Formula Data Analysis
2) TOP SPEEDS: - Large difference between fastest (Aston, 345km/h) and slowest (Alpine, 336) cars. - Big differences between teammates, too: PIA 342km/h vs NOR 335; PER 341 vs VER 337. 3) MINISECTORS: - PER had excellent traction: check the exit of T2, T4β¦
Enjoyed this summary? π
Then become a page supporter to access:
- All the weekendβs analyses (80+)
- The in-depth quali and race preview and post-race articles for all GPs
- My two webinars on βF1 Telemetry analysisβ (Beginner and Intermediate level)
Thanks for your support! π€©
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/membership
Then become a page supporter to access:
- All the weekendβs analyses (80+)
- The in-depth quali and race preview and post-race articles for all GPs
- My two webinars on βF1 Telemetry analysisβ (Beginner and Intermediate level)
Thanks for your support! π€©
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/membership
Buy Me a Coffee
Membership | Formula Data Analysis
Hi! Thank you for wanting to support my projectI've always been fascinated with data - and cars!For three years, I supervised the design, production and racing of a Formula Car ποΈ, and then I sta
β€3π1
PRACTICE 2 - LONG RUNS:
Russell was quickest: his gap to SAI was over half a second. The Hards (which RUS used) could be a better racing tyre... but no doubt that Mercedes' pace is looking great.
π₯RUS
π₯SAI +0.588s
π₯PER +0.670s
4οΈβ£PIA +0.730s
5οΈβ£VER +0.893s
6οΈβ£NOR +0.906s
7οΈβ£ALO +3.060s
Russell was quickest: his gap to SAI was over half a second. The Hards (which RUS used) could be a better racing tyre... but no doubt that Mercedes' pace is looking great.
π₯RUS
π₯SAI +0.588s
π₯PER +0.670s
4οΈβ£PIA +0.730s
5οΈβ£VER +0.893s
6οΈβ£NOR +0.906s
7οΈβ£ALO +3.060s
π9
Formula Data Analysis
PRACTICE 2 - LONG RUNS: Russell was quickest: his gap to SAI was over half a second. The Hards (which RUS used) could be a better racing tyre... but no doubt that Mercedes' pace is looking great. π₯RUS π₯SAI +0.588s π₯PER +0.670s 4οΈβ£PIA +0.730s 5οΈβ£VER +0.893sβ¦
All the teams (Alonsoβs long run was the slowest on the grid).
π7
PERFORMANCE IN QUALIFYING
β¬ οΈ Worse / Better β‘οΈ
β¬οΈ Lower / Higher top speed β¬οΈ
π΄'King of Baku' Charles Leclerc got his 4th pole in a row despite a modest top speed (same for Mercedes, Williams, and Haas).
π McL had the lowest one! Proof that grip is more important than straight-line speed in Baku qualifying, but they could struggle to attack/defend tomorrow.
π΅RedBull can be aggressive, exploiting their +3km/h top speed advantage vs Ferrari and Mercedes and +6km/h over McLaren.
What's your prediction for the race? π€
β¬ οΈ Worse / Better β‘οΈ
β¬οΈ Lower / Higher top speed β¬οΈ
π΄'King of Baku' Charles Leclerc got his 4th pole in a row despite a modest top speed (same for Mercedes, Williams, and Haas).
π McL had the lowest one! Proof that grip is more important than straight-line speed in Baku qualifying, but they could struggle to attack/defend tomorrow.
π΅RedBull can be aggressive, exploiting their +3km/h top speed advantage vs Ferrari and Mercedes and +6km/h over McLaren.
What's your prediction for the race? π€
π₯10β€1
Norris reached consistently higher top speeds (~4km/h more) than Piastri in qualifying: this should aid his recovery drive!
PIA's top speed was the worst on the grid!
His additional downforce, however, could help with tyre wear.
(Laps with a tow were excluded.)
Made via @JMP_software
PIA's top speed was the worst on the grid!
His additional downforce, however, could help with tyre wear.
(Laps with a tow were excluded.)
Made via @JMP_software
π4
Piastri surprised Leclerc under braking getting a well-deserved win! π
McLβs excellent T16 exit and less loaded DRS plane made him gain up to the middle of the straight. π
SAI-PER crash helped McL get a sizeable lead in the WCC. π₯
10 points for Williams. π₯
BEA: first in history to drive 2 races with 2 teams getting points in both! π(Keeping a 7-times WDC behind for many laps).
Whatβs YOUR opinion? π€
McLβs excellent T16 exit and less loaded DRS plane made him gain up to the middle of the straight. π
SAI-PER crash helped McL get a sizeable lead in the WCC. π₯
10 points for Williams. π₯
BEA: first in history to drive 2 races with 2 teams getting points in both! π(Keeping a 7-times WDC behind for many laps).
Whatβs YOUR opinion? π€
β€21π5π₯3
π‘McLaren has a "Mini-DRS", which acts on top of the "Flexy wing"
- Wing flex: McL > Ferrari >> RedBull
- McL has a never-seen-before lift of the upper plane leading edge: it's as if the DRS opens partially at high speed, providing a further advantage.
The effect is measurable: McL had the highest top speed when the DRS was inactive despite being slowest when the DRS was open (Data from quali).
Is this legal? π€
- The flexy wing is, as it passed the FIA's load tests. A wing that flexes are 'against the spirit of the rules', but until the load tests change to avoid that such a thing is perfectly ok.
- I'm not sure about the deformation of the DRS plane: I expect Ferrari to protest that, but the outcome is hard to predict.
Photo and idea: @brakeboosted, @multiviewer
- Wing flex: McL > Ferrari >> RedBull
- McL has a never-seen-before lift of the upper plane leading edge: it's as if the DRS opens partially at high speed, providing a further advantage.
The effect is measurable: McL had the highest top speed when the DRS was inactive despite being slowest when the DRS was open (Data from quali).
Is this legal? π€
- The flexy wing is, as it passed the FIA's load tests. A wing that flexes are 'against the spirit of the rules', but until the load tests change to avoid that such a thing is perfectly ok.
- I'm not sure about the deformation of the DRS plane: I expect Ferrari to protest that, but the outcome is hard to predict.
Photo and idea: @brakeboosted, @multiviewer
β€11π2π1π€£1π¨1
Formula Data Analysis
π‘McLaren has a "Mini-DRS", which acts on top of the "Flexy wing" - Wing flex: McL > Ferrari >> RedBull - McL has a never-seen-before lift of the upper plane leading edge: it's as if the DRS opens partially at high speed, providing a further advantage. Theβ¦
X (formerly Twitter)
Formula Data Analysis (@FDataAnalysis) on X
The legality of the βmini-DRSβ seemingly depends on whether it would revert to the βfully-closedβ position in case of failure
McLaren nullified its 1.74s/lap race pace gap in one year, gaining more than anyone! π
Solid improvement by Haas, Williams, and Mercedes. π
RedBull lost all its 2023 advantage (0.54s/lap vs Ferrari). π
The field got much closer: 4 teams within 0.22s/lap! (1.02s/lap last year).
Made via @JMP_software
Solid improvement by Haas, Williams, and Mercedes. π
RedBull lost all its 2023 advantage (0.54s/lap vs Ferrari). π
The field got much closer: 4 teams within 0.22s/lap! (1.02s/lap last year).
Made via @JMP_software
π14β€1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πUse this linkπ
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
πUse this linkπ
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL π¬
In Baku:
π΄Ferrari's DRS improved dramatically (+20km/h in '24 vs +13km/h in '23).
π΅RedBull's was the strongest, stronger even than last year's.
π McLaren's top speed when the DRS was active was the lowest.
β«οΈMercedes ran a less loaded wingβ‘οΈFastest without DRS and matched for fastest with.
(Data from quali; DRS=OFF data from the main straight, immediately before the drivers activated DRS.)
π΄Ferrari's DRS improved dramatically (+20km/h in '24 vs +13km/h in '23).
π΅RedBull's was the strongest, stronger even than last year's.
π McLaren's top speed when the DRS was active was the lowest.
β«οΈMercedes ran a less loaded wingβ‘οΈFastest without DRS and matched for fastest with.
(Data from quali; DRS=OFF data from the main straight, immediately before the drivers activated DRS.)
β€8π₯3π2
Singapore GP Preview π
- 2 chicanes were removed last year, making the 3rd sector quicker.
- A FOURTH DRS zone is being added this year.
4 DRS zones + very loaded wings β‘οΈ DRS effectiveness crucial for qualifying performance. π‘
Traction and braking are critical; cornering not as much.
Due to their recent performance and the track characteristics, I expect McLaren and Ferrari to fight for the win.
πΈ @pirellisport
- 2 chicanes were removed last year, making the 3rd sector quicker.
- A FOURTH DRS zone is being added this year.
4 DRS zones + very loaded wings β‘οΈ DRS effectiveness crucial for qualifying performance. π‘
Traction and braking are critical; cornering not as much.
Due to their recent performance and the track characteristics, I expect McLaren and Ferrari to fight for the win.
πΈ @pirellisport
β€15
REAR WINGS - Singapore GP
The track has gotten much quicker compared to β22 (two chicanes less, a fourth DRS zone added), yet teams are still using maximum-load wings.
The additional DRS-zone helps with that in quali, yet those in free air in the race will effectively have a βparachuteβ behind the cockpit. πͺ
πΈ: @AlbertFabrega
The track has gotten much quicker compared to β22 (two chicanes less, a fourth DRS zone added), yet teams are still using maximum-load wings.
The additional DRS-zone helps with that in quali, yet those in free air in the race will effectively have a βparachuteβ behind the cockpit. πͺ
πΈ: @AlbertFabrega
π₯10π2π1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
FP2 DATA HIGHLIGHTS π
1) BEST SECTORS:
Ferrari and McL left little to competitors: P1-P4 in S1; +0.18s vs next quickest (RUS) in S2 and +0.26s (vs PER) in S3.
PER was 3rd quickest in S3, VER 2nd slowest.
2) GRIP:
Ferrari was unmatched in the last, fast left-hander (~5g lateral acceleration).
McL and Racing Bulls had superior braking, however.
3) MINISECTORS:
Ferrari and McL seem to have similar characteristics and traded blows in S1 and S3.
TSU was quickest in several of S2's 90-degree corners!
Who's looking favourite for pole, in your opinion? π€
1) BEST SECTORS:
Ferrari and McL left little to competitors: P1-P4 in S1; +0.18s vs next quickest (RUS) in S2 and +0.26s (vs PER) in S3.
PER was 3rd quickest in S3, VER 2nd slowest.
2) GRIP:
Ferrari was unmatched in the last, fast left-hander (~5g lateral acceleration).
McL and Racing Bulls had superior braking, however.
3) MINISECTORS:
Ferrari and McL seem to have similar characteristics and traded blows in S1 and S3.
TSU was quickest in several of S2's 90-degree corners!
Who's looking favourite for pole, in your opinion? π€
π7π€2β€1