MONACO GP FP2 ANALYSIS ππ
1) MINIMUM SPEEDS:
Will any team stay above FIFTY km/h in F1's slowest corner? π
π PIA had the highest minimum speed (48), π΄ LEC the lowest (43), as he tried to prioritise the exit. He still lost to PIA there, though.
2) BEST SECTORS:
π΄ Ferrari was quickest in Sectors 1 (LEC) and 3 (HAM)
π McL in S2 (PIA)
Ferrari seems to have a complete package: Sector 1 requires good traction out of Saint-devote and good front-end and driver confidence for the turn-in at Massenet. Sector 3 requires good downforce and stability/agility in changes of direction
3) GAP VISUALISED:
It was a back-and-forth between π΄ LEC and π PIA: LEC gained up to the T6 hairpin, but PIA gained there. PIA was almost 3 tenth in front at the chicane after the tunnel! LEC recovered and got in front in T17.
Qualifying will be tight and race-deciding! π¬
What's your prediction? π
1) MINIMUM SPEEDS:
Will any team stay above FIFTY km/h in F1's slowest corner? π
π PIA had the highest minimum speed (48), π΄ LEC the lowest (43), as he tried to prioritise the exit. He still lost to PIA there, though.
2) BEST SECTORS:
π΄ Ferrari was quickest in Sectors 1 (LEC) and 3 (HAM)
π McL in S2 (PIA)
Ferrari seems to have a complete package: Sector 1 requires good traction out of Saint-devote and good front-end and driver confidence for the turn-in at Massenet. Sector 3 requires good downforce and stability/agility in changes of direction
3) GAP VISUALISED:
It was a back-and-forth between π΄ LEC and π PIA: LEC gained up to the T6 hairpin, but PIA gained there. PIA was almost 3 tenth in front at the chicane after the tunnel! LEC recovered and got in front in T17.
Qualifying will be tight and race-deciding! π¬
What's your prediction? π
π7β€4
MONACO GP - QUALIFYING
π McLaren improved more than any other team in Monaco quali: almost half a second quicker than last year. β
π’ Aston's Imola upgrades work: 2nd most-improved team in Monaco, and third row again for ALO! π
π£ Alpine's best lap was over one SECOND slower than last year. π¨
[Track conditions were slightly worse this year.]
π McLaren improved more than any other team in Monaco quali: almost half a second quicker than last year. β
π’ Aston's Imola upgrades work: 2nd most-improved team in Monaco, and third row again for ALO! π
π£ Alpine's best lap was over one SECOND slower than last year. π¨
[Track conditions were slightly worse this year.]
π11β€2
MONACO GP - QUALIFYING | TRACK DOMINATION
Qualifying was very close: π NOR dominated ~30% of the lap, π΄ LEC ~40%!
NOR lost little where he was slower than LEC, and gained significantly where he was quicker --> pole by 0.109s!
π΅ VER was very competitive in the Fairmont hairpin (T3) and at lap end (T12 to T18), but he lost significantly in the other sections --> gap over 7 tenths!
Qualifying was very close: π NOR dominated ~30% of the lap, π΄ LEC ~40%!
NOR lost little where he was slower than LEC, and gained significantly where he was quicker --> pole by 0.109s!
π΅ VER was very competitive in the Fairmont hairpin (T3) and at lap end (T12 to T18), but he lost significantly in the other sections --> gap over 7 tenths!
β€12
MONACO GP - RACE PACE ANALYSIS
The performance delta between the front runners and everyone else was INSANE: only the top 5 were not lapped! π€―
- NOR, LEC, and PIA had a very similar pace, as overtaking was impossible. β
- HAD finished P6, yet he was lapped and over 2s/lap slower than NOR! π‘
- Nightmarish race for Mercedes: RUS and ANT were quickest by far once in free air (thanks to the fresh tyres), still ANT was over 3s/lap slower ON AVERAGE: that's the huge impact that the traffic had on their race! π¨
- Two cars (Williams) got points despite being lapped TWICE!
Do you think that the second mandatory stop improved the GP? π
The performance delta between the front runners and everyone else was INSANE: only the top 5 were not lapped! π€―
- NOR, LEC, and PIA had a very similar pace, as overtaking was impossible. β
- HAD finished P6, yet he was lapped and over 2s/lap slower than NOR! π‘
- Nightmarish race for Mercedes: RUS and ANT were quickest by far once in free air (thanks to the fresh tyres), still ANT was over 3s/lap slower ON AVERAGE: that's the huge impact that the traffic had on their race! π¨
- Two cars (Williams) got points despite being lapped TWICE!
Do you think that the second mandatory stop improved the GP? π
β€11π7
MONACO GP - TOP SPEED PER LAP
I've checked the data from all the sessions: no car ever reached 300km/h during the Monaco Weekend! π³
The highest was 295km/h, by STR in the race. Highest in quali was lower (no slipstreams), 292km/h by OCO and ALB: that's lower than the minimum speed in Silverstoneβs T1! π
This is the only track where the highest speed is often reached WITHOUT DRSπ‘ (Out of the tunnel, as the longer full-throttle time and downhill gradient matter more than the main straight's DRS zone!)
I've checked the data from all the sessions: no car ever reached 300km/h during the Monaco Weekend! π³
The highest was 295km/h, by STR in the race. Highest in quali was lower (no slipstreams), 292km/h by OCO and ALB: that's lower than the minimum speed in Silverstoneβs T1! π
This is the only track where the highest speed is often reached WITHOUT DRSπ‘ (Out of the tunnel, as the longer full-throttle time and downhill gradient matter more than the main straight's DRS zone!)
π΄5β3π1
Good news, fans of Imola: we could still race there next year, but I need your help for that!π
The Spokesman of Imolaβs Mayor contacted me: the next 2 weeks will be crucial to show our interest and convince F1 to keep it
32871 people have already signed the petition: Iβm among them, letβs go!!! π
https://chng.it/XKs6rwkmfw
Share this post to make sure other fans like you can see it too!
The Spokesman of Imolaβs Mayor contacted me: the next 2 weeks will be crucial to show our interest and convince F1 to keep it
32871 people have already signed the petition: Iβm among them, letβs go!!! π
https://chng.it/XKs6rwkmfw
Share this post to make sure other fans like you can see it too!
β€10π10
Formula Data Analysis
Good news, fans of Imola: we could still race there next year, but I need your help for that!π The Spokesman of Imolaβs Mayor contacted me: the next 2 weeks will be crucial to show our interest and convince F1 to keep it 32871 people have already signedβ¦
We only need 1,120 more signatures to reach the next goal - can you help?
π7
SPAIN PREVIEW ππ
Softest (Monaco) to Hardest Compounds!
Medium/High Downforce.
Cornering is king.
Very high tyre stress, esp. the front left. ππ₯
The medium/high-speed corners should suit McLaren, but the βFlexy-wingβ ban could shake the order!π‘
2024:
π₯π΅VER
π₯π NOR
π₯β«οΈHAM
Whatβs your prediction for 2025? π€
πΈ @pirellisport
Softest (Monaco) to Hardest Compounds!
Medium/High Downforce.
Cornering is king.
Very high tyre stress, esp. the front left. ππ₯
The medium/high-speed corners should suit McLaren, but the βFlexy-wingβ ban could shake the order!π‘
2024:
π₯π΅VER
π₯π NOR
π₯β«οΈHAM
Whatβs your prediction for 2025? π€
πΈ @pirellisport
β€5π₯2
Formula Data Analysis
Good news, fans of Imola: we could still race there next year, but I need your help for that!π The Spokesman of Imolaβs Mayor contacted me: the next 2 weeks will be crucial to show our interest and convince F1 to keep it 32871 people have already signedβ¦
Thank you, everyone: weβve increased the signature count by 4400, and itβs currently the largest F1-related petition on https://Change.org! π€
The Mayorβs spokesperson who contacted me is extremely pleased (and surprised) with the result: maybe we made a difference! π€π
The Mayorβs spokesperson who contacted me is extremely pleased (and surprised) with the result: maybe we made a difference! π€π
Change.org
Change starts here
Join over 500,000,000 people creating real change in their communities.
π₯6β€1π1
The 'flexy-wing' clampdown is here: it will hurt several teams, and some more than others π¨
Making the front wing flex provides two benefits:
β Less drag on straights;
β Aero balance (lower front downforce coefficient at high speed β‘οΈbalance shifts towards understeer β‘οΈmore stable at high speed).
Several teams (McL, Mercedes, Ferrari, etc) stiffened their front wing to comply (notice McLaren's additional bracket).
To my understanding, β«οΈMercedes' wing flexed the most, then π McL, then π΄Ferrari/π΅RBR.
@dr_obbs came to similar conclusions. This could make Mercedes slide further back, and allow Ferrari and RBR to catch up with McLaren.
This will get spicy! π₯
Making the front wing flex provides two benefits:
β Less drag on straights;
β Aero balance (lower front downforce coefficient at high speed β‘οΈbalance shifts towards understeer β‘οΈmore stable at high speed).
Several teams (McL, Mercedes, Ferrari, etc) stiffened their front wing to comply (notice McLaren's additional bracket).
To my understanding, β«οΈMercedes' wing flexed the most, then π McL, then π΄Ferrari/π΅RBR.
@dr_obbs came to similar conclusions. This could make Mercedes slide further back, and allow Ferrari and RBR to catch up with McLaren.
This will get spicy! π₯
β€4π₯3π2
Formula Data Analysis
The 'flexy-wing' clampdown is here: it will hurt several teams, and some more than others π¨ Making the front wing flex provides two benefits: β
Less drag on straights; β
Aero balance (lower front downforce coefficient at high speed β‘οΈbalance shifts towardsβ¦
- The maximum vertical deflection cannot exceed 15mm (was 20mm before) when a 1000N force is applied symmetrically, and 10mm (was 15mm) when it is applied to just one side.
- The deflection of the trailing edge cannot exceed 3mm (was 5mm before).
So a 25%-40% reduction: significant!
- The deflection of the trailing edge cannot exceed 3mm (was 5mm before).
So a 25%-40% reduction: significant!
β€8π3
SPANISH GP - FP2
1) TOP SPEEDS:
We still don't know which teams were hurt the most by the 'Flexy front wing' clampdown, but one thing is sure:
McLaren, usually a draggy car, had an excellent top speed in FP2! π¬
The telemetry suggests a PU mode similar to their competitors'.
So, what happened is either:
- McL wasn't hurt as expected relative to others;
- They ran a slightly less loaded front wing than otherwise (rear too, for balance): unchanged drag, yet lost some downforce.
1) TOP SPEEDS:
We still don't know which teams were hurt the most by the 'Flexy front wing' clampdown, but one thing is sure:
McLaren, usually a draggy car, had an excellent top speed in FP2! π¬
The telemetry suggests a PU mode similar to their competitors'.
So, what happened is either:
- McL wasn't hurt as expected relative to others;
- They ran a slightly less loaded front wing than otherwise (rear too, for balance): unchanged drag, yet lost some downforce.
π₯7β€1π1
Formula Data Analysis
2) BEST MINISECTORS: It wasn't just the top speed: π PIA was quicker than π’RUS and π΅VER at the end of all full-throttle sections, indicating low drag. Yet, RUS could stay full-throttle through T9: his very loaded rear wing gave him excellent downforce! (PIAβ¦
For the real F1-nerds among you: the repository containing the 65 analyses I've already made about the race weekend π€«π
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/spanish-gp-analyses-repository-3727910
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/spanish-gp-analyses-repository-3727910
Buy Me a Coffee
Spanish GP - Analyses Repository β Formula Data Analysis
Post by Formula Data Analysis
π3β€1
SPANISH GP - LONG RUNS (FP2)
π΄ SOFT
1) π¦VER 1:19.918
2) π§NOR 1.20:220
3) π₯LEC 1:20.287
4) π©RUS 1.20:847
π‘ MEDIUM
1) π§NOR 1:18.76 βΌοΈ
2) π¦VER 1.20:088
3) π₯LEC 1.20:675
My take:
- NOR's pace on mediums was incredible;
- VER was unusually strong in his long runs (RBR has been running a lot of fuel + low engine modes in FP2 most weekends);
- Soft looks viable, but Medium is the better tyre.
What's YOUR prediction? π€
π΄ SOFT
1) π¦VER 1:19.918
2) π§NOR 1.20:220
3) π₯LEC 1:20.287
4) π©RUS 1.20:847
π‘ MEDIUM
1) π§NOR 1:18.76 βΌοΈ
2) π¦VER 1.20:088
3) π₯LEC 1.20:675
My take:
- NOR's pace on mediums was incredible;
- VER was unusually strong in his long runs (RBR has been running a lot of fuel + low engine modes in FP2 most weekends);
- Soft looks viable, but Medium is the better tyre.
What's YOUR prediction? π€
π₯12β€3π1
SPANISH GP - RACE PACE
π¦ Verstappen was quickest on average but scored only 1 point: his extra stop cost him time and forced a restart on Hards. Contact with RUS was the final nail in the coffin.
RBR used TEN tyre sets in total! π³
π§ PIA was the fastest three-stopper; π§ NOR just 0.06s/lap slower; π₯ LEC was further off but quick enough to grab the podium.
π₯ HAM never found the pace, 0.28s/lap slower than his teammate on average. Swapping them was the right call.
π© HUL maximised his chances.
McLarenβs supposed drop in pace from the flexi-wing clampdown? Nowhere to be found. π¬
π¦ Verstappen was quickest on average but scored only 1 point: his extra stop cost him time and forced a restart on Hards. Contact with RUS was the final nail in the coffin.
RBR used TEN tyre sets in total! π³
π§ PIA was the fastest three-stopper; π§ NOR just 0.06s/lap slower; π₯ LEC was further off but quick enough to grab the podium.
π₯ HAM never found the pace, 0.28s/lap slower than his teammate on average. Swapping them was the right call.
π© HUL maximised his chances.
McLarenβs supposed drop in pace from the flexi-wing clampdown? Nowhere to be found. π¬
β€9π€5π4
SPANISH GP TOP & MINIMUM SPEEDS
TOP SPEEDS
- OCO reached 345km/h in the race, but TSU was fastest on average: 339km/h π(average of his 15 highest speeds).
- HAM and PIA never used DRS.π‘
MIN SPEEDS
- VER, PIA, and NOR had the highest speed in the slowest corner.π
- Sauber's mechanical grip was lacking, it seems: lowest figures for HUL and BOR.
TOP SPEEDS
- OCO reached 345km/h in the race, but TSU was fastest on average: 339km/h π(average of his 15 highest speeds).
- HAM and PIA never used DRS.π‘
MIN SPEEDS
- VER, PIA, and NOR had the highest speed in the slowest corner.π
- Sauber's mechanical grip was lacking, it seems: lowest figures for HUL and BOR.
β€10π2π₯1
AVERAGE QUALIFYING GAP AFTER 9 RACES
π Evolution (upper graph).
π Season average (lower graph).
π McL has been almost flawless in quali this year; their largest gap to pole was just 0.065sπ¬ (Miami).
Mercedes was quicker than π΄ Ferrari in all races except for Japan (practically matched) and Monaco.
π Evolution (upper graph).
π Season average (lower graph).
π McL has been almost flawless in quali this year; their largest gap to pole was just 0.065sπ¬ (Miami).
Mercedes was quicker than π΄ Ferrari in all races except for Japan (practically matched) and Monaco.
π₯8β€2
SPANISH GP - QUALIFYING | 2025 vs 2024
Williamsβ performance in the SpanishGP quali was their 2025 worst gap-wise, yet they were the only team to improve their 2024 laptime: thatβs how bad last yearβs car was!
[Track conditions were worse this year.]
Mercedes, Aston, and McL gained over the other teams. Ferrari lost ~0.15s to them, but RBR was far worse (~0.28s lost to McL)!
Williamsβ performance in the SpanishGP quali was their 2025 worst gap-wise, yet they were the only team to improve their 2024 laptime: thatβs how bad last yearβs car was!
[Track conditions were worse this year.]
Mercedes, Aston, and McL gained over the other teams. Ferrari lost ~0.15s to them, but RBR was far worse (~0.28s lost to McL)!
β€8π1