Japanese GP - Qualifying | Corner Analysis
VER gained 0.112s in the last chicane, getting pole by just 0.012s! π₯
- π NOR lifted and braked early; π΄LEC less so; π΅VER did for last.
- VER had to brake the most (largest longitudinal accel.) Yet, he still made the corner (largest lateral accel.).
- Yet, his exit was no worse than LEC's.
VER gained 0.112s in the last chicane, getting pole by just 0.012s! π₯
- π NOR lifted and braked early; π΄LEC less so; π΅VER did for last.
- VER had to brake the most (largest longitudinal accel.) Yet, he still made the corner (largest lateral accel.).
- Yet, his exit was no worse than LEC's.
π₯10π2
Japanese GP - Qualifying | Aero Characteristics
The race could be wet, at least in part! π§
In that case, teams running a more loaded aero setup (McL, Haas) should gain over those that focused more on reducing drag (Ferrari, Mercedes, Red Bull): the drag penalty will be lower, and downforce will be even more important.
The race could be wet, at least in part! π§
In that case, teams running a more loaded aero setup (McL, Haas) should gain over those that focused more on reducing drag (Ferrari, Mercedes, Red Bull): the drag penalty will be lower, and downforce will be even more important.
π₯12β€2π1
JAPANESE GP - RACE PACE
π NOR and π΅ VER were quickest, and had identical pace!
PIA was just 0.03 s/lap slower on average but was quicker than them at the end (yet slower than ANT, who had a fresher tyre)!
π’ ANT 0.02s/lap quicker than π΄ LEC.
1-2) McL/RBR (NOR/VER)
3) Mercedes (ANT) +0.26 s/lap
4) Ferrari (LEC) +0.28 s/lap
5) Racing Bulls (HAD +0.59 s/lap
6) Williams (ALB) +0.62 s/lap
7) Aston (ALO) +0.91 s/lap
8) Haas (BEA) +0.93 s/lap
9) Alpine (GAS) +0.94 s/lap
10) Sauber (DOO) +1.38 s/lap
π NOR and π΅ VER were quickest, and had identical pace!
PIA was just 0.03 s/lap slower on average but was quicker than them at the end (yet slower than ANT, who had a fresher tyre)!
π’ ANT 0.02s/lap quicker than π΄ LEC.
1-2) McL/RBR (NOR/VER)
3) Mercedes (ANT) +0.26 s/lap
4) Ferrari (LEC) +0.28 s/lap
5) Racing Bulls (HAD +0.59 s/lap
6) Williams (ALB) +0.62 s/lap
7) Aston (ALO) +0.91 s/lap
8) Haas (BEA) +0.93 s/lap
9) Alpine (GAS) +0.94 s/lap
10) Sauber (DOO) +1.38 s/lap
β€10π4
Formula Data Analysis
JAPANESE GP - RACE PACE π NOR and π΅ VER were quickest, and had identical pace! PIA was just 0.03 s/lap slower on average but was quicker than them at the end (yet slower than ANT, who had a fresher tyre)! π’ ANT 0.02s/lap quicker than π΄ LEC. 1-2) McL/RBRβ¦
Tyre strategies during the race
Become a supporter of the page to access all the analyses here π
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/japanese-gp-analyses-repository-3591147
Become a supporter of the page to access all the analyses here π
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/japanese-gp-analyses-repository-3591147
π8
Japanese GP - Tyre Degradation
One of F1's main problems: the Hard tyre was FASTER than the Medium β and lasted longer too! π‘
The Medium just can't handle the stress, so drivers can't push as much, making it slower. π¨
Just one viable strategy β‘οΈBoring races
What's YOUR opinion? π€
One of F1's main problems: the Hard tyre was FASTER than the Medium β and lasted longer too! π‘
The Medium just can't handle the stress, so drivers can't push as much, making it slower. π¨
Just one viable strategy β‘οΈBoring races
What's YOUR opinion? π€
β€14π€3π1
BAHRAIN PREVIEW
3 DRS zones, 2 of which follow a slow corner: overtakes will be plenty (unlike in Suzuka)!
Like Suzuka, however, the race will be a 1-stopper due to the hardest compounds (C1-C3).
π McLβs high drag will be handy in Sector 2;
π΅ RBRβs low drag in Sectors 1 and 3.
π΄ Ferrari is finally bringing a new floor, which would solve (part of) their issues: in 2018 and 2019 they finally regained performance once in Bahrain.
πΈ: @pirellisport
3 DRS zones, 2 of which follow a slow corner: overtakes will be plenty (unlike in Suzuka)!
Like Suzuka, however, the race will be a 1-stopper due to the hardest compounds (C1-C3).
π McLβs high drag will be handy in Sector 2;
π΅ RBRβs low drag in Sectors 1 and 3.
π΄ Ferrari is finally bringing a new floor, which would solve (part of) their issues: in 2018 and 2019 they finally regained performance once in Bahrain.
πΈ: @pirellisport
β€13π5π₯5
BAHRAIN GP - REAR WINGS
Bahrain requires less loaded wings than Suzuka - Despite that, McL and Ferrari are using the same ones seen in Japan.
Mercedes' top speed was the highest in quali; despite that, they've further reduced the wing load.
RBR, instead, has increased it!π‘
Many unexpected choices: expect some teams to change spec for qualifying.
πΈ @AlbertFabrega
Bahrain requires less loaded wings than Suzuka - Despite that, McL and Ferrari are using the same ones seen in Japan.
Mercedes' top speed was the highest in quali; despite that, they've further reduced the wing load.
RBR, instead, has increased it!π‘
Many unexpected choices: expect some teams to change spec for qualifying.
πΈ @AlbertFabrega
β€8π2π₯°1
Formula Data Analysis
BAHRAIN GP - REAR WINGS Bahrain requires less loaded wings than Suzuka - Despite that, McL and Ferrari are using the same ones seen in Japan. Mercedes' top speed was the highest in quali; despite that, they've further reduced the wing load. RBR, insteadβ¦
Rear wings in Suzuka and top speeds in qualifying:
β€8π4π1
BAHRAIN GP - PRACTICE 1
TOP SPEEDS vs 2024 QUALIFYING
Mercedes is running a very unloaded rear wing this year, a choice maybe influenced by having the worst top speed last year!
They are 8km/h faster already (partly due to wind), yet there are still 4 faster teams!
McL's downforce is excellent: having high drag is a good tradeoff .π
TOP SPEEDS vs 2024 QUALIFYING
Mercedes is running a very unloaded rear wing this year, a choice maybe influenced by having the worst top speed last year!
They are 8km/h faster already (partly due to wind), yet there are still 4 faster teams!
McL's downforce is excellent: having high drag is a good tradeoff .π
π7β€1
Formula Data Analysis
BAHRAIN GP - PRACTICE 1 TOP SPEEDS vs 2024 QUALIFYING Mercedes is running a very unloaded rear wing this year, a choice maybe influenced by having the worst top speed last year! They are 8km/h faster already (partly due to wind), yet there are still 4 fasterβ¦
All the analyses π₯π
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/bahrain-gp-analyses-repository-3609450
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/bahrain-gp-analyses-repository-3609450
Buy Me a Coffee
Bahrain GP - Analyses Repository β Formula Data Analysis
Post by Formula Data Analysis
JAPANESE GP - RACE
THE EFFECT OF DIRTY AIR - VISUALISED! π‘
π NOR following π΅ VER closely through the mighty 130R corner on Lap 3
The slipstream reduced the aero forces:
1) Before the corner: less dragβ‘οΈNOR gaining;
2) Into the corner: less downforceβ‘οΈNOR had to lift 20%, losing 6km/h; his lateral acceleration was 0.6g lower than VER's!
Notice that VER remained full-throttle, yet still lost speed, due to:
1) Energy dissipation caused by cornering forcesπ;
2) Decreased ERS deploymentπͺ«(Not smart to deploy energy right before a braking point)!
Made via @JMP_software
THE EFFECT OF DIRTY AIR - VISUALISED! π‘
π NOR following π΅ VER closely through the mighty 130R corner on Lap 3
The slipstream reduced the aero forces:
1) Before the corner: less dragβ‘οΈNOR gaining;
2) Into the corner: less downforceβ‘οΈNOR had to lift 20%, losing 6km/h; his lateral acceleration was 0.6g lower than VER's!
Notice that VER remained full-throttle, yet still lost speed, due to:
1) Energy dissipation caused by cornering forcesπ;
2) Decreased ERS deploymentπͺ«(Not smart to deploy energy right before a braking point)!
Made via @JMP_software
β€11
BAHRAIN GP - PRACTICE 2 DATA ANALYSIS
FP2 data shows that π McL's key to performance was... unmatched downforce!π‘
1) HEAD TO HEAD:
π PIA lost 0.25s to π’RUS in the first 2 straight due to much higher drag (7km/h top speed deficit).
His downforce advantage was insane, though: check out how much less he could lift in T5/6/7! He also reached much greater braking g's.
To put things into perspective:
The best non-McL driver (RUS, P3 in FP2) lost over 0.7s in sector 2 to PIA!
2) TOP SPEEDS:
Two McL cars at the bottom. βͺοΈBEA reached 332km/h (+14km/h vs NOR)!
It seems that it was due to a higher engine mode (gaining on all straights vs his longer runs).
3) AERO PERFORMANCE:
Most teams are close together, around the center of the graph (average characteristics).
McL is a total outlier.
FP2 data shows that π McL's key to performance was... unmatched downforce!π‘
1) HEAD TO HEAD:
π PIA lost 0.25s to π’RUS in the first 2 straight due to much higher drag (7km/h top speed deficit).
His downforce advantage was insane, though: check out how much less he could lift in T5/6/7! He also reached much greater braking g's.
To put things into perspective:
The best non-McL driver (RUS, P3 in FP2) lost over 0.7s in sector 2 to PIA!
2) TOP SPEEDS:
Two McL cars at the bottom. βͺοΈBEA reached 332km/h (+14km/h vs NOR)!
It seems that it was due to a higher engine mode (gaining on all straights vs his longer runs).
3) AERO PERFORMANCE:
Most teams are close together, around the center of the graph (average characteristics).
McL is a total outlier.
β€10π₯°1
BAHRAIN GP - QUALIFYING
Hear this:
No driver had a lower top speed than π PIA, yet he still got the pole! π€―
His very loaded setup gave him unmatched downforce, losing on the straights but gaining everywhere else!
π’Merc, π΄Ferrari, π£Alpine, and π΅RBR behaved similarly.
[Each team's best lap considered]
Hear this:
No driver had a lower top speed than π PIA, yet he still got the pole! π€―
His very loaded setup gave him unmatched downforce, losing on the straights but gaining everywhere else!
π’Merc, π΄Ferrari, π£Alpine, and π΅RBR behaved similarly.
[Each team's best lap considered]
π9β€1
Formula Data Analysis
BAHRAIN GP - QUALIFYING Hear this: No driver had a lower top speed than π PIA, yet he still got the pole! π€― His very loaded setup gave him unmatched downforce, losing on the straights but gaining everywhere else! π’Merc, π΄Ferrari, π£Alpine, and π΅RBR behavedβ¦
All the drivers
Teams who opted for two different aerodynamic setups:
- Williams (ALB +6km/h vs SAI);
- Racing Bulls (HAD + 6 vs LAW);
- McLaren (NOR + 4 vs PIA);
- Haas (OCO + 6 vs BEA).
Teams who opted for two different aerodynamic setups:
- Williams (ALB +6km/h vs SAI);
- Racing Bulls (HAD + 6 vs LAW);
- McLaren (NOR + 4 vs PIA);
- Haas (OCO + 6 vs BEA).
π5β€2π1
BAHRAIN GP - LONG RUNS π
π΄ SOFT
1) NOR 1:38.268 [13 Laps]
2) RUS +0.260 [9]
3) HAM +0.548 [6]
4) VER +0.575 [7]
5) ANT +0.681 [10]
π‘ MEDIUM
1) LEC 1:38.621 [7 Laps]
2) TSU +0.136 [10]
βͺοΈ HARD
1) PIA 1:38.081 [7]
Even the soft has excellent durability!
A one-stop strategy is feasible.
π΄ SOFT
1) NOR 1:38.268 [13 Laps]
2) RUS +0.260 [9]
3) HAM +0.548 [6]
4) VER +0.575 [7]
5) ANT +0.681 [10]
π‘ MEDIUM
1) LEC 1:38.621 [7 Laps]
2) TSU +0.136 [10]
βͺοΈ HARD
1) PIA 1:38.081 [7]
Even the soft has excellent durability!
A one-stop strategy is feasible.
π12β€2
Bahrain rarely disappoints π₯
- Fantastic season start for PIA
- McLβs high drag didnβt help NOR attacking RUS
- Ferrariβs pace was neutralized by the safety car
- Frustrating race for VER
- Fantastic result for GAS (P7)
- Haas double points (OCO P8, BEA P10)
- Solid TSU
The fight for race wins is on fire: we have 4 teams with very similar performance, and McL (whoβs clearly in front of the other 3) isnβt miles in front of the others.
The developments will decide the championship: remember what the 2024 season looked like after the first 6 races?
What's YOUR take?π€
- Fantastic season start for PIA
- McLβs high drag didnβt help NOR attacking RUS
- Ferrariβs pace was neutralized by the safety car
- Frustrating race for VER
- Fantastic result for GAS (P7)
- Haas double points (OCO P8, BEA P10)
- Solid TSU
The fight for race wins is on fire: we have 4 teams with very similar performance, and McL (whoβs clearly in front of the other 3) isnβt miles in front of the others.
The developments will decide the championship: remember what the 2024 season looked like after the first 6 races?
What's YOUR take?π€
β€19π6π₯2π«‘2
Formula Data Analysis
BAHRAIN GP - RACE PACE PIA was unbeatable: 0.39s/lap quicker than his teammate ON AVERAGE! Pace per team 1) McL quickest 2) Mercedes +0.48/lap 3) Ferrari +0.50 4) RBR +0.90βοΈ 5) Alpine +0.93βΌοΈ McLβs advantage over the 2nd best car (0.48s) is the same thatβ¦
The pace last year:
β€2π2