Formula Data Analysis
PRACTICE 2 - LONG RUNS: Russell was quickest: his gap to SAI was over half a second. The Hards (which RUS used) could be a better racing tyre... but no doubt that Mercedes' pace is looking great. π₯RUS π₯SAI +0.588s π₯PER +0.670s 4οΈβ£PIA +0.730s 5οΈβ£VER +0.893sβ¦
All the teams (Alonsoβs long run was the slowest on the grid).
π7
PERFORMANCE IN QUALIFYING
β¬ οΈ Worse / Better β‘οΈ
β¬οΈ Lower / Higher top speed β¬οΈ
π΄'King of Baku' Charles Leclerc got his 4th pole in a row despite a modest top speed (same for Mercedes, Williams, and Haas).
π McL had the lowest one! Proof that grip is more important than straight-line speed in Baku qualifying, but they could struggle to attack/defend tomorrow.
π΅RedBull can be aggressive, exploiting their +3km/h top speed advantage vs Ferrari and Mercedes and +6km/h over McLaren.
What's your prediction for the race? π€
β¬ οΈ Worse / Better β‘οΈ
β¬οΈ Lower / Higher top speed β¬οΈ
π΄'King of Baku' Charles Leclerc got his 4th pole in a row despite a modest top speed (same for Mercedes, Williams, and Haas).
π McL had the lowest one! Proof that grip is more important than straight-line speed in Baku qualifying, but they could struggle to attack/defend tomorrow.
π΅RedBull can be aggressive, exploiting their +3km/h top speed advantage vs Ferrari and Mercedes and +6km/h over McLaren.
What's your prediction for the race? π€
π₯10β€1
Norris reached consistently higher top speeds (~4km/h more) than Piastri in qualifying: this should aid his recovery drive!
PIA's top speed was the worst on the grid!
His additional downforce, however, could help with tyre wear.
(Laps with a tow were excluded.)
Made via @JMP_software
PIA's top speed was the worst on the grid!
His additional downforce, however, could help with tyre wear.
(Laps with a tow were excluded.)
Made via @JMP_software
π4
Piastri surprised Leclerc under braking getting a well-deserved win! π
McLβs excellent T16 exit and less loaded DRS plane made him gain up to the middle of the straight. π
SAI-PER crash helped McL get a sizeable lead in the WCC. π₯
10 points for Williams. π₯
BEA: first in history to drive 2 races with 2 teams getting points in both! π(Keeping a 7-times WDC behind for many laps).
Whatβs YOUR opinion? π€
McLβs excellent T16 exit and less loaded DRS plane made him gain up to the middle of the straight. π
SAI-PER crash helped McL get a sizeable lead in the WCC. π₯
10 points for Williams. π₯
BEA: first in history to drive 2 races with 2 teams getting points in both! π(Keeping a 7-times WDC behind for many laps).
Whatβs YOUR opinion? π€
β€21π5π₯3
π‘McLaren has a "Mini-DRS", which acts on top of the "Flexy wing"
- Wing flex: McL > Ferrari >> RedBull
- McL has a never-seen-before lift of the upper plane leading edge: it's as if the DRS opens partially at high speed, providing a further advantage.
The effect is measurable: McL had the highest top speed when the DRS was inactive despite being slowest when the DRS was open (Data from quali).
Is this legal? π€
- The flexy wing is, as it passed the FIA's load tests. A wing that flexes are 'against the spirit of the rules', but until the load tests change to avoid that such a thing is perfectly ok.
- I'm not sure about the deformation of the DRS plane: I expect Ferrari to protest that, but the outcome is hard to predict.
Photo and idea: @brakeboosted, @multiviewer
- Wing flex: McL > Ferrari >> RedBull
- McL has a never-seen-before lift of the upper plane leading edge: it's as if the DRS opens partially at high speed, providing a further advantage.
The effect is measurable: McL had the highest top speed when the DRS was inactive despite being slowest when the DRS was open (Data from quali).
Is this legal? π€
- The flexy wing is, as it passed the FIA's load tests. A wing that flexes are 'against the spirit of the rules', but until the load tests change to avoid that such a thing is perfectly ok.
- I'm not sure about the deformation of the DRS plane: I expect Ferrari to protest that, but the outcome is hard to predict.
Photo and idea: @brakeboosted, @multiviewer
β€11π2π1π€£1π¨1
Formula Data Analysis
π‘McLaren has a "Mini-DRS", which acts on top of the "Flexy wing" - Wing flex: McL > Ferrari >> RedBull - McL has a never-seen-before lift of the upper plane leading edge: it's as if the DRS opens partially at high speed, providing a further advantage. Theβ¦
X (formerly Twitter)
Formula Data Analysis (@FDataAnalysis) on X
The legality of the βmini-DRSβ seemingly depends on whether it would revert to the βfully-closedβ position in case of failure
McLaren nullified its 1.74s/lap race pace gap in one year, gaining more than anyone! π
Solid improvement by Haas, Williams, and Mercedes. π
RedBull lost all its 2023 advantage (0.54s/lap vs Ferrari). π
The field got much closer: 4 teams within 0.22s/lap! (1.02s/lap last year).
Made via @JMP_software
Solid improvement by Haas, Williams, and Mercedes. π
RedBull lost all its 2023 advantage (0.54s/lap vs Ferrari). π
The field got much closer: 4 teams within 0.22s/lap! (1.02s/lap last year).
Made via @JMP_software
π14β€1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πUse this linkπ
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
πUse this linkπ
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL π¬
In Baku:
π΄Ferrari's DRS improved dramatically (+20km/h in '24 vs +13km/h in '23).
π΅RedBull's was the strongest, stronger even than last year's.
π McLaren's top speed when the DRS was active was the lowest.
β«οΈMercedes ran a less loaded wingβ‘οΈFastest without DRS and matched for fastest with.
(Data from quali; DRS=OFF data from the main straight, immediately before the drivers activated DRS.)
π΄Ferrari's DRS improved dramatically (+20km/h in '24 vs +13km/h in '23).
π΅RedBull's was the strongest, stronger even than last year's.
π McLaren's top speed when the DRS was active was the lowest.
β«οΈMercedes ran a less loaded wingβ‘οΈFastest without DRS and matched for fastest with.
(Data from quali; DRS=OFF data from the main straight, immediately before the drivers activated DRS.)
β€8π₯3π2
Singapore GP Preview π
- 2 chicanes were removed last year, making the 3rd sector quicker.
- A FOURTH DRS zone is being added this year.
4 DRS zones + very loaded wings β‘οΈ DRS effectiveness crucial for qualifying performance. π‘
Traction and braking are critical; cornering not as much.
Due to their recent performance and the track characteristics, I expect McLaren and Ferrari to fight for the win.
πΈ @pirellisport
- 2 chicanes were removed last year, making the 3rd sector quicker.
- A FOURTH DRS zone is being added this year.
4 DRS zones + very loaded wings β‘οΈ DRS effectiveness crucial for qualifying performance. π‘
Traction and braking are critical; cornering not as much.
Due to their recent performance and the track characteristics, I expect McLaren and Ferrari to fight for the win.
πΈ @pirellisport
β€15
REAR WINGS - Singapore GP
The track has gotten much quicker compared to β22 (two chicanes less, a fourth DRS zone added), yet teams are still using maximum-load wings.
The additional DRS-zone helps with that in quali, yet those in free air in the race will effectively have a βparachuteβ behind the cockpit. πͺ
πΈ: @AlbertFabrega
The track has gotten much quicker compared to β22 (two chicanes less, a fourth DRS zone added), yet teams are still using maximum-load wings.
The additional DRS-zone helps with that in quali, yet those in free air in the race will effectively have a βparachuteβ behind the cockpit. πͺ
πΈ: @AlbertFabrega
π₯10π2π1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
FP2 DATA HIGHLIGHTS π
1) BEST SECTORS:
Ferrari and McL left little to competitors: P1-P4 in S1; +0.18s vs next quickest (RUS) in S2 and +0.26s (vs PER) in S3.
PER was 3rd quickest in S3, VER 2nd slowest.
2) GRIP:
Ferrari was unmatched in the last, fast left-hander (~5g lateral acceleration).
McL and Racing Bulls had superior braking, however.
3) MINISECTORS:
Ferrari and McL seem to have similar characteristics and traded blows in S1 and S3.
TSU was quickest in several of S2's 90-degree corners!
Who's looking favourite for pole, in your opinion? π€
1) BEST SECTORS:
Ferrari and McL left little to competitors: P1-P4 in S1; +0.18s vs next quickest (RUS) in S2 and +0.26s (vs PER) in S3.
PER was 3rd quickest in S3, VER 2nd slowest.
2) GRIP:
Ferrari was unmatched in the last, fast left-hander (~5g lateral acceleration).
McL and Racing Bulls had superior braking, however.
3) MINISECTORS:
Ferrari and McL seem to have similar characteristics and traded blows in S1 and S3.
TSU was quickest in several of S2's 90-degree corners!
Who's looking favourite for pole, in your opinion? π€
π7π€2β€1
RACE PACE - Singapore GP
π₯π NOR
π₯π΅VER +0.41s/lap
π₯π PIA +0.68s/lap
A dominant performance by NOR and McL: much quicker than the 2nd quickest car (RedBull in terms of final gap, albeit stuck-in-traffic LEC was arguably at least as quick) and than his teammate (hit by traffic).
Ferrari's disastrous qualifying ruined their weekend by making them unable to express the carβs potential. π‘
Solid pace for ALO/HUL/TSU/COL! π
NOR now 52points behind VER (who did good damage-limitation).
π₯π NOR
π₯π΅VER +0.41s/lap
π₯π PIA +0.68s/lap
A dominant performance by NOR and McL: much quicker than the 2nd quickest car (RedBull in terms of final gap, albeit stuck-in-traffic LEC was arguably at least as quick) and than his teammate (hit by traffic).
Ferrari's disastrous qualifying ruined their weekend by making them unable to express the carβs potential. π‘
Solid pace for ALO/HUL/TSU/COL! π
NOR now 52points behind VER (who did good damage-limitation).
β€10π8π₯1
Singapore GP - Gap to Race Winner:
Two drivers impressed the most: Lando Norris and Charles Leclerc:
In the first stint (Mediums), NOR increased his advantage on VER from 5s on lap 10 to 25s on lap 28: ~1.1s/lap quicker! π³
LEC quickest in the last stint (Hards), even more than PIA who was on a 2L-fresher tyre. Leclerc could have gotten P2 had he started in a better spot. π€
Two drivers impressed the most: Lando Norris and Charles Leclerc:
In the first stint (Mediums), NOR increased his advantage on VER from 5s on lap 10 to 25s on lap 28: ~1.1s/lap quicker! π³
LEC quickest in the last stint (Hards), even more than PIA who was on a 2L-fresher tyre. Leclerc could have gotten P2 had he started in a better spot. π€
β€16π₯4π1