CANADIAN GP - ACCELERATION TIMES
Nobody was as quick as Bearman at the start: he reached 200km/h one-tenth sooner than the next quickest drivers (HAD, HUL, HAM)! π
HAM and BOR needed just 2.1s to go from 100km/h to 200km/h: these cars are insane! π€―
Best starter on Hards (SAI) was 2 tenths slower to 200km/h than the best starter on Mediums (BEA).
Nobody was as quick as Bearman at the start: he reached 200km/h one-tenth sooner than the next quickest drivers (HAD, HUL, HAM)! π
HAM and BOR needed just 2.1s to go from 100km/h to 200km/h: these cars are insane! π€―
Best starter on Hards (SAI) was 2 tenths slower to 200km/h than the best starter on Mediums (BEA).
β€7π₯2π1
Formula Data Analysis
CANADIAN GP - ACCELERATION TIMES Nobody was as quick as Bearman at the start: he reached 200km/h one-tenth sooner than the next quickest drivers (HAD, HUL, HAM)! π HAM and BOR needed just 2.1s to go from 100km/h to 200km/h: these cars are insane! π€― Bestβ¦
Acceleration times per compound π
π₯7β€1π1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
So... I did somethingπ¬
I'm teaming up with JMP to organise an F1-themed data analysis summer challenge!π€©
You'll analyse the data from an F1 race: laptimes, compounds, pit stops, speed traps, you name it!π
Same data for everyone: may the best among you win!
Info in commentπ
I'm teaming up with JMP to organise an F1-themed data analysis summer challenge!π€©
You'll analyse the data from an F1 race: laptimes, compounds, pit stops, speed traps, you name it!π
Same data for everyone: may the best among you win!
Info in commentπ
π₯°12β€4π1π₯1
Formula Data Analysis
So... I did somethingπ¬ I'm teaming up with JMP to organise an F1-themed data analysis summer challenge!π€© You'll analyse the data from an F1 race: laptimes, compounds, pit stops, speed traps, you name it!π Same data for everyone: may the best among you win!β¦
1) SIGN UP
2) DOWNLOAD a JMP free trial and the dataset
3) CREATE your analysis in JMP, and submit it
I will be on the jury alongside other experts. The winners will present their findings in a webinar and will also receive a LEGO F1 car! π§±
Click here:
https://www.jmp.com/en/offers/summer-challenge/motorsport?utm_source=fdanalysis&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=701Ki000000EZJgIAO
See you at the challenge!
2) DOWNLOAD a JMP free trial and the dataset
3) CREATE your analysis in JMP, and submit it
I will be on the jury alongside other experts. The winners will present their findings in a webinar and will also receive a LEGO F1 car! π§±
Click here:
https://www.jmp.com/en/offers/summer-challenge/motorsport?utm_source=fdanalysis&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=701Ki000000EZJgIAO
See you at the challenge!
β€11
AUSTRIA PREVIEW
C3-C5 compounds (as last year);
Optimal strategy was 2 stops (Starting on Mediums, alternating Mediums and Hards).
KEY FEATURES:
- 700m altitude (~7% lower air density β‘οΈLess drag and downforce).
- Fewest corners (10), shortest laptime (1'02"939 pole in 2020).
- Requires balance: traction, braking, medium and high-speed cornering, power and drag are all important.
RACE PACE 2024
VER and NOR were very close in performance; RUS capitalised on their crash to win! PIA didn't have the updated car. RBR and McL were quickest, Mercedes and Ferrari not far off them.
πΈ @pirellisport
C3-C5 compounds (as last year);
Optimal strategy was 2 stops (Starting on Mediums, alternating Mediums and Hards).
KEY FEATURES:
- 700m altitude (~7% lower air density β‘οΈLess drag and downforce).
- Fewest corners (10), shortest laptime (1'02"939 pole in 2020).
- Requires balance: traction, braking, medium and high-speed cornering, power and drag are all important.
RACE PACE 2024
VER and NOR were very close in performance; RUS capitalised on their crash to win! PIA didn't have the updated car. RBR and McL were quickest, Mercedes and Ferrari not far off them.
πΈ @pirellisport
π6π₯5β€3
AUSTRIAN GP - REAR WINGS
- Track layout requires medium-low downforce (many straights; medium-high speed corners present but not prevalent).
- Lower air density (~7%), however, forces teams to claw back some of the lost downforce.
Load levels (Highest to lowest):
Aston / Alpineβ«
McL
Haas / Ferrari
Mercedes / RBR
Racing Bullsβ¬
πΈ @AlbertFabrega
- Track layout requires medium-low downforce (many straights; medium-high speed corners present but not prevalent).
- Lower air density (~7%), however, forces teams to claw back some of the lost downforce.
Load levels (Highest to lowest):
Aston / Alpineβ«
McL
Haas / Ferrari
Mercedes / RBR
Racing Bullsβ¬
πΈ @AlbertFabrega
β€11π₯2π1
FP2 DATA RECAP: Pole is π§McL's to lose...
1) BEST SECTOR GAPS:
π§NOR dominated the session, being quickest in all sectors! McL is the clear favourite here: McL 1-2 in Sectors 1 and 3 (STR was second quickest in S2).
2) TOP SPEEDS:
π©Aston and π¦RBR (+ ANT) had the best top speeds, which does not seem due to a higher engine mode.
Williams is running TONS of drag: they need to reduce that to be able to attack/defend (nor PU-related).
3) MINISECTORS - NOR/VER/STR
NOR dominated over half of the lap: fantastic traction (out of T1, T3, T4, T10) but high-speed cornering was excellent too (T6-7, T9-10). RBR and Aston, combined, were only quicker on the straights (lower drag).
What's your prediction? π€
1) BEST SECTOR GAPS:
π§NOR dominated the session, being quickest in all sectors! McL is the clear favourite here: McL 1-2 in Sectors 1 and 3 (STR was second quickest in S2).
2) TOP SPEEDS:
π©Aston and π¦RBR (+ ANT) had the best top speeds, which does not seem due to a higher engine mode.
Williams is running TONS of drag: they need to reduce that to be able to attack/defend (nor PU-related).
3) MINISECTORS - NOR/VER/STR
NOR dominated over half of the lap: fantastic traction (out of T1, T3, T4, T10) but high-speed cornering was excellent too (T6-7, T9-10). RBR and Aston, combined, were only quicker on the straights (lower drag).
What's your prediction? π€
β€10π4
LONG RUNS - Austrian GP is looking spicy π₯
π΄SOFT:
1) HAM
2) VER +0.145s
π‘MEDIUM:
1) NOR
2) ANT +0.144s
3) LEC +0.201s
βͺοΈHARD:
1) PIA
2) SAI +0.340s
3) ALB +0.498s
Longest stints: ANT (14 push laps), TSU (13);
ALB's tyres had 26 laps by the end of the stint!
McL is the clear favorite.
Ferrari is not looking bad.
ANT did a streak of 8 extremely fast laps! (his pace dropped afterwards) .
π΄SOFT:
1) HAM
2) VER +0.145s
π‘MEDIUM:
1) NOR
2) ANT +0.144s
3) LEC +0.201s
βͺοΈHARD:
1) PIA
2) SAI +0.340s
3) ALB +0.498s
Longest stints: ANT (14 push laps), TSU (13);
ALB's tyres had 26 laps by the end of the stint!
McL is the clear favorite.
Ferrari is not looking bad.
ANT did a streak of 8 extremely fast laps! (his pace dropped afterwards) .
β€9
My VERY extensive βQuali and race previewβ article (2500+ words, over 19 images/analyses from FP2) π
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/austrian-gp-quali-race-preview-3800589
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/austrian-gp-quali-race-preview-3800589
β€8π₯°1
AUSTRIAN GP - RACE PACE
McL dominated the race, finishing almost 20s in front of the next best car (Ferrari/LEC) and lapping everyone but the top 7!
Both Saubers within 1-2 tenths of RUS.
LAW and ALO had an excellent pace despite the one-stopper: brilliant race.
PACE
1) π§ NOR quickest
2) π§ PIA +0.03s/lap
3) π₯ LEC +0.27
4) π₯ HAM +0.43
5) π© RUS +0.91
Who surprised you the most? π€π
McL dominated the race, finishing almost 20s in front of the next best car (Ferrari/LEC) and lapping everyone but the top 7!
Both Saubers within 1-2 tenths of RUS.
LAW and ALO had an excellent pace despite the one-stopper: brilliant race.
PACE
1) π§ NOR quickest
2) π§ PIA +0.03s/lap
3) π₯ LEC +0.27
4) π₯ HAM +0.43
5) π© RUS +0.91
Who surprised you the most? π€π
β€8π1π₯1
Formula Data Analysis
AUSTRIAN GP - RACE PACE McL dominated the race, finishing almost 20s in front of the next best car (Ferrari/LEC) and lapping everyone but the top 7! Both Saubers within 1-2 tenths of RUS. LAW and ALO had an excellent pace despite the one-stopper: brilliantβ¦
McLaren is dominating this season: they have scored 417 points in 11 races, just 2 less than their two main rivals COMBINED! π
(419: 210 Ferrari + 209 Mercedes)
(419: 210 Ferrari + 209 Mercedes)
π₯9β€2
AUSTRIAN GP
UPPER IMAGE: Gap to Leader
(only non-lapped drivers shown)
Yes, just 5 other drivers were not lapped by NOR!
LOWER IMAGE: Tyre Wear
(fuel-corrected laptimes per team and tyre compound)
Ferrari and RUS were closer to McL on Mediums than on Hards.
Russellβs pace on Hards was terrible!
UPPER IMAGE: Gap to Leader
(only non-lapped drivers shown)
Yes, just 5 other drivers were not lapped by NOR!
LOWER IMAGE: Tyre Wear
(fuel-corrected laptimes per team and tyre compound)
Ferrari and RUS were closer to McL on Mediums than on Hards.
Russellβs pace on Hards was terrible!
π13β€6
BRITISH GP - WING THURSDAY!
McLaren is still unsure about the best wing to run at Silverstone π‘
A MORE loaded wing (left) provides:
β β Much better braking (grip + stability);
β Improved cornering and traction;
β Higher drag (main drawback).
π Will it result in better tyre deg? Yes... maybe
- The tyres will spin/slide less β‘οΈSmaller temperature spikes β‘οΈ Lower thermal deg.
- Tyres will be subject to higher vertical forces, AND also longitudinal/lateral forces if the driver exploits the additional grip β‘οΈ Larger MECHANICAL stress.
The AVERAGE temperature can get higher, increasing the mechanical wear (tyre gets softer) and the thermal wear too.
In Silverstone, a more loaded wing normally improves tyre deg. There are exceptions, though: LEC got P3 in 2020 on the terrible SF1000 also thanks to the lower tyre stress induced by his less loaded rear wing!
If you liked this topic I will make a more detailed discussion and analysis on it in the future!
Photos by: @albertfabrega
McLaren is still unsure about the best wing to run at Silverstone π‘
A MORE loaded wing (left) provides:
β β Much better braking (grip + stability);
β Improved cornering and traction;
β Higher drag (main drawback).
π Will it result in better tyre deg? Yes... maybe
- The tyres will spin/slide less β‘οΈSmaller temperature spikes β‘οΈ Lower thermal deg.
- Tyres will be subject to higher vertical forces, AND also longitudinal/lateral forces if the driver exploits the additional grip β‘οΈ Larger MECHANICAL stress.
The AVERAGE temperature can get higher, increasing the mechanical wear (tyre gets softer) and the thermal wear too.
In Silverstone, a more loaded wing normally improves tyre deg. There are exceptions, though: LEC got P3 in 2020 on the terrible SF1000 also thanks to the lower tyre stress induced by his less loaded rear wing!
If you liked this topic I will make a more detailed discussion and analysis on it in the future!
Photos by: @albertfabrega
π₯15β€3π1
Forwarded from Formula Data Analysis
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
So... I did somethingπ¬
I'm teaming up with JMP to organise an F1-themed data analysis summer challenge!π€©
You'll analyse the data from an F1 race: laptimes, compounds, pit stops, speed traps, you name it!π
Same data for everyone: may the best among you win!
Info in commentπ
I'm teaming up with JMP to organise an F1-themed data analysis summer challenge!π€©
You'll analyse the data from an F1 race: laptimes, compounds, pit stops, speed traps, you name it!π
Same data for everyone: may the best among you win!
Info in commentπ
β€6π₯1
Formula Data Analysis
So... I did somethingπ¬ I'm teaming up with JMP to organise an F1-themed data analysis summer challenge!π€© You'll analyse the data from an F1 race: laptimes, compounds, pit stops, speed traps, you name it!π Same data for everyone: may the best among you win!β¦
1) SIGN UP
2) DOWNLOAD a JMP free trial and the dataset
3) CREATE your analysis in JMP, and submit it
I will be on the jury alongside other experts. The winners will present their findings in a webinar and will also receive a LEGO F1 car! π§±
Click here:
https://www.jmp.com/en/offers/summer-challenge/motorsport?utm_source=fdanalysis&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=701Ki000000EZJgIAO
See you at the challenge!
2) DOWNLOAD a JMP free trial and the dataset
3) CREATE your analysis in JMP, and submit it
I will be on the jury alongside other experts. The winners will present their findings in a webinar and will also receive a LEGO F1 car! π§±
Click here:
https://www.jmp.com/en/offers/summer-challenge/motorsport?utm_source=fdanalysis&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=701Ki000000EZJgIAO
See you at the challenge!
π₯4π1
Formula Data Analysis
1) SIGN UP 2) DOWNLOAD a JMP free trial and the dataset 3) CREATE your analysis in JMP, and submit it I will be on the jury alongside other experts. The winners will present their findings in a webinar and will also receive a LEGO F1 car! π§± Click here: β¦
A race weekend might be the best time to get involved in a F1-themed data analysis challenge! ππ
If you missed it, the JMP Summer Challenge will have you working on real F1 data, with no entry fee and with a prize for the winner! ππ
More info: https://www.jmp.com/en/offers/summer-challenge/motorsport?utm_source=fdanalysis&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=701Ki000000EZJgIAO
If you missed it, the JMP Summer Challenge will have you working on real F1 data, with no entry fee and with a prize for the winner! ππ
More info: https://www.jmp.com/en/offers/summer-challenge/motorsport?utm_source=fdanalysis&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=701Ki000000EZJgIAO
π3π₯1
BRITISH GP - PRACTICE 2 ANALYSIS
The telemetry of π§NOR vs π₯LEC's laps is VERY interesting:
π§NOR was 8km/h (!!) quicker than LEC at Turn 4 apex, yet he was also quicker on entry and no slower on exit.
π§NOR downshifted to 2nd gear into T7 (LEC used 3rd).
π₯LEC didn't lift into Copse (T9), but his ERS deployment before that is much lower (notice how he loses more and more speed)!
π₯However, he was 8km/h quicker at the end of the snake (T12-13) as he lifted was less through there, producing ~1g higher lateral acceleration. He only lost a bit on exit.
π₯He lifted less into T15, but his performance was similar to NOR's.
Summary: π§McL is the favourite, but π₯Ferrari should be strong again, as in Austria (Mercedes might be in the mix too, aided by the cooler temperatures).
What's YOUR opinion?
The telemetry of π§NOR vs π₯LEC's laps is VERY interesting:
π§NOR was 8km/h (!!) quicker than LEC at Turn 4 apex, yet he was also quicker on entry and no slower on exit.
π§NOR downshifted to 2nd gear into T7 (LEC used 3rd).
π₯LEC didn't lift into Copse (T9), but his ERS deployment before that is much lower (notice how he loses more and more speed)!
π₯However, he was 8km/h quicker at the end of the snake (T12-13) as he lifted was less through there, producing ~1g higher lateral acceleration. He only lost a bit on exit.
π₯He lifted less into T15, but his performance was similar to NOR's.
Summary: π§McL is the favourite, but π₯Ferrari should be strong again, as in Austria (Mercedes might be in the mix too, aided by the cooler temperatures).
What's YOUR opinion?
β€8
Formula Data Analysis
BRITISH GP - PRACTICE 2 ANALYSIS The telemetry of π§NOR vs π₯LEC's laps is VERY interesting: π§NOR was 8km/h (!!) quicker than LEC at Turn 4 apex, yet he was also quicker on entry and no slower on exit. π§NOR downshifted to 2nd gear into T7 (LEC used 3rd).β¦
SECTOR GAPS:
NOR quickest in S1 and S3; LEC in S2 (where VER struggled).
TOP SPEEDS:
RBR, Ferrari, and Alpine had the highest top speeds (325-322km/h);
McL and Aston had the lowest (320-319km/h).
NOR quickest in S1 and S3; LEC in S2 (where VER struggled).
TOP SPEEDS:
RBR, Ferrari, and Alpine had the highest top speeds (325-322km/h);
McL and Aston had the lowest (320-319km/h).
π3π₯°2β€1