before Al-Qaeda, Follow EIJ <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Wl71!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb917a47d-d343-416c-ad61-d1da4cd2cbb1_1320x1535.jpeg

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line The familiar 9/11 narrative focuses on Osama bin Laden. His face became the face of the attack. His organization became the name attached to the attack.

But Egyptian Islamic Jihad had its own history, its own leadership, its own operational experience, and its own relationships with intelligence services across the Middle East. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!49Gk!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F450851f8-250f-44e0-98dd-6ef002a67638_1320x2189.jpeg

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Egyptian militant factions formed during the late 1970s. Members of that broader radical environment participated in the 1981 assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat. Ayman al-Zawahiri eventually became Egyptian Islamic Jihad’s best-known leader. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!_zfH!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsu[...]

bstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2dcbf2a8-8fd7-4803-a49e-97965c0c0619_1320x1313.jpeg

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line EIJ did not suddenly materialize in the summer of 2001. Its members had been organizing, traveling, fundraising, recruiting, and conducting operations for years. EIJ veterans brought experience in clandestine organization, security, assassination planning, forged documentation, and international movement.

The United Nations and the United States Treasury describe EIJ as an organization that merged with al-Qaeda in 2001. But EIJ personnel had worked with bin Laden’s network well before that formal merger. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!X6mY!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F02f03c80-d1ee-4519-9a61-f14db1a8c73d_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line That raises a different question from the one normally asked:

Was EIJ merely absorbed by bin Laden—or did EIJ provide much of the operational brain that the public later learned to call al-Qaeda?

The merger occurred only months before September 11. That timing matters. But it does not mean bin Laden arrived only three months before the attacks.

According to the 9/11 Commission, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed proposed an aircraft operation to bin Laden by approximately 1996, and bin Laden approved the operation in late 1998 or early 1999. The Hamburg pilots entered the developing plot well before the formal EIJ–al-Qaeda merger. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!MZpJ!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1735f02d-62f8-4021-b3d6-8cf10e3f0106_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line The more precise—and potentially more revealing—hypothesis is this:

The al-Qaeda label was finalized shortly before 9/11, allowing the public history to emphasize bin Laden while paying far less attention to the older Egyptian operational network surrounding Zawahiri.

That is the thread I want to pull. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!sL1T!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F84d1e15f-fad0-4376-99b5-cc07d6fe1d87_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Who Had Penetrated Egyptian Islamic Jihad?

Intelligence services do not ordinarily ignore an organization committed to assassinating presidents, overthrowing governments, and attacking embassies.

They recruit inside it.

They map its families.

They trace its money.

They watch its travel.

They compromise its communications.

The question is not whether EIJ attracted intelligence attention. The question is how deeply it had been penetrated—and what those intelligence services did with the information they collected. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Ql3Q!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F73753323-5152-456c-9c2a-92e5ed20ccd6_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line My working hypothesis is that Israeli and other regional intelligence services attempted to penetrate Egyptian radical organizations early in their development. What remains unproved is whether any penetration went beyond passive collection into financing, protection, manipulation, or provocation.

That distinction is critical.

An informant inside a dangerous organization may help prevent an attack. But a protected network can also be permitted to continue because it provides intelligence, leverage, or geopolitical utility. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!AJzU!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%[...]

3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc4b368d3-61c9-4be6-91fc-e8d119bb6092_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line So I want the names.

Who were the intelligence sources inside EIJ?

When were they recruited?

Who paid them?

Which financial organizations moved their money?

Which communications channels were monitored?

Did Israeli intelligence maintain files on the extended Jarrah family? <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!nb-t!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc3b91cb6-f078-4197-b40d-ab8e95f19f50_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Did Ali al-Jarrah ever mention Ziad’s studies in Germany, his repeated trips to Lebanon, or his flight training in the United States?

Those are questions.

They are not accusations.

But they are exactly the questions an intelligence investigation should ask.

In Cracking 9/11 — Part One: Follow the Comms, I argued that encrypted communications provide a better investigative trail than another round of speculation about collapsing buildings. In George Webb’s Awan Minutes to Midnight — Part One, I followed that communications trail into the years immediately preceding 9/11.

The devices change.

The server names change.

The cutouts change.

But the investigative method does not change.

Follow the comms.

Follow the travel.

Follow the money. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!8Ko3!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0fd5bd13-ed13-4f29-95f3-d013fddb354d_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line From Emergency Support to Permanent Influence

There is another twenty-five-year transformation that deserves examination.

American Jewish organizations raised private support for Israel long before 1975, including during periods of war and national emergency. Over time, American support for Israel became more permanently institutionalized through congressional appropriations, lobbying, military assistance, intelligence cooperation, and joint defense programs. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!rBJz!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F4d4ff15b-b9dc-4488-b2da-a2bd4d647144_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line AIPAC had existed since the 1950s and became increasingly influential after the 1973 Arab-Israeli War. It is important to be precise: during the period examined here, AIPAC was principally a lobbying organization. It did not establish its own federal political action committee until 2021, although politically active pro-Israel donors and separate PACs had operated for decades. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!NscD!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F897c20b0-e555-4c68-8b34-f83f36214e80_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line My reporting question is not whether Americans were legally permitted to support Israel. Of course they were.

The question is whether the middle 1970s marked a transition from episodic private fundraising toward a durable system of congressional influence, military assistance, joint programs, classified cooperation, and spending that became increasingly difficult for the public to trace. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!wCRf!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F7df45471-1f34-40e6-a6e5-9a530162110c_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line That is a document questio[...]

n.

It requires appropriations records.

It requires presidential directives.

It requires defense agreements.

It requires declassified intelligence files.

And it requires something that Washington has resisted for decades:

An auditable ledger. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!yzrI!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fe21bd966-d36e-4578-a9ab-57b88d1e2000_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line The Rumsfeld Bookends

Donald Rumsfeld first became secretary of defense on November 20, 1975, under President Gerald Ford. He served until January 20, 1977.

Nearly twenty-four years later, Rumsfeld returned to the Pentagon under President George W. Bush. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!GDVy!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F230a0ce2-4196-4910-9604-84d83d9f3fc4_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line On September 10, 2001, Rumsfeld gave a major speech about the Pentagon bureaucracy and the Department of Defense’s antiquated financial systems. He said that, according to some estimates, the department could not track $2.3 trillion in transactions.

That statement has acquired a mythology of its own, so precision is necessary.

Rumsfeld did not announce that $2.3 trillion in cash had disappeared. He referred to accounting transactions that could not be reliably tracked or supported through the Pentagon’s fragmented, outdated, and incompatible financial systems. The underlying accounting problem had been publicly reported before September 10. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!1lgE!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fce46d4b4-ab35-415b-85a1-d3967dce85ea_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line But correcting the exaggeration does not make the real problem disappear.

A defense department unable to produce a reliable audit trail creates an ideal environment for waste, fraud, misclassification, concealed transfers, and programs shielded from meaningful oversight.

That environment deserves investigation.

It is not proof that untraceable transactions went to Israel, EIJ, or any other specific recipient. But it tells us why tracing covert relationships through official ledgers can become extraordinarily difficult.

I have repeatedly returned to the systems beneath the public narrative. Some News Is Just Too Big explains why today’s investigation so often leads back to work begun twenty years earlier. The George Webb Investigates Case File provides the broader roadmap connecting my investigations into 9/11, intelligence networks, encrypted communications, biological programs, and political influence. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!zSUA!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0f262bf3-afbe-4776-8181-43eb0613ee53_1536x1024.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line The signal is rarely located in one sensational number.

It is found in the system that made the number impossible to explain.

Who Was Killed in the Pentagon?

American Airlines Flight 77 struck the western side of the Pentagon on September 11. The attack killed military personnel, civilian employees, contractors, budget analysts, and financial-management personnel. It destroyed offices, records, computers, and human lives.

This has generated a persistent claim that the plane killed the precise auditors responsible for discovering the $2.3 trillion accounting problem.

That claim should not be repeated as fact without individual names, job assignments, office locations, and project records. <pictureh[...]

ttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!H0RE!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F7e474682-fe72-490d-b797-dd49c3138a3a_1536x1024.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line The Pentagon strike killed people working in budget and financial offices. That is documented.

But did it eliminate the specific audit team responsible for the $2.3 trillion finding?

I have not yet found a personnel roster and project-assignment record that proves it.

That does not end the investigation.

It defines the next document request.

Who was working on which reconciliation project?

The Pentagon strike killed people working in budget and financial offices. That is documented.

But did it eliminate the specific audit team responsible for the $2.3 trillion finding?

I have not yet found a personnel roster and project-assignment record that proves it.

That does not end the investigation.

It defines the next document request.

Who was working on which reconciliation project?

Where were the duplicate records stored?

Which databases survived?

Which contracts and transactions were being examined?

Which investigations continued after the attack, and which quietly disappeared?

The incredible coincidence of the 9/11 hijacker hitting the office of the Pentagon auditors is uncanny, and that’s where shoe-leather reporting begins.
Flight 93, Windber, and the Wider Investigation

The Jarrah question does not exist in isolation from the geography surrounding Flight 93.

In Where Was Robert Malone on 9/11?, I examined the Windber Research Institute and the people reportedly meeting there on the morning of September 11. In Cracking 9/11 — Part Six: Ten Questions for Bob Malone, I laid out the questions concerning Windber, the Flight 93 crash site, and the anthrax attacks that followed. Hone Malone — Getting the HIV Band Back Together Again followed those personnel relationships further. These articles present my prior reporting and hypotheses; they are not substitutes for original records. Their value is that they preserve the investigative map—the names, places, timelines, and unanswered questions that can be tested against documents.

That same method applies to Ali and Ziad Jarrah.

Do not begin with the conclusion.

Begin with the record.

Then build the timeline.

Then ask who knew whom.

The Larger Intelligence Architecture

My 9/11 reporting repeatedly intersects with older intelligence, financial, and technology networks.

In Epstein’s Connections With Ehud Barak Reach Back to Iran-Contra and 9/11, I followed encrypted communications and financial relationships across those eras. Who Shot the Sheriff? examined the Israeli “art student” story and the intelligence environment surrounding American law enforcement before 9/11. Ehud Barak, Les Wexner, and Jeff Epstein Were Godfathers of Palantir explored the overlap among private money, intelligence relationships, data systems, and surveillance. CIA-Sponsored Dr. Soon-Shiong Hides John Brennan returned to the Flight 93 and Windber questions through another set of institutional relationships.

Finally, Chasing the Signal — The Final Chapter explains why I have spent twenty-five years following these overlapping trails.

None of those connections should be treated as proof merely because two names appear on the same map.

But intelligence investigations are built by mapping recurring people, companies, communications systems, money routes, and government programs—then obtaining the documents that show whether the connections are operational, incidental, or imaginary.

That is what The Last Jarrah is trying to do.

My Working Hypothesis

Here is the hypothesis I want to test.

EIJ was penetrated by regional and Western intelligence services long before September 11. Its experienced personnel played a larger operational role in the development of al-Qaeda than the simpli[...]

fied “bin Laden did it” narrative suggests. The formal 2001 merger then collapsed several older organizational and intelligence trails into one public name: al-Qaeda.

A second hypothesis concerns the money. The Pentagon’s unauditable financial systems could conceal classified transfers, joint programs, and covert expenditures from effective public oversight.

But an unauditable system is not proof of a particular covert transfer.

Ali al-Jarrah’s reported Israeli intelligence relationship is not proof that he financed EIJ.

The EIJ–al-Qaeda merger is not proof that bin Laden was merely a late-arriving cover figure.

The Pentagon impact is not proof that auditors were deliberately targeted.

These are hypotheses to investigate—not conclusions to assume.

That distinction matters because a strong investigation should survive contact with the documents.

Show Me the Documents

Here is what should be obtained next:

1. Ali al-Jarrah’s Lebanese interrogation, prosecution, and trial records.

2. Payment records, dead-drop evidence, travel records, and seized communications equipment associated with Ali and Youssef al-Jarrah.

3. Israeli records concerning Ali, Youssef, Ziad, and the extended Jarrah family.

4. Ziad Jarrah’s complete travel and communications history in Lebanon, Germany, and the United States.

5. Intelligence reporting on Egyptian Islamic Jihad from 1979 through 2001.

6. Records identifying intelligence sources operating inside EIJ.

7. Financial records connecting named intermediaries and organizations to EIJ.

8. Documents memorializing the 2001 EIJ–al-Qaeda merger.

9. Pentagon accounting reports and transaction-level data underlying the $2.3 trillion estimate.

10. The names, offices, and project assignments of Pentagon financial personnel killed on September 11.

11. Records identifying which Pentagon financial databases and physical files were destroyed, duplicated, or reconstructed.

12. Lawfully declassified U.S.–Israel defense agreements, transfers, and joint programs from 1975 through 2001.

Show me.

Show me the bank transfer.

Show me the handler report.

Show me the travel manifest.

Show me the audit assignment.

Show me the communications intercept.

That is how a working hypothesis becomes a documented case—or is disproved by the evidence.

The Twenty-Five-Year Window

Twenty-five years is the number that connects this investigation.

Approximately twenty-five years from Rumsfeld’s first arrival at the Pentagon to his return in 2001.

Approximately twenty-five years in which Ali al-Jarrah was alleged to have worked for Israeli intelligence.

And twenty-five years since the public was told that one organization, under one famous Saudi name, explained September 11.

The available documents do not yet prove that Ali financed EIJ.

They do not prove that Mossad created EIJ.

They do not prove that Pentagon accounting problems concealed transfers to Israel.

And they do not prove that Flight 77 deliberately targeted the auditors.

But they tell us where to look.

Follow the Jarrahs.

Follow EIJ before the merger.

Follow the intelligence penetrations.

Follow the transactions—not merely the talking points.

The purpose of Part Two is not to declare the case closed.

It is to identify the records that could finally open it.

Primary and Background Sources

● The 9/11 Commission Report — official chronology of the plot, the Hamburg contingent, Ziad Jarrah, and Flight 93.

● United Nations Security Council: Egyptian Islamic Jihad — U.N. sanctions summary for EIJ.

● U.S. Treasury: Treasury Designates Seven Al-Qaida Associates — describes EIJ as having merged with al-Qaeda in 2001.

● Department of Defense Key Officials, 1947–2012 — official chronology of Rumsfeld’s first tenure as secretary of defense.

● Congressional hearing quoting Rumsfeld’s $2.3 trillion statement — government record of the accounting language.

● House hearing on Pentagon financial [...]

management — background on longstanding Pentagon accounting failures.

● Contemporary overview of the Lebanese espionage cases — reporting on Ali al-Jarrah and the Lebanese allegations.

● Reuters examination of the $2.3 trillion claim — distinguishes untraceable accounting transactions from missing cash.

● AIPAC: About — AIPAC’s description of its organization, funding, and mission.

● Federal Election Commission: AIPAC PAC — federal registration and filings for AIPAC’s political action committee.

George Webb Reporting Archive — 12 Related Articles

1. The Last Jarrah

2. Cracking 9/11 — Part One: Follow the Comms

3. George Webb’s Awan Minutes to Midnight — Part One

4. Some News Is Just Too Big

5. The George Webb Investigates Case File

6. Cracking 9/11 — Part Six: Ten Questions for Bob Malone

7. Where Was Robert Malone on 9/11?

8. Hone Malone — Getting the HIV Band Back Together Again

9. Epstein’s Connections With Ehud Barak Reach Back to Iran-Contra and 9/11

10. Who Shot the Sheriff?

11. Ehud Barak, Les Wexner, and Jeff Epstein Were Godfathers of Palantir

12. Chasing the Signal — The Final Chapter

George Webb’s Intelligence Network is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support twenty-five years of independent investigative reporting, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

George’ Webb Task Force Orange Journal
We Still Have Great Leads in the Fauci Investigation

<picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!3sIk!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F9d53fcc7-0ae0-4fa0-82b4-00e5a22c0da1_1536x1024.png <svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line We Still Have Great Leads in the Fauci Investigation Six years after the first COVID questions, the investigation is not running out of road. It is becoming a document hunt.

By George Webb
The message in the video above is simple: We still have great leads in the Fauci investigation.

That doesn’t mean I have proved every theory I have investigated concerning Anthony Fauci, COVID-19, gain-of-function research, biodefense programs, or the vaccine-development pipeline.

It means something much more useful to an investigative reporter. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!6PMQ!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F99250450-5374-4ce5-9f5d-44308f7a98ef_1536x1024.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line There are still leads that can be tested. Documents that can be requested. People who can be interviewed. Contracts that can be traced. Laboratories that can be visited. Timelines that can be reconstructed.

And that has been the organizing principle of this investigation from the beginning.

My reporting has never depended upon one document suddenly appearing with “the answer” printed across the top.

It has been a six-year attempt to reconstruct a system. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!U4O3!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F51d3d1f4-1cb3-4481-a4f2-3a95c7ee159a_1536x1024.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line The Investigation Didn’t Begin With Fauci

Long before Fauci and Me, I was asking a broader question: how did the American biodefense establishment evolve into the enormous network of military laboratories, public-health agencies, universities, pharmaceutical companies and private contractors that existed when COVID arrived?

That is the road mapped in my George Webb Investigates Case File⁠.

It is also why my reporting repeatedly returns to geography.

Fort Detrick. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!p_fU!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F4572c2ed-3840-4e87-8306-fcfe2cebbe27_1204x652.jpeg

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Fort Belvoir. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!P47c!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fa4a37d52-3c87-4a05-8fe5-e1bb597195ff_1174x668.jpeg

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line UNC. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!9kqy!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1a165c51-8ae1-45eb-ad01-5d9b9d156078_1190x659.jpeg

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line UTMB. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!1qig!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F8ce9cc4a-2730-483e-ad53-7b8837c1b22f_1672x941.png

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Erasmus Medical Center. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Uzjh!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-med[...]

ia.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbaef4cd2-b3fa-4873-80be-f7e1c5b008b8_640x360.jpeg

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Wuhan.

DARPA programs. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!lmcG!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F42ca2304-33e5-4bd8-a016-419c3cce177f_1012x775.jpeg

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line NIH funding. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!fErF!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ff71b987f-8d9d-4372-aaf0-4cd15df718bc_792x990.jpeg

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Private biotechnology companies. <picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!RQeq!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb730bcf7-5411-4a1a-823b-8ae5e2eed13e_540x360.jpeg

<svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line Instead of beginning with a conclusion and looking for facts to support it, the better method is to reconstruct the network and ask which connections can actually be demonstrated.

That approach is laid out explicitly in my Start Here: Roadmap To Deep State Takedown⁠, where biodefense and pandemic networks form one of the principal investigative tracks. From the “Live Exercise” to the Paper Trail

One of the earliest organizing ideas in my COVID reporting was what I called the Coronavirus Military Live Exercise.

My Real Corona Live Exercise — Part One: Return To Patient Zero⁠ lays out that investigative theory.
The distinction between a theory and evidence remains important.

Calling something a “live exercise” does not establish who caused the pandemic. Neither does identifying a military program, a grant, a laboratory collaboration or a suspicious chronology.

Each connection has to be demonstrated independently.

That is exactly why the investigation remains alive. Fort Detrick, Fort Belvoir, UNC, UTMB and Erasmus

By July 2026, I tried to pull six years of field reporting into a single narrative.

Fauci’s Ouchies Brought To You By Citizen Journalists⁠ describes trips by citizen journalists to Fort Detrick, Fort Belvoir, Erasmus, UNC, UTMB and other locations that became part of our investigation.

That matters because investigations become much more interesting when they move beyond personalities.

Fauci is one person.

The biodefense establishment is a system.

The questions therefore become:

Who funded the research? Who administered the grants? Which laboratories performed which experiments? Which military programs overlapped with civilian research? Which intellectual property existed before the pandemic? Which companies obtained licenses? And which decisions can be reconstructed from contemporaneous documents?

Those are answerable questions. The BioAgent Odyssey

That approach became what I called the BioAgent Odyssey.

The July 2026 Book Introduction — BioAgent Odyssey, Fauci Coverup Docs Confirm All and the subsequent Full Book — BioAgent Odyssey are both indexed in my Substack archive⁠.
The archive is important because it preserves the evolution of the investigation rather than pretending that every hypothesis emerged fully formed.

Good investigations change when the evidence changes.

Some leads become stronger.

Some become weaker.

Some die.

And occasionally a document that seemed meaningless three years earlier becomes important because a second document finally supplies the missing context. Then Came Fauci and Me

In August I reorganized the investigation around a much longer chronology.

New George Webb Book — Fauci And Me⁠ introduced the idea of following two parallel paths across roughly four decades: Fauci’s [...]

scientific and government career on one side and my own developing investigation of biological programs on the other.

The point wasn’t merely autobiographical.

It was chronological.

What existed before COVID?

That question remains one of the most productive questions in the entire investigation. Go Back Before 2020

The next piece, Fauci And Me — A Technical Preface⁠, reaches much further back, into HIV/AIDS-era questions and South Africa’s documented Project Coast biological and chemical warfare program.

That article is particularly useful because it contains an important methodological qualification: the chronology matters, and later evidence should not simply be projected backward onto earlier events.

That same discipline needs to be applied to COVID.

Finding a pre-2020 coronavirus program is significant.

It isn’t automatically proof that the program produced SARS-CoV-2.

Finding pre-pandemic mRNA research is significant.

It isn’t automatically proof of a predetermined vaccine rollout. The investigative work occurs in the space between those two statements. The Convenient Emergence

The next installment was Fauci And Me — Chapter One: The Convenient Emergence, which remains indexed alongside the rest of the series on my Substack homepage and archive⁠.

Then came Chapter Two — The First Envelope And The First Spike and Fauci And Me — Chapter Three: Murder On The GP120 Express, also preserved in that archive.

Together, those pieces broaden the chronology from coronavirus into the much longer history of biological research, vaccine development and government funding that I believe needs closer examination.

The claims in those articles should be tested against primary documents, not accepted merely because I wrote them.

That’s what an investigation is. Erasmus Was Already on the Map

And this didn’t begin in 2026.

Years earlier I was writing about Erasmus and its infectious-disease research.

My October 2023 article Erasmus Blood On The Floor Connects All The Deep State Mates⁠ revisited my earlier Erasmus reporting and points readers toward books and field reporting I had already produced concerning the Rotterdam laboratory.

Again, the existence of coronavirus or influenza research at a laboratory doesn’t prove responsibility for COVID.

But it absolutely can make the laboratory’s grants, collaborations, experiments, personnel movements and funding history legitimate subjects for investigation. Then We Found the Earlier Papers

That brings us to the material I recently revisited in Operation Lockstep Part Two — The White Paper⁠.

The story centers on our citizen-research group examining a 2018 paper and trying to reconstruct the relationships among earlier biodefense programs, coronavirus research, DARPA technology, universities and government funding.

One line in that article probably summarizes the methodology better than anything else: No leaps. No assumptions.

Every connection gets a source.

Anything we cannot prove gets labeled a question.

That should be the standard for this entire investigation. And Then There Is the Vaccine Question

More recently I turned to another branch of the chronology: where the vaccine technology actually came from.

National Resilience — Where The Vaccines Really Came From⁠ presents my investigative thesis concerning the prehistory of the mRNA vaccine-development infrastructure.

That thesis needs to be tested company by company, contract by contract, patent by patent and program by program.

“Pfizer vaccine” and “Moderna vaccine” are convenient shorthand.

An investigator asks a different set of questions.

Who developed each technology?

Who funded it?

Who owned the intellectual property?

Who licensed it?

Who performed manufacturing?

Who financed manufacturing capacity?

What government contracts preceded 2020?

And what changed after the emergency began?

Those q[...]

uestions can produce documents. Why Restoring the Archive Matters

That brings me to perhaps the most important article in this whole sequence:

Restore The Archive — Fauci Criminal Evidence Is Needed⁠.

Whatever one thinks of my conclusions, thousands of hours of field reporting constitute a historical research archive.

Interviews.

Laboratory visits.

Conferences.

Documents held up to cameras.

Conversations with sources.

Locations.

Dates.

Names.

Vehicles.

Flights.

Corporate relationships.

Research leads that appeared insignificant at the time.

An archive allows those claims to be checked.

Destroy the archive and you don’t merely erase my conclusions. You erase the ability of somebody else to challenge them.

That is why preservation matters. We Still Have Great Leads

So when I say in this video that we still have great leads in the Fauci investigation, I don’t mean we need another round of internet speculation.

I mean almost the opposite.

We have enough hypotheses.

Now we need records.

Grant applications.

Subcontracts.

Statements of work.

Patent assignments.

Material-transfer agreements.

Laboratory notebooks where obtainable.

Emails.

Meeting calendars.

Travel records.

Conference programs.

Procurement records.

Clinical-development agreements.

Corporate registrations.

Government audits.

Congressional exhibits.

And testimony that can be compared against contemporaneous documents.

That is where this investigation goes next.

My broader Chasing the Signal⁠ project explains the philosophy: the signal is usually buried underneath enormous amounts of noise.

The job isn’t to make the loudest allegation.

The job is to keep reducing the number of things that cannot be explained by the documents.

Six years later, I don’t think the Fauci investigation is exhausted.

I think we have finally accumulated enough history to ask better questions.

And better questions produce better document requests. We still have great leads. Now follow the documents.

George’ Webb Task Force Orange Journal
Why I Wrote “City Of London Hopscotch”

<picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!hxye!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F70e58e81-50b5-4256-85ef-ea85bbbf7a80_1826x874.png <svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line

Why I Wrote “City Of London Hopscotch”

For most of my childhood, Americans were taught to see the Cold War through the Domino Theory.

The argument was simple: if Vietnam fell to communism, the next country would fall, then the next, and then the next—like a row of dominoes. That theory became one of the principal arguments for America’s escalating involve…

Read more

George’ Webb Task Force Orange Journal
Why I Wrote “Hollywood Bus” - Yes, Manson’s

<picturehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!3nku!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ff4d30b47-3acd-4b4f-b398-55a5ceaa6826_1536x1024.png <svg<g<path<svg<polyline<polyline<line<line

Why I Wrote “Hollywood Bus”

Most people meet Charles Manson in 1969.

That is the Charles Manson of Helter Skelter: Spahn Ranch, the Tate-LaBianca murders, frightened Hollywood celebrities and a collection of young women transformed into killers.

But that isn’t where my Hollywood Bus story begins.

I wanted to back the film up two years and ask a different qu…

Read more